Things are really heating up on Twitter and in the media: Dr. Anthony Fauci really set himself up hopefully for his own demise:
It's now in the news that Trump retweeted this above tweet, so the media pays close attention to these things.
So, Fauci, apparently joining forces with the New York Times, has decided to come out against Trump, thinking he needs to protect his own career by joining the MSM and their relentless criticism of Trump for not taking action sooner. But again, this might have been a fatal move on the part of Fauci. Not only has Trump come out against him, the man, when examined, won't withstand scrutiny:
This talk he gave on pandemics at Georgetown University in 2017, in which he predicts "a surprise outbreak," opens up a whole new can of worms. After all, people can actually SEE the "exposed" position he's put himself in, and ask the obvious question: just HOW did Fauci know in advance? (I'm rather curious about that myself.)
Actually, I just had a brainstorm. If everyone reading this thread were to join Twitter (or, to those already on Twitter, here's a recommendation) and start tweeting @realDonaldTrump, and using #FireFauci or #TrumpLashesOut, or developing new hashtags, it could be a way of giving Trump more confidence to act against the WHO, CDC, Bill Gates, etc.
#GatesOfHell, by the way, is another great hashtag to use, as well as hashtags with the words 'pandemic' and 'vaccines'... such as: #AgainstMandatedVaccination, for example.
Here's a Twitter tip: if you're interesting in doing this, put @realDonaldTrump at the end or in the middle of your tweet. If you start a tweet with @realDonaldTrump it only goes to him. Tagging it at the end or placing it in the middle somewhere means the tweet will be seen on your feed and at the hashtags you use, as well as go to Trump.
Also: if you tweet something, and you check and see it's not appearing on your feed, or at the hashtags you specified, you can retweet your message by pressing the retweet button at the bottom of your tweet, then press "retweet with a comment," and in your comment (which will be above the original tweet) let people know that Twitter has censored this tweet from the hashtag you used, or from your feed, depending on where it didn't appear. Twitter doesn't want to be caught censoring legitimate material, so this can be effective. You should, at the very least, see your retweet on your feed and at the hashtags you used since Twitter wants to be seen to correct such things.
Also: if you decide to do this, always be concise and professional sounding. It puts the onus on Twitter to respect your content.
I'd add that in keeping to this one topic -- which, after all, has a lot of facets to it, including criticism of Bill Gates and his malevolent mandating of vaccines -- it could make these messages to Trump more powerful.
Actually, now's the time to strike while the iron's hot, and make the connection between Fauci and Gates. Not that Trump wouldn't already know this, but it's to keep the pressure on while he's doing battle with Fauci, arming him with more and more tweetable weaponry.
AND: if Trump retweets a tweet of yours, that's MAXIMUM exposure. He has millions of followers. It also shows he's listening to the specific type of content you are providing. And, of course, the MSM will be paying close attention.
Using appropriate videos is probably a good idea too for people who want to deepen their understanding of these issues, although it's not necessary.
Anyway, it's just an idea that only just occurred to me, so it's hot off the press, as it were. Not that there aren't people on Twitter already hammering away at these issues. Even so, since tweets don't allow for a lot of material, it's a good way to edit your ideas, and come up with refined and powerful arguments, which is a good exercise in itself. And who can say, maybe your tweet will be the one that catches the attention of Trump. That's what's so great about Trump's unprecedented (for a president) involvement on Twitter. It really breaks down the barrier between those in power and everyone else -- especially if used intelligently.
I would suggest too that it's in these seemingly small ways that powerful directives toward positive change could possibly erupt, or go viral, at it were. Not saying it's not a long shot. I have to admit that. Still, why not try anyway? After all, what do we have to lose?
(I just realized #EXPOSURE might be another good hashtag to use as well.)
