Itchen Valley, Hampshire 06/18/1995
What did I say about the names in UK. Good morning class, I hope that you are all staying out of the way of the powers that be, at least for the time being. Have you met the new attendee’s here today, might be able to add some light on the subject, might see more in the world in one of my interpretations, you never know. So, thank you all for attending, and here we go …
This crop circles is one of the surrounding class and has an image of orbiting objects in the interior of it. It seems like there are three orbits with objects attached to each. The centre in the center is of a size that engulfs the first orbiting object at apogee in its orbit. The second looks to have a more geocentric orbit that puts it near a constant spacing from the centre at the center. The third orbit is showing a slight heliocentric path, not uncommon in any solar system for any of these orbits. The second orbit has a centre and an internal orbiting center, like a moon. This is the only un-commonality found here. This does look quite like a solar system at some point of time identified by the location of each orbiting body in this crop circle. I am planning on this having a planar or flat solar system. I am sure that these may have orbits like Pluto, titled to the planar structure of the solar system. I am not planning on this for another year or two of crop circles, I hope. This crop circle is encircled by twenty six centre’s on a halo that is two and one half times the diameter of the centre at the center. This gap is constant between this crop circle and the one that is its predecessor. We will have to keep an eye on this feature, see if it is replicating in some way. What is unique is that on this crop circle is the surrounding objects. On our last crop circle the objects were either on the line or towards the interior of the halo. On this one we have progressed to having objects on the interior and exterior of the halo. This includes one completely detached from it. I am drawn to this feature as if it is pointing out a reason for it being this way. I am just not picking it up, just yet. What else, oh yes, there are five larger centre’s on the halo that look to be centered on it, without deviations. I have looked at many images that were available for this crop circle and I only see two sizes of centre’s on the halo. A greater and a lesser, with the lesser in groups separated by the greater centre’s. There is a varied pattern in the numbers but they are ‘33447’. But this could also be 34473, 44733, 47334, 73344 or 74433, 44337, 43374, 33744, 37443 depending on the starting point and direction of reading, clockwise or counterclockwise. So, that was a lot of help (sarcasm from the inner self).
I keep coming back to the understanding of why the haloed centre’s and what is their connection to the orbiting objects shown in this crop circle. And does connection placement on or off the halo, centered on or off the halo represents something important and inside or outside placement identify something altogether different. Probably all the above and more, each with a different meaning. Just who are you out there, and can we tell by halo application, size and groupings? Just a lot more questions,
I am not getting any more on this crop circle, so off the model this one …
Alright I am finished here and I have identifying alternate concepts on this crop circle, especially in the halo areas. Each of the halo’s are depicted as a planar object, like a plate. The halo’s could be tilted to this plane which would create another level here. Then the centre’s on the outlying halo could also be placed on, above or below the main plane. I could really take some liberty with this but I will not because of the longer time to model such an item. And I would make many mistakes in the interpretation, not fully understanding the application. Other than that, I found a possible alignment in the blue centre’s. The orbiting blue centre almost aligns with two of the outer blue centre’s. To note; I could easily make a five-point star between these centre’s. This may be due to doing this overlay modeling method I use, it could easily create this kind of deviation. No alignment was intended, this is just an interesting result that was not previously noticed. So, it looks like I need to plot these five lines of the star shape and see if they point to something. (I have a slight doubt that any of these will point to something (unless I am very lucky). I have too many variables. To note: a 1° angle is about one inch in a foot deviation. If you extend this a mile you could be off a tenth of a mile. At 1000 miles you could be off 10 miles, and so on. I could be off of placement by a possible deviation of ±1 to 5°. At the maximum deviation of tolerance stated here, you could be off target by 50 miles in 5000 miles. And this is compounded by the number of objects that I am referring to. Not good by engineering standards, but enough of that.)
I will have to step away to do the plotting on this crop circle, be back shortly …
Back again, I got the results. Since I do not have a true clocking on this crop circle I have prepared two forms of opposing direction. The equipment lines in the field are the tracking, in the first sheet of the PDF document show it in one direction and the second is the opposing pointing. The images of this are spectacular, this crop circle turned out very well. Made a few images of the results, good from any view.
Let me draw your attention to the orbiting objects. There are three of them with one having an independent satellite. This is odd to me, let me explain. On a standard solar system, like ours, has numerous satellites (moons) orbiting planets. I like to think that we are a pretty normal solar system. But we have a majority of the planets having moons, with the exception of Mercury and Venus. We know from the C’s that Venus is an import to our solar system, this would explain its lack of them. Mercury is just too close to the sun, if it had one at one time it was probably consumed at some time by the sun, I can understand that. But this crop circle only shows one satellite, I think that this is for some other reason. So, why only 3 planets and one satellite? Maybe it is just a small solar system. Maybe it is only showing the important ones. I would go with the important ones, seems most logical. Important ones, like worlds that are to a certain degree of advancement? Don’t waste good field drawing the non-important ones, is that it. And if that is so then these are the developed worlds of a solar system. And one of them has a moon that is developed. That is more likely. Then if that is so, who are the ones that are outside on the halo. Are they transferring something? Are they others that are helping in some way, the worlds on the inner pattern? Or are they there causing ill to the worlds below? Maybe part of all of these. Then we could state that the haloed centers are representing them, good and bad? Maybe this is why the placements inside to outside the halo. Those outside of the halo are of a certain polarity and the ones on the inner side of the halo are the opposing. Those on the line are of equal proportions. Well, this is a out there theory, not a salable item, yet. We can take this into the following crop circles and see if this kind of a theory can hold water.
I counted way too many ‘if’ statements here and you are only allowed one. And I only have more questions here, and no method of solving. Just a lot of visualizations. Until next time, Haiku …