Explosion at fertilizer plant near Waco, Texas - Meteorite or comet fragment?

[Jono]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

I dont know, but it does look like a light is coming from above before the explosion from below :/

Yes, it is weird that the left part of the screen lights up before the explosion. Why should it?

It may be that gas of some sort was leaking badly and took a few moments to catch wind of the fire, but even still it's highly unlikely the flash would come from the top left

 

[Mike]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Here is a third perspective:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAA5NmmEWqc

I don't know, but reading the below story from SOTT the opening quote really stood out as well as the mention of Waco, etc in the article and I'm left wondering about the connections between the topics of fertilizer, explosions, Waco, Oklahoma City bombing, the topic of terrorism in relation to Boston and the explosion that Forrestdeva posted about above all around the same time of year. A little spooky...

http://www.sott.net/article/226214-18-years-on-the-untold-truth-about-the-Oklahoma-City-bombing

(A fertilizer bomb did this? Only in the black-op world where jet fuel can melt 2 skyscrapers...)

 

[Atuya]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Here is a third perspective:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAA5NmmEWqc

This perspective also shows a distinct burst of light prior to the actual explosion. Yikes.

The only thing I can say with absolute certainty is that the demon head of Margaret Thatcher can clearly be seen in the initial smoke cloud escaping to the right of the fertilizer plant at 1:22. Ritual soul release?

 

[anart]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

So I thought to myself "Yeah right, missile!" And after watching the video it does seem like something came from the left of the fire. Also, I'm unsure of the sound that comments are saying was a missile sound.

REDO - Stunning Video - Missile used in Texas???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRIpB2jkCRs

Edit added: Maybe there is a more logical explanation for what is seen in the video.

Could something on the ground (propane tank/fuel tank/etc.) have exploded to the left of the plant, triggering a larger explosion in the plant itself? Something out of camera range? It is odd.

 

[Mike]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Here is another video of the explosion that has the 'whoosh' sound - looks like it is from a similar perspective as the slowed down 'missile' youtube video.

http://www.weather.com/video/plant-explosion-caught-on-video-36226

 

[Joe]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Compare the sound in the second version of the explosion to the sound of these "JDAMS"

http://youtu.be/XpbPNVsZvSo

 

[Laura]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Compare the sound in the second version of the explosion to the sound of these "JDAMS"

http://youtu.be/XpbPNVsZvSo

Yeah, it sounds like it to me.

 

[Joe]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

The reason I don't think it is a missile is because it is already "on fire" as it approaches. A missile would look like a dark solid object before detonation. There is also the "cone" shape to it.

 

[Loire]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

WOW, seems like these incidents happening in America are somehow related to each other. Does anybody else get the feeling that the US might currently be under the siege of cosmic justice?

 

[anart]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

The reason I don't think it is a missile is because it is already "on fire" as it approaches. A missile would look like a dark solid object before detonation. There is also the "cone" shape to it.

Yeah, it kind of looks like the edge of an explosion to me, coming in from the left. I'd like to know what sort of storage tanks were on that side of the building. I don't think it's impossible that it could have been a meteorite, but I can't really wrap my head around the timing of it, considering that the plant was already on fire - but - just because I can't wrap my head around it doesn't mean it's not possible or not what happened.

 

[Nawd]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

WOW, seems like these incidents happening in America are somehow related to each other. Does anybody else get the feeling that the US might currently be under the siege of cosmic justice?

Define cosmic justice.

 

[Ennio]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Assuming that it was a meteorite, maybe there was something specific to the fire or the original explosion that acted as an 'attractor'? And if so, what would it be?

Could Kniall's points made in his article about it's symbolism - in relation to the Branch Davidian massacre - be on to something? Could the lies and malevolence around that event have left some kind energetic and gravity-changing imprint on the area? Another possibility is that the original explosion created some kind of negative electrical charge that was the attractor to a not so distant neo. Just thinking out loud here.

Interesting to see what the C's said about some of these things recently.

Q: (PoB) So it's a swarm. (L) They were friends! Next? (Belibaste) You know there was this place in Central Europe... A guy at his house, he got meteorites that fell on his house like five or six times. Is the cause a local anomaly in the electric charge of the Earth in this specific location?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste) Okay. Is it that locally, the place, is it more positive, or more negative than the asteroid or meteorite?

A: Neg

Q: (Belibaste) More negative. Okay. Can one individual, or several individuals, attract in a similar manner as this place, some cometary bodies?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste) Is it because their electric charge collectively or individually is modified?

A: Not only electric charge. In the realm from which some of these things are manifested or, better, "directed", information is king.

Q: (Belibaste) So if a group of individuals acquires, stores, information that is orthogonal to truth, i.e. lies, will this fact of acquiring information that is orthogonal to truth increase the attraction to meteorites or cometary bodies?

A: Yes

Q: (Belibaste) How does it work?

A: Other realm just mentioned... Gravity waves.

Q: (L) Are you saying that gravity waves are a property of a different realm?

A: Mostly.

 

[mkrnhr]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Assuming that it was a meteorite, maybe there was something specific to the fire or the original explosion that acted as an 'attractor'? And if so, what would it be?

Reading http://www.sott.net/article/261096-Was-the-West-Texas-Explosion-a-Meteorite-Impact , and the mention of anhydrous ammonium, the mention of Earth core being made of Ammonia (apparently the same but someone more familiar with chemistry may confirm) by the Cassiopaeans is the 31 October 2001 (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,18645.msg176211.html#msg176211 ) session may be part of the symbolic message, is any.

 

[Cosmos]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Assuming that it was a meteorite, maybe there was something specific to the fire or the original explosion that acted as an 'attractor'? And if so, what would it be?

Reading http://www.sott.net/article/261096-Was-the-West-Texas-Explosion-a-Meteorite-Impact , and the mention of anhydrous ammonium, the mention of Earth core being made of Ammonia (apparently the same but someone more familiar with chemistry may confirm) by the Cassiopaeans is the 31 October 2001 (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,18645.msg176211.html#msg176211 ) session may be part of the symbolic message, is any.

Joe says in his article, that:

"The whole world seems content to assume that, because the Texas explosion two days ago occurred at a fertilizer factory, it must have been fertilizer that caused the explosion. The problem with that theory is that the factory in question did not stock the commonly used fertilizer, ammonium nitrate, which is a solid, prone to exploding (with the proper ignition source) and is widely used by farmers and bomb makers (both the legal and illegal kinds). What the factory did stock was anhydrous ammonium, a gas, that is less volatile and, when ignited, less likely to explode with such force as seen at the West plant. For this reason, all mainstream media reports that have attempted to explain the explosion have been forced to refer to ammonium nitrate, despite the fact that there was no ammonium nitrate at the plant."

From where do we know that "the factory did not stock the commonly used fertilizer, ammonium nitrate, which is a solid, prone to exploding" and what the factory was stocking instead was "anhydrous ammonium, a gas, that is less volatile and, when ignited, less likely to explode with such force as seen at the West plant"?

How do we know that? What is the source of this information?

 

[Joe]

Re: Explosion hits fertilizer plant north of Waco, Texas

Assuming that it was a meteorite, maybe there was something specific to the fire or the original explosion that acted as an 'attractor'? And if so, what would it be?

Reading http://www.sott.net/article/261096-Was-the-West-Texas-Explosion-a-Meteorite-Impact , and the mention of anhydrous ammonium, the mention of Earth core being made of Ammonia (apparently the same but someone more familiar with chemistry may confirm) by the Cassiopaeans is the 31 October 2001 (http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,18645.msg176211.html#msg176211 ) session may be part of the symbolic message, is any.

Joe says in his article, that:

"The whole world seems content to assume that, because the Texas explosion two days ago occurred at a fertilizer factory, it must have been fertilizer that caused the explosion. The problem with that theory is that the factory in question did not stock the commonly used fertilizer, ammonium nitrate, which is a solid, prone to exploding (with the proper ignition source) and is widely used by farmers and bomb makers (both the legal and illegal kinds). What the factory did stock was anhydrous ammonium, a gas, that is less volatile and, when ignited, less likely to explode with such force as seen at the West plant. For this reason, all mainstream media reports that have attempted to explain the explosion have been forced to refer to ammonium nitrate, despite the fact that there was no ammonium nitrate at the plant."

From where do we know that "the factory did not stock the commonly used fertilizer, ammonium nitrate, which is a solid, prone to exploding" and what the factory was stocking instead was "anhydrous ammonium, a gas, that is less volatile and, when ignited, less likely to explode with such force as seen at the West plant"?

How do we know that? What is the source of this information?

It's in most media reports on the subject.