Comment to Niall Bradleys „United States of Europe: New German Reich crushes...

miharo

Padawan Learner
Wolfgang Schaeuble, Germany's Finance Minister. Is it just me or is he the spitting image of a certain notorious German Chancellor?
I hope it is just you, Niall Bradley, because it is a profound misinterpretation.

On a personal level Schaeuble is most probably a very demoralized personality. In 1990 he survived an assassination attempt and is captured in a wheelchair since. 1997 Helmut Kohl, after being 16 years Chancellor of Germany, placed Schaeuble as his desired successor in the first row, in a moment in which he could only lose the election. Since then he has no chance any more to become Chancellor.
1999 he played an ambiguous roll in the donations scandal of his party, the CDU. He is still most probably to be susceptible to blackmail.
Beside all this Schaeuble is a pretty upright and straight-lined character, I think. He is jurist with little understanding of economy.
He follows simple guidelines. One is “Pacta sunt servanda" (=agreements must be kept). A housewife-wisdom proverb he quotes on and off is “Everybody brushes in front of its own door.” Thats from the region he comes from in Germany, Swabia, and that makes him a little ridiculous for Germans not from the area.

While conducting the negotiations about the Greek government-debt crisis it was Schaeubles job to convince the Germans of the necessity of the so called 3. Economic Adjustment Program or 3. Aid Package. Nobody should even think openly about Greece national bankruptcy, the only reasonable ending.
They need this very crisis indefinitely in order to push things toward the European Central State. The next step on the agenda is a European Finance Ministry.
Without any claims and demands addressed to the Greek government the German people would not have accepted to act again as a guarantor for Greek dept. The people in Germany swallowed it because Schaeubles merciless show was convincing. The menace for “Grexit” was a bluff. What an arc of suspense.
Now the money is permitted and flows. The Tsipras Government is gone and the next Greek Government will care a damn shit about “Pacta sunt servanda" (as long as they get the money). Without a doubt the new Greek Government will say “We did not negotiate this!”. Everybody in the establishment knows this.

Everybody knows that Greece can never repay anything because an substantial Greek economy doesn't exist. Greece will never transpose any of the so called reforms. The Greek society is entirely rooted in nepotism. The existing rudimental Greek economy is patronage economy.

Schaeuble, born in 1942, belongs to a generation fully traumatized and brain-washed by WW2 and the holocaust. They do everything to get rid of their German identity. Thats why they push the EU, inexorably.
What the German majority shall not see is that they are only chosen to finance the EU playhouse, a project somehow between socialism and fascism. But Germans are not invited to set the rolls, the real coup plotters are not in Berlin. They are elsewhere but without German money the show is over, irreversible. The European Union never was, nor is today or will be a German-controlled institution.

I'd never thought that I will stand up for Wolfgang Schaeuble but to compare him with “a certain notorious German Chancellor” is utterly below grade.
And, by the way, it is not a very challenging task to take an disadvantageous photo of someone. You just have to shot dozens of pics per second and then select the most stupid one.

Hope part 2 of the essay is getting better.
 
So, essentially, you're saying he's an authoritarian follower, like most people in politics, military, intel, media etc? So, he can't be expected to be aware of what he is doing, other than completing his programming? In this role, he doesn't need to understand anything about the reality of the situation, he just needs to follow orders and get Greece, et al, to pay back the bad loans German banks gave them... even though the money is made up and not real, he is locked into the belief than the rules must be followed to the letter, no exceptions... right? So, we shouldn't pity him, nor hate him, but like everyone else, just understand that he is simply a sheep, a pawn, or a 'machine' that is following orders, his programming, his conditioning, same as all the rest. Pawns, like sheep are expendable, and not expected to lead anyone or anything at any time; they are what they are and nothing more, so don't expect anything other than a mechanical reaction from him. This makes him a very 'useful idiot'.... for the NWO, and like all the rest, totally expendable after his term of service is over, which seems almost here, so soon we won't hear about his existence any more... right? He's just a necessary obstacle in the road for those that deem themselves more than sheep, pawns or machines. So, he is what he is, like all the rest of the herd.

Or did I misunderstand? ;D
 
miharo said:
Wolfgang Schaeuble, Germany's Finance Minister. Is it just me or is he the spitting image of a certain notorious German Chancellor?
I hope it is just you, Niall Bradley, because it is a profound misinterpretation.

On a personal level Schaeuble is most probably a very demoralized personality.

You are hopelessly naive if you really believe that...

'The fund they want Greek assets transferred to is managed by … Schäuble'

'Fund Proposed to Hold 50 bln Euros of Greek Assets Is Controlled by German Fin Min Schauble'


miharo said:
While conducting the negotiations about the Greek government-debt crisis it was Schaeubles job to convince the Germans of the necessity of the so called 3. Economic Adjustment Program or 3. Aid Package. Nobody should even think openly about Greece national bankruptcy, the only reasonable ending. They need this very crisis indefinitely in order to push things toward the European Central State. The next step on the agenda is a European Finance Ministry.

Actually, I'm going to make the case in part 2 that Germany is blocking anything like that from happening. They're perfectly happy with the way things are because they have all the power.

miharo said:
Without any claims and demands addressed to the Greek government the German people would not have accepted to act again as a guarantor for Greek dept. The people in Germany swallowed it because Schaeubles merciless show was convincing. The menace for “Grexit” was a bluff. What an arc of suspense.

This has nothing to do with one 'people' bailing out another 'people'. It's about the psychopaths in power increasing their control over all peoples. This was a bailout of the biggest European BANKS, disguised as bailing out 'the people'. It's the oldest trick in the trade: Make Us Believe that Evil Comes from Others. Their own deviant networks - yes, which also extend into Greece - were protected at the expense of ordinary people everywhere.

miharo said:
Everybody knows that Greece can never repay anything because an substantial Greek economy doesn't exist. Greece will never transpose any of the so called reforms. The Greek society is entirely rooted in nepotism. The existing rudimental Greek economy is patronage economy.

They have you exactly where they want you: believing their lies. ALL societies are rooted in 'nepotism', and its European branches meet in Germany. You have fallen for the German equivalent of the American belief that 'we are rich because we are best'. No, you are rich because you stole it all.

miharo said:
Schaeuble, born in 1942, belongs to a generation fully traumatized and brain-washed by WW2 and the holocaust. They do everything to get rid of their German identity. Thats why they push the EU, inexorably.

:violin:

Sympathy For The Devil

miharo said:
What the German majority shall not see is that they are only chosen to finance the EU playhouse, a project somehow between socialism and fascism. But Germans are not invited to set the rolls, the real coup plotters are not in Berlin. They are elsewhere but without German money the show is over, irreversible. The European Union never was, nor is today or will be a German-controlled institution.

Yes, ultimately it's US/Bankster-controlled, but Germany marshals Europe on their behalf.

miharo said:
I'd never thought that I will stand up for Wolfgang Schaeuble but to compare him with “a certain notorious German Chancellor” is utterly below grade. And, by the way, it is not a very challenging task to take an disadvantageous photo of someone. You just have to shot dozens of pics per second and then select the most stupid one.

Puh-lease! The guy looks the same in just about every photo.

So you don't think such historical comparisons are appropriate? Greece disagrees with you...

_84254096_schaposterwantednew13jul15a.jpg


CJETzDJWsAEQs5L.jpg


article-0-11A81F35000005DC-144_634x437.jpg


3h343-bild.jpg


0,,16722048_303,00.jpg


_74075129_merkelgreece.jpg


miharo said:
Hope part 2 of the essay is getting better.

Oh, you're gonna hate it. Schaüble is a "committed transatlanticist", and Germany's 'special mission' isn't what you think it is.

I see you have quite a national identification thing going on, miharo. You might want to work on that: it's causing you to completely miss the crux of the matter.
 
I see you have quite a national identification thing going on, miharo. You might want to work on that: it's causing you to completely miss the crux of the matter.
I'm honestly convinced that my national identification is rather undersized and is nothing that guides me. I am not proud of anything here. People who know me personally would most probably collapse of laughter finding out that someone attests me quite a national approach.
In the other thread I was writing about historical truth regarding WW1&2 and still closed archives. After all the stuff is accessible, lets talk again about.

But thats not my point here. Lets keep it simple:
I'm surefire it is you who completely miss the crux of the matter when you locate “a certain notorious German Chancellor” with Schäuble. He is a technocrat, driven and motivated by what I have written. MSM have YOU exactly where they want you.

What is Germany's 'special mission' which isn't what I think it is? My point is, it is Germany's part to keep the show called “globalization” financially running, on the EU-level. If there are people who speak German and/or with a German passport above this technocratic layer they do not do this for “Germany”, they are loyal for something else.

Nobody benefits from visualizing a “New German Reich” rising.
Nobody doubts that Schäuble is a "committed transatlanticist".

Where is the article? The direct link works but it is not listed anymore at http://www.sott.net/
 
miharo said:
Where is the article? The direct link works but it is not listed anymore at http://www.sott.net/

It's still there. There are number of ways of accessing it. You can scroll through the Puppet Masters section, for one. It's just not at the top of the page since newer focus/best of the web have since gone up.
 
It seems you are splitting hairs, and as Niall said, missing the crux of the matter, miharo. None of these pathocrats do ANYTHING for "their country." Neither did Hitler and his Nazi gang do ANYTHING for Germany - that was just the ideological mask and rhetoric that psychopaths in power use to get the people riled up and behind their agendas, which works particularly well when the people are in one or another kind of crisis (usually because of previous agendas of the pathologically power hungry). And they bring catastrophe on "their own" people and country, as much as the rest of the world - and they don't GIVE a damn....

Technocrat, ideologue, whatever, they serve the interests of the network of pathological power and domination through the institutions set up for just that purpose. When (an almost completely global) pathocracy has matured, as the current one, every position of any importance is filled with some kind of pathological personality that will naturally identify with the psychopaths and pathologicals in the highest echelons of power. That's the long and the short of it. By the way, they also tried to assassinate Hitler during the war. So what?
 
miharo said:
Nobody benefits from visualizing a “New German Reich” rising.

Except those who gain power and wealth through rising to the top of such creations.
And with all such creations, it will be sold under a new banner for 'the good of all'.

You should check out Holocaust 2.0: The ultimate decisions of conscience and The dying of the light

The point is it's happening globally, right now, everywhere.

Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. - Stuart Mill
 
SeekinTruth, I do not see splitting hairs here and I do not think I miss the crux so much. All other things I agree with you. Lets talk about Pathocracy, Soziopathie, Fascism, euphemism like Global Government etc. and we know what we talk about.
But the headline “...New German Reich crushes Greece...” or sentences like “Is it just me or is he the spitting image of a certain notorious German Chancellor?” are pointing in another direction. Thats not splitting hairs. Hitlerism and Thule society were another cults.
By the way, they also tried to assassinate Hitler during the war. So what?
Yes, so what?
 
Schäuble is also known for the ideas of creating the "Stasi 2.0" (online data storage and so on) in Germany and he liked to kill every terror suspect and imo that is already enough that speaks for Schäuble. These were just ideas from him, but already these ideas give a good inside view of his mind which imo is disturbing.

Schäuble möchte am liebsten sofort mögliche Terroristen töten
Schäuble will griechisches Volksvermögen enteignen und in ein Fond übertragen, von dem er selbst Chef ist: Stellvertreter ist SPD-Chef Sigmar Gabriel
 
Miharo, what you are really taking offence to is the suggestion - which was merely an afterthought that had no bearing on the arguments in the article - that the current German elite are behaving rather like German elites of old.

I understand that it's a shocking notion for you, but history does tend to repeat.
 
miharo said:
Nobody benefits from visualizing a “New German Reich” rising.
Nobody doubts that Schäuble is a "committed transatlanticist".

Hi miharo. I don't get that.
You do not think that history can repeat itself in new and yet unseen ways and people should realize that?
Schäuble is conscious of his evil / Schäuble is not conscious of his evil, and so it's a puppet... what's the difference for us all?

Isn't that in the line like: 'Hitler was a good guy because he was simply manipulated and wanted good for the World?'
Or, 'Hitler had mental illness, so that was not his fault really... it's the Demons from Thule!'

Just curious at the parallels with the German-Greece crisis back in 1893-1898, when Baron Adolf Marschall von Bieberstein allegedly did to Greece exactly what Schäuble has been done today.
There's this article from an Italian online newspaper that talks about it, but haven't found much online...

http://www.ilfattoquotidiano.it/2015/08/02/grecia-cosi-120-anni-fa-un-altro-falco-tedesco-piego-atene-violatrice-del-diritto/1905242/

... apart some references to much wider "economic crisis" plaguing all Latin countries, in the last decade of the 19th century, Germans and Ottoman Empire doing business with Turkey for a Baghdad Railway, and on:

https://books.google.it/books?id=Sj_CpfzEiysC&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=Adolf+Marschall+von+Bieberstein+greece&source=bl&ots=TwJQk6Qm2S&sig=xHnyNzoATmvZx7w0WQnrKdVYUdY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDgQ6AEwA2oVChMIo-vH_rPFxwIVyVcaCh2j1Aat#v=onepage&q=Adolf%20Marschall%20von%20Bieberstein%20greece&f=false

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_Marschall_von_Bieberstein
 
Niall, I do not see an offence. There is no shock to me.
What I call a sloppy or inchoate analysis, you call afterthought.
I'm not Schäubles defender. If you name him a psychopath, I would agree. But “Is it just me or is he the spitting image of a certain notorious German Chancellor?” and the headline “...New German Reich crushes Greece...” is subsurface to me and discredits the entire analysis. What you call “afterthought” gives it a complete other spin.
If you disclose in part 2 “Germany's special mission” (beside been the money lender) I'll not hate it. If you do I'll take my hat off to you. But I want evidence. Neither more, nor less.
 
Miharo, you might also wish to read this excellent article by Pierre Lescaudron Greek debt and German hypocrisy, especially the part titled Historical Perspective. Hope it helps clarifying the current state of affairs in the EU in general, and Germany's role in particular.

You said earlier in this thread:

miharo said:
My point is, it is Germany's part to keep the show called “globalization” financially running, on the EU-level. If there are people who speak German and/or with a German passport above this technocratic layer they do not do this for “Germany”, they are loyal for something else.

And this is partly true, Germany IS loyal to someone else, but not so much to its OWN detriment. It's mainly other members of the EU who are forced to pay for this "loyalty." And that's what makes this situation so similar to the historic records, osit.

miharo said:
I'm not Schäubles defender. If you name him a psychopath, I would agree.

And since you agree about Schäuble's nature, what is wrong with comparing the two psychopaths? Why not say that one resembles another in his attitude and actions towards other people? His resolutions essentially make thousands of Greeks starve. Is that not enough for such comparison?
 
miharo said:
But “Is it just me or is he the spitting image of a certain notorious German Chancellor?” and the headline “...New German Reich crushes Greece...” is subsurface to me and discredits the entire analysis. What you call “afterthought” gives it a complete other spin.

a) He is a fairly spitting image.
b) This isn't just another instance of Godwin's Law. Making Nazi comparisons doesn't discredit analyses, if the comparisons are deserved. And if you are familiar with ponerology, the comparison is very often deserved, as it is in this case.

So, really, why does the Hitler/Nazi comparison make you so prickly?
 
Back
Top Bottom