Virus is UV sensible
Just to clarify, do you mean UV sensitive?
Virus is UV sensible
Yes. UV inactivates the Virus.Just to clarify, do you mean UV sensitive?
Here is a good analysis from Prof Michel Chossudovsky on who benefit economicaly from that false pandemic, as usual it all about economy.
COVID-19 Coronavirus: A Fake Pandemic? Who’s Behind It? Global Economic, Social and Geopolitical Destabilization
Written by Prof Michel Chossudovsky; Originally appeared at Global Research The media hype and disinformation campaign regarding the spread of...southfront.org
yes, more accurately, the C one, UVC. I bought a UVC lamp from China .Yes. UV inactivates the Virus.
Then it can be found in water as well. UV water filters should be recommended.Active Virus in urine and faeces
Now how does pig virus magically turn up in a vaccine for diarrhoea?It doesn’t! It gets put there. And what is unbelievable is that even though both vaccines were suspended and it transpired that all the vaccines for 2 years had been contaminated , the FDA suspended them for a few months then let them carry on!
Prof Weiner is not only the worlds DNA technology expert but he is also a special employee and adviser to the FDA.
He has perfected a new method of giving these DNA vaccines via Electroporation which is a electro magnetic pulse that opens up the cells, injects foreign DNA and then it closes.
The coronavirus may be used as a vaccine for treating and/or preventing a disease, such as infectious bronchitis, in a subject’.
And the list of countries that are designated contracting states.
list of countries: https://www.vigiliae.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/chrome_Vgm9eWMFhn.png
So why have all these countries recently as of November 20th 2019, all agreed to a contract for the coronavirus, (take into account the fact that the corona virus is built as a vaccine against bronchitis) and why has it been claimed in the media that the vaccine was created in two hours by InOvio?
Pirbright Institute has a list of stakeholders and shareholders who include veterinary vaccine manufacturers and other alphabet agencies including World Health Animal health. The director, Professor Bryan Charleston is also an animal practise professional.
While unfortunate for the people on the ship, it does provide a relatively good 'lab' environment from which to get some insights about how the virus spreads among an isolated group (though after the first cases, passengers were quarantined to their rooms, so it's probable that more would have gotten the virus had the quarantine not gone into effect).
Maybe it was a trial in this boat, how long and how many old passengers will take the corona, a sort of lab.I've read an article on CGTN about this Diamond Princess case and if the information is accurate, it seems like a perfect storm situation. Firstly, the vast majority of passengers were elderly people who are more prone to catch the virus and develop a disease. And secondly, they got quarantined inside a ship with a circular ventilation system, i.e. the passengers were possibly exposed to recycled air:
What exactly went wrong on Diamond Princess?
news.cgtn.com
Here is the age chart of the passengers from the article:
View attachment 34072
So if this information is accurate, then it is understandable why so many people were infected onboard, fwiw.
Lately I have been thinking it over, and if the incubation period is 2 weeks (the original communicated information) or longer like 24 days (later suggested) that probably means the amount of people exposed is already quite huge by now.
Tens of thousands? Hundreds of thousands?
Whatever the number this leads to my next question: where are these people?
Maybe they have gotten the virus and either their immune systems were good enough to have fought it off 1) without showing symptoms or 2) having mild enough symptoms much like when people get one of the very many flu-type viruses and they just got over it in short time and never even thought they had the Corona virus.
If this is true, then the true mortality rate becomes vanishingly small. Or at least on the order of the influenza mortality rate that we deal with all the time - where as usual, influenza is mainly dangerous for those with deficient immune system.
(Among the things that hurt the immune system are vaccinations & pollution - both things high in China that might make it worse there even if Asians would not have a genetic weakness for this virus which has been proposed by some people.)
Well, although it is devastating to those who have lost close ones to it, it really may be far from a devastating world threat, mortality-wise, just based on this reasoning.
I may be wrong to simplify it like this.