I think “the person“ on the lower part of the water tower is just a tree branch and “the person“ on top of the water tower probably a combination of pixilation and the darker side of that structure.
Failed Trump Assassination Attempt
- Thread starter Tristan
- Start date
I think “the person“ on the lower part of the water tower is just a tree branch and “the person“ on top of the water tower probably a combination of pixilation and the darker side of that structure.
Looked at the high res video here and Trump isn't facing the Jumbotron head on. He's merely turned towards it. But not so much that it's impossible or even implausible for the shot to have come from somewhere approximating Crooks' position.
I agree, the first round sounds different than the ones that followed but only in that video. When listening to the first three shots in other videos there's no difference between them so I don't know what to make of that. It seems to be only in that one video where I can hear a difference.
Edit: Just want to add that the first shot being different would make sense if there was a pro taking the first shot and he wasn't in the exact same location.
The spray goes to the right, though. If someone was shooting towards Trump the spray should be going to the left. The spray, considering the man was shot, very well could've been blood or dust of some kind from the bullet hitting the railing.
Looking at the area after the fact there's nowhere for a sniper to have gotten off a round from there. Not without getting noticed or freaking out the people nearby who didn't respond like people do to someone shooting during an active shooter situation.
Also, the other people in the video she's claiming were pointing to a shooter were actually pointing towards a person who'd been hit. As one person can be heard saying "he hit" just before she switches back to herself.
A comment on that video says there's a longer version floating around though they didn't provide a link showing the person on the ground is one of the guys who was shot in the top right of the nearby bleachers. Haven't found this video to confirm it though.
The guy recording those videos as well as several other people in them indicate a "shot" came from the bleachers which looks to me not like a shot but a ricochet. One woman pointed out how the "shot", aka smoke, went away from Trump.
However, the younger guy says he saw something not where everyone else had indicated in the bleachers but in the nearby field. Who or what did he see because there wouldn't have been a shot to take from that spot. Would there?
I see the same, a tree branch and pixelation.
Last edited:
You are right. The direction of the spray would mean that the shot came from the left.
I just had a random thought - if we know the shutter speed we should know the bullet’s speed based on how stretched it is right? For a given shutter speed, the bullet would have the same stretch distance given a specific flight speed. I believe it was mentioned the shutter speed was 1/8000 if I’m not mistaken. That means we would just need to measure the stretch of the bullet in inches, which could be done given we know its exact location relative to Trump’s head.
Then we would just need to know how much stretch a moving object at a specific speed would have when captured with the 1/8000 (or whatever the actual shutter setting was, might need to confirm) shutter speed.
At least this would tell us if the bullet was subsonic. My guess is this could be done with math without having to experiment, but I’m not super sure.
Unless I’m missing other settings that would affect the stretch like ISO (and do we know what those were in this case)? I’m not a camera person or a math person, but is this possible?
Then we would just need to know how much stretch a moving object at a specific speed would have when captured with the 1/8000 (or whatever the actual shutter setting was, might need to confirm) shutter speed.
At least this would tell us if the bullet was subsonic. My guess is this could be done with math without having to experiment, but I’m not super sure.
Unless I’m missing other settings that would affect the stretch like ISO (and do we know what those were in this case)? I’m not a camera person or a math person, but is this possible?
Yesterday I tried to google/Yandex image search on her image with dark glasses from the video (and some clean up), the only result I got was people with sun glasses.
I tried to remove her glasses, unfortunately i couldn't spend enough time to have a clean image. Her images on google, looks similar though not exactly same (with time and heat one can't expect the same as official portrait). We will see how it goes.All this exposure starts to stink like Hell for PTB. May be some fragrance in the "heaven". How does one explain FBI assistant director behind trump behaving weirdly at the time of assassination attempt? Triple bad day is around the corner for sure.
How did PTB thought of get away with this? It is as if they don't even have a contingency for any eventuality of failure. Wishful thinking at its best I guess.
Janeen DiGuiseppi Named Assistant Director of the FBI's Insider Threat Office | Federal Bureau of Investigation
FBI Director Christopher Wray has named Janeen DiGuiseppi as the assistant director of the Insider Threat Office at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Most recently, Ms. DiGuiseppi was the special agent in charge of the Albany Field Office in New York.
www.fbi.gov
Goemon_
The Living Force
He that case he could have been hidden behind the water tank, it seems.
What about the attendees who said shots came from Water tower and James Webb who talked about tree's got grazed by ?
I am still open to the whatever the outcome is.
IMHO, It is unlikely for this reason.
Crooks is a novice to count on getting the target. Having contingency to shoot him from hiding is unnecessary unless he is part of Trump's SS team. If water tank shooter is from Trump's SS team, they would have told by now.
Yesterday I tried to google/Yandex image search on her image with dark glasses from the video (and some clean up), the only result I got was people with sun glasses.
All this exposure starts to stink like Hell for PTB. May be some fragrance in the "heaven". How does one explain FBI assistant director behind trump behaving weirdly at the time of assassination attempt? Triple bad day is around the corner for sure.
How did PTB thought of get away with this? It is as if they don't even have a contingency for any eventuality of failure. Wishful thinking at its best I guess.
Janeen DiGuiseppi Named Assistant Director of the FBI's Insider Threat Office | Federal Bureau of Investigation
FBI Director Christopher Wray has named Janeen DiGuiseppi as the assistant director of the Insider Threat Office at FBI Headquarters in Washington, D.C. Most recently, Ms. DiGuiseppi was the special agent in charge of the Albany Field Office in New York.
Looking more closely, there seem to be some distinct differences between the two people. The mouth is of similar shape, but the nose, ears, and skin tags suggest they are two different people.
I made a comparison image:
Don't know where he got that blue dot to the left. Coperhaven was just a few seats to the left of Dutch, who is the right blue dot.Shooter #2’s bullet, directed at the counter-sniper closest to Crooks, was captured on video striking two rally attendees who were standing in the third set of bleachers, furthest to the East of the venue, killing one and critically injuring another. The two bystanders struck by the bullet are depicted in the image below as blue dots. This allowed Ambellas to track the exact path of the bullet.
Additionally, it is vital to point out that several rally attendees who were on the set of bleachers in which the two victims were struck were captured on video pointing and screaming that a second shooter was in the exact direction shown with the red line, tracing back to shooter #2’s position in the sniper nest.
From Crooks's perspective, he would've seen Dutch at roughly a 45-degree angle. The entire front (including the "right front") would've been visible to a shooter at Crooks's location. Here's a very rough drawing (stick figure is oversized for visibility). Basically, he could've been shot anywhere on his left side, anywhere on his front, but not on his right side.
I didn't put the nephew because I don't know even roughly where he was located. Can anyone see him in the videos? As for the hydraulics, they line up perfectly with shots that hit Trump and Dutch.
Moot, since the video has been exposed as a fake, but there were hundreds of people filming. Wouldn't be surprised if at least a handful more videos get uploaded in the coming weeks, especially as the boomers send the videos to their kids who know how to upload them to social media.
Yes, I think it is 2 different women. The picture which is posted of her in the posts which are going round on X are from when she was younger, I think. Unfortunately, in that picture, when she got the job as assistant director to the FBI, they likely posted a picture of her from a decade earlier, which is not unusual. Yet, she doesn't quite the same anymore.
In this article from 2023, when she got the job, there is a picture of her which is circulating. As can be seen in Keyhole's post, then she looks different now. Below a picture of her, when younger (I assume).
