I also saw this and am making a video on it. Here are some pictures of the "constructs" they found at 400x magnification:
View attachment 100093
View attachment 100094
View attachment 100095
View attachment 100096
View attachment 100097
View attachment 100098
The structures appear to have the capacity for dissassembly, then reassembly at different times. Here is the proposed model for "recycling" of these nanostructures:
View attachment 100099
They also showed responsiveness to EMF. After exposure to EMF, the size, number, and morphology changed:
View attachment 100100
The scientific community has actually been studying this for a long time. Back in the early 2000s, NATO advisors were discussing the potential uses of nanotechnology for military use.
Here are some relevant pieces of information:
This technology is generally referred to as "nanorobotics". These externally controlled robots are manufactured in the mico/nanometer range, and can be controlled by different external sources of energy. Heat, UV light, external magnetic fields.
They can be manufactured from various original materials, although graphene-based semiconductors appear to be the most common AFAIK.
Much of the publicly available science that I have read is framed in the context of medical application, which IS extremely interesting.
Magnetically Driven Micro and Nanorobots
Manipulation and navigation of micro and nanoswimmers in different fluid environments can be achieved by chemicals, external fields, or even motile cells.
Many researchers have selected magnetic fields as the active external actuation source based on the advantageous features of this actuation strategy such as remote and spatiotemporal control, fuel-free, high degree of reconfigurability, programmability, recyclability, and versatility. This review introduces fundamental concepts and advantages of magnetic micro/nanorobots (termed here as “MagRobots”) as well as basic knowledge of magnetic fields and magnetic materials, setups for magnetic manipulation, magnetic field configurations, and symmetry-breaking strategies for effective movement. These concepts are discussed to describe the interactions between micro/nanorobots and magnetic fields. Actuation mechanisms of flagella-inspired MagRobots (i.e., corkscrew-like motion and traveling-wave locomotion/ciliary stroke motion) and surface walkers (i.e., surface-assisted motion), applications of magnetic fields in other propulsion approaches, and magnetic stimulation of micro/nanorobots beyond motion are provided followed by fabrication techniques for (quasi-)spherical, helical, flexible, wire-like, and biohybrid MagRobots.
Applications of MagRobots in targeted drug/gene delivery, cell manipulation, minimally invasive surgery, biopsy, biofilm disruption/eradication, imaging-guided delivery/therapy/surgery, pollution removal for environmental remediation, and (bio)sensing are also reviewed. Finally, current challenges and future perspectives for the development of magnetically powered miniaturized motors are discussed.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01234
Here is where is gets fascinating. They can target SPECIFIC cells using nano robots.
Core-shell magnetoelectric nanorobot – A remotely controlled probe for targeted cell manipulation
We have developed a remotely controlled dynamic process of manipulating targeted biological live cells using fabricated core-shell nanocomposites, which comprises of single crystalline ferromagnetic cores (CoFe2O4) coated with crystalline ferroelectric thin film shells (BaTiO3). We demonstrate them as a unique family of inorganic magnetoelectric nanorobots (MENRs),
controlled remotely by applied a.c. or d.c. magnetic fields, to perform cell targeting, permeation, and transport. Under a.c. magnetic field excitation (50 Oe, 60 Hz), the MENR acts as a localized electric periodic pulse generator and can permeate a series of misaligned cells, while aligning them to an equipotential mono-array by inducing inter-cellular signaling. Under a.c. magnetic field (40 Oe, 30 Hz) excitation, MENRs can be dynamically driven to a targeted cell, avoiding untargeted cells in the path, irrespective of cell density. D.C. magnetic field (−50 Oe) excitation causes the MENRs to act as thrust generator and exerts motion in a group of cells.
We have developed a remotely controlled dynamic process of manipulating targeted biological live cells using fabricated core-shell nanocomposites, which comprises of single crystalline ferromagnetic cores (CoFe2O4) coated with crystalline ferroelectric thin film shells (BaTiO3). We demonstrate...
www.nature.com
Graphene-based nano technology acting as a "nano-transceiver"
Graphene-based Plasmonic Nano-transceiver for Terahertz Band Communication
In this paper, a plasmonic nano-transceiver forwireless communication in the Terahertz Band (0.1-10 THz)is proposed, modeled and analyzed.
The nano-transceiver isbased on a High Electron Mobility Transistor (HEMT) builtwith a III-V semiconductor and enhanced with graphene. Intransmission, when a voltage is applied between the HEMT drainand source, electrons are accelerated at the HEMT channel.This movement of electrons results in the excitation of a plasmawave which, on its turn, induces a Surface Plasmon Polariton(SPP) wave on the graphene-based gate. The reciprocal behavioris achieved in reception. The performance of the proposednano-transceiver is analytically investigated in transmission bycoupling the hydrodynamic equations that govern the generationof plasma waves in the HEMT, with the dynamic complexconductivity of graphene and the Maxwell’s equations. Numericalresults show that the proposed nano-transceiver can effectivelygenerate the necessary SPP wave to drive a plasmonic nanoantenna at Terahertz Band frequencie
s. Moreover, the utilizationof the same nanomaterial as in the plasmonic nano-antennas isexpected to ease the transceiver-antenna integration and opensthe door to tunable compact nano-transceivers for TerahertzBand communication
https://web.archive.org/web/20170810210901id_/http:/bwn.ece.gatech.edu/papers/2014/c1.pdf
The transhumanist-types are calling this the "
Internet of Bio-Nano Things"
Internet of Bio‑Nano Things (IoBNT) is e
nvisioned to be a heterogeneous network of nanoscale and biological devices, so called Bio‑Nano Things (BNTs), communicating via non‑conventional means, e.g., molecular communications (MC),in non‑conventional environments, e.g., inside human body. The main objective of this emerging networking framework is toenable direct and seamless interaction with biological systems for accurate sensing and control of their dynamics in real time.
This close interaction between bio and cyber domains with unprecedentedly high spatio‑temporal resolution is expected to open up vast opportunities to devise novel applications, especially in healthcare area, such as intrabody continuous healthmonitoring. There are, however, substantial challenges to be overcome if the enormous potential of the IoBNT is to be realized.These range from developing feasible nanocommunication and energy harvesting techniques for BNTs to handling the bigdata generated by IoBNT. In this survey, we attempt to provide a comprehensive overview of the IoBNT framework along withits main components and applications. An investigation of key technological challenges is presented together with a detailedreview of the state‑of‑the‑art approaches and a discussion of future research directions
Here is an excerpt from a NATO whitepaper published recently, discussing the new form "cognitive warefare", and stressing the need to "militarize" nano-technology:
Cognitive Warfare, a Battle for the Brain - Francois du Cluzel
Leveraging neuroscience and technology to achieve military effects is not new, but the revolution and theconvergence in NBIC (Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology, and cognitive science) including advances in genomics, has the potential for dual-use technology development.
A wide range of military applications such as improving the performance of soldiers, developing new weapons such as directed energy weapons are already discussed. The use of neuroscience and technology for military and intelligence purposes is realistic, and represents a clearand present concern.
Products of neuroscientific and neuro-technological research can be utilised to affect
1) memory, learning, and cognitive speed;
2) wake-sleep cycles, fatigue and alertness;
3) impulse control;
4) mood, anxiety, and self-perception;
5) decision-making
6) trust and empathy;~
7) and movement and performance (e.g., speed, strength, stamina, motor learning, etc.).
In military/warfare settings, modifying these functions can be utilized to mitigate aggression and fostercognitions and emotions of affiliation or passivity; induce morbidity, disability or suffering; and “neutralize”potential opponents or incur mortality.
This entire book on "Military Nanotechnology" was published in 2006, and discusses weaponization of vaccines and insects to achieve biological and psychological effects, INCLUDING control of perception, emotions, and brain function.
MILITARY NANO TECHNOLOGY - Potential applications and preventive arms control
4.3.6 Operations against biological systems and humans
Living systems could be influenced, damaged or killed using MNT by avariety of mechanisms:
• traditional macroscopic action from outside – projectile, overpressure,heat – MNT-enhanced by guidance, material, intelligence, transport,near-site production;
• new action from outside by masses of small systems: clogging of nose and mouth, covering of eyes or face, mechanical blocking of fingers,arms, legs, creating slippery layers on the ground; for plants: clogging of cell openings, covering leaves;
•
traditional or new chemical or biological agents, including application by injection by (artificial/hybrid) insect or release in nose;
•
penetration into the human body with microscopic action, potentiallyafter several generations of self-replication, starting immediately or after settling in with delay:
• in organs: mechanical damage, clogging of arteries or inducingtheir contraction;
• in cells: changing of metabolism or DNA, arbitrary results (assuming full understanding of gene and protein chemistry), e.g. new haircolour, over-/underproduction of hormones, excrescence in the face, tumours, necrosis of limbs;
• in nerve cells and brain:
• interference with perception, thinking or motor activity,• control of general mood, pain sensation etc.,
• control of thinking (certainly extremely difficult to achieve).
All things considered, I would consider this another hit for the C's. Although much of this research is framed as providing medical benefit, the military/NATO documentation shows they have been investigating this technology for behavioural modification and a focus has been on "weaponization".
And the technology appears to work as intended. Its not a crazy conspiracy theory.... scientists in medical biotechnology and materials sciences have literally been publishing papers on this for decades.
Its crazy to think they actually did this with the COVID mRNA shots, but the evidence is lining up quite nicely. The C's told us it happened, after all.
