My actual analyse of the situation :
The PTB really thought, in February, that, looking at China's reaction, they have a good real pandemic on-going, thus, they decided the following : let's start the plan, we have our pandemic there, and we also received the "orders" to urgently do the necessary to avoid the virus to spread. Then we know what happened and is still going on in many countries.
About fights/disputes that are happening between them, one thing i have in mind : a lot PTB sub-circles of power are blaming BigPharma circle, or are jealous (remember it's STS world) of it because the virus topic sticks well to their plan, but for some, it's maybe the start of a new reality for them : you are the next one to be sacrified. And on top of that, some are not yet prepared, and they mainly rely at this moment on BigPharma medical propaganda for the plan not to fail, it's their actual Achilles heel. If BigPharma fails it,
and they will fail, we may see clear signs of retaliation vs them.
I like to think about the actual situation, it's maybe a bit optimistic, but why not. I summarized it by this sentence one guy of the PTB could say to another, both not from BigPharma :
Sh**t, it's not at all a pandemic, not enough deads, BigPharma activated all of their resources and are trying their best to impose the plan but it's crackling from everywhere, people are starting to wonder why we broke the econmies just for this, we are all in defcon 6, save your ass, we won't be able to maintain our storyline for much longer
As we know that they will NEVER surrender, never stop, question is : what would be their B plan then ? I'm wondering in fact if they have one. I think that they are now almost obliged to continue with their actual narrative, and with the slow but visible raising of people awarness around the globe, the more they send "propaganda missiles", the more they'll receive back in return. I mean, maybe i'm doing wishfull thinking here, but from how I see it is progressing, even if we still have many examples of "sheep people",
the truth is by far more contagious than anything else, and it's spreading massively at this moment.
Off-topic-recent-happy-personal-example :
Today, one of my brothers, who's is much an "authoritarian follower", told his girlfriend (who told me the evening, we are good mates and try both to open his eyes) that he said, traduced from french : "I'm going to end up agreeing with him" (speaking of me). He even for the first time answered to one of my email about this crisis and asked "And what do you recommend we do besides find out?" - another sign. It's INCREDIBLE, wonderful, a miracle, so to all : yes it's possible, patience, kindness and love, it seemed it worked ! 
On the financial side, the biggest of their card, the economic reset one, it looks like they'll have hard to apply it, they need more time. Maybe a strong recession is coming but not the big reset they plan to, I think that Trump here plays a major role against this, he'll not allow it or will do all he can to prevent it.
Regarding BigPharma, this may by wishful thinking from me, but I would say that they already lost the battle, all their plans are collapsing, even if they still hit hard using their medias. On top of that, they risk a lot about their "reputation". I'm tempted to say that this could completely backfire them by doing the total inverse of what they planned : the majority of people will not want a vaccine after all the exposures they are showing us at this moment.
(At least, THIS IS THE FUTURE I WANT. If you also would like to see this, think the same, loudly, in your mind 
)
Thus, all will depend on how truth will spread around the globe, we can count on many new "soldiers of truth" who will be alimented by a kind of revenge and a lot frustration. For sure its not the good attitude, but it's not the point here, there will be many, all who lost their job, the ones who lost someone, the ones who lost their couple because his/her partner did not understand the whole picture and it resulted in a separation, or even simply the ones who became angry of having being fooled (some well written articles could play on this, just point the real guilty then let the things happen)
Creating our own reality, intentions :
I already mention this in a previous post in this thread, but this idea remains sticked to me. The answer, from Gandalf, was to look at the "
Prayer of the Soul" thread. But I would like to come back on this subject, to know if we could do something more "targeted" based on the intent.
I found the following among the sessions, searched on "creating reality" then on "intent" words, there are many results. The following session of 11/8/1996 is much explaining the subject (but remains complicate to understand) :
Q: (L) OK, we've been talking earlier this evening about intent, and of course, our own experiences with intent have really been pretty phenomenal. We've come to some kind of an idea that intent, when confirmed repeatedly, actually builds force. Is this a correct concept, and is there anything that you can add to it?
A: Only until anticipation muddies the picture... tricky one, huh?
Q: (L) Is anticipation the act of assuming you know how something is going to happen?
A: Follows realization, generally, and unfortunately for you, on 3rd density.
Q: (L) Is this a correct assessment of this process?
A: Both examples given are correct. You see, once anticipation enters the picture, the intent can no longer be STO.
Q: (L) Anticipation is desire for something for self. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) OK, so it's OK to intend something, or to think in an intentional way, or to hope in an intentional way, for something that is to serve another, but anticipation defines it as a more personal thing.
A: And that brings realization.
Q: (L) So, desire to serve others, and to do something because it will help others, brings realization...
A: But, realization creates anticipation.
Q: (L) Well, how do we navigate this? I mean, this is like walking on a razor's edge. To control your mind to not anticipate, and yet, deal with realization, and yet, still maintain hope... (J) They said it was tricky... (L) This is, this is, um...
A: Mental exercises of denial, balanced with pure faith of a non-prejudicial kind.
Q: (L) OK, so, in other words, to just accept what is at the moment, appreciate it as it is at the moment, and have faith that the universe and things will happen the way they are supposed to happen, without placing any expectation on how that will be?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) This is, and I'm not asking about Ark, this is something that he has talked about in terms of shaping the future. He talks about shaping the future as an intentional act of shaping something good, but without defining the moment of measurement. In other words, adding energy to it by intent, but not deciding where, when or how the moment of measurement occurs. When the quantum jump occurs, it occurs on it's own, and in it's own way. Is this the concept he's dealing with here?
A: Anticipation.
Q: (L) In other words, is what he's talking about anticipation?
A: No.
Q: (L) Well, what do you mean, anticipation in response to what I said?
A: That is the key to shaping the future... Avoiding it.
Q: (T) OK, because we’re not anticipating in what we're doing...
A: Yes.
Q: (T) What we're doing is not anticipatory, it's just happening. We were talking about it on the way up, that with interactions with others, we are facilitating, we are creating reality. This is what they all say about reality.
A: When it hits you, it stops.
Q: (L) When what hits you? (J) The realization. (T) The fact that it's happening.
A: Yes unless you cancel out all anticipation.
Q: (L) Well, this is very tricky. (J) Well, hang on a second, I have a kind of a corollary question. The way I perceive what has happened with us in the campaign against the microwave towers; the article in the Times, and the editorial, and speaking to the people... The way I view it is that when things like that happen, I look at them, and the synchronicities tell me that I am on the right path. Is that a true statement, that they are an indication that I'm going in the right direction?
A: Semi.
Q: (T) It's a road sign, an indicator. (J) OK, thank you! That's good, it's an indicator. (L) OK, shaping the future... (J) In what way is it not? The answer was semi; part of it is true...
A: We have told you.
Q: (L) Well then it seems to me, excuse me in this one, it seems to me that Ark may understand this one better than I do.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) That's all I wanted to know. (J) So, let him teach you! (T) He'll teach you what you need to learn from him, and you'll teach him what he needs to learn from you! And as a result, you'll both gain!
And another session of 9/12/17 :
Q: (Pierre) The beliefs. It reminds me of a question I wanted to ask for months. With Artemis and the guys here, we made this game here in the kitchen where we put our hands on someone's head. And then you concentrate and we were repeating something like 10 times or whatever. Then we put our fingers under the knees and armpits of the subject, and we lift them up. So maybe my first question is: Am I mistaken to think that in some cases, the gravity or the weight of the individual was really reduced?
A: Yes. Coral Castle.
Q: (Pierre) Yeah, exactly! So, through intention... Well, what I want to mention now: There were some cases where the consensus of the belief - maybe concerning the subject... It was with Atreides. He's heavier than the rest of us. He didn't seem to believe it. We did the same procedure, and it didn't work. He was the same weight, and we didn't manage to lift him. So if we didn't manage to lift him, is it because he didn't believe the experiment?
A: Active resistance.
Q: (Pierre) Okay, so he was not into it, or it was scary or whatever, he was not into this state of mind and we didn't manage to lift him.
(Andromeda) Sometimes there are people who don't necessarily believe it, but they're not actively disbelieving it.
(Pierre) Fighting against it.
(Andromeda) Right.
(Pierre) But in this case, he was opposing. We were not on the same wavelength.
(Mikey) Is that related to the Belief Center that the C's mentioned several times?
A: Yes
There are probably more but I suppose some here better know the subject.
Based on this, the intention, without becoming an STS wish and without also touching anyone's free will :
Is it possible to do something at our level, (from our confined homes actually)
regarding what is actually happening ?
Or we have enough with the prayer of the soul if we want to do something more on the "intention" (wish) side ?
I ask this remembering having read different experiments made in US with group of people meditating with a common wish to lower crime rate in the city (one link as example -
Scientific Research Shows Group Meditation Lowers Crime And Death In Surrounding Areas)
I was thinking like an intention, clearly written, to be shared and "thought" by anyone here who want to "add his weight" to it ? This could change, like weekly or monthly, or change it when it's needed. We could have something like "The intention of the month", which would not be like the prayer of the soul wich could be seen as a general intention, but one which would be more focussed on a topic/action/results ?
If this would be possible/feasible, i have 2 / 3 sub-questions :
- Would it need to be said/thought at the same time or not, meaning anyone can say/think the intention when he wants ?
- (sub question) doing it at the same time could eventually re-inforce it ? I mean, better effect if 5 people do it at the same time than each at any time ?
- Would it help to reinforce the FRV, and/or could it be considered as a kind of training ?
Last words about : I thought about this because I would like so much to see bigpharma collapsing, loosing all credibility, loosing the vaccine war, even loosing one other of their main business which is the cancer one, beaten by the simple little Vitamine C.
This would be my intend, i would like to see the Vitamine C being the world most known treatment to cure cancers in my/the future. Is it possible to believe in that, to formulate this wish in order to respect the rules described by the C's in the session of 1995 posted above ? Would it help to if the intention rules are respected, or would it be wishful thinking ?
I recently posted a good number of "like" but choosing the "Angry" (
) smiley (which is not smilying anymore btw), and it was mostly when I read about a sub-subject regarding BigPharma. Like Jesus did when he get angry, i'm a bit fed up about, sorry, ok, i should control my emotions, but can we do something concrete to retaliate, at least on another level than trying to counter their propaganda ? I would like give them back a "present" in return, in french, "
leur rendre la monnaie de leur pièce" ?
Sorry it took so long.
