Failed Trump Assassination Attempt

In the video he's analyzing, the second volley of 5 shots does sound very different than the first 3. But I do find it odd that he doesn't even mention that in the video he's analyzing, for the first 3 shots the camera is facing one direction, then the cameraman turns around 180 degrees for the next 6 shots. I would guess that would affect the acoustics and how the shots register on the phone's microphone... (Again though, sounds like 5+1 shots in the second volley, not 5+2.)
I found the original video, he makes the case that there where 2 or 3 shooters.
Seems at this point, after all the discussion, it's still possible that there was only one shooter, Crooks, although given the various suspicious details and precedents, it's highly unlikely that he acted alone. Maybe that's where we'll have to leave it until more data comes in, assuming any does.
Here's the video:


Some points:
The first three shots come from the same location/have the same time signature. About 400-450ft (~120-130m)
Based on the footage of the first shot hitting the railing, he estimates it's a rising shot. Meaning it was fired upwards (from the window)
Screenshot 2024-07-19 221641.png

He backs this up with audio analysis from a video from a different location (nearer the shooter). The first three shots have no echo, where as the other shots do. Meaning the first three shots where probably from inside.
Screenshot 2024-07-19 221945.png

There is additional discrepancies with the rapid fire section (shots 6-9) in that they again don't have echo's - and are most likely 100ft behind the first (two) shooters.
Screenshot 2024-07-19 222132.png
Looking on google maps, this would put the third shooter in the yellow area I've marked:
Screenshot 2024-07-19 222458.png

In conclusion:
Screenshot 2024-07-19 221426.png
 
yes, This video is much clearer. Initially I was ignoring shadow on the top as I was assuming the top structure on the water tower is Lot taller than human size ( 6 or 7 ft). I guess this tower height is of human size. There are 2 shooters on the water tower (one on the rim and other one is top of the tower). With the force the gun produces, I thought it is very risky for the person to shoot from the water tower slope. I guess it is not.

Not convinced, at all. Without extreme zoom, it looks like the dark/shadowed side of the structure on top. When you extreme zoom in, you make anything you want out of it.
 
Just for the record....


CNN report on July 15th incorrect states that three weapons were fired at the Trump.

"The first three shots were consistent with alleged weapon A, the next five were consistent with alleged weapon B, and the final “acoustic impulse” was emitted by a possible weapon C, per audio analysis by Catalin Grigoras, director of the National Center for Media Forensics at the University of Colorado in Denver, and Cole Whitecotton, Senior Professional Research Associate at the same institution.

Screenshot 2024-07-19 234055.jpg
 
I’m inclined to think it’s the same person, it’s obvious she is wearing a lot of make up in photo on the left. Regular base application and shadow contouring techniques commonly used would explain any slight differences. Highlights applied on bridge of nose would explain slight difference in the appearance of shape of the nose. The blemishes look like freckles not moles which are easily covered. And this is normal for a professional woman to use makeup like this, highly unusual if she didn’t, particularly in USA.
Look again at the ears, they are dramatically different.
 
So maybe they really were arrogant enough to put shooters in the building that Crooks was on top of? Wasn't it officially stated that there were SS personnel in that building, to use it as a "spotting" location?
 
So maybe they really were arrogant enough to put shooters in the building that Crooks was on top of? Wasn't it officially stated that there were SS personnel in that building, to use it as a "spotting" location?
Here's a screen shot from that video I posted that you can't view:
Screenshot 2024-07-19 at 7.20.11 PM.png
Not a lot of info in the video, just that it was allegedly the sniper(s) in that building who spotted Crooks and circulated that photo of him. Not entirely clear from the report at what time this happened. (BTW, that picture of Crooks was going around on Twitter very shortly after the shooting.)
 
I found the original video, he makes the case that there where 2 or 3 shooters.
Just to correct my post: this guy isn't the one who works for the University of Colorado. He's just sharing a similar analysis and isn't an audio forensics expert as I initially thought he was. That might explain why he missed the change in sound matching the change in camera orientation...
 
Last edited:
Wasn't it officially stated that there were SS personnel in that building, to use it as a "spotting" location?
That seems to be the case. Way back in the thread there was ZeroHedge article I posted about with information related to that.

 
That seems to be the case. Way back in the thread there was ZeroHedge article I posted about with information related to that.

Speaking of ZH, this article just got posted:


They have a second shooter farther back in the AGR complex, but shooting from the same angle as Crooks. And they discount the water tower theory.

Again, it's a theory a minute right now, but that one at least looks plausible.
 
I just had a random thought - if we know the shutter speed we should know the bullet’s speed based on how stretched it is right? For a given shutter speed, the bullet would have the same stretch distance given a specific flight speed. I believe it was mentioned the shutter speed was 1/8000 if I’m not mistaken. That means we would just need to measure the stretch of the bullet in inches, which could be done given we know its exact location relative to Trump’s head.
Something else we could check from that picture of the 'elongated' bullet is the rough angle of the shot. The bullet would have come from the left, correct? And it was shot from a rooftop, so we should expect the bullet trajectory to reflect this downward angle towards the right. If you extended the line the bullet draws towards its origin on the left, would it reach the rooftop at the correct distance? At first sight, just by looking at the picture, yes it goes down, it seems to me about right but not quite (lol) - but that's very hard to estimate just by looking at the picture so I don't trust my impression at all. Our reference point as the line of the 'horizon' is the stand, but how much is it skewed? The picture shows nothing of the bleachers on the back, which means that it was taken at a rather upward angle, so that complicates the matter. And we would need to know how elevated from the ground was Trump's head. Anyway it would be an interesting exercise to make with some 3D software or something.

Here's the picture again:

mills2.jpg

I'll add that at the moment I'm totally unconvinced that there were more shooters. The people saying there was a shooter on the water tower could have just been making an assumption, considering that the real shooter was roughly in the same direction. The bangs to the right of Trump were probably ricochets from the same shooter. And the analysis of the sound of the shots, it seems to me that there may be a number of reasons for the distortion of sound, and also, could some of those shots be from the police? They had already seen Crooks and some were aiming his way, so if they saw him shooting, they could have pulled the trigger immediately, no?

Having said that, the excuses they've given for not covering that rooftop are just ridiculous, as well as their failure to act when he was spotted and people were pointing at him. My current bet is is they knew Crooks was going to try to kill Trump and they made it easy for him. Probably a Greenbaum subject.
 
we should expect the bullet trajectory to reflect this downward angle towards the right. If you extended the line the bullet draws towards its origin on the left, would it reach the rooftop at the correct distance? At first sight, just by looking at the picture, yes it goes down, it seems to me about right but not quite (lol)
The bullet in the photo is about half a degree off horizontal. It's true that not only don't we know how the camera was oriented, but I don't think we know if the pic was edited (rotated) or not prior to release?
 
Last edited:
Wonder if it's the guy mentioned here:

"Concerned citizen"? Accomplice?
My apologies if this has been posted before.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom