Help me understand this. You say the virus HAS been "isolated". Rappoport has said in numerous articles that a virus has NOT been isolated and explains his reasoning as such:
Isolation is absurdly taken to mean: “We have the virus in a soup in a dish in the lab. It is not separated out (isolated) from the soup. The soup contains various cells—human, monkey—and an array of (toxic) chemicals and drugs. We know the virus is there, because it is infecting and killing some of the cells.”
On to the next factor: the ever-present claims of having “sequenced the genetic structure of the virus.” Again, SAYING the sequencing has been achieved is not the same thing as proving it.
And proving it is impossible, if you don’t already have the virus in a purified and isolated state. Instead of proof, you have shady inference and assumption and guesswork and deception. (excerpt from SARS-CoV-2 has not been proven to exist; I can do this forever « Jon Rappoport's Blog)
Is that your understanding of how a virus is "isolated"? If so, what about all the other stuff in the "soup"? What benefit does Rappoport (and others) derive from this argument, in your opinion?
I agree @SevenFeathers
to that the deeper you dig into the subject, the more confusing it get's.
The definition of virus isolation
appears to me being interpret in several ways. Isn't that in itself a problem ? I believe this creates a lot of confusion. Both to scientists (dependent in which camp you reside in, each one will claim their version). Then those who seek answers - getting kind of stuck "in between" the camps. Unless you decide your "truth". I find it personally simply a no-go to claim at this point, it is settled.
1) a SARS-Cov-2 virus has been isolated
2) a SARS-CoV-2 virus has not been isolated.
At this stage, we find arguments and 'proof' in both camps. So... how does that make it a truth ? I mean truly, honestly, how does such large gap bring us closer to something that aligns better reflecting this (3D) reality ? I would love if everything revolving the subject would be more humanly explained - bringing it down to a larger audience. I also would welcome some serious large-scale tests. But I guess most scientists just play in their own backyard... You have to work against a huge tide; the PTB, the economical system behind medicine, the political situation, etc to scrutinize what is going on with HIV and SARS-CoV-2.
Then there is the other issue:
How much do we really honestly listen, once we already made up our minds about a subject or area ?
In a video between Dr Judy Mikovits vs. Dr Andras Kaufman
they had a very interesting, heated dispute - yet at the same time - which puzzled me even more -
both were in agreement of that the SARS-CoV-2 virus had not been isolated, nor has there ever been evidence of human to human transmission. How can that be ?
I mean
Dr Judy Mikovits isn't known to deny virus - on the contrary all for it - given how she in her 40 years of experience, says she has isolated the HTLV-3 (later HIV) virus and other similar ones many times, as well having proof of transmission between cells. She also stands 100% behind Luc Montagnier's discovery revolving the HIV virus in the 80s.
Yet, Judy Mikovits says - no SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated this far. "Because it cannot be isolated outside of a human cell". Again;
How can that be ? ( I would have expected her to say the opposite)
She also claims that virus can no exist out of the cell (which made everything even more confusing, to say the least, unless I heard or interpret it wrong) She said virus are creations of the human cell. So, a corona type of virus, which has a lipid membrane, it protects the RNA from being attacked by the immune system - because otherwise enzymes in the blood stream would immediately target any loose RNA and DNA, disintegrating it. So, why would a virus not being able to sustain outside of a cell... if it has a lipid membrane ?!
She said, that it is the
blueprint of virus (instructions ?), which is injected though vaccines into our blood stream, creates disturbances and illness into our system - and herein lies the lethal danger. SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 is the trigger event for all past vaccines. The final switch. Anything can get created out of that mess induced by the mRNA genetic injections. (At least this would connect to what the C's said about a possible mutations in the near future, in somebody, with potential to create an illness similar to the Black Death).
That the
blueprint of a virus, is what might interfere with existing DNA, even if it is only one person with a specific setup - leading up to something far more deadly.
So, then what is, or should be "isolation of virus" ?
So, what I wish to point out is - that no matter what different camp(s) claims regarding "isolation of virus" - the jury is still out there -
It has to be! And no, an electron microscopic image of a fuzzy, in hindsight colored, round boll - without showing anything of it's wider surrounding where it lies embedded - certainly does not cut it as being "proof" for specific virus.
It certainly shows something, yes. But what ? This isn't the first time, a kind of visual flirtation of a "virus image" has been shown off to a wider audience, claiming "this is it. Here is the proof". If every major camp translates/interprets "isolation" differently... then we do get different results, which in return creates even more claims, "proof" and confusions.
If there is proof, how are the procedures done to show that it grows/spreads/infects inside a human body ? And if there is proof, how have tests/studies
exactly been conducted to prove that it indeed was responsible for inducing illness ? The presence of a virus or similar, is still not the final proof to be the cause of illness.
We can assume it is - but in science, you should do much better then that. Because what happens, if it is not the cause ?
The official medical world
the one which shows it's face to the world on the public stage - isn't ruled by truth - otherwise we wouldn't be in the s**t house we are in year 2021.
Common sense tells me - and that is my own personal opinion - that reality might be closest to a mix of both
Germ and Terrain Theory. Undoubtedly the terrain is important - the condition within our body - defining how much or little a disease can take hold. Also the brain/psyche plays a major roll, as well. Now we have to look deeper into what viruses really are, and what they are consequence of -
beyond what meets the eye, and
beyond what the brain was taught about them - to observe, see and start to understand, what they actually can do / don't do.
Honestly listening & observing - is one key of this puzzle !
.
