Coronavirus Pandemic: Apocalypse Now! Or exaggerated scare story?

Ursus Minor said:
Belarusian President Claims IMF And World Bank Offered Him A Bribe To Impose COVID Restrictions

By Martin Armstrong

Sep 7, 2020 - "President Aleksandr Lukashenko said last month via Belarusian Telegraph Agency, BelTA., that World Bank and IMF offered him a bribe of $940 million USD in the form of “Covid Relief Aid.” In exchange for $940 million USD, the World Bank and IMF demanded that the President of Belarus:

• imposed “extreme lockdown on his people”
• force them to wear face masks
• impose very strict curfews
• impose a police state
• crash the economy

Belarus President Aleksandr Lukashenko REFUSED the offer and stated that he could not accept such an offer and would put his people above the needs of the IMF and World Bank. This is NOT a conspiracy. You may research this yourself. He actually said this!

And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!
Now IMF and World Bank are bailing out failing airlines with billions of dollars, and in exchange, they are FORCING airline CEOs to implement VERY STRICT POLICIES such as FORCED face masks covers on EVERYONE, including SMALL CHILDREN, whose health will suffer as a result of these policies.

And if it is true for Belarus, then it is true for the rest of the world! The IMF and World Bank want to crash every major economy with the intent of buying over every nation’s infrastructure at cents on the dollar!"
Click to expand...

Just came across this myself and this video on twitter of Lukashenko "scolding" the other people in government about all this covid theatrics:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1453468089744506883
 
Every day, the same psy-op pattern repeats...

Government: We will begin vaccinating kids tomorrow.
Journalist: Are you also going to mandate vaccine passports for kids over the age of 5?
Government: This is something we are carefully considering. Thank you for bringing this point to our attention.

which is the equivalent of...

Government: We will begin making kids' lives much more difficult than they are now.
Journalist: Are you also going to restrict their flow oxygen to make the environment safer?
Government: This is something we are carefully considering. Thank you for bringing this point to our attention.
 
I don't know much about this lady - Christine Anderson from Alternative fur Deutschland, EU MP - and i'm not thinking it will get much traction, but it's good to hear some politicians saying something against the propaganda:

“In the entire history of mankind there has never been a Political elite sincerely concerned with the wellbeing of regular people. What makes anyone think it’s different now” - Christine Anderson European Parliament.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1454117801598259208

Well, there probably have been times where politicians and the establishment cared, but fair enough.

Another, this time an MP from the UK who has been pretty consistent in speaking out:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1453105301339639816
 
itellsya said:
I don't know much about this lady - Christine Anderson from Alternative fur Deutschland, EU MP - and i'm not thinking it will get much traction, but it's good to hear some politicians saying something against the propaganda:

“In the entire history of mankind there has never been a Political elite sincerely concerned with the wellbeing of regular people. What makes anyone think it’s different now” - Christine Anderson European Parliament.”

https://twitter.com/x/status/1454117801598259208
Click to expand...
Full video of the European Parliament MEPs from the clip in the twitter video:
 
Noam Chomsky......I could never tolerate this man. He'd open his mouth and begin speaking and an oppressive weight would come over me and I'd turn him off. So, I've never known what he spoke about even though many have found him brilliant. My gut response has now been verified....isolate the unvaccinated and getting food is their own problem. In this video, he seems to be one of those people who in their old age looks to have had the life force sucked right out of them. Thats the consequence of working for the dark side. Check out his eyes.

Another good one from Tim Pool. He's taken a turn recently with a passionate stand against tyranny. In the past, he seemed wishy washy, straddling the fence and not wanting to offend either side. Noam video at 1.28 min.


Speaking of Noam, he used to work for this company but quit after claiming a bout of conscience. Maybe this is something he's struggled with throughout his life,

In 1963, MITRE tapped a brilliant young linguist from MIT named Noam Chomsky, to assist the “development of a program to establish natural language as an operational language for command and control.” After a few years of work on projects like these, Chomsky said, “I couldn’t look myself in the mirror any more,” and thrust himself into antiwar activism.
Click to expand...

MITRE ‘Cloak and dagger’ military-intelligence outfit at center of US digital vaccine passport push​

OCTOBER 26, 2021

While vaccine passports have been marketed as a boon to public health, promising safety, privacy, and convenience for those who have been vaccinated against Covid-19, the pivotal role a shadowy military-intelligence organization is playing in the push to implement the system in digital form has raised serious civil liberties concerns.

Known as MITRE, the organization is a non-profit corporation led almost entirely by military-intelligence professionals and sustained by sizable contracts with the Department of Defense, FBI, and national security sector.

From discredited and destructive COVID-19 lethality modeling to digital passport push​

On March 17, 2020, practically hours after a global pandemic was declared by the World Health Organization, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction division contracted MITRE to “engage, inform and guide” mayors, governors and emergency response officials on the COVID-19 response. According to Forbes, the Center for Disease Control also inked a $16.3 million contract to establish “an enduring national capability to contain Covid-19.”

One day after signing its contract with the DHS’s WMD division, MITRE pumped out a white paper outlining the projected impact on COVID-19 on the US population, and issuing recommendations for local and federal officials on an emergency response.

MITRE’s paper confidently asserted that COVID-19 represented “an epidemic that is approximately as dangerous as the Spanish Flu that infected 500 million people and killed 50 million worldwide.” During the 1918 epidemic, when the US population was well over 1/3 of what it is today, some 675,000 Americans died. MITRE thus over-estimated the 2020 death toll by a factor of six.

With its now-discredited modeling as justification, MITRE demanded that authorities reduce social contact between members of the US population by 90 percent, impose harsh lockdowns, shut down virtually all businesses, seal borders, and “quarantine returning citizens in hotels or other facilities, one to a room, with skeleton staff.”

Many US states followed some version of this extreme model, triggering a social and economic catastrophe from which the population may never fully recover.

Now that the lockdowns appear to be over, MITRE is at the center of the push for digital vaccine passports through the Vaccine Credential Initiative. Yet the influential military-intelligence organization remains behind “cloak and dagger,” mostly unknown to a US public whose lives could be radically altered by one of its most consequential projects.

Read Jeremy Lofreddo and Max Blumenthal’s first installment in this series on digital vaccine passports.

thegrayzone.com

'Cloak and dagger' military-intelligence outfit at center of US digital vaccine passport push - The Grayzone

Described as “the most important organization you’ve never heard of,” MITRE rakes in massive security state contracts to pioneer invasive spy tech. Now it’s at the heart of a campaign to implement digital vaccine passports. While vaccine passports have been marketed as a boon to public health...
thegrayzone.com thegrayzone.com
 
Last edited:
Ireland now has the highest number of covid patients in hospitals since March despite having an official 91% vaxx rate (highest in the EU):

HIGHEST COVID NUMBERS IN HOSPITAL SINCE MARCH DESPITE 91%+ JABBED​

Ireland now has the highest number of patients in hospital with Covid-19 since March, despite over 91% of the population over-12 being vaccinated – the highest jab rate in the EU.

The number of Covid-positive patients in Irish hospitals now stands at 513 – figures not seen since the end of the infamous third wave last winter. 101 of these are in ICU this week – an increase from the 74 seen last week.

CMO Dr. Tony Holohan said that he was “increasingly worried about the rising incidence of the disease nationwide.”

According to the Irish Times, Dr. Anne Moore, who is a vaccine specialist at UCC, said cases would increase until there was a “transmission-blocking vaccine,” as whatever protection from transmission the current vaccines offered had already begun to wane.

“I think we will eventually have to boost the rest of the population…because we are going to see a huge increase in the number of cases,” she said.

To date, over 91% of the Irish population over the age of 12 has been vaccinated, making Ireland the most vaccinated country in the entire EU.
Click to expand...
gript.ie

Highest Covid numbers in hospital since March despite 91%+ jabbed - Gript

101 are in ICU this week - an increase from the 74 seen last week.
gript.ie gript.ie
 
Another interesting find, retweeted by Nick Hudson, so it should be quite legit. There is a guy that allegedly did some analysis on non-public NHS hospital data regarding vaccinations and fatal hospitalizations from COVID-19. His conclusions regarding how efficient clot shots are in a real-world scenario are devastating.
In the last few posts we’ve chewed the cud over the non-random nature of data and the multitude of biases that we cannot possibly hope to account for, and the group has been instrumental in helping me formulate a whole new approach for solving what appears to be an intractable problem. Until we solve these fundamental problems we cannot say anything about vaccine benefit or disbenefit. Well actually we can, but what we say isn’t going to be worth tuppence!
Whilst sitting in my battered Land Rover watching masked shoppers yesterday I hit upon the idea of randomising the data and comparing randomised datasets to the original. This morning I narrowed the scope down to investigating the EPR of 9,783 in hospital deaths since 8th December 2020 for a sizeable NHS Trust that must remain unnamed. The EPR enables me to know if and when these people were vaccinated prior to death and whether their death was associated with a diagnosis of COVID. It is thus a simple matter to cross-tabulate vaccination status with COVID status to see how the cookie has crumbled in terms of crude benefit/disbenefit.
The cunning bit is to do this for the original source data and randomised datasets. What I mean by 'randomised' is that the vaccination records are mixed up in relation to the patient record. We may then apply varying degrees of randomisation to see how the cookie crumbles once more. This approach is known as a simulation study, for which statisticians use deliberately faked or constructed data to understand the deep nature of complex datasets.
For this initial run I opted to shift the vaccination records by 1 patient, by 10 patients, by 100 patients and by 1,000 patients. Each of these shifts creates randomised (simulated) data such that COVID diagnosis at death bears absolutely no relationship to the vaccination record. Cross-tabulations of COVID status and randomised vaccination status should thus yield a null result; that is to say there should be no discernible correlation. For good measure I also totally randomised all 9,793 records.
I am hoping folk will understand what I’ve done and why because the results are nothing short of astounding and blow every darn analysis made by every darn analyst claiming vaccine benefit clean out of the water.
In plain English, and in a nutshell, I found an apparent vaccine benefit for records randomised by 1 patient, 10 patients, 100 patients and 1,000 patients. What expert folk are claiming around the globe is thus nothing more than an illusion. It is only when I come to totally randomise all 9,783 records that the illusion of vaccine benefit disappears and we find no correlation between COVID status and vaccination status.
Experienced statisticians will immediately understand what has been happening. Age-prioritised rollout, initial targeting of the vulnerable, declining disease prevalence over time, seasonal death, behavioural changes, policy changes and all the rest are all multiply correlated variables and correlated over time. These biases have served to systematically skew figures such that we may observe what appears to be genuine vaccine benefit. Some analysts (including myself) have attempted to account for some of these biases but it is impossible to account for them all.
This simple simulation study has allowed us to see that vaccine benefit (in terms of COVID-diagnosed in-hospital death) is nothing more than a product of multiply correlated influences coming together. Even by sliding records across 1,000 patients we see the illusion peeking through! I would advise all analysts with access to individual patient records to try such simulation studies for themselves so we may collectively verify this astonishing result.
I have avoided a lot of statistical jargon and printout in this post but my entire output log can be found at the link in the comments directly below.
Click to expand...
 
Interesting study from the University of London that reveals that the official UK "vaxxed vs unvaxxed" numbers are verifiably wrong:

- 10 million people and 1236 deaths are completely missing in the official UK report
- The number of unvaccinated people is grossly underestimated
- This means that the mortality rates have to be significantly adjusted up for the vaxxed and down for the unvaxxed
- All-cause mortality for the vaccinated is certainly higher in each age group than for the unvaccinated

Discrepancies and inconsistencies in UK Government datasets compromise accuracy of mortality rate comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated​

  • October 2021
Abstract

To determine the overall risk-benefit of Covid-19 vaccines it is crucial to be able to compare the all-cause mortality rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated in each different age category. However, current publicly available UK Government statistics do not include raw data on mortality by age category and vaccination status. Hence, we are unable to make the necessary comparison.

In attempting to reverse engineer estimates of mortality by age category and vaccination status from the various relevant public Government datasets we found numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies which indicate that the Office for National Statistics reports on vaccine effectiveness are grossly underestimating the number of unvaccinated people.

Hence, official statistics may be underestimating the mortality rates for vaccinated people in each age category. Although we have not subjected this data to statistical testing the potential implications of these results on the effects of vaccination on all-cause mortality, and by implication, the future of the vaccination programme is profound
Click to expand...
Conclusions

Our analysis has discovered that over 10 million people are missing from the PHE/ONS analysis and 1,236 deaths that occurred during week 26 are also missing. [...] Given this, there is the possibility that as many as 22 million people, in week 26, were unvaccinated rather than the 9.5 million reported.

Our analysis clearly suggests that, when compared to ONS death figures from week 26, all-cause mortality (UMR) for vaccinated people, compared to unvaccinated people, is certainly higher in single dosed individuals and slightly higher in those who are double dosed.
Click to expand...

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom