First ever Sott.net Talk Radio Show Sunday Jan 20th 2013!

[Lisa Guliani]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

1. Psychopaths & Narcissists
2. Drone strikes in Pakistan
3. What is really going on in Syria
4. The idea of revolution and how the collective ( and individual) thinking needs to change before there can be any external 'revolution'
5. The issue of rape
6. Scientology, the CIA, and MIVILUDES: Cults of Abuse
7. Cointelpro and the Alternative Media
8. Israel's occupation of Palestine, U.S. support of Israel

Off the top of my head....

 

[LQB]

Great show guys - unfortunately I had to miss some parts.

One thing has kind of bothered the back of my mind (since the shooting): the precision and efficient killing. Do we really know that it was that precise and efficient considering the ME's performance and other reports? If an Op was planned around framing Lanza, it seems to me that some care would be taken to make it a bit messier rather than rely on a story about Lanza's expert control of a rapid fire rifle. The possibilities I've thought of are:

1) The precision and efficiency are a kind of message to the collective subconscious and were intended for this purpose.
2) Just bad Op planning (hard to buy for me)
3) Or, is this somehow covering for multiple shooters that could have been determined by the ME?
4) Lanza really was a fully programmed killer in the class of Kathleen Sullivan (if you believe her story)

 

[Masamune]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

There are so many things that I can think of that are worth covering: Laura's new book, Syria/Iran, food prices, comets and cyclical catastrophes, world economy, ketogenic diet and healthcare, ...

Both of you did a fine job with the Sandy Hook show.

I would be interested in a show about Laura's new book or the latest info about health and diet. I would also like to see an interview with Laura or guest appearance. :D Thanks everyone and great job!

 

[Foxx]

I missed the first part when it was live, so I just caught up and finished the show. Great job guys!

 

[Redrock12]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

1. Psychopaths & Narcissists
2. Drone strikes in Pakistan
3. What is really going on in Syria
4. The idea of revolution and how the collective ( and individual) thinking needs to change before there can be any external 'revolution'
5. The issue of rape
6. Scientology, the CIA, and MIVILUDES: Cults of Abuse
7. Cointelpro and the Alternative Media
8. Israel's occupation of Palestine, U.S. support of Israel

Off the top of my head....

Perhaps, to expand on points 5&6, a discussion on missing children and the elite global pedophile rings, as well as discussing the book "The Franklin Scandal."
Just suggestions.

 

[fabric]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

1. Psychopaths & Narcissists
2. Drone strikes in Pakistan
3. What is really going on in Syria
4. The idea of revolution and how the collective ( and individual) thinking needs to change before there can be any external 'revolution'
5. The issue of rape
6. Scientology, the CIA, and MIVILUDES: Cults of Abuse
7. Cointelpro and the Alternative Media
8. Israel's occupation of Palestine, U.S. support of Israel

Off the top of my head....

Good topics!

I was thinking perhaps SoTT could also do a show on food/diet? I think there's quite a lot in that area that can be covered (latest ketogenic research, local food sourcing, canning and food preservation, coming shortages etc).

 

[ocean59]

I listened to the entire show just before work, and really enjoyed it! Kniall and Perceval did a great job, and Lisa's call-in was great too, and very relevant to the conversation.

I think it is interesting that Brad chose to declare war and post the FB link before the call. My initial impression (albeitedly I was not paying as close attention at the end as I was getting ready to go to my job, but I did perk up and 'tune in' pretty quickly when I heard the tone and intro of the caller) was that he was sincere and really believed what he was saying. If it were intentionally conscious COINTELPRO, I think it would have been handled differently. But I am easily fooled. My thought at this point is along the lines of 'maybe he doesn't realize what a tool he is.' Regardless, I wouldn't be surprised to hear from 'Brad' next week or one of his 'friends' from the Facebook group.

For that reason, I think anart's idea of giving a full response to his comments, followed by transitioning into Authoritarian Followers (and then maybe psychopathy, though maybe that is a topic that needs its own episode, something to be worked up to) is a good idea to consider.

Great job everyone and thank you!!

 

[dantem]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

[...]
3. What is really going on in Syria

One vote for the third suggestion :) It can cover also Libia and the "War" topic in general.

Great show indeed! Thanks!

 

[loreta]

Btw, are there any suggestions for next week's show?

[...]
3. What is really going on in Syria

One vote for the third suggestion :) It can cover also Libia and the "War" topic in general.

Great show indeed! Thanks!

War is always a very interesting subject. Syria, Libya, and now Mali.... This is something. Also, after reading the article you post on Sott about China (http://fr.sott.net/article/12734-La-Chine-augmente-ses-importations-de-riz-de-400) that can be also a very acute subject.

 

[Kaigen]

:) Going to listen to it now since I couldn't today morning.

 

[Ollie]

I listened to the entire show just before work, and really enjoyed it! Kniall and Perceval did a great job, and Lisa's call-in was great too, and very relevant to the conversation.

For the amount of the show that I heard, I agree

I think it is interesting that Brad chose to declare war and post the FB link before the call. My initial impression (albeitedly I was not paying as close attention at the end as I was getting ready to go to my job, but I did perk up and 'tune in' pretty quickly when I heard the tone and intro of the caller) was that he was sincere and really believed what he was saying. If it were intentionally conscious COINTELPRO, I think it would have been handled differently. But I am easily fooled. My thought at this point is along the lines of 'maybe he doesn't realize what a tool he is.' Regardless, I wouldn't be surprised to hear from 'Brad' next week or one of his 'friends' from the Facebook group.

Unfortunately I missed this.

For that reason, I think anart's idea of giving a full response to his comments, followed by transitioning into Authoritarian Followers (and then maybe psychopathy, though maybe that is a topic that needs its own episode, something to be worked up to) is a good idea to consider.

Great job everyone and thank you!!

This would be a logical way to link to the next show, and as a lead in the 'full' topic for next week's show, which may be on how to spot psychopaths - more educational than provocative, yet the latter could arise through examples and phone-ins.

Great work.

 

[Deleted member 4320]

I think that the guy at the end of the show probably had specific goal. His statement was a bait for System 1.

The (most) people on this Forum are involved the acquisition of knowledge and understanding. Can say that knowledge and values ​​are crystallized, then they are not very prone to pitfalls that occur in our own mind.

But among people in who were no crystallization. They are like flags on the wind and the wind is different ways of lying to self. For some people it is a vicious circle, cognitive bias make them difficult to obtain the knowledge and understanding, lack of knowledge and understanding make them difficult to recognize and treat cognitive bias.

I think the efforts of that guy was primitive, but on someone else could prove effective. It was strengthening the effect of Stockholm syndrome, based on the recall image/presentation of the good leader good for his people.

I often notice, that they are, this is like attack the weakest animal in the herd. Like in the phone. That Brad's substance of speech was very low but can effectively influence on those more susceptible, those being "beetwen".

How you guess, I would suggest to foreordain on the one radio talk show on the debate about psychology, cognitive biases, Stockholm syndrome, authoritarianism, you know, something like this.

Moreover I have to say that the whole show is a great thing. You did good job. It can only get better from one to another radio show.

FWIW

 

[Niall]

Great show guys - unfortunately I had to miss some parts.

One thing has kind of bothered the back of my mind (since the shooting): the precision and efficient killing. Do we really know that it was that precise and efficient considering the ME's performance and other reports? If an Op was planned around framing Lanza, it seems to me that some care would be taken to make it a bit messier rather than rely on a story about Lanza's expert control of a rapid fire rifle. The possibilities I've thought of are:

1) The precision and efficiency are a kind of message to the collective subconscious and were intended for this purpose.
2) Just bad Op planning (hard to buy for me)
3) Or, is this somehow covering for multiple shooters that could have been determined by the ME?
4) Lanza really was a fully programmed killer in the class of Kathleen Sullivan (if you believe her story)

What about the ME's performance?

Someone edited his press conference to make it seem like he was looney, but if you watch the full video of the conference (which, of course, didn't go viral on YouTube) you'll see that his responses were actually what you'd expect from an ME.

There's no need to "make it a bit messier" because they're not worried about people questioning the explanation that Lanza had "expert control of a rapid fire rifle". They're relying on people not even thinking about it. In fact, they're relying on people not thinking at all. They felt brazen enough to pull this off because they gauged that people are so dumbed down at this point. And they were proven right. The mass response to it has been the usual emotional thinking about "pulling through this together" and "staying strong for Jesus, the country, the victims..." whatever.

 

[anka]

Hi,

i want to know if the broadcast & commenting works without being-logged-in-to/having-an-account-with the FB. I raised a question in relation to that here

http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,20572.msg393537.html#msg393537
(reply #10)

and i would also be interested to hear from someone about the position of the QFG on using the FB and other platforms since i haven't used any of them so far. If this topic was discussed anywhere on this forum then i missed it so thanks for a suggestion/link.

 

[LQB]

Great show guys - unfortunately I had to miss some parts.

One thing has kind of bothered the back of my mind (since the shooting): the precision and efficient killing. Do we really know that it was that precise and efficient considering the ME's performance and other reports? If an Op was planned around framing Lanza, it seems to me that some care would be taken to make it a bit messier rather than rely on a story about Lanza's expert control of a rapid fire rifle. The possibilities I've thought of are:

1) The precision and efficiency are a kind of message to the collective subconscious and were intended for this purpose.
2) Just bad Op planning (hard to buy for me)
3) Or, is this somehow covering for multiple shooters that could have been determined by the ME?
4) Lanza really was a fully programmed killer in the class of Kathleen Sullivan (if you believe her story)

What about the ME's performance?

Someone edited his press conference to make it seem like he was looney, but if you watch the full video of the conference (which, of course, didn't go viral on YouTube) you'll see that his responses were actually what you'd expect from an ME.

Sorry - I missed that.

There's no need to "make it a bit messier" because they're not worried about people questioning the explanation that Lanza had "expert control of a rapid fire rifle". They're relying on people not even thinking about it. In fact, they're relying on people not thinking at all. They felt brazen enough to pull this off because they gauged that people are so dumbed down at this point. And they were proven right. The mass response to it has been the usual emotional thinking about "pulling through this together" and "staying strong for Jesus, the country, the victims..." whatever.

I understand what you're saying and you are probably right, but it would have taken very little time/effort to make it more believable that Lanza did the shooting - that may just be me though.