Coming solar eclipse casts its first U.S. shadow on Eagle Pass, Texas

So, the Mensa club in Saskatchewan, Canada (yeah, apparently some of “those” Hicks, and dirt farmers offspring qualified) posted this meme today, regarding the upcoming solar eclipse.
I found it pretty hilarious.
I don't know why the Lord wants to pick on us poor Tennesseans, we jus' good 'ol country boys around here y'all. Ain't there places where there's much more of Sodom-y and Gommorah-y goin' on? :lol:
 
Do you think it might be possible that the light conditions created by this event might, at some point, make something visible in the sky that normally is not? Like the sun's companion, maybe? Or something else? I don't know.
If something weird is in the sky would it not be visible at night? If something appears in the shadow of the eclipse, I imagine it will be a special presentation brought to us by the PTB.
 
Hoagland is back! He's saying the remnants of the 'glass dome' over the moon will be visible during the eclipse. He says that the glow around the darkened sun during the eclipse is actually glass refracting light from the sun and that photos with polarized lenses should be used to photograph the phenomenon. Recent advances in astronomical equipment owned by amateur astronomers provide a unique opportunity during the upcoming eclipse.

 
Hoagland is back! He's saying the remnants of the 'glass dome' over the moon will be visible during the eclipse. He says that the glow around the darkened sun during the eclipse is actually glass refracting light from the sun and that photos with polarized lenses should be used to photograph the phenomenon. Recent advances in astronomical equipment owned by amateur astronomers provide a unique opportunity during the upcoming eclipse.


Per Hoagland's description in the first 6 min or so: "[There is an] ancient ET lunar glass dome completely covering the moon" and later, "that [the glass dome] is incredibly eroded, that it is not the same density all over [the moon], and that is why we could safety land because the dome has almost disappeared on the side of the moon that faces us... but the glass over the south lunar pole is so much more better preserved."

Hoagland provides these images as proof:

1712521075537.png

^I do not see a glass dome on this one at all. The circle around the edge of the photo just seems to be the edge of the camera lens.

1712521183283.png

^and on these, I do not see anything resembling a glass dome.

He goes on to say there are hundreds of photos showing definitive evidence of the glass dome. If that is the case, why were these two shown that show, to me at least, nothing?

There sure are some weird things going on on the moon, but the glass dome just doesn't make sense to me. With all the impact craters on the moon, I would think that an "ancient glass dome" would have long been destroyed. Also, with ETs super advanced tech, I don't think it would be necessary for them to make a greenhouse of the moon.

Hoagland may be a genius, but I think this one is a miss.

Q: Fine with Hoagland! He was on the radio the other night saying that Leedskallen moved his Coral Castle because he wanted to align it with Hoagland's proposed grid theory. That is clearly the most obvious foolishness since Hilliard told us about the moving of the Coral Castle and that it was because of some county regulatory reasons. That is the most ridiculous bunch of poppycock I have ever heard!

A: Whatever else you find true about Hoagland, just remember that genius resides adjacent to insanity!

Q: (A) What is the meaning of this remark about Hoagland?

A: Some of his stuff may be "poppycock," but some is right on the money, honey!

Q: (A) I don't know for what reason, but I want to write about disinformation, or lying, by Bearden and misleading by Richard Hoagland. I want to expose them. I don't know if it is a good thing, but the idea that I should do it, provided it is done in a proper way...

A: The problem with Mr. Hoagland is that he has been lead astray by others.

Q: (A) He has been lead astray by others, and now he is leading astray many others himself.

A: Yes.
 
Per Hoagland's description in the first 6 min or so: "[There is an] ancient ET lunar glass dome completely covering the moon" and later, "that [the glass dome] is incredibly eroded, that it is not the same density all over [the moon], and that is why we could safety land because the dome has almost disappeared on the side of the moon that faces us... but the glass over the south lunar pole is so much more better preserved."

Hoagland provides these images as proof:

View attachment 94046

^I do not see a glass dome on this one at all. The circle around the edge of the photo just seems to be the edge of the camera lens.

View attachment 94047

^and on these, I do not see anything resembling a glass dome.

He goes on to say there are hundreds of photos showing definitive evidence of the glass dome. If that is the case, why were these two shown that show, to me at least, nothing?

There sure are some weird things going on on the moon, but the glass dome just doesn't make sense to me. With all the impact craters on the moon, I would think that an "ancient glass dome" would have long been destroyed. Also, with ETs super advanced tech, I don't think it would be necessary for them to make a greenhouse of the moon.

Hoagland may be a genius, but I think this one is a miss.
Odd.. I dreamed of a glass dome just last night. Multiple tornadoes were forming within and touching down. Also. there was limited oxygen and people were exiting buildings to try to breathe.
 
It’s a composite.
I haven’t checked if it’s a mash up up of planetary positions over a time span of 24 hours, or within the eclipse window, but I thought it looked pretty awesome!
 

Attachments

  • 5CCE0697-0CD1-497C-A807-7C55426DF9FF.jpeg
    5CCE0697-0CD1-497C-A807-7C55426DF9FF.jpeg
    111.2 KB · Views: 61
He goes on to say there are hundreds of photos showing definitive evidence of the glass dome. If that is the case, why were these two shown that show, to me at least, nothing?
He's talking about the way the light is refracted and distorted by the glass which can be seen in the distortion of images in the photos. He's not talking about being able to see the edge of the dome. I think Hoagland has shown some images in the past that show a highly eroded edge of an ancient massive dome. But yes, Hoagland could be wrong or misinformed. He's a 'colorful character' and I am curious enough to wait and see if there is any objectivity in what he says.
 
He's talking about the way the light is refracted and distorted by the glass which can be seen in the distortion of images in the photos. He's not talking about being able to see the edge of the dome. I think Hoagland has shown some images in the past that show a highly eroded edge of an ancient massive dome. But yes, Hoagland could be wrong or misinformed. He's a 'colorful character' and I am curious enough to wait and see if there is any objectivity in what he says.

Fair, I missed that difference. I can't speak to the analysis of light distortion at all, but if there is proof of that, it would seem a lot more likely to me that it has something to do with the Moon's atmosphere, not a gigantic ancient glass dome. Perhaps the Moon's atmosphere is much thicker or different than NASA tells us?

 
There sure are some weird things going on on the moon, but the glass dome just doesn't make sense to me. With all the impact craters on the moon, I would think that an "ancient glass dome" would have long been destroyed. Also, with ETs super advanced tech, I don't think it would be necessary for them to make a greenhouse of the moon.
You missed this earlier session where the C's confirmed Hoagland's findings on the Moon and said that they were constructed by Atlanteans. This is from November 19, 1994:

Q: (T) So, the Atlanteans had inter-planetary ability?
A: Yes. With ease. Atlantean technology makes yours look like the Neanderthal era.
Q: (T) Who created the structures on the moon that Richard Hoagland has discovered?
A: Atlanteans.

Q: (T) What did they use these structures for?
A: Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as in monuments or statuary.
Q: (T) What statuary are you referring to?
A: Example is face.
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.
Q: (V) Is it similar to them gaining a life and intelligence of their own?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You mean these crystalline structures came to life, so to speak?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And then what did they do?
A: Destroyed Atlantis.
The C's did not talk about the glass domes as such, only about energy transfer points for crystalline power and monuments or statues. Though since interplanetary travel was possible "with ease" for Atlanteans, it is also possible that they created large glass or crystalline domes on the Moon. If they traveled to the Moon in their physical bodies, they would maybe need places with atmosphere there too.

There are indeed a few other photographs from the Moon that show possible "glass dome" structures better (eg. in his book "Dark Mission" about the NASA shenanigans). Though most of it is kind of up to interpretation, in the sense that there are strange lines, halos or blobs in the sky above the Moon surface - which could indicate huge partly transparent structures.

The claim that these structures used to cover most of the Moon seems a bit fishy though. The various "shards" or towers do indicate that whoever built them had the capability to build enormous structures on the Moon (from Hoagland's "Dark Mission" book):

Image1.jpg
Image2.jpg
Image3.jpg
Image4.jpg
 
@axj I'm not denying the existence of those structures. I've seen convincing arguments for their existence. I'm calling into doubt Hoagland's claim from the podcast Mark7 posted that there is an ancient glass dome surrounding the moon that is mostly eroded. For clarity, "surrounded" as in suspended over the entire atmosphere of the moon, not "surrounded" as in structures all over the surface of the moon.
 
Back
Top Bottom