Well, I don't know what actually happened, and neither does anyone else, that's one of the reasons why we are commenting.
Sure, but what you are doing is just being obtuse, even when people are trying to have a proper discussion.
And I just wanted to make a case for a particular theory - since it was the most obvious - was it an accident?
And you already did, so there's no point in insisting unless, like some of us have said, you have logical arguments.
I feel I've covered it pretty good and have nothing to add.
Good, except you couln't help yourself below.
Sorry if I offended, but if you look for answers, you might not like what you see, and it is explicit, and if it isn't actually the truth, it leaves nothing to the imagination, making a discussion uncomfortable. So, sorry if I came across wrong.
Other than the fact that how they come across can say a lot about some people, it's not a problem (unless you mind). It's that it just doesn't match FACTS. You sound quite pretentious and ignorant, but that's your choice. By "teaching us" that "you might not like what you see", you are missing the point: most of us would wish it had been an accident, and not a gratuitous malevolent act. At least it would just be sad and symbolic, instead of also being infuriating and shocking for being a psychopatic act (like many similar others). There is no investment in making it into a conspiracy just for fun, in case you haven't noticed.
Oh, one more thing... (sorry, I can't help it) ...
Evidently...
at least no one died or got hurt. And it was in such a state of decay that it was already in need of repair. And because of this, donations are plentyful. So it's not as bad as it seems. It needed work, and now there is more money to do the work. And the new roof won't be such a fire hazard with the repairs.
It was going to ask you what country you are from, since you seem to be missing quite a bit, but now I feel like asking you which PLANET you are from! Your comment would be laughable for some people, and an insult to many others. The funds were sufficient before to do the works needed. Everybody knows that the money will not to in the right pockets, and that it won't cost millions for the repairs. AND, in the current climate, try saying what you wrote to a gilet jaune struggling to feed his children, asking for a bit of a tax reduction and not getting it, while the elites in power take so much and laugh to their faces. Finally, for the third or fourth time, the roof was never a fire hazard to begin with. Basic physics, Metrist.
It requires quite a bit of mental gymnastics to come up with the "positive twist" above. You could make the same type of arguments just about anything and not only be dead wrong, but also insensitive. "The US and its allies invaded, pillaged and destroyed countries in the Middle East. Oh, but many people survived, now they are rebuilding themselves some nice little houses, so there's money and humanitarian aid (how nice!). And they are still independent countries on paper, wonderful!"