- I had the impression, above all, of a disorganized team,
of maybe amateur people, or maybe non-trained, or maybe beginners.
-He is Jean-Pierre Diot, specialist of the close-up guard.
He has notably protected Nicolas Sarkozy and Pope Jean Paul II.
He was shown the video of the assassination attempt of Donald Trump,
and here is his reaction:
- He's the one who gets down.
That is to say, he feels something in his ear.
He says, I'm going to get down, because there's something going on.
I don't know what it is.
But normally, that was the role of the evacuator.
To evacuate, to lay on the ground, to reassure him,
to say, now we're going to work, we're going to evacuate.
The guy hides, he have to changes his job, in my opinion.
He goes down, rather than going into contact, he runs away.
It's the same, he lies down and
he lifts him up with a view of his face,
but really flagrant in front of everyone.
These officers are not carriers of the Kevlar suitcase.
It's a triptych, it's a suitcase that we unfold, but which is the proof of the bullets.
If there was a Kevlar or
even umbrellas,
we put an umbrella, it hides everything, it makes a visual shelter,
and we don't see what's going on.
That is to say that if there was a shooter, he doesn't know where to hit,
possibly if there was a second one.
But here, it's very easy to hit him.
And here, I notice that there is no equipment.
If it is only to donate his body,
by surrounding the personality, both good and bad,
with little gabarits, with people who are agitated.
We have the impression that there is a ball of rugby in the middle,
it's a mess.
There are my hands that protect with his hand,
as if a hand could protect a 5.56.
It's long, it's long, it's long, before evacuating.
He lets him do his job,
but normally, in these cases, the personality does nothing, doesn't say anything.
He is no longer the boss.
It is those who evacuate and who want to save his life who are the bosses.
We don't let him shine like that, the point raised, etc.
No, no, we lay him down, we hide him, we evacuate him.
Once again, it's an amateur who did that, who shot.
If it had been a pro, it would have been a two,
the second one wouldn't have been in it.
The vehicle is far away, there is a kind of confusion, etc.
He shouldn't have come in through the right door,
but through the left door, hidden from where the aggression comes from.
There are a lot of little things that don't go,
which are, in my opinion, the object of a non-training
or a non-repetition of emergency evacuation, let's say.
We don't see any drones, we don't see any controls,
we don't see any external patrols, etc.
The person, the gunman, is 150 meters away with the scope,
he sees what's going on, if he has a carry, he sees it,
with the performance glasses they have.
So, at the same time, he immediately saw that he had a weapon.
There, he didn't need an order there.
- They can shoot without an order?
- There, completely.
But there, we see that, indeed, it would seem that it lets us see
that he was observing the shooter
and that he waited for him to shoot to be able to react.
It's just an impression. Now you have to be careful with pictures.
In their defence, you have to realise that meetings are both one of the most difficult missions
for a security officer, because, precisely, there can be fireworks,
there can be a kind of diversion,
having a few seconds of interrogation.
"What's going on? Are they fireworks?
Are they fireworks?"
What's surprising is that really no one saw this shooter
go up with his gun, settle down nicely,
like in a forest party.
And that, on the other hand, there is something really that escapes me.
Apparently, it was in a farm or rather isolated.
It was quite simple, at the base.
And with a building to watch over, he didn't.
That, I can't understand.
Frankly, it's something that I...
That's it.
I would have even put a sniper on the building
to make a counter-target, a counter-sniper.
You could see him from very far away.
You could really almost feel him.
And no one, well...
That, it will be explained after the investigation.
There will be something, in my opinion.
