Events in Russia

Russian MPs to back groundbreaking smoking ban – speaker

Unfortunately, Russia is in some ways even ahead of the West in going in the wrong direction domestically.

This legislation would ban them from smoking forever, even when they grow up. Though of course they will be able to get tobacco "illegally" anyway - since it is not banned for those born before 2009.

Whether children should get nicotine as protection against the nano-contamination of food, water and many other things is a good question though. How much is the "not wanting your kids to smoke" an internal program and how much is it justified?

That's how I understand that proposed law in Russia as well: People born after 2009 will never be legally able to buy tobacco, to vape or use hookahs. Which would mean effectively that slowly but surely, in the next decades, pretty much a total ban of tobacco for ALL people in Russia would be created.

I do think that is largely because Putin believes most of the propaganda about tobacco and smoking:

Yeah, in terms of measures against smoking, Russia seems more extreme then many countries in the west. I think that might largely be based on Putins and/or his team actually believing the lies about it. I’m pretty sure that this is a blindspot of Putin. Putin believes it is bad for health and society and therefore he is taking measures against it. Sort of doing the wrong thing with good intentions in mind.
 
All about Russian pork. Meat consumption in Russia is up, in particular pork consumption. Russia became self-sufficient in pork in 2018, and is effectively competing with Western pork exports to the East.


Russia has taken the fourth place among the world’s largest meat producers. Experts call it the livestock miracle of Russia. After all, Russia has come a long way from an overwhelming dependence on American meat to reach complete self-sufficiency in poultry meat plus pork. How has Russia raised animal husbandry from its knees in 20 years, who helped the country in this, and why are there not comparably impressive successes in beef so far?

Russia has managed to achieve the fourth place among the world’s largest meat producers. This was recently stated by Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin at a meeting with Chairman of the Board of the Russian Agricultural Bank Boris Listov.

According to the National Meat Association, imports of meat and meat products from 2003 to 2023 decreased from 2.67 million tonnes to 0.64 million tonnes.

Particularly impressive results in import substitution have been achieved for poultry and pork meat. Meat imports in the early 2000s reached 1.2 million tonnes, but in 2023 only 0.23 million tonnes were imported.

“Imports of pork and pork offal, including lard, over the years has reached from 600,000 tonnes to 1.250 million tonnes at its peak in 2010. This year, pork imports will be only 3,000 tonnes, and exports will be about 300,000 tonnes. Beef imports have also decreased significantly, though not because of our successes, but because of changes in the structure of domestic consumption: other types of meat have become much cheaper than beef, and people have begun to eat less beef. Imports in 2003 reached 700,000 tonnes, and in 2023 decreased to 231,000 tonnes, and this year we will supply about 40,000 tonnes of beef for export to other countries,” says Sergei Yushin, Head of the Executive Committee of the National Meat Association.

How did Russia manage to achieve such incredible success in animal husbandry for poultry and pork?

Yushin, chief executive of the National Meat Association, recalls that from the 1990s into the early 2000s, the situation was difficult: 70% of consumption was provided by imported broiler meat – the famous ‘Bush legs’. There was an excess of legs in the USA, as they prefer other parts of the chicken there.
“The first investments went specifically into broiler production, because it is the most affordable and acceptable meat for Russians; there are no religious restrictions on its use; a low payback period due to the rapid production of a piece of meat from chicken, unlike pig farming where the terms of investment return are several times longer, not to mention beef cattle where capital costs are also much higher,” says Yushin.

Interestingly, the first major investors in Russian poultry farming were American funds, which began to actively come to Russia after 1998.

An important milestone in the development of animal husbandry was the arrival of Alexei Gordeyev to the Ministry of Agriculture in the early 2000s. “Gordeyev drew attention to the fact that import dependence is dangerous, and if a man-made disaster occurs, or animal disease, then there will be nothing to eat. Secondly, it was a shame that Russia, having huge territories for the production of animal feed, oilseeds, etc., is so heavily dependent on imported meat,” says Yushin (right).

The main problem, he said, was the low and often negative profitability of production, so Gordeyev set about the task of ensuring profitability. Accordingly, in 2005, customs and tariff regulation measures were introduced – quotas were introduced for meat imports, and high duties were imposed on import volumes exceeding the quota. This has led to an increase in meat prices and then to the incomes of Russian enterprises. Europe used the same measures to raise its livestock production after the Second World War, the source recalls.

Since about 2005, thanks to these import duties, a second industry has appeared that has become interesting to investors – pig farming.

“Many foreign companies, primarily German, Danish and French, also took part in the formation of modern pig farming in Russia. They not only built their own pig farms, but also provided expertise, technological equipment, breeding programs, genetic material, and so on,” Yushin says.

The second important stage was the implementation in 2006-2007 of the National Agro–industrial Complex Development Project, where for the first time the state provided preferential loans for livestock farming. Government support and cheap money have done their job – banks have become more willing to lend to companies to build farms.

The third stage was the adoption in 2008 of the state program for the development of agriculture and regulation of the market of agricultural products, raw materials and food, which was in effect for four years until 2012. “This program provided for a number of measures to support agricultural producers, including animal husbandry. These are the construction of new and modernization of old facilities, zero rates for the supply of breeding material from abroad. Then substantial funding was allocated,” the source says.

In 2012, Russia joined the World Trade Organization (WTO), and measures were provided to protect our market for livestock farmers. At the same time, the state support program was extended until 2020.

“All these years, enterprises have been built in Russia. We worked closely with leading foreign companies that supplied us with the best equipment, the best technologies, the best breeding material, and advised on the production of feed for farm animals. Genetic companies, world market leaders, opened their representative offices in Russia and trained our specialists. They have done a lot of work on the development of breeding in Russia. There was a breakdown of stereotypes that the work of a collective farmer is dirty and for the uneducated. Very educated, erudite and active people have joined the industry. Without this, nothing would have happened either,” Yushin believes.

Another factor which helped the Russian livestock miracle happen was the growth of household incomes in the 2000s when meat consumption began to grow in step with the growth of the economy.

Over twenty years, meat consumption in Russia has increased from 52 kg per capita in 2003 to 80 kg per capita in 2023; this includes poultry from 18 kg to 36 kg and pork from 17 kg to 32 kg, while beef consumption has decreased from 17 kg to 13 kg.

“Despite the large volumes of imports, we had to produce more and more and the demand of the population supported good prices, which allowed companies to take out new loans and build, build, build. We have built a huge number of enterprises, created more than a hundred thousand new jobs. The development of animal husbandry has prompted the accelerated development of crop production, the construction of the most advanced feed mills, veterinary science, vaccine production, etc.,” says Yushin.

It is clear that at the stage of the formation of animal husbandry in Russia, the cost of meat was artificially inflated by the government’s import restrictions.

“I don’t hide the fact that at the initial stage in the second half of the 2000s and in the first half of the 2010-2020 decade, Russians overpaid for meat compared to the world market. But the goal was to raise profitability and increase local production. So that the moment will come when the competition in the market will be so fierce that meat will become one of the cheapest in the world for us.”

“And indeed, today commercial pork is more expensive in Brazil, in Canada and the US, where traditionally there were cheap pigs – pork is more expensive there than in our country. In terms of poultry meat, we are one of the lowest in price,” says Yushin.

Over the past decade, active work has been underway to open export markets. “We are displacing [other country] imports in the competitive struggle, but our market is also not so flexible — people cannot go on eating infinitely more meat. Our meat consumption level has already increased to 83 kg per person, and this is the level of rich countries. Therefore, our potential is to increase exports. Russia already supplies meat to more than 60 countries on a regular basis,” the expert says.

Exports of meat and meat products have grown enormously in twenty years – by a magnitude of 22 times: from 36,000 tonnes in 2003 (mainly supplied to neighbouring CIS countries) to 800,000 tonnes in 2023. Foreign countries bought 343,000 tonnes of poultry meat, 223,000 tonnes of pork, and 36,000 tonnes of beef.

An important step was the understanding of the country’s leadership that top officials of the state should develop exports, as did the presidents of the United States, Brazil, the Prime Minister of France, etc., the expert notes. The departments of government have also joined the effort in parallel, and the Ministry of Agriculture has created a strong agricultural attaché apparatus abroad. “We see the result: almost 45 billion roubles worth exports of agricultural products. Who would have believed this ten years ago,” Yushin notes.

Another thing, the expert does not hide, is that the current situation with expensive money due to the high key loan rate of the Central Bank greatly complicates the situation. “To be realistic, the industry may face a period of stagnation in investment and a halt in growth. And then we will lose the fight for world markets to other countries where loans are still cheap. No one will take out loans at 22% to 23%. The cost of construction has almost doubled in price over the past five years. The labour force has not only risen in price, but we also have a shortage of workers,” the source expresses concern.

Another potential for the development of animal husbandry in Russia lies in cattle meat. “Russia has not achieved great success in beef, except that it fully meets the needs of the Russian market in expensive marbled beef, which was previously imported from America and Australia. Consumption of this expensive meat has increased ten times in 10 years. In addition, we also export it. However, there were no large investments in beef, with the exception of a few projects. There are very long payback periods, the infrastructure of cattle raising is not developed, and there is low or even negative profitability. So we see a continuing decline in the number of cattle. We have enough beef, plus there are imports, but beef is where Russia could take the next step, albeit it’s a difficult one. But this requires no less money than other projects. We are talking about a trillion rubles and a period of 10-20 years,”” Yushin concludes. Beef in Russia is also one of the cheapest in the world, and this is one of its tragedies, since the low price scares off investors and slows down the development of the industry.
 
I won't say that this achievement overly inspires me, but it is definitely an achievement.
Despite all the sanctions: for the first time, the Russian bank became the second among all banks in the world

Despite the departure of companies and vendors, thanks to its own technological developments, Beber not only retained its place in the top three in the world ranking of the largest acquirers, but also moved from the third place to the second.

According to the world's leading publication in the field of payment systems, Nilson Report, by the end of 2023, the BEAC is only 1 percentage point behind the leader of the rating, JPMorgan Chase.

The Russian bank now accounts for 9.1% of the global transaction market. The third and fourth places were taken by Worldpay and Fiserv, which lost significantly more to the Savings Bank.

In fact, despite Russia's "technological lay" under sanctions, which some experts claim, the Russian banking industry has almost overtaken the largest international banks.
https://rusvesna.su/news/1729083711

Я не скажу, что это достижение чрезмерно вдохновляет меня, но определенно это достижение.
 
To put it bluntly, any fears of the frostbitten Polish authorities do not interest me at all. I am publishing this news because of an interesting selection of photos from the summit in Kazan. There are more than 90 photos on the link, there is something to see.
Poland was afraid of the economic agreement at the BRICS summit
Polish Deputy Foreign Minister Andrzej China expressed concerns about the economic agreement that may be adopted at the BRICS summit in Kazan. He made the corresponding statement on the TVP Info channel.
"I'm only afraid that it might come to too far-reaching agreements in the field of economics," the deputy minister says.

As an example, Shane cited the potential creation of a payment system that provides mutual settlement bypassing the West.

The BRICS Summit is taking place in Kazan on October 22-24. 36 countries participate in it, 22 national delegations are headed by heads of state.
В Польше испугались экономических договоренностей на саммите БРИКС - Российская газета

Прямо сказать, всякие опасения отмороженных властей Польши меня совсем не интересуют. Эту новость я публикую из-за интересной подборки фото с саммита в Казани. По ссылке более 90 фото, есть на что посмотреть.
 
I was wondering why Vucic was not there and I found an answer. He said that he was invited by Putin, be he had an unexpected guest (Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk), so he had to cancel the trip. At the conference, Tusk was reading a part of his speech in Serbian. Vucic said that he was the first foreign guest politician to speak that well in Serbian. EU must be really desperate to turn the Serbia to her side and away from Russia.

"I hope that our conversation will favor, I say this without pressure, a more monolithic policy in Europe. Poland and Serbia have the same interest and there is no reason for conflicts to arise," said Tusk.

Then he repeated that he is serious about the EU perspective of the Western Balkans.

"EU enlargement must include Serbia because there is no complete EU without Serbia," said the Polish Prime Minister.

He then thanked the President of Serbia for choosing to speak with him in Belgrade even though he had another attractive opportunity, referring to the BRICS meeting to which Russian President Vladimir Putin invited Vučić.

 
Putin believes most of the propaganda about tobacco and smoking

One of the big lies propagated through sport as a discipline in terms of taking care of health. But wouldn't that be a positive percentage considering that the majority of cigarettes that society smokes are more toxic than beneficial?

Putin expresses concern about the use of e-cigarettes among young people in Russia.

A bill to ban e-cigarettes has reportedly been introduced in Russia's State Duma. At the end of August, the Russian Ministry of Health reported that e-cigarette users are at risk of developing a new lung disease called EVALI. This is an acute lung injury directly related to the use of electronic cigarettes. The symptoms are similar to those of COVID-19, including fatigue, fever, cough and shortness of breath.

The president stressed that vaping has become a "fad" among young people, he also insisted that it is crucial to understand the possible consequences of this habit.


I think it is wrong not to do a study of the benefits of tobacco and replace cigarettes from Western countries on the Russian market and make their own tobacco companies, something that could be if only they did not see it as a political strategy against their enemies.

Especially because so far the news that I have read about it express Putin's concern specifically, towards electronic cigarettes and not smoking in general. It seems to me that Putin talks about a specific problem but another group of people takes the opportunity to go much further "ah the problem is macdonald, let's ban eating meat!".

Therefore, this team that proposes such a measure is the least informed about it, if they did, they would be proposing to replace foreign tobacco companies and bet on domestic production with a focus precisely on the health they want to take care of.

The image of the Russian in the 90s worldwide was just that, Vodka and cigars and maybe that's what Putin wants to reverse. Unfortunately, there are changes that cannot be made gradually.

What are the data of acceptance of the population by that measure? There are news that only reflect that measure as a reflection of a dictator but curiously there is no news about great rejection either or to drop his popularity drastically because of it. In fact, I think it should be the opposite for Putin to be a good example and that just serves to take advantage of taking those measures now and for all.
 
I have already apologized here before for publishing news about "independent" Georgia in a thread about Russia, which, in fact, "independent" Georgians may categorically dislike. However, the following news just shows the need for quotation marks to the word independence in relation to Georgia. How quickly the "democratic" fleur disappears and how quickly the leash with a strict collar is stretched. It was only in the USSR that it was possible to eat unearned food for decades and think of themselves as superhumans. Such tricks do not work with real bourgeois, they themselves like to eat unearned food.
Back in early July, I wrote about the US intention to change power in Georgia as a result of parliamentary elections. This moment seems to have arrived. The elections were held, the ruling party won and, as it should be according to the typical scenario of color revolutions, someone should publicly declare fraud. This "someone" in "independent" Georgia was the former French ambassador to this country, and now President Salome Zurabishvili.
In general, this is also quite a typical situation for "independent" countries controlled by the West. In the Baltic States, Lithuania and Latvia, the presidents were citizens of Canada and Germany, In Ukraine, the ministers and governors were citizens of the United States, Lithuania, Georgia, In Moldova, the current president Sandu is a citizen of Romania.
So, perhaps we are witnessing the beginning of another color revolution. The last similar campaign in Georgia was called the "rose revolution", I wonder what the current one will be called?
The President of Georgia announced the falsification of elections - the opposition is preparing for mass protests
The President of Georgia announced attempts to falsify the current parliamentary elections, which caused widespread outrage among the opposition and their supporters. Opposition coalitions have announced plans to hold mass protests that will begin after the closure of all polling stations and the completion of negotiations between the parties. During the elections, numerous questions arose about the organization of the process, especially outside Georgia, where voters also faced difficulties — in particular, in London, about 2,500 people remain in line without the opportunity to vote.

According to preliminary data published on the website of the Central Election Commission of Georgia, the ruling Georgian Dream party is in the lead with 63.59% of the vote, which has added tension to the political atmosphere of the country. Opposition forces have expressed doubts about the reliability of the results and demand careful verification, insisting on transparency and legality of the elections.

In response to allegations of possible fraud, opposition parties began coordinating actions to organize mass demonstrations and express disagreement with the results. It is expected that the exact date, time and place of the protests will be announced after the completion of voting and consultations within the coalition.
Президент Грузии заявила о фальсификации выборов - оппозиция готовится к массовым протестам

Еще в начале июля я писал о намерении США сменить власть в Грузии в результате парламентских выборов. Этот момент, похоже, настал. Выборы состоялись, победила правящая партия и, как и положено по типичному сценарию цветных революций, кто то должен во всеуслышание заявить о фальсификациях. Этим "кто то" в "независимой" Грузии стала бывший французский посол в этой стране, а ныне президент Саломе Зурабишвили.
Вообще это тоже вполне типичная ситуация для "независимых" стран, контролируемых западом. В Прибалтике, в Литве и в Латвии президентами были граждане Канады и Германии, В Украине министрами и губернаторами были граждане США, Литвы, Грузии, В Молдове нынешний президент Санду является гражданкой Румынии.
Итак, возможно, мы наблюдаем начало очередной цветной революции. Прошлая подобная кампания в Грузии называлась "революция роз", интересно как назовут нынешнюю?
 
So far, everything is developing according to a well-known scenario, which assumes the appearance of "sacred victims" to escalate tensions and increase pressure on the authorities (the so-called "heavenly hundred" of Khokhlomaidan). By the way, if anyone does not remember, then I will remind you that snipers from Georgia "worked" on Khokhlomaidan in Kiev, now the opposite is true. Such a cycle of snipers takes place in "independent" states.
In general, the unfortunate Georgia is preparing to eat its "independence" with a full spoon for the second time, and whether the current authorities will be able to hold on now is a big question. The Prime Minister is already making feverish statements that Georgia adheres to a pro-European and pro-Atlantic orientation and has no plans to restore diplomatic relations with Russia. This is nothing more than a last attempt to appeal to the main organizers of the Maidan not to demolish the current authorities by the Maidan. It looks quite "independent".
Sources reported on the arrival of snipers trained in Ukraine in Georgia

MOSCOW, October 28 — RIA Novosti. The West has sent snipers trained in Ukraine to Georgia, informed official sources in the region told RIA Novosti.

"Westerners in their attempts to shake up the internal political situation in Georgia after the October 26 elections and provoke another "color revolution" do not shy away from anything: snipers trained in Ukraine arrive in the republic to organize provocations during mass protests," they said.

An opposition rally is currently taking place in Tbilisi, which did not recognize the election results. The leaders of the opposition parties demand a new vote under "international administration".
Georgian President Salome Zurabishvili, who spoke at the rally, said that she had spoken with representatives of the West today, who promised her not to recognize the past elections.
Zurabishvili, who began her political career in Georgia as the French ambassador to the Transcaucasian republic, supports the pro-European opposition, although according to the constitution the president must be non-partisan. She refused to recognize the results of the last elections and initiated the unification of major opposition parties.
Источники сообщили о прибытии в Грузию подготовленных на Украине снайперов

Пока все развивается по известному сценарию, предполагающему появление "сакральных жертв" для нагнетания напряженности и усиления давления на власти (т.н. "небесная сотня" хохломайдана). Кстати, если кто не помнит, то я напомню, что на хохломайдане в Киеве "работали" снайперы из Грузии, теперь наоборот. Такой вот круговорот снайперов происходит в "независимых" государствах. В общем несчастная Грузия уже второй раз готовится откушать своей "независимости" полной ложкой и удастся ли нынешним властям теперь удержаться это большой вопрос. Премьер-министр уже делает лихорадочные заявления на тему того, что Грузия придерживается проевропейской и проатлантической ориентации и не планирует восстанавливать дипотношения с Россией. Это ничто иное, как последняя попытка обращения к главным организаторам майданов не сносить майданом нынешние власти. Выглядит вполне "независимо".
 
Catching up with this thread...

I won't say that this achievement overly inspires me, but it is definitely an achievement.

Despite all the sanctions: for the first time, the Russian bank became the second among all banks in the world

Despite the departure of companies and vendors, thanks to its own technological developments, Beber Sber not only retained its place in the top three in the world ranking of the largest acquirers, but also moved from the third place to the second.

From what I understand, thanks to Nabiullina's rates, it's banks that benefit and grow, not the Russian economy. Sber has majority shares owned by Russian government (50% + 1 share), the rest is owned by individual and legal persons, including foreign ones, like Vanguard Group, BlackRock, J.P. Morgan, etc. Its Chairman and CEO since 2007, German Graf, who reportedly also owns shares in "his" bank, enjoyed for years one of the very top positions on Forbes list of the most expensive company executives. Haven't checked more recent lists though. Russian globalists do what globalists in general do.

So yeah, I'm with you youlik, nothing to be excited about.

To put it bluntly, any fears of the frostbitten braindead Polish authorities do not interest me at all. I am publishing this news because of an interesting selection of photos from the summit in Kazan. There are more than 90 photos on the link, there is something to see.

That translation made me laugh, but I also learned another, and surprising, meaning of the word "отмороженный"!
The event as reflected in the photos was - apart from tightening the ties between participating leaders - a good propaganda for those countries, and for showing how badly isolated Russia is (not). Well done, especially in the context of the war efforts and war propaganda dominating the other part of the world.
 
All about Russian pork. Meat consumption in Russia is up, in particular pork consumption. Russia became self-sufficient in pork in 2018, and is effectively competing with Western pork exports to the East.
Russia has the best bacon I've ever had, especially the one at a farmer market. Also, unforgettable salo.

Another potential for the development of animal husbandry in Russia lies in cattle meat. “Russia has not achieved great success in beef, except that it fully meets the needs of the Russian market in expensive marbled beef, which was previously imported from America and Australia.

That includes Russia's own Black Angus. :)

transl:
We have discovered the secret of real beef
Not so long ago, there was almost no beef suitable for steaks on the market. Marbled meat was only found on the menus of premium restaurants and travelled a long, long way from America or Australia. In just a few years, Miratorg has created a unique full-cycle production facility in our country and introduced Russians to the real taste of beef. Today, real marbled meat is available to everyone. You can buy it in a shop, order it in a restaurant or try it in a burger shop. Our secret to real beef is based on the right breed of Aberdeen-Angus steers, fattening with grain grown in our own fields, processing at our state-of-the-art automated facility and quality control at all stages of production.

Black Angus.jpgBlack Angus1.jpg

:)
 
Putin at the recent Valdai Club made some interesting comments about climate change and global warming.

Vladimir Putin: Of course, what you were doing now in conversations, in discussions with your colleagues here at the Valdai Club, – this one of the most important areas of research for humanity. It is obvious. Now we will not go into details, we will not discuss that is happening, because of what.

That is what happens, of course, – climate change, global warming. What is this happening? Because of human activities or some other factors affect, down to global space, or something with the Earth happens periodically, and we don’t really understand what. But changes obvious, they happen – is a fact. And it would be careless to do nothing at all, you can’t argue with that.

Session 17 July 2022

Q: (Ze Germanz) Does Putin think there is a good likelihood of an ice age coming fairly soon?

A: He is aware of the research, yes.

Q: (Ze Germanz) Is he aware of a possible comet swarm or objects with greater effect coming in towards Earth?

A: Yes

So although he speaks about climate change and green energy, etc., he's not necessarily on board with the AGW hypothesis.
 
Putin at the recent Valdai Club made some interesting comments about climate change and global warming.
Maybe, it's partly related to the following (from Tass) :

Russia warming faster than global average — weather agency​

According to lead researcher of the Russian Hydrometeorological Center Roman Vilfand, the average annual temperature in the temperate latitudes of Eurasia is rising 2.5 times faster

MOSCOW, November 11. /TASS/. Climate warming in Russia is occurring at a faster rate than the global average, Roman Vilfand, lead researcher of the Russian Hydrometeorological Center, told TASS.

"Global warming has its own spatial and temporal peculiarities. Russia is warming much faster than the global average," he said.

"The average annual temperature in the temperate latitudes of Eurasia, where we live, is rising 2.5 times faster than the global average," Vilfand added.

Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin, during the Valdai International Discussion Club plenary session, stated that warming in Russia is occurring more rapidly than in other regions of the world, which could lead to serious consequences.
 
Putin at the recent Valdai Club made some interesting comments about climate change and global warming.


Session 17 July 2022



So although he speaks about climate change and green energy, etc., he's not necessarily on board with the AGW hypothesis.

Unfortunately, the above is a rather poor translation of what Putin said. Here is the best translation:

Vladimir Putin: Without a doubt, everything that you have discussed with your colleagues here at the Valdai Club clearly represents a critical area of research for humanity. We will not go into detail or debate the causes of ongoing developments now.

Clearly, climate change and global warming is what is happening. Why is it happening? Is it caused by human activity, or are there other factors at play, including outer space, or is it something that happens to Earth now and then, which we do not really understand? However, changes are clearly there. That is a fact. It would be reckless on our part to do nothing about it, and that is undeniable.

We in Russia know this first-hand because warming in our country is going at a faster pace than anywhere else around the world. Over the past 10 years, we have seen temperatures go up by 0.5 degrees, and even more – by 0.7 degrees – in the Arctic. We see this clearly. For a country with 60 percent of the territory in the permafrost zone, this factor has practical consequences. We have entire towns and cities, as well as production facilities and more, built on permafrost. This is a very serious matter with serious consequences for us. So, we understand what this is all about.

Incidentally, we have one of the world’s greenest energies, 40 percent of which comes from gas and nuclear generation, as well as hydrogeneration. Overall, low-emission energy accounts for 85 percent of the total energy generation in Russia, which makes it one of the greenest operations globally. Also, I believe Russia is home to about 20 percent of the world’s forests, which represents a significant absorption capacity.

We are pondering this and we have plans, which we made public some time ago, stating the year by which we will work to reduce man-made emissions. And, of course, we will work on it.

By the way, those who made the biggest fuss over this issue are, unfortunately for everyone and most likely for themselves as well, moving in exactly the opposite direction.

For instance, coal generation in Europe is sharply up. Not long ago, there was a lot of clamour in Europe against coal-fired generation. What they did after all is they have expanded it instead of shutting it down. This is strange, but it is a fact. Again, they did so for some far-fetched political reasons. But that is a separate topic.

Now, regarding artificial obstacles to the development of the emerging economies linked to the environmental agenda. These so-called green obstacles, which some countries have started creating for the emerging economies and markets, are nothing other than a new instrument they have invented to hinder development.

If they are concerned, really concerned about climate change, which is something we should think about, of course, they should provide sources of funding and technologies for the countries that are ready to work in this sphere, so that they can calmly adopt these innovative technologies without sustaining losses. Otherwise, they would be trailing behind progress.

Some rightly tell those who demand immediate conversion to innovative technologies that they themselves had used up all the sources of energy and had polluted everything, including the atmosphere, and now demand that we immediately move to new levels of power generation. They wonder how they can accomplish this. Should they spend all their remaining resources on purchasing innovative technology from them? This, again, is a tool of neo-colonialism.

Give people an opportunity to live and develop, if you really and sincerely think that we all must take care of this issue together. Provide the sources of funding and technologies instead of limiting access to them. I fully agree with you, if that is what you hinted at in your speech. It cannot be any other way, the way I see it.

The same goes for funding. As I have said, according to our experts, whom I fully trust, the United States cashed in $12 trillion out of thin air over the past 10 years simply because the US dollar is a global currency. They did it by printing and circulating more dollars, which usually get back to their banks and their financial system, which are getting an additional income and profit from that. It is a tactical position. They just make money out of thin air, and this is what everyone should bear in mind.

If they simply issue this money which represents windfall profit for them. This money should be used as a source of funding, including for the environmental agenda. Share your windfall profits with us, if you are really concerned about the environment. If that is what you hinted at, I can say that you are absolutely right, and it is difficult to argue with this approach. This is how it should be done.

Well, this is probably all I can say. I have nothing more to add to this. That is, there is much more to say, but I have outlined the main points.

Thank you.
 
He's of the opinion that Putin's recent peace offer was more of an ultimatum, in the sense that if it is not accepted (which it obviously wasn't), then there will be subsequent offers - each one less and less favourable to the West. Full piece below, a sort of bird's-eye view of future possibilities:
[...]
Economically — you will pay double or quadruple for key resources without which your industry will be unable to function — resources such as natural gas, enriched uranium, titanium for aircraft manufacturing, rare earths and noble gases for semiconductor manufacturing and much else. This will cause your industry to shrivel up, in turn making it impossible to maintain your civilian and military infrastructure.

Last May, the US imposed (partial) ban on importing Russian depleted uranium:

Joe Biden has signed into law a bipartisan bill that bans the import of enriched uranium from Russia, in the latest effort by Washington to apply further pressure on Vladimir Putin over his invasion of Ukraine.

The ban on imports of the fuel for nuclear power plants begins in about 90 days, although it allows the Department of Energy (DOE) to issue waivers in case of supply concerns, up until 2028.

In response to restrictions imposed by Washington for 2024–2027 and a ban on the import of Russian uranium products from 2028, the Russian government has introduced temporary restrictions on the export of enriched uranium to the United States.

‘Russia is bringing the US economy to its knees": the Russians got their way. No country in the world will be able to help Washington
transl:
Nov 17, 2024

‘Russia is bringing the US economy to its knees": the Russians got their way. No country in the world will be able to help Washington
Vladimir Putin's unprecedented decision is proving to be a more painful blow to Washington than first thought. The Russians have had their way. There is no way out of this situation. No country in the world will be able to help the Americans - all attempts to circumvent the ban with the help of Kazakhstan or Uzbekistan are blocked: ‘Russia is bringing the US economy to its knees.’

The patriots who demanded that Russia stop supplying enriched uranium to the United States have achieved their goal. A ban is being imposed. On what it really means for Washington, spoke radiologist, former deputy of the State Duma Maxim Shingarkin in a conversation with Tsargrad.

[here is the gov. document dated Nov 15, in Russian; no English translation available ATM.]

According to him, the main emphasis is placed on the fact that uranium, in fact, providing about half of the U.S. nuclear power plants with nuclear fuel, will cease to be supplied there:

The fact is that Russia produces twice as much uranium for the world market as it consumes. And most of it goes to the United States

However, the expert noted, it often happens that uranium going to the United States is labelled as Kazakhstani or Uzbekistani, although in fact it is still a Russian resource:

We are now carrying consultations with those who will execute the relevant orders, and we will insist that there should be no misrepresentation, so that any uranium that was enriched in Russia should acquire the status of prohibited for supplies to the United States, regardless of where the raw material originated. Then half of the nuclear power plants in the United States would shut down.

To understand the scale, this is one and a half times more than nuclear power plants in Russia. That is, about 45 nuclear units will be shut down just because of the lack of fuel enriched in Russia. Shingarkin noted that the amount of energy these units generate allows Washington to produce a gross domestic product equal to Russia's entire GDP:

In fact, we are depriving the United States economy of key energy. And this is the very energy that primarily feeds the US defence complex. In the United States, when deciding who to cut off, defence enterprises will be cut off first, because turning off cities and conventional production is very fraught. Accordingly, with this move, Russia is bringing the US economy to its knees.

It is logical to think that Washington would then urgently look for alternatives. But they do not exist at the moment. There is no way out of this situation.

The fact is, our interlocutor assures us, that Russia produces about 50 per cent of the world's enriched uranium. In order to build plants even with the technologies that are available in the States today, it would have been necessary to do it about 7-8 years ago.

This means that half of U.S. nuclear power in the United States will be idle all this time. No other country in the world is capable of supplying that uranium in that period of time.

Long awaited move. We'll see how it goes, it's worth keeping an eye on the development.
 
Back
Top Bottom