Did anyone else here stumble upon this?

[ziutek]

I used to follow the information on the Wingmakers website. There is a breathing exercise that is supposed to be the key to enlightenment. Inhale 4s, pause for 4s, exhale 4s, pause 4s and so 4 times then rest several seconds and again.
After doing several such exercises, I always had a piloerection effect (I didn't know the name before) accompanied by very pleasant (almost unbearable)chills all over my body.
There is also such an exercise of visualizing a sort of star around the body where each vertex of the star is named the six virtues.
One can send such a visualization to others for protective purposes. The very moment of sending protection was also accompanied by these feelings of piloerection.
I stopped practicing it because I realized that I didn't really know what I was doing and maybe it was better not to do it.
Interesting.

 

[Alejo]

I used to follow the information on the Wingmakers website. There is a breathing exercise that is supposed to be the key to enlightenment. Inhale 4s, pause for 4s, exhale 4s, pause 4s and so 4 times then rest several seconds and again.
After doing several such exercises, I always had a piloerection effect (I didn't know the name before) accompanied by very pleasant (almost unbearable)chills all over my body.
There is also such an exercise of visualizing a sort of star around the body where each vertex of the star is named the six virtues.
One can send such a visualization to others for protective purposes. The very moment of sending protection was also accompanied by these feelings of piloerection.
I stopped practicing it because I realized that I didn't really know what I was doing and maybe it was better not to do it.
Interesting.

Hi, have you heard of Éiriú Eolas?

I have realized the power of breathing, and intent. But I have also come to realize that breathing alone doesn't really bring one to enlightenment, there's quite a bit of conscious effort required to set oneself on that path.

 

[Alejo]

From what we know about implants and 4D STS monitoring of people, it’s likely that all of us already have such types of tracking and beaming implants in our bodies, either from hyperdimensional or secret government consortium sources. That being said, that doesn’t mean the actual mechanisms are as she describes them. And the C’d have said the jabs are in essence an Operating System for direct beaming applications, which is in line with the capabilities this woman insinuates these technologies have.

Right, which is why I won't discount what she says, but I recall the C's talking about 4D being able to read someone's aura through the aura interacting with someone else. So, the purposes of the tech she's proposing, have been part of their arsenal for a very very long time, so this would seem overkill, or perhaps what it accomplishes is that it grounds certain abilities from 4D in material 3D reality, much like what they're trying to do with the UFO, dismissing the entire hyperdimensional aspect of it and replacing it with simple technological advancement, keep it al material.

 

[Debra]

I’ve been watching Sabrina Wallace videos off and on, for the last few weeks. Her research into the “why” the human electro/magnetic/bio fields are being “harvested/targeted” and what they are possibly being used for, is becoming a lot more coherent, in my opinion.​

Check out this info, it’s in “meme” form, but the figures have been mentioned in other articles I’ve come across, for what it’s worth.​

Now, if you read this “opinion” piece about Sabrina’s “theories” it starts making a bit more sense.​

Sabrina Wallace's Controversial Claims | Frequency Control & Human Exploitation​

By
Emilie Jensen
Jul 21, 2025, 11:55 PM
Edited By
Tariq Jafari

A wave of debate surrounds Sabrina Wallace, a whistleblower with alleged ties to military-black-projects. She claims that her background includes covert research related to brain-machine interfaces. Her arguments about technology's darker side have ignited strong responses across communities.

Who is Sabrina Wallace?​

Wallace identifies as a family insider connected to DARPA. She asserts that her parents played roles in classified programs, impacting her life and leading her into controversial research.

Core Claims from Wallace​

Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs)​

• Biofield as Nodes: Wallace believes human bodies create a biofield, acting as a part of an electromagnetic network, powered by 6G technology.
• Weaponization Warning: She warns that these systems can be misused for tracking and targeting via DNA frequencies.

Transhumanist Surveillance & Control​

• Global Networks Control: Allegedly, systems governed by organizations like IEEE and DoD use nanotech and sensors to exert control over individuals.
• Emerging Threats: Claims of "electromagnetic drone warfare" and techniques such as "plasma charges" are cited as potential hazards.

Mixed Reactions from People​

Supporters & Critics​

Wallace's supporters label her a brave truth-teller, despite her trauma. One user commented, "Sabrina, although a trauma victim, remains a truth teller."

NotEveryone is convinced. Some critiques highlight her points as unproven and overly speculative. A commenter remarked,

"Sabrina doesn’t explain anything fanciful ideas that aren’t rooted in any kind of reality."

Authenticity Concerns: Questions emerge about whether her claims symbolize controlled opposition, given her purported connections to Department of Defense personnel.

Independent Corroboration?​

While technologies like WBANs and 6G are acknowledged areas of research, Wallace's more extravagant claims, such as DNA-targeted drones, lack substantive support from scientific or classified sources.

Addressing Popular Sentiments​

• AI and Human Replacement: People express a growing concern about AI's influence, with many fearing for their livelihoods as automation advances. A frequent sentiment reads, "AI is coming for everything."
• Control Mechanisms: Some argue there is more subtlety in control, noting, "They don’t control you; they nudge you."
• Global Phenomenon: Observers worldwide feel the impact of these technologies, questioning their origins and implications for society, as one comment sarcastically put it, "The controlling frequencies can come with me."

Key Insights​

Wallace's claims tackle real tech like 6G and body-area networks.

Her most alarming allegations remain unverified.

"They nudge you" - a user sharing their perspective.

The debate sparked by Wallace's claims continues to rattle both supporters and skeptics, leading to urgent discussions about privacy, technology, and autonomy in the digital age.

Predictions on the Horizon​

As debates simmer around Sabrina Wallace's claims, there's a strong chance that tech companies and governmental organizations will ramp up transparency efforts, aiming to clarify their use of emerging technologies like 6G and wireless body networks. Experts estimate around a 70% likelihood that we'll see new regulations or guidelines focusing on ethical technology deployment in the next couple of years. With the public increasingly vocal about privacy concerns, organizations may face pressure to disclose how they utilize personal data and emerging technologies. Consequently, more discussions and partnerships may form between tech firms and privacy advocates to establish a balance between innovation and individual rights.

Echoes from History​

A fascinating parallel can be drawn to the rise of electricity in the late 19th century. Just as Wallace highlights concerns over new technologies, early critics warned about the dangers of electric power, fearing everything from health impacts to societal control. In that era, many saw the advent of electricity as a tool for both enlightenment and oppression, with skeptics questioning how it would shape human lives. As it turned out, those fears evolved into a complex relationship with electricity, where both advancements and unintended consequences played out through subsequent decades. Today, the discourse around tech control could follow a similar path; people might find themselves grappling with the dual nature of these technologies, balancing innovation against potential overreach.