davey72 said:You may want to look at this thread
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/board,39.0.html
Davey, looks like you messed up the link to the thread you wanted to share. The above link leads to the Newbies board, not to a specific thread.
davey72 said:You may want to look at this thread
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/board,39.0.html
obyvatel said:DoomAndGloomIsALie said:Dear Menna,
I figured if there was one member who would have a problem with my post it would be you, and it appears I was correct. I'm telling you this right here and now. YOU ARE STS, NOT STO. Unable to handle any sort of criticism because you have a tiny little insecure heart that can't stand "outsiders" undermine your spiritual name that you have garnered for yourself here. Too much light (=knowledge/wisdom), too little love. The Law of One considers STS the light/love path whereas STO is the love/light path. Highly self-focused you are. All the knowledge in the world won't change that. I advise you to consider that you were wrong about your polarity, and the sooner you realize this, the faster you can transcend the ladder of STS. This is not a damnation, as one can always shift polarity. Instead it is intended as an enlightenment for yourself.
You are out of line with this post. You are acting like a jerk and that is not tolerated here.
Yeah, he's baiting us. I wouldn't waste your energy.Data said:Captainmurphy said:IMO doom and gloom probably won't be back.
I'm not so sure. DoomAndGloomIsALie probably is enjoying himself blue by posting what he has posted. I think he will be back!
This program your running has been called 'the right man' ( I wish I could remember by whom).
"Van Vogt points out that the Right Man is an 'idealist' -- that is, he lives in his own mental world and does his best to ignore aspects of reality that conflict with it.
That such practice EE, go for a walk to the forest, swim in the sea, something that makes you leave your emotional hijacking, which allows for more clear thoughts.DoomAndGloomIsALie said:Now, I sometimes check in to read some topics out of nothing but sheer innocent interest yet I can't help but out my feelings on how some members seem to be operating on some kind of spiritual ego where they attribute STS behaviour on all kinds of things which are in reality NOT NECESSARILY STS at all.
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:Yet y'all seem to agree that this or that is manipulative (aka STS) and if some (mostly newer) member disagrees then you even go a step further and label this person as STS.
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:If anything, since none of you have ever set foot into STO 4D reality, none of you in fact can know for certain ("Understanding is not of 3rd density" is my favorite teaching of the Law of One), therefore saying such things as if you are some kind of authority on the matter (no, the universe does not care if you have read the entire C material or not) does in fact seem a little bit manipulative don't you think? Who are you to decide what is STO and what is STS? WHO ARE YOU??
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:Hence, I offer you a choice, take my message at heart and think about it with an air of acceptance
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:or judge it and ignore it and keep doing whatever it is you are doing.
DoomAndGloomIsALie said:Now, I sometimes check in to read some topics out of nothing but sheer innocent interest yet I can't help but out my feelings on how some members seem to be operating on some kind of spiritual ego where they attribute STS behaviour on all kinds of things which are in reality NOT NECESSARILY STS at all.
Soluna said:After reading this thread a few thoughts came to mind which I'd like to share, and perhaps get some feedback on to see if perhaps I am on the right track, despite perhaps the points being slightly tangential to the topic (although I do feel they may be somewhat pertinent).
I feel the majority of the forum and communities aspire to be of a more STO alignment, however as we currently are NOT STO, our aspirations are perhaps tainted and misguided in the sense that we may take the highlighting of our STS natures to heart in a negative way - and acting emotionally would respond on a negative manner to the original post.
The main theme of my thoughts - were that it is NOT WRONG to be STS, although those of us who perhaps strive to be more STO naturally find the opposite STS nature abhorrent and 'evil'. There NEEDS to be STS, just as much as there needs to be STO - the C's have said that there is no right or wrong, and that there is always balance. Just as in our current density, there must be birth and death. I think the concept that STS is not 'bad' is a very difficult thing to grasp.
SAO said:He's accusing the forum of what he himself is doing in his post. He says don't label or judge and that's all he did. He says take heed of what others say and he did none of that. Funny how that works.