Economic collapse: Pay off Credit cards or no?

In the end I think what matters is what will happen or how the collapse will arise. I don't think that there is a general rule for everything. If the system breaks down due to say an EMP pulse that would fry all electronics - all debt would instantly "evaporate" as all records would be permanently lost (as they are mainly in electronic form today - banks hardly keep paper records anymore).

If however the collapse comes in the form of political upheaval, then debt would most probably serve as an excuse to expropriate you of all that you own in tangible assets.

So my take on that is that it's hard to predict, so maybe the "not putting your eggs in one basket" approach is best. Continue to pay off your credit card, but also stock up on valuable and useful stuff that you could need in case of collapse.
 
I have been worrying about this question as well. I have almost $10k in credit card debt that I have been struggling with for years. I have managed to pay it down slowly. I can't see the PTB coming after small fry like me for that amount of debt, especially CC debt. Heck, the US is how many trillions in debt and they are going to come after me for 10k?

I recently took a disbursement on a small pension, so I have enough cash to pay all my debt tomorrow if I wanted to. But I am buying stuff I think I will need to survive a catastrophic collapse instead. I may pay a portion of my debt, but I just don't think it would be wise to pay the debt off under the current circumstances. Credit card debt is usury, and just one more part of a corrupt system that just needs to go away.

This site has been mentioned on the Cass forum before I believe : getoutofdebtfree.org

It is a site that guides people through communicating with lenders of all types, with the goal of eliminating or drastically reducing debt. There's a forum as well, I signed up not long ago. There are some form letters that have worked for people that can be purchased for a small fee. I haven't got that far yet but I would be more inclined to fight for elimination or reduction of my debt rather than pay off the total amount.

I just can't see them only going after people in debt. They will be coming for everyone, crushing souls, or trying to - my 2 cents.
 
When i self-exiled from Canada in 2010, I decided to call the system's bluff and disconnect from my (humble) debt, thinking about the illegitimacy of it all, in front of banks printing trillions for themselves.

All in all, about 3-4k of credit card debt (linked to my bank account) and about 6-7k in student debt (held by government, with same bank). I withdrew all cash from my account (and quickly went broke, that's a different story) and withheld from any communication with authorities.

My relatives received harassing phone calls from legally powerless debt collectors for nearly two years. This is the only consequence of my behaviour that I feel sorry about, as it should not have been their burden to bear such harassment. By that point, I logged back into my bank account online to find out the credit card had been deactivated AND removed from my account, with all related negative balance disappeared.

Another 2 years later (2014) I came back to accompany my grandfather in his transition, and subsequently decided to stay and see what kind of Work had been prepared for me here. When I decided to put my papers in order, I called the bank and realized my account had been removed. Not deactivated, mind you, but deleted, along with all records - they could neither find my folio number nor my name.

I thank the DCM for that blessing. It's purely material but definitely removed a burden from my shoulders and allowed me to open up to the tasks at hand, free from worries. Would I do it again, even if the debt didn't get wiped away? Hell yes, as stacking more debt unbalanced by actual assets is yst another straw on the camel's back, hopefully contributing just a tiny little bit to the inevitable collapse of the current economic paradigm.
 
I think there were precedents when the debt was transferred to a new currency at a much worse rate than savings. So there is definitely the possibility that the government would make it harder for debtors to take advantage of a currency collapse.
 
United Gnosis said:
When i self-exiled from Canada in 2010, I decided to call the system's bluff and disconnect from my (humble) debt, thinking about the illegitimacy of it all, in front of banks printing trillions for themselves.

All in all, about 3-4k of credit card debt (linked to my bank account) and about 6-7k in student debt (held by government, with same bank). I withdrew all cash from my account (and quickly went broke, that's a different story) and withheld from any communication with authorities.

My relatives received harassing phone calls from legally powerless debt collectors for nearly two years. This is the only consequence of my behaviour that I feel sorry about, as it should not have been their burden to bear such harassment. By that point, I logged back into my bank account online to find out the credit card had been deactivated AND removed from my account, with all related negative balance disappeared.

Another 2 years later (2014) I came back to accompany my grandfather in his transition, and subsequently decided to stay and see what kind of Work had been prepared for me here. When I decided to put my papers in order, I called the bank and realized my account had been removed. Not deactivated, mind you, but deleted, along with all records - they could neither find my folio number nor my name.

I thank the DCM for that blessing. It's purely material but definitely removed a burden from my shoulders and allowed me to open up to the tasks at hand, free from worries. Would I do it again, even if the debt didn't get wiped away? Hell yes, as stacking more debt unbalanced by actual assets is yst another straw on the camel's back, hopefully contributing just a tiny little bit to the inevitable collapse of the current economic paradigm.


Ah. The duck and cover method of debt management.

So long as you're a small fish, I think that could work. -Where the cost of the worker/researcher hours required to go after you weighed against the potential net reward of successfully collecting determines whether or not your file lands on somebody's desk and how much attention it is given when it does. Factors like how much material possession you have which could be seized and auctioned off, (car, house, business), are probably figured into their blood-calculus.

The way debt collection works, (I researched this a few years back when I was barely-making-rent-broke and had a variety of collectors after me, including government, banking and private), is that your debt is sold by the people you initially owe, to a collection agency. The collection agency pays something like 70 cents on the dollar. So the initial creditor takes a hit, but gets paid, and then it's up to the collection agency to get the full amount from the target person in order to finance their own operations. The level of harassment allowable under law is determined by whatever region you live in.

During this cruddy period, I happened to have an outstanding shipping bill. -I'd paid the actual quoted shipping portion; this was a second bill from their customs department, so basically a tax, -one of the more opaque, unevenly enforced, and often seemingly arbitrary taxes, -and one with no realistic system of recourse available if you want to contest it. -Normally I'd just pay those bills and shake my head, but for whatever reason this time I was feeling angry and jilted with the details of the transaction and dug my heels in. It was only worth one or two hundred dollars, but I was totally unmotivated to pay up and equally unmotivated to waste any time and adrenaline arguing with anybody about it. So I simply ignored their threatening form letters until it went to a collection agency. Then I ignored the collection agency's letters.

-Interestingly, the shipping company considered this to be the end of the matter; they'd sold the debt to a third party and continued to do business with me as before. That surprised me, but I suppose in a world where debt is a commodity, it makes (a kind of) sense.

Anyway, the collection agency (I assume it was them) (EDIT*** Yes, it was; I did a call trace one time.) -anyway, they called every day for about a year. When I'd pick up the phone, an automated message instructed me to stay on the line and wait for an operator. -It didn't even identify itself, just cold instructions. I felt this to be an amazingly a rude way to begin a conversation, so I'd simply hang up. I figured, "If a human takes the time to call me and is polite, I'll talk with them and maybe we can finally have that argument and work something out. But no way am I going to obey a frickin' machine."

Well, an actual person never called once the whole time, and I eventually got used to simply ignoring the phone when it rang. Most of my communications are via email these days, and I talk face to face with friends; I'd sometimes just leave the phone unplugged for days at a time and only plug it in when I wanted to have a chat with somebody far away. For a while it was aggravating and a bit scary to know that there were vultures circling, (half-hearted and automated as they may be), but eventually it just became background static. Then after a year or so, I noticed that they had stopped calling. The end.

I don't know what the policy would be if it were a higher amount of money at stake, or if there's a collection record out there ready to be re-activated at a moment's notice, but that's how that experience went.
 
Years ago I helped some friends get out of crushing CC debt by getting my own bank to negotiate the balances of all their CC accounts, and pay off those debts in the form of another loan that I co-signed. I also went to a branch of their own bank and arranged a cash loan (at low interest) for them by securing it with a CD (I bought) at this bank. They eventually paid off these loans and joined the ranks of the savers - and still are savers AFAIK.

So, another possibility is to get friends/family to do something similar so that those horrendous interest rates are eliminated in favor of much more rapid payment of principal.
 
In terms of debt and what to do, I think it really depends on how things play out. If there is an economic crash and the system holds together for some time (let’s say a few years before the cosmic reaction from universe leading to full breakdown), then debt may be a pretty big burden on a person. Having debt may restrict travel and individuals may even be imprisoned over debt. Recent stories have surfaced talking about the trend of the rise of debt prisons once again in the US and if the system holds together I think the trend will only continue and intensify. https://news.vice.com/article/debtors-prisons-are-taking-the-us-back-to-the-19th-century

With this in mind I’m of the opinion that a person should work on eliminating debt as fast as possible, yet a more balanced approach in case the system breaks down fully and debt doesn’t really matter might be to take half of the money available and pay debt and with the other use for prepping and necessities.
 
Related to this, when somebody (in the US) has an IRA (aka retirement savings plan), one can withdraw the money for no more than 60 days without penalty and the penalty being that the money becomes income and therefor taxable.

I was thinking that for my wife's IRA, we could pull the money out and buy some precious metals which then need to be sold before that 60 days is over and hopefully we make a profit and replenish the account.
Unfortunately, cashing out altogether is probably not going to fly with her.
Any thoughts?

Dominique
 
domi said:
Related to this, when somebody (in the US) has an IRA (aka retirement savings plan), one can withdraw the money for no more than 60 days without penalty and the penalty being that the money becomes income and therefor taxable.

I was thinking that for my wife's IRA, we could pull the money out and buy some precious metals which then need to be sold before that 60 days is over and hopefully we make a profit and replenish the account.
Unfortunately, cashing out altogether is probably not going to fly with her.
Any thoughts?

Dominique

Hi Dominique,
Cashing out and paying the penalty seems to be the best option according to many alternative financial writers, since if things turn south the government will in all likelihood will force IRAs funds into bonds, if not try to take the funds outright. That is the contention of Jim Sinclair http://www.jsmineset.com/ who recommends getting out the system as much as possible and putting as many barriers between your money and the government as possible. Maybe try to collect information and present it to your wife to see if she might change her mind.

In terms of the 60 days idea, it could be a little risky. Although PMs seem to have been posed for a big jump for about a year, prices keep getting driven down by the paper markets. Even if it seems unlikely, you never know if paper prices are going to get pushed down further before a big rise and with the limit of the 60 days you might take a loss. If you were able to buy and hold, then I'd say now is a good time to put money in PMs.
 
I think a lot of it depends on what kind of reset we're talking about. Are the PTB going to be able to stage manage a controlled burn or are they going to lose their grip and the whole thing degenerates into uncontrolled chaos? I always thought it would be a controlled demolition and they would replace it with the verichip hand scanner system that was alluded to in the early sessions. If that's the case, they'll be able to make the value of PMs whatever they want and everyone will be herded to a much finer order of control. The only hard asset that might function as some store of value is land and maybe some commodities, but that would be a crapshoot. Maybe they would want to keep gold high as some kind of failsafe, but I don't see why they would need to. It would just be a more refined version of the system we have now.

It depends on what exactly is meant by "No Money." To me no money means no money. No dollars, euros, yuan, or rubles. No derivatives, bonds, ETFs, or SDRs. No cashless society credits either. The financial system disappears. All you're left with is barter, and that includes gold. The Cassiopaeans said that acquiring gold and silver were only "partly" useful and "needful things" were "mostly" useful. It sounded to me like all of the institutions would collapse and people would be wandering around in the streets all glazed over in the eyes, and then come to the realization, "Hey, we still need to do stuff." So it seems like in that situation, you have a future where people are primarily concerned with survival and the acquisition and transport of needful things. Gold would not function as any sort of monetary unit, but a trade good of convenience because of its concentrated value, which would vary tremendously from place to place.

We were told that soon there will be no money, but "Ownership will survive awhile longer." It is a little bit hard for me to imagine a society without money but with ownership. I see them as kind of one and the same. The only way I can see it is communities trying to protect their compounds that they worked so hard to build and patrolling the borders, creating a sort of ownership in a certain region. Then it is implied that even that will pass eventually.

I've read a lot of the FOFOA stuff which seems to have a bit of a following in alternative financial circles, and his opinion is that gold gets revalued to the equivalent of $50,000 an ounce and is used as a store of value to back future currencies. Apparently world bankers have been preparing for this for a long time, and there will be a sudden, but somewhat orderly collapse while everything gets reshuffled and then things will more or less carry on normally after revaluation and balance of trade is figured out. While that may have been the original plan in conjunction with biometric IDs, I don't think it's going according to plan, and I don't think it really agrees with the future that the Cassiopaeans have laid out.

Like many of you, I have quite a bit of debt, and have been using the past two years to acquire useful things without adding any new debts. My view is that when SHTF, survival will come first and contractual obligations can be dealt with later. I have been trying to hedge my bets between these different scenarios and I'm hoping that PMs can be recycled into hyperinflated currency to pay devalued debts if the debt slave traders come knocking. But this brings us back to "no money." No money could really mean no money period, it could mean cashless society, it could mean no money for awhile, but then some sort of financial system gets reconstructed. I'm sure the PTB will try to reconstruct it, and it may work to a degree in certain cosmopolitan urban centers, but it will be so hard for them to tame the monster that they've created, by the time they start to reconsolidate the comets will come and then even gold flies out the window. That's my interpretation of the latest sessions.

In short, ideally debts should be paid off, but that's not going to happen for most people, and holding a couple ounces of gold may buy some time or give you some room to maneuver with the bill collectors.
 
Neil said:
In short, ideally debts should be paid off, but that's not going to happen for most people, and holding a couple ounces of gold may buy some time or give you some room to maneuver with the bill collectors.
I think the idea with gold is that the long term trend is that it holds its value over time. This makes it a safe way of maintaining value versus holding a currency that could become devalued through hyperinflation. When a more stable currency returns, the gold that has been held can then be exchanged for that currency.

Although there are swings in value in the short term that could be highly profitable if someone knew just when to buy and when to sell, picking those exact moments would be practically impossible (unless you are someone with insider information about a rigged market), and hence I don't think buying gold should be seen as an easy way to make a fast profit. If you look at the graphs of the price of gold on www.goldprice.org, anyone who bought gold from January 2013 to the present has probably not made any money on it. When you buy from a gold dealer, they sell a little above the "spot price", and when you sell gold back to them, they pay a little below the "spot price", which is how the dealer makes their money. But this also makes it less feasible to make a short term profit buying and selling gold.

So for example if you have a credit card debt that you envisage having to pay back, I don't think it would be a good idea to buy gold before paying back the credit card debt. While gold may increase in value, the long term trend is not likely to go up at a higher rate than credit card interest rates of 20%. (There could be a short term swing that takes it up even 100% within a couple of years, but that brings up the risk factor of having to pick just when to buy and sell.)

Also I don't think gold should be seen as being a way to deal with bill collectors during a period of economic turmoil. The situation where you owe say $1000 and have a bill collector at your door, and no other way of paying but gold, seems like one where you would get the worst possible exchange rate, e.g. "Hey you owe me $1000. You don't have any money? But you've got an ounce of gold worth $1800? [NB: not current price] OK I'll take that. Have a nice day!"
 
Gold might be useful during a period of time right after a major drop in the value of the dollar. It might be a very narrow window of opportunity, but if gold could be sold right after an initial huge drop in dollar value, and then used to pay off any debt, well, that would be something of a coup.

The PTB have most probably already taken steps to eliminate that future opportunity however.

All money worthless - no money... I can see that. When one party owns everything and the other party owns nothing, why would a system of exchange even be needed. Cow and chickens don't have money.
 
Everyone should think about investing in Insurance products such as Annuities with a guaranteed fixed rate of return. You can transfer qualified non taxed money to an annuity without being taxed because you are going from one qualified plan to another. You can also invest non qualified - after taxed money to annuities as well. Other investments IRA's 401k Stocks and so forth are variable and follow the market there is no safety however annuities have guarantees 6-8% with step up features and pay out percentages and guaranteed income for life. Some also have a return of principle feature that can be given to a designated beneficiary.

Remember if you sell precious metals come tax season you have to declare what you sell and buy. Annuities serve as protection for your money and grow tax deferred.

There is also fixed growth/guarantee percentage of annual Tax Free return in a Variable/Index universal life insurance policy. After 7 yrs you have access to your principal plus the separate account fixed rate tax free grown and there is a death benefit as well that helps protect your families future.

The only other thing that grows tax free are municipal bonds bought in the state you live in. Free from federal tax and state tax however if the economy does collapse these bonds will default.

The insurance industry have more money than the banking industry.

Investing in Commodities such as gold, silver, oil is not the best idea still subject to market risk central banks entities that are responsible for the financial stability of a nation it buys and sells gold and also holds it.

This information is from knowledge obtained from schools here in US and federal/state exams and from the US financial company I am with if you don't reside in the US I suggest you do further research or ask me a question as I am licensed in the US and have other resources that have foreign financial information

The FDIC insures up to $250,000 per account. If you have more than that in a bank account you can lose that money
 
I feel that the trick here is to use the situation to your advantage.

Personally, when i get paid, I take all the money out and keep it at home and wait until the last day possible before making any credit card payments.
Rather than using the cash to buy anything, I pay for most things on the credit card and then pay that off at the end of the month by using the said cash, thereby not incurring any interest. That way, there's at least some cash available if/when the financial situation becomes dire.
The whole money situation is a huge trigger, that can cause a lot of stress in one's life. However, remember what we know... the financial system is a top down criminal enterprise and "we" are certainly not the criminals here. It is one of the most important tools available to "them", purely because of the control it brings, emotionally and physically.
If you can remove the trigger, then it's all about juggling the numbers. Just picture yourself as a clown at the circus.
Making light of this topic may raise an eyebrow, but being emotionally invested in it will not allow you to think clearly.

If you are simply unable to pay your credit card, deal with the issue by making the credit company aware of your situation as soon as possible, hiding and hoping it will go away will break you down slowly but surely, every letter, every time the phone rings, an unexpected knock at the door... it will drain you!

if you are struggling though, do keep on top of things, by keeping them informed. It's awkward to take legal action against someone who is making an effort to reduce the debt. If it does end up in court, 9 times out of 10, you'll be able to make an arrangement to pay a nominal amount. They'll want evidence of all your outgoings though... (The court system here in the UK is in a terrible state that can barely handle the workload they have now. Pretty much every court is under staffed).

In conversation with others, it's been noticed how easy it is to fall into the mindset of "I've got no money" and projecting that far off into the future, as if you will never have any ever again. Circumstances do change though and I get the impression that such a way of thinking can cause a block, particularly on an emotional level, that manifests itself in sickness.
 
Menna said:
The FDIC insures up to $250,000 per account. If you have more than that in a bank account you can lose that money

The FDIC actually has very little money as compared to the amount of money that it ensures. If/when banks start going bust the FDIC won't have nearly enough money to insure depositors. Only a huge bailout of depositors by the gov't would save them, which I doubt will happen. What is most likely is the gov't will Bail-in the banks where depositor money is taken and depositors are give worthless shares in the bank. At least that is what seems to be the plan a la what happened in Cyprus and has been written in policy by the western countries.

What you have written about annuities might be true in a stable, non-pathological system, yet that is not what we have. Personally, like I wrote in a previous post I recommend not having your money where the gov't can easily have access to it and snatch it. That would be property, PMs, or something like supplies.
 
Back
Top Bottom