Tying in with that text accompanying that video in French of Luc Montagnier (discussed above), which claims he stated things which he did not, is this highly recommended article by Rosemary Frei up on Sott:
It's about the search for cold hard evidence and thoroughly reading and investigating papers and claims made by both Covidiots and Covid-sceptics and she gives three tips on how to do that. There is a lot of misinformation out there (don't we know!), not only propagated by Covidiots. She mentions in that respect America's Frontline Doctors and Dr. Christiane Northrup in the example she sets out in examining their information and claims for evidence relating to the spike protein shedding business from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated. After thorough investigation and following all leads and then some made in their statements (all in the article), she concludes that the claims they make are build on very flimsy ground and according to Rosemary Frei, they offer zero proof.
This is what she concludes with:
===
Using very shaky 'evidence' to try to 'prove' something suggests that in fact there's probably no proof of it at all.
It's not that I don't think the vaccines aren't dangerous and aren't negatively affecting people who've been in close contact with them. There are plenty of plausible reports of, for example, altered periods in women who have been in the vicinity of people who've been vaccinated. So altered periods are quite possibly related to being in close proximity with vaccinated people. But there's zero proof, as far as I've seen, that the spike proteins produced by the mRNA jabs cause those altered periods.
Maybe it's something else in the shots that's resulting in all the negative effects in people who've been in proximity to individuals who've had the jabs. Or maybe perhaps it's not something in the shots, but somehow another phenomenon associated with receiving the shots.
At the moment it's very hard to know. Chasing misinformation just makes us go down blind alleys and delays or even permanently stops us from finding the truth.
Spreading information that has extremely flimsy grounds also gives significant fodder to our opponents to paint us all as spreaders of lies. That turns many people away from listening to what any of us are saying.'
===
So true. It is such a Blessing to be connected to the network of the forum to help us stay on the path of finding the truth together!
Three tips for checking whether a medical study is legit or bulls-it
Tools to help you learn to quickly sort out whether a paper is solid or shaky. You've just watched a video of a high-profile, Covid-sceptic speaker saying that shedding of the spike protein from vaccinated people endangers those they come in...
www.sott.net
It's about the search for cold hard evidence and thoroughly reading and investigating papers and claims made by both Covidiots and Covid-sceptics and she gives three tips on how to do that. There is a lot of misinformation out there (don't we know!), not only propagated by Covidiots. She mentions in that respect America's Frontline Doctors and Dr. Christiane Northrup in the example she sets out in examining their information and claims for evidence relating to the spike protein shedding business from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated. After thorough investigation and following all leads and then some made in their statements (all in the article), she concludes that the claims they make are build on very flimsy ground and according to Rosemary Frei, they offer zero proof.
This is what she concludes with:
===
Using very shaky 'evidence' to try to 'prove' something suggests that in fact there's probably no proof of it at all.
It's not that I don't think the vaccines aren't dangerous and aren't negatively affecting people who've been in close contact with them. There are plenty of plausible reports of, for example, altered periods in women who have been in the vicinity of people who've been vaccinated. So altered periods are quite possibly related to being in close proximity with vaccinated people. But there's zero proof, as far as I've seen, that the spike proteins produced by the mRNA jabs cause those altered periods.
Maybe it's something else in the shots that's resulting in all the negative effects in people who've been in proximity to individuals who've had the jabs. Or maybe perhaps it's not something in the shots, but somehow another phenomenon associated with receiving the shots.
At the moment it's very hard to know. Chasing misinformation just makes us go down blind alleys and delays or even permanently stops us from finding the truth.
Spreading information that has extremely flimsy grounds also gives significant fodder to our opponents to paint us all as spreaders of lies. That turns many people away from listening to what any of us are saying.'
===
So true. It is such a Blessing to be connected to the network of the forum to help us stay on the path of finding the truth together!