Indeed. Can’t remember the last time i was so immersed in a movie.It was impressive to see those worm scenes and feel the whole cinema shake, I loved it.
Even started thinking about a trip to Jordan.
Indeed. Can’t remember the last time i was so immersed in a movie.It was impressive to see those worm scenes and feel the whole cinema shake, I loved it.
I've only watched the 1st movie so far, but what you said was my issue. I've read the three first book in the Dune series and Dune (the 1st book is my fave novel of all time) but if I didn't have a good grasp of the story already, I would've been completely lost and I wouldn't have understood the plot. Also, I wasn't happy that the philosophical aspect and politics seems to be a bit lost. However, I thought that the acting and cinematography was excellent, though I'm not sure I was too fond of Zendaya as Chani (she's a bit one note imo).Bit late on this one but just watched both movies after finally reading the book. I enjoyed them as action movies, but if I hadn't just read the book I would've had absolutely no idea what was happening. Perhaps having just read the book has made me too harshly critical also, but there was just too much missing IMO.
There is no Hawatt, the plots and intrigue are largely missing, the visions are not elaborated on. Understanding of the planet such as the water, the Makers and the vision of Liet-Kynes is not really fleshed out (seems like a missed opportunity to throw in some climate change/environmentalist propaganda). Little of what is going on in Paul's spice-enhanced, prescient mind is shown properly. Why does he have to go Jihad again? Motivations of many characters are not clear. Little is explained of the spice or the connection with the guild and space travel. The antagonists are made to seem too foolish, like cartoon villains, and lack the cunning they possessed in the book.
The second movie in particular just seems like an action movie, one that spends so much time bashing religion and fluffing up Paul's relationship with Cheni that there was just too little time left for the plot to really make sense.
All in all they're fun if you've read the books, but if not then I wouldn't bother.
Yes, it feels unbalanced. For me, the focus on the 'tragic love story' (and some one-note acting) sits uncomfortably in such an overwhelmingly epic context. Shame, as there is so much else I love about the movie.I saw the film this weekend. I thought it was the best adaptation of the Dune saga to be put to film. The soundtrack was glorious! The Harkonnen home world was what I think a world populated by psychopaths would look like. There was something about the ending I didn't like. I don't know what it was and I can't put my finger on it. As others have said, it deviated a bit from the original story but hopefully there will be a third installment and more of this calibre of film in the future.
Yeah this is the problem. It's a failed film, perhaps on purpose as politically, the Fremen represent the Arabs.From everything I've read about the second movie, it seems to be a good movie, but it doesn't seem to capture the essence of what Dune was about.
The wonderfully rich world of Frank Herbert's "Dune" has enjoyed a renaissance of sorts in the past few years.
There's Denis Villeneuve's big-screen saga, "Dune: Part One" and "Dune: Part Two," for starters and Boom! Studios' "Dune" comic book titles adapted from Brian Herbert and Kevin J. Anderson's "Dune" prequel and sequel novels. There's even an upcoming "Dune: Awakening" open world survival video game.
Adding to the resurgence are the gorgeous hardback "Dune: The Graphic Novel" releases from Abrams ComicArts, accented with the fine work of artists Raúl Allén and Patricia Martín. These deluxe presentations were released as "Book 1" in 2020 and "Book 2: Muad'Dib" in 2022. Now the third and final chapter of this lavishly illustrated translation, "Dune: The Graphic Novel, Book 3: The Prophet" is ready to flow this summer like the consciousness-enhancing spice of Arrakis.
The first installment was fairly close to the first novel, some items were left out, but it was still very well done. Casting was excellent, and I was especially impressed with the portrayal of the ornithopters!I finally got around to seeing parts 1 and 2 these last 2 nights. I admit I haven't read Herbert's novels, but overall I found the films very enjoyable.
Not sure if this is a satisfactory explanation but I've heard it said spice is meant to be a metaphor for oil.What's with the whole obsession in the story's world with spice? I would have liked a little exposition on that subject, it's just left to your imagination if you're not familiar with the books. A psychoactive substance seemed to be the only explanation in the films.