Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

sandrabrownma said:
The process of the inability to integrate the information and be congruent between intellectual data and emotional experiences, is what creates the cognitive dissonance that is so strong from pathological exposure. (Laura, sounds sort of like what you were going thru). Normally in these, we battle between choosing the Jekyll or Hyde personas. They're good/they're bad, or in hyper empathy cases, They're bad/they're sick. But Laura, in your case it still sounds like you went thru a round of cognitive dissonance, only personalized I'm Good/I'm Bad. Pathologicals typically target people who are in helping professions or educational ones. It's exactly the kinds of 'events' we have seen through the antics of the Camwell/McGrannahan approaches. Camwell has pretty well hit every major website in this genre (and used others to do her marketing) trying to create those personalized cognitive dissonance reactions from those sites that were targeted.
I think the mark of pathology is the experiencing of cognitive dissonance whether it is other-oriented or whether it produces personalized self dissonance.

They're good/They're bad

They're sick/they're bad

Their sick or bad/I'm sick or bad

These are three dissonant sink-holes that occur from pathological exposure? Direct consequences of a human psyche trying to resolve a discordance between intellectual data and emotional experience.

That such a discrepancy is noted, and recognized as such, is not something you are born knowing how to do. I am pretty sure most of us react at a simple gut level, but that response is non-specific, just "danger, Will Robinson!!", maybe :D .

In retrospect, I had so many nonspecific "Danger, Will Robinson!" reactions to new relationships, and tended toward the third sink-hole. I personalized . . . almost everything :( . I didn't have much in the way of personal boundaries. I have had many relationships where my "gut" reacted with a warning, and only in the recovery from the relationship with my exH did I realize that "gut" warning was an intact, brilliantly accurate tool. Knowing how to proceed from "Danger, Will Robinson!" to informed action has been a learned process.

I suspected that cognitive dissonance was a red flag, indicating an encounter with a pathological person but don't have anything to back that up with but personal observation.

Awareness of the state of cognitive dissonance is not instinctual either, far from it.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

It's about time this woman Barbara Camwell is exposed for all the suffering she has caused by exposing innocent people in her blogsite which is filled with hatred and run with ignorance and superficiality. Its' about time justice is done, for the sake all the real women with real names who have gone through sentimental hell with men and have the dignity and pride to lick their wounds and go on with their lives without looking for petty defamatory revenge. For the sake of all those women who believe that only saying the truth and living a honest, decent, clean life leads to, if not happiness, at least serenity. There is no honesty, no truth, no pride in that blogsite. Time for it to go to the mud pool where it belongs.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Hi Jacaranda,

I'd like to invite you to post an intro in the newbies section of the forum. It doesn't have to be long, just a little about yourself and how you found the forum. :)

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/board,39.0.html
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Jacaranda said:
It's about time this woman Barbara Camwell is exposed for all the suffering she has caused by exposing innocent people in her blogsite which is filled with hatred and run with ignorance and superficiality. Its' about time justice is done, for the sake all the real women with real names who have gone through sentimental hell with men and have the dignity and pride to lick their wounds and go on with their lives without looking for petty defamatory revenge. For the sake of all those women who believe that only saying the truth and living a honest, decent, clean life leads to, if not happiness, at least serenity. There is no honesty, no truth, no pride in that blogsite. Time for it to go to the mud pool where it belongs.

For what it's worth, a blogsite devoted to highlight online stalking and harassment is a good thing. A collection of news articles about cyberstalking is worthwhile and educational. But it has been used as camouflage, in the case of EOPC. Most readers of EOPC are unaware of the motives of Barbara Camwell Ness, aka "Fighter". She casually mixes genuine news articles and personal vendettas, in hopes all will be swallowed whole.

Her only original material stems from writing her personal vendettas. YidwithLid/Jeff Dunetz, Gary Stone, Betsy Ashby, Sandra Brown MA., Laura Knight-Jadczyk -- are individuals featured on Exposing Online Predators and Cyberpaths because they ran afoul of Camwell Ness in some way. None of these individuals have been sued, much less convicted, of cyberstalking -- just accused by Camwell Ness. Each of these individuals have identified Camwell Ness as " Fighter" of EOPC and authoring (her only original writing), without reproducible fact, personal defamation against them.

She manages to camouflage her personal vendettas within the context of real cyberpathy. An ostensibly humanitarian blogsite which is used to defame those blowing the whistle on Camwell Ness should be tossed into the mud pool, I agree. It causes more harm to innocent people than it reveals the stories of the true cyberpaths. That it is designed to disguise a cyberpath -- Barbara Camwell Ness -- is even more reason to trash it and allow someone else with better character to carry it on.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

"I think the mark of pathology is the experiencing of cognitive dissonance whether it is other-oriented or whether it produces personalized self dissonance."

I meant the mark of having experienced pathology is cognitive dissoance wheter it is other oriented or whether it produces personalized self dissonance! (Big difference!! )
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Pathological people are going to do pathological things, because they're pathological. I grok that. What's frustrating me is the refusal of the Authorities in Los Angeles to respond to clear violations of California law.

It is illegal to impersonate someone online in California, and I have proof that both Barbara Camwell and Mary McGrannahan have done so, from a California IP...repeatedly.
http://leginfo.ca.gov/pub/09-10/bill/sen/sb_1401-1450/sb_1411_bill_20100927_chaptered.html

The emails where Barbara impersonates "Carolyn Reily" have been preserved on the mail server, so they can be accessed directly by law enforcement. McGrannahan's impersonation of Kester has been well documented as well.

I'm thinking we should give the California State Attorney until the new year to pursue charges, and if there's no action in the case, make a LARGE public stink about his failure to enforce the law?

These are NOT the only examples of criminal acts being committed via IP 96.229.138.82, there are quite a few more cases...these are just a few good examples.

______________________________

The impersonation of Carolyn Reily (who doesn't even live in the US) from the CA IP (as well as Camwell's IP 74.64.15.225 in NY, and the Cafe down the street from her house, 209.119.10.114)

http://cassiopaea-cult.com/?attachment_id=822

______________________________

The impersonation of Melissa Kester from CA IP 96.229.138.82

artfuldodger_cass_1.jpg
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

http://cassiopaea-cult.com/?attachment_id=822

That was an interesting read. Were these impersonated emails to you or someone else (forgive my confusion)? Did the original Carolyn speckle her communications with "dear" quite so often?? :whistle:

BCN has been awfully quiet lately. McGrannahan (not that you can believe a thing she says) alludes to BCN and Dino Ness being actually separated, with BCN no long in the home. I've asked her about it (she's currently infesting my LiveJournal as three or four imaginary friends) and she refuses to answer, which *might* indicate this is real information that she, of course, won't give me because I asked for it. _http://bink-think.livejournal.com/25207.html?view=213111#t213111

The point is that hopefully BCN is no longer exploiting or harassing anyone, whether or not she has some kind of nasty Come to Jesus experience or not.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Briseis said:
That was an interesting read. Were these impersonated emails to you or someone else (forgive my confusion)?

If you're not confused at this point, you're probably not paying attention :lol: :lol:

The emails were sent to me, by Barbara, impersonating Carolyn Reily

Did the original Carolyn speckle her communications with "dear" quite so often?? :whistle:

Not that I've noticed.

BCN has been awfully quiet lately.
Not really, she's all over Facebook, has new pages, etc.


McGrannahan (not that you can believe a thing she says) alludes to BCN and Dino Ness being actually separated, with BCN no long in the home.

Mary's lying...again. Babs and Dino were still a happy couple as of last week, and I still suspect he's known about her antics all along.

The point is that hopefully BCN is no longer exploiting or harassing anyone,
:rotfl: :rotfl: ... now that's a good one.

whether or not she has some kind of nasty Come to Jesus experience or not.

Hon, she's a 'path, whatever religion she picks she'll just use it as a tool to get what she wants. Right now she's claiming Jewish, but she could be doing the Maha Mantra next week if she found a Hare Krishna she wanted to have cybersex with.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Ya know, when you stop and think about it, we really do have quite a collection of Spiritual paths represented in this case. Barbara is Jewish, Mary claimed to be Wiccan at one time, Sandra is Christian, Laura is Paleo-Christian, and I'm Norse Pagan (Heathen)

I need to do a religion check with the rest of Barbara's and Mary's victims... if we find a Buddhist, a Mormon, and a Muslim, I think we might qualify for free UN mediation. :P :P
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

sandrabrownma said:
Lord, dont' put the UN thru this!

True, they already have enough problems. :rolleyes:

It is interesting how they keep harping on religion, like our individual Spiritual paths have anything to do with this what-so-ever? All the victims (that I know of so far) are of different denominations and/or Faiths...and the three main perps are Jewish, Wiccan and Christian.

This is totally nonsecular cyberstalking ...which is kinda encouraging in a sick sorta way. :/
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

Just wanted to add my 2 cents in about Camwell Ness. All of you have her pegged 100%. I noticed last week that my blog about her had been taken down. It was the one that was "Barbara Camwell Ness Internet Harasser". It was on 'blogspot'. There are much worse blogs out there about her. Barbara has had it out for me for 6 years. I've put it back up on three different blog sites. You should be able to google in a few days to find my blog.

I'm still trying to figure out how she got to my blog.
 
Re: Exposing Online Predators & Cyberpaths

notavictimanymore said:
I'm still trying to figure out how she got to my blog.

Have you contacted google? You're right, there are MUCH worse blogs...why take down your's and not Barbara's and Mary's...or any of the other "gripe" blogs?
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom