There is some pushback on the shutting down of this study and the destruction of the samples. Whether it will be successful or not is yet to be seen.

So many are working to memory hole evidence. I hope the legal notice is successful and the physical and data are kept intact.

Speaking of data, Denis Rancourt has issued another paper with his colleagues and provided a talk (March in Calgary, Alberta - by the way, he said he has also had talkes with RFK Jr.). Here is the talk below. However, in summary, some main points are thus:

The slide presentation represents all cause mortality, and that caption (see slides) discussing Quebec as an example, should read, and to paraphrase, ‘outside of Montreal there are no deaths of that type’ – in Montreal the elderly were dying by the score – old age homes, care homes and hospitals et cetera. Montreal was particularly cruel, so when you hear locals talk, oh it was so bad, what they are not saying are the reasons of why that was so (I had a loved one get pushed through the care homes of Montreal and it was very concerning).

The correlation of the studies shows that Montreal as a big city was similar to Toronto and New York – but not in the rest of Quebec, Ontario or the U.S. have the same outcomes. These big city places carried political decisions that became the consequences in mortality - mass excess mortality.

Age class is factored in slides, so for instance in Alberta (18 to 44 years of age) where the slide below shows a green line that is covid with very little deaths, the excess mortality goes through the roof ("1,000 extra deaths that should not have occurred"). Why?

Drug overdose (poisoning) was a large factor (suicide hits hard too), and this slips into BC too. It is likely replicated in the U.s. and in other countries in similar and different ways. The second slide looks cause.

1750487227654.png1750487483062.png

There is a socioeconomic aspect to this noted in younger ages in Alberta, Saskatchewan and Newfoundland.

This next slide is interesting (correlation) that may take some pondering. There are 5 events noted with mortality data extrapolated: 1. Is when Chine was brought in to the western financial markets (1982). 2. Is the wreaking of Russia (1992) when the corporations took over and went global. 3. The big (2008) financial meltdown (derivatives mostly - by the way, that is Mark Carney, Bernanke, Geithner and many others world). 4. Oil sector price collapse (2014) that looked to hurt Russia, and 5. Covid (2020). Mortality followed for all the unemployment reasons we see in time.

The conclusion speaks for itself. “The changes that were imposed during covid became permanent practice” – now persistent (especially with the elderly).

1750487619134.png1750488026299.png

2025-03-03 ::: Towards understanding the government assault and persistent excess mortality (presentation in Calgary)​

 
There will be a massive pandemic planning exercise in the UK in autumn. This release was from January of this year, so apologies if it has already been posted.

I suppose just like Putin ended the pandemic by starting the SMO, the PTB may try to end the SMO with another pandemic.


  • Pandemic planning stepped up with unprecedented exercise between government, emergency services and nations and regions.
  • Over 4,000 resilience and emergency workers to be trained every year through the UK Resilience Academy.
  • New tool built by the Cabinet Office and Office for National Statistics will help identify vulnerable groups who need targeted support.
  • National test of the Emergency Alert System to take place.
The country’s preparation for future pandemics will be stepped up by the largest ever national response exercise due to be held in the Autumn.

Ministers have also set out plans to better support vulnerable groups - such as the elderly or those receiving care - and train thousands of public servants to handle a range of crises, including pandemics.

These measures come in response to the Covid-19 Inquiry’s Module 1 report, which examined the resilience and preparedness of the UK prior to the pandemic.

Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, The Rt Hon. Pat McFadden MP, said:

We must learn lessons from the Covid pandemic as we cannot afford to make the same mistakes again. But we will plan in a way that recognises the next crisis may not be the same as the last.

We agree with the Inquiry that more needs to be done and are announcing measures to make sure that we are as prepared as possible for future pandemics.

These changes will improve our resilience and preparedness and help to safeguard our citizens.

The national pandemic exercise is the first of its kind in nearly a decade and is set to be the biggest in UK history. It will test the country’s capabilities, plans, protocols and procedures in the event of another major pandemic.

It will be led by senior ministers, involve thousands of participants, and run across all regions and nations of the UK. All government departments, local resilience forums, and the devolved governments have been invited to participate, and the government is encouraging the most significant involvement ever at a local level.

The exercise is due to take place on different days over several months in the Autumn. The government will communicate findings and lessons from this exercise as recommended by the Covid-19 Inquiry.

The government has also committed to providing more support for vulnerable groups, many of whom were disproportionately impacted during the Covid-19 pandemic.

To support this, the Cabinet Office has created a Risk Vulnerability Tool with the Office for National Statistics. The tool creates a map of the UK for different risks that we face, and shows where there are vulnerable groups who might be disproportionately impacted. Vulnerable groups are identified by data including age, disability, or whether someone is receiving care.

It is a government tool, which can be instantly shared across departments and with devolved governments. It will improve the government’s understanding of where disproportionately impacted groups are ahead of and during crises, and enable targeted local support where required.

A third measure the Government is taking is to train over 4,000 people in resilience and emergency roles every year through the UK Resilience Academy. The training, which begins in April, will help practitioners plan for and manage a range of crises, including pandemics. It will be based on revised National Occupational Standards to ensure that people have the knowledge and skills they need to support them in their roles.

The Government will also carry out a national test of the Emergency Alert System later in 2025. While the system has been deployed successfully four times since launching in 2023, the national test will ensure the system is functioning correctly, should it need to be deployed in an emergency. Regular testing will ensure the UK remains in line with other countries that test similar systems on a regular basis.

The national test will provide valuable operational lessons for both central government and telecommunication partners, giving an opportunity to solve any issues prior to a potential emergency activation.

The exact date of the test will be announced in due course and will see every phone in the country - approximately 87 million devices - receive a test message similar to the previous test in April 2023. The test will be advertised widely in advance.

The Covid-19 Inquiry published its Module 1 report in July last year. The government agrees with what the Inquiry is seeking to achieve through its recommendations and the response published today sets out where progress has been made, and where further action will be taken.

Delivering on our country’s Missions, including building a National Health Service fit for the future, will help us prepare for the range of risks we face. These Missions also rely on a strong, foundational system of resilience that must be maintained and improved.
 

Drug-resistant BAT-HUMAN HYBRID FLU engineered by NIH-funded researchers to create a new worldwide pandemic to try to kill everyone
07/09/2025 // S.D. Wells

The depopulation machine is still in full gear folks. The freaks in their white lab coats are still designing new plandemics with new deadly diseases and clot shots to go with it. Here’s the latest scoop.

A new peer-reviewed study published June 18, 2025, in Pathogens has revealed that scientists funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) have genetically engineered novel hybrid influenza viruses combining bat and human virus components. The research, conducted at the University of Missouri and partially funded by the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), raises significant public health and biosecurity concerns.
  • NIH-Funded Creation of Hybrid Bat-Human Influenza Viruses: Researchers at the University of Missouri, funded by NIH and CEIRR grants, engineered chimeric influenza viruses by combining bat virus genes with human H1N1 components—raising significant concerns due to their ability to replicate in mammalian cells and resist common antivirals.
  • Engineered for Antiviral Resistance and Survival: The viruses were deliberately mutated at key sites (e.g., N31, H37, W41) to confer resistance to amantadine, a standard flu treatment, and to study how these mutations affect viral replication and survival, confirming the study’s gain-of-function nature.

  • Pandemic Potential and Biosecurity Fears: Constructed using reverse genetics, these lab-created viruses could potentially infect humans, making them highly controversial in light of past pandemic origins linked to lab-based virus manipulation and prompting renewed biosecurity concerns.
  • S. Taxpayer-Funded and Internationally Overseen: Despite growing public and governmental scrutiny, this research received funding from U.S. agencies including NIH/NIAID and CEIRR, with involvement from WHO-affiliated scientists and formal biosafety clearance—further fueling debate over accountability and transparency in high-risk virology.

NIH-funded researchers engineer drug-resistant bat-human hybrid influenza viruses in Missouri

Led by Dr. Richard Webby of St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital—also a World Health Organization collaborator—the study involved the creation of chimeric influenza viruses using a method known as reverse genetics. Researchers used internal genes from bat influenza viruses (H17N10 and H18N11) and combined them with surface proteins from the human H1N1 strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934. These synthetic combinations were shown to replicate efficiently in mammalian cells, particularly Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells, which are standard for studying influenza infectivity.

Crucially, the viruses were found to induce cytopathic effects (CPEs)—cellular damage caused by viral infection—suggesting they are functionally infectious in mammalian systems. This suggests a potential zoonotic crossover risk, where viruses engineered in the lab might be capable of jumping from animals to humans.

Even more concerning is the fact that the engineered viruses were resistant to the antiviral drug amantadine. The M2 protein of the bat influenza strains contained a naturally occurring N31 mutation known to confer resistance. Researchers further modified the M2 protein at key sites—such as H37, W41, and L36—to investigate the impact on viral replication, infectivity, and drug resistance. Several of these engineered variants survived and replicated successfully, revealing that small genetic changes could significantly enhance the virus's survival and potential pathogenicity.

This kind of experimentation is considered gain-of-function (GoF) research—where viruses are intentionally altered to study how mutations affect traits like transmission, virulence, and immune evasion. While such studies aim to prepare for future pandemics, they are highly controversial due to the inherent risks of accidental or intentional release.

The study emphasized that reverse genetics was used to synthetically construct these novel viruses. Eight plasmids encoding the viral genome were mixed and incubated to generate recombinant strains—none of which exist naturally in the wild. This synthetic approach enables the creation of viruses with entirely new properties, increasing concerns about laboratory safety and global health implications.

This research comes at a time of heightened sensitivity to lab-origin theories of pandemics. Major U.S. intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA, have acknowledged that a laboratory-related incident is a plausible explanation for the origin of COVID-19. The creation of drug-resistant, mammalian-infectious viruses under U.S. government funding—without full transparency—has drawn criticism from biosecurity experts.

The project received approval from the University of Missouri’s Institutional Biosafety Committee (Protocol #12100) and was supported by the NIH, the Centers of Excellence in Influenza Research and Response (CEIRR), and university startup funds.

As debate grows over the ethics and safety of gain-of-function research, this study underscores the urgent need for stricter oversight, greater transparency, and reevaluation of federally funded virological experiments with pandemic potential. Bookmark Infections.news to get the latest updates about the engineered "bird flu pandemic” and the drug-resistant bat-human hybrid flu coming to fake news theatres near you!

Sources for this article include:

Modernity.news

MDPI.com

Reporter.NIH.gov
 
And see who's won the race for a Plague inoculation: MSN

World’s First mRNA Vaccine Against Bubonic Plague: Israeli Scientists Make History​



In a historic breakthrough for global medicine, Israeli researchers have made a ground-breaking development of the world’s first mRNA-based vaccine to protect against a deadly, antibiotic-resistant bacterium, Yersinia pestis, the same bacterium responsible for the Black Death, aka the Bubonic Plague, that wiped out two-thirds of Europe’s population in the 14th century.


The vaccine, created through joint effports between Tel Aviv University and the Israel Institute for Biological Research, is a significant milestone. It is the first instance when mRNA vaccine technology, famously used in making the COVID-19 vaccines, has now been effectively used to combat bacterial infections, which has always posed a threat to modern medicine since its inception.

What Makes This Vaccine Groundbreaking?​

While viruses such as the one causing COVID-19 require host cells to replicate and are rather simple to treat, bacteria are much more complicated. They do not depend on human cells to live on, and their protein is significantly different compared to the protein of human beings.


Treating bacterial infections for a long time has proved an excruciatingly challenging process. Now, the mRNA vaccines are designed in such a way that they allow the immune system can learn to identify these bacterial infections and hit them with more precision. But now, the Israeli researchers have overcome this challenge.

According to Tel Aviv University’s Vice President for Research and Development, Prof. Dan Peer, the bacterium “spreads from person to person and causes respiratory illness, making it particularly difficult to develop a vaccine against it”.

Dr Uri Elia, a researcher from the Israel Institute for Biological Research, explained: “Viruses rely on a host cell to survive and replicate. They infect the cell with an RNA molecule (mRNA) that contains instructions for making viral proteins.”

“Bacteria, however, are a different story: they produce their own proteins and do not rely on human cells. Moreover, due to the different evolutionary paths of humans and bacteria, their proteins are very different from ours,” added Dr Ella


In 2023, the team developed a technique to produce bacterial proteins in human cells in a manner that the immune system recognises them as a threat to the body, mimicking a real and dangerous infection and training them to treat the infection.

In this system, scientists developed a new mRNA vaccine targeting pneumonic plague, the respiratory variant of bubonic plague. This form of the disease is highly contagious among human beings by air during direct contact and is almost undoubtedly deadly, in case it is not treated immediately.


Surprising results were delivered by the vaccine after experimentation on various animal models.

“After two vaccine doses, we achieved 100% protection against pneumonic plague,” said Prof. Dan Peer, Tel Aviv University’s Vice President for R&D. “The animals infected with the plague did not get sick at all.”

The models indicated that some high protection levels were achieved with only one dose of the vaccine, which demonstrated effectiveness, as well as the potential to achieve fast protection in case of an outbreak.

Although plague might appear to be one of the evil issues of the Middle Ages, however, the reality is different as its cases are seen in modern times too. According to WHO (World Health Organisation), dozens of cases of plague are reported annanlly, with high mortality rates.


Apart from the health issue, these infections are also a potential source of bioterrorism.

“This bacterium concerns us as a potential agent of bioterrorism,” warned Dr Elia. “If one of our enemies tries to use it against us, we want to be prepared with a vaccine.”

The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention identifies Yersinia pestis as a category-A bioterror agent that can be turned into an instrument of mass destruction. To fight this, an effective, quick vaccine may be a line of last defence.
 
Coming from the ones who bomb others just in case they might want to bomb them, we might as well just know where the next Plague pandemic will come from, in case there is one.
Apart from the health issue, these infections are also a potential source of bioterrorism.

“This bacterium concerns us as a potential agent of bioterrorism,” warned Dr Elia. “If one of our enemies tries to use it against us, we want to be prepared with a vaccine.”
 

INSIDIOUS ISRAELI SCIENTISTS design “Black Death” mutant plague mRNA injections that turn human cells into Frankenstein mutations
07/18/2025 // S.D. Wells

Governments around the world are funding scientists to create the next deadly plandemic and nobody is trying to stop them. This is ludicrous. It’s criminal. For example, Israeli military scientists have genetically engineered a mutant form of Yersinia pestis, the bacterium responsible for the plague, and used its virulence genes to create a new mRNA vaccine. The research, conducted by the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), has sparked global alarm due to its implications for biowarfare, bioethics, and vaccine safety.

  • Israeli Scientists Engineer Mutant Plague mRNA Vaccine: Military researchers at Israel’s Institute for Biological Research genetically modified the Yersinia pestis bacterium (causative agent of plague) and developed an mRNA vaccine that instructs human cells to produce two key plague proteins—one mimicking immune suppression, the other evading immune detection.

  • Use of Controversial mRNA Ingredient (m1?): The vaccine uses N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1?), a synthetic nucleotide linked to rogue protein production, autoimmune reactions, and cancer growth—already flagged as a safety concern in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine studies.

  • Global Biowarfare Concerns and Legal Loopholes: Israel’s work was conducted outside the Biological Weapons Convention, which the nation has not ratified, raising alarm about international legal oversight, especially as plague was recently added to the WHO’s pandemic watchlist.
  • Bioethics and Safety Questions Intensify: Critics argue the project blurs the line between biodefense and biowarfare by normalizing the use of genetically engineered Tier 1 bioweapons in vaccines, potentially endangering public health under the banner of pandemic.

Israel Engineers Mutant Plague: mRNA Jab Turns Human Cells Into ‘Black Death’ Protein Factories
The genetically altered strain, known as F1? Kimberley53, was developed by deleting the caf1 gene from a fully virulent plague variant, thereby removing the bacterium’s immune-shielding capsule. This modified strain was designed to simulate a “vaccine escape” pathogen—one that could potentially circumvent immune defenses. Researchers then extracted genetic segments from this engineered plague and inserted them into a dual-component mRNA vaccine.

This vaccine contains synthetic mRNA instructions for producing two modified plague proteins:
  1. LcrV – a virulence protein used by Y. pestis to suppress immune responses and infect human cells.

  2. F1 – a protein that normally forms a capsule around the bacterium to shield it from immune detection.
  • Use of Controversial mRNA Ingredient (m1?): The vaccine uses N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1?), a synthetic nucleotide linked to rogue protein production, autoimmune reactions, and cancer growth—already flagged as a safety concern in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine studies.

  • Global Biowarfare Concerns and Legal Loopholes: Israel’s work was conducted outside the Biological Weapons Convention, which the nation has not ratified, raising alarm about international legal oversight, especially as plague was recently added to the WHO’s pandemic watchlist.

  • Bioethics and Safety Questions Intensify: Critics argue the project blurs the line between biodefense and biowarfare by normalizing the use of genetically engineered Tier 1 bioweapons in vaccines, potentially endangering public health under the banner of pandemic preparedness.
  1. LcrV – a virulence protein used by Y. pestis to suppress immune responses and infect human cells.


  2. F1 – a protein that normally forms a capsule around the bacterium to shield it from immune detection.
Both proteins were further fused with a human antibody domain (Fc region) to enhance stability and immune response. The mRNA was chemically altered with N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1?), a synthetic nucleotide also used in COVID-19 vaccines. While m1? increases mRNA longevity and protein output, studies have linked it to immune evasion, autoimmune responses, and even accelerated tumor growth.

Critics argue that this research, carried out under the banner of pandemic preparedness and biodefense, treads dangerously close to violating international bioweapons laws. Israel, notably, is not a signatory of the Biological Weapons Convention, and the IIBR has long been associated with military-grade biological research. Despite this, the study was peer-reviewed and supported by the European Research Council and the EU’s Horizon 2020 program.

Legal and ethical experts warn that the Israeli team’s approach—engineering a mutant version of the plague and using its virulence mechanisms to program human cells—raises profound biosecurity and ethical concerns. These include the potential misuse of the technology, the risks of accidental release, and the health dangers posed by synthetic mRNA vaccines that direct human cells to produce harmful bacterial proteins.

The use of m1? in this platform is especially concerning, as multiple studies have highlighted its role in creating “rogue” proteins through genetic frameshifts and in promoting cancer metastasis. Critics argue that this adds another layer of risk, especially as booster doses accumulate in individuals.

This project marks a troubling intersection of biotechnology, military interests, and global health policy. It also sets a precedent for normalizing the use of genetically engineered Tier 1 pathogens—those classified as top-level bioterrorism threats—in vaccine development. While intended as a defensive measure, the manipulation of plague genes for insertion into human cells via mRNA platforms underscores the growing threat of dual-use research, where the line between medical innovation and biowarfare becomes increasingly blurred.

Bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on experimental gene therapy injections like mRNA clot shots that lead to early death, infertility, turbo cancer and Long-Vax-Syndrome.

Sources for this article include:

Pandemic.news

NaturalNews.com

Modernity
 

INSIDIOUS ISRAELI SCIENTISTS design “Black Death” mutant plague mRNA injections that turn human cells into Frankenstein mutations
07/18/2025 // S.D. Wells

Governments around the world are funding scientists to create the next deadly plandemic and nobody is trying to stop them. This is ludicrous. It’s criminal. For example, Israeli military scientists have genetically engineered a mutant form of Yersinia pestis, the bacterium responsible for the plague, and used its virulence genes to create a new mRNA vaccine. The research, conducted by the Israel Institute for Biological Research (IIBR), has sparked global alarm due to its implications for biowarfare, bioethics, and vaccine safety.

  • Israeli Scientists Engineer Mutant Plague mRNA Vaccine: Military researchers at Israel’s Institute for Biological Research genetically modified the Yersinia pestis bacterium (causative agent of plague) and developed an mRNA vaccine that instructs human cells to produce two key plague proteins—one mimicking immune suppression, the other evading immune detection.

  • Use of Controversial mRNA Ingredient (m1?): The vaccine uses N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1?), a synthetic nucleotide linked to rogue protein production, autoimmune reactions, and cancer growth—already flagged as a safety concern in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine studies.

  • Global Biowarfare Concerns and Legal Loopholes: Israel’s work was conducted outside the Biological Weapons Convention, which the nation has not ratified, raising alarm about international legal oversight, especially as plague was recently added to the WHO’s pandemic watchlist.
  • Bioethics and Safety Questions Intensify: Critics argue the project blurs the line between biodefense and biowarfare by normalizing the use of genetically engineered Tier 1 bioweapons in vaccines, potentially endangering public health under the banner of pandemic.

Israel Engineers Mutant Plague: mRNA Jab Turns Human Cells Into ‘Black Death’ Protein Factories
The genetically altered strain, known as F1? Kimberley53, was developed by deleting the caf1 gene from a fully virulent plague variant, thereby removing the bacterium’s immune-shielding capsule. This modified strain was designed to simulate a “vaccine escape” pathogen—one that could potentially circumvent immune defenses. Researchers then extracted genetic segments from this engineered plague and inserted them into a dual-component mRNA vaccine.

This vaccine contains synthetic mRNA instructions for producing two modified plague proteins:
  1. LcrV – a virulence protein used by Y. pestis to suppress immune responses and infect human cells.

  2. F1 – a protein that normally forms a capsule around the bacterium to shield it from immune detection.
  • Use of Controversial mRNA Ingredient (m1?): The vaccine uses N1-methyl-pseudouridine (m1?), a synthetic nucleotide linked to rogue protein production, autoimmune reactions, and cancer growth—already flagged as a safety concern in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine studies.

  • Global Biowarfare Concerns and Legal Loopholes: Israel’s work was conducted outside the Biological Weapons Convention, which the nation has not ratified, raising alarm about international legal oversight, especially as plague was recently added to the WHO’s pandemic watchlist.

  • Bioethics and Safety Questions Intensify: Critics argue the project blurs the line between biodefense and biowarfare by normalizing the use of genetically engineered Tier 1 bioweapons in vaccines, potentially endangering public health under the banner of pandemic preparedness.
  1. LcrV – a virulence protein used by Y. pestis to suppress immune responses and infect human cells.


  2. F1 – a protein that normally forms a capsule around the bacterium to shield it from immune detection.
(...)

Guess we'll see what happens , great choices either way .

Session 23 April 2022 :

(...)

(Niall) Russia and China are both surrounded by American biolabs doing things.

(Gaby) In a prior session, they were saying it was not mostly the US experiments that were a threat to humanity, but instead a space virus. So, if that's the case, in theory if there's a 4th density STS virus coming up, will it be a DNA or an RNA virus?

A: RNA.

Q: (Gaby) And what kind of disease will it produce?

A: Most likely to be similar to primitive smallpox.

Q: (Pierre) Primitive smallpox is nasty. It's a descendant of the Black Death.

(L) I think we decided that primitive smallpox was the Black Death.

(Gaby) Smallpox is a DNA virus. So if this is an RNA virus, it could be nastier I suppose.

(Pierre) With 79% death rate, it's nasty.

(Joe) What kind of treatments would be effective against such a critter?

A: Vit C and oxygen.

(...)

-----------------------------------


Session 13 January 2024 :

(...)

Q: (Ursus Minor) As the World Economic Forum starts promoting 'Disease X' – what could it be?

A: A big mistake that very well might take them out!

Q: (Andromeda) So where's this Disease X gonna come from?

A: Lab.

Q: (Joe) And where is it likely to be released? Globally, or in one particular area?

A: California, New York, Singapore, Paris, London.

Q: (Andromeda) And what's the purpose of releasing this? Is it the depopulation thing, or is it an excuse to enforce more control or...

A: Both.

Q: (Laura) And they're gonna obviously have another vaccine?

A: Yes.

Q: (Laura) And they actually think people are going to take it the second time around?

A: Yes.

Q: (Laura) Do they think we're all stupid?

A: Yes.

(...)
 
Yet another method.
 
Just saw that the corona vaccination campaign in Holland starts on 15th September, in spite of everything that has come out so far. They just go on and on, and in that light, I wanted to report on Arno van Kessel, a brave Dutch lawyer, who has taken on Goliath. (See here, here here, here, here, here, here and here) Five years ago, in 2020, Van Kessel saw through the scamdemic and vocally opposed the corona policy and shots. For 5 years, he has been pestered and harassed by authorities, but could still do his job, and initiated legal proceedings not only against the Dutch State, but also high profile national and international figures like Mark Rutte, Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and others. There are certainly comparisons to the full destruction of Reiner Fuellmich in neighbouring Germany. Absolutely horrendous what is happening, and aside from a few hundred sympathizers, it seems no one could care much less.

On July 14th 2023, Arno van Kessel and his colleague Peter Stassen, on behalf of the Recht Oprecht Foundation representing seven plaintiffs who all suffer from the consequences of corona vaccinations, filed a civil lawsuit before the District Court of Leeuwarden (in the very north of Holland). The defendants include the Dutch state, former Prime Minister Mark Rutte, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, Bill Gates, and others, totalling 17 individuals and entities. The plaintiffs allege that the Covid-19-‘vaccine’ is actually a cloaked bioweapon, and that the alleged side effects are deliberately chosen effects. The lawyers accuse the government of committing genocide of its own people, whereby it must be noted that the legal definition of genocide also includes the infliction of serious bodily harm. The lawsuit seeks damages for the alleged vaccine injuries, and a verdict of the Court deciding whether the Covid-19-shot is a vaccine for the health of the population, or a bioweapon.

In their briefs, the plaintiffs provide the necessary evidence. They also want to hear six expert witnesses under oath who can prove their allegation regarding the injections as a bioweapon: Professor Dr. Dr. Francis Boyle (professor of International Law), Catherine Austin Fitts (Former U.S. Government Chief Officer), Dr. Mike Yeadon (former top scientist at Pfizer), Alexandra Latypova (former pharmaceutical), researcher Katherine Watt and Dr. Joseph Sansone (psychotherapist specializing in clinical hypnosis). One of them, Professor Boyle, with whom the lawyer duo had contact on 12 January 2025, died on 30 January at the age of 74.

A significant development occurred in September 2024 when Bill Gates challenged the court’s jurisdiction over him, citing Article 11 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure. The Leeuwarden District Court rejected this claim in an interim judgment, ruling that Gates must stand trial, making him the only defendant required to appear in person. The court scheduled a hearing for July 9, 2025, to address the substantive issues of the case, marking the first significant progress after two years of procedural delays, partly attributed to Gates’ legal team submitting extensive objections and scheduling conflicts.

Now on 11th June 2025, Arno van Kessel was arrested by the Special Intervention Service (DSI). During the military style raid on his house, he was blindfolded, arrested and taken away with a great show of power. His entire family was held at gunpoint. The house was searched for hours by a team of fifteen agents. The action turned out to be related to several raids in Holland, in which eight people, called ‘souvereigns’ (people turning away from the state), were arrested. The only thing that the Public Prosecutor’s Office has come out with, is that the group is “suspected of committing criminal and terrorist offences together, aimed at collecting or wanting to use weapons and/or dangerous substances”. It was even suspected they had planned an attack during the NATO top in The Hague, which was held on 24th and 25th June. Until now, authorities fail to provide a shred of evidence, just stating that ‘in the context of the investigation we cannot give out any information.’ Since 9/11, all these types of rules where suspected 'terrorists' are involved, make it so much easier of the authorities to silence or put someone away without any accountability or visibility. Van Kessel’s wife emphasizes that her husband is wrongly associated with this.

While the MSM in Holland is silent on the arrest, the case has attracted attention abroad from Sri Lanka to Brasil, framing it as an attempt to suppress the lawsuit, after all, should the judge rule that it the Covid-19-shots are indeed a bioweapon, such a ruling would have colossal criminal consequences worldwide for persons, agencies and governments involved in the roll-out of the Covid-19 injections. The accusation that Van Kessel is part of terrorist organization may therefore well be intended to stop him in this legal process.

Interestingly, the DSI has been in existence since July 2006 as part of the Dutch National Police. It acts as an arrest team in case of firearm-hazardous, or terrorism and dangerous suspects. Within the DSI, police officers and the military work closely together. Due to the involvement of the military in the DSI, NATO cannot be kept out of the picture in terms of international cooperation. The DSI’s deployment of the arrest of people suspected of terrorism is undoubtedly done with the knowledge of Dutch intelligence agencies like AIVD (Fun Fact: Dutch prime minister Dick Schoof, was previously director-general of the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD), and the National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism (NCTV) before becoming PM), organizations that hold a lot of sway in the national administration. Moreover, FOI documents and statements of the government, including of the former Minister of Health Fleur Agema, show that the Dutch corona policy was carried out on behalf of the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) and NATO. And through NATO even on behalf of other powerful international institutions.

The arrest took place shortly after van Kessel submitted documents for the July 9 hearing. He was brought to a maximum-security prison, reportedly blindfolded during transport, and held under strict restrictions, including no contact with his wife. His detention was extended for 90 days, preventing him from attending the July 9 hearing, though the case proceeded with his colleague Peter Stassen representing the plaintiffs.

At the July 9th hearing, Stassen moved to ask the Court whether plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, as mentioned above, can testify under oath. Defendants absolutely oppose this, claiming 'they are not experts, let alone independent experts, and that the vaccines are safe and effective on the basis of scientific consensus.’ :lol: A ruling on the inclusion of expert witnesses is expected within six weeks, with the next hearing scheduled for November 27, 2025.

The case’s outcome hinges on the plaintiffs’ ability to substantiate their claims of vaccine-related harm. In order to get Van Kessel out of the way, the Dutch Bar Association, that organization that stands for “rights for everyone and a good administration of justice,” :rolleyes: disbarred him at the end of July, because he is a suspected terrorist. Nice and easy! Furthermore, the crowdfund platform GoFundMe is still failing to pay Euro 70.000 in donations that have been collected for Van Kessels’ legal proceedings because he is regarded as a potential terrorist. And the media — including also professional legal journals — mercilessly destroy him while he sits in prison.

As the lawsuit progresses, all eyes are on the District Court of Leeuwarden. The inclusion of expert witnesses could shape the case’s trajectory, while van Kessel’s ongoing detention raises broader questions about legal fairness. The November 27 hearing will be a critical moment, potentially determining whether this case becomes a landmark challenge to global health policies or fades into obscurity.

Personally, I don’t hold my breath over a just and truthful outcome of the case, but one can hope and applaud the bravery of men like Van Kessel and Stassen.
 
A ruling on the inclusion of expert witnesses is expected within six weeks

Following up on my post above, the judge of the District Court of Leeuwarden yesterday issued a ruling on the request of a preliminary hearing of expert witnesses on the use of Covid-19 injections as a biological weapon in the context of a project called ‘Covid 19: the Great Reset.’

A bit confusing, but as I understand it, the lawyer Peter Stassen requested this hearing on behalf of 3 other plaintiffs than the ones in the ongoing proceedings on the merits of the case. From the court documents, I understand that he wanted to get a ruling on the hearing in order to get evidence, and to get clarity on the chances of winning the trial on the merits.

Basically, the judge denied the request by ruling that:
“granting the request would interfere with ongoing proceedings on the same subject brought against the same opposing parties. In this case, a hearing of party experts is also not the appropriate way to gather evidence and obtain clarity about the chances of success in proceedings on the merits. The court therefore finds that granting the request would be time-consuming and costly, while leading to inefficient information gathering. In conjunction with the above considerations, this means that the request is contrary to the proper procedural order.”

Sasha Latypova, one of the 6 expert witnesses, on her substack, writes that this case is far from over. They had been been anticipating this rejection, she writes, and have been preparing an alternative strategy, which is now in play.

Interestingly, in a statement issued by Peter Stassen after the ruling came in (quoted on Sasha Latypova’s substack), he says that “shortly before the oral hearing of the request on July 9th, a new press guideline was introduced in the Netherlands, which stipulates that only so-called "accredited journalists" are authorized to make video recordings of hearings. Despite the fact that the judge is not bound by this press guideline and my urgent request to the judge to allow video recordings by the many journalists present, the hearing was censored. The accredited journalists were conspicuous by their absence", and, oddly, ”an edited audio recording of the hearing, authorized by the court, was available at the same time as the verdict. In response to my questions, the court declined to explain why it decided to distort the voices of the defendants' lawyers in these recordings.” He furthermore states that the court has made a serious mistake and announces that he will appeal. Meanwhile his partner Arno van Kessel remains in the high-security prison in Vught.

Also noteworthy is that the sixth expert witness Stassen wanted to put on the stand was Francis Boyle. He was an American human rights lawyer and professor of international law at the University of Illinois College of Law, and died on 30 January 2025 at the age of 74. He was known for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989 and for serving as legal counsel for various international entities. In January 2020, he declared that SARS-CoV-2 was a biological weapon. Before the covid vaccine was rolled out, he declared that that too was a biological weapon (see this article about Joseph Sansone, also one of the expert witnesses, and Francis Boyle). The cause of death remains unknown. He was healthy, in his seventies, and still working full-time, according to Latypova’s substack.
 
Back
Top Bottom