Giant UFOs?

[Laura]

Have a look at these things:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHj0h8aInLc&feature=player_embedded

They strike me as paranormal, variably physical or something.

 

[Gimpy]

Reminds me of slides from biology class...like pond debris or other kinds of single cell organisms?

Funny how the brain insists on making certain connections...these are more interesting than any of the 'machine' type images.

 

[Explorer]

Yeah, certainly not "nuts and bolts". They look ghostly, and I find it strange that the narrator thinks that they are mechanical, maybe even from Earth. If these are craft, they are not operating on material technology. Reminds me of that Arthur Clarke quote -"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Very interesting video. Thanks for posting, Laura.

 

[LQB]

Maybe like plasmoid 3D/4D variable physicality. They seem similar to the cellular "plasmoids" that have been photographed and associated with big orgon devices like the cloudbuster.

 

[Tigersoap]

They don't look like solid crafts, ghostly is the word. Maybe they're both actually, seen from our 3D perspective.
Maybe they're just giant living organisms slipping in and out of dimensions.
I wonder what size they really are ?

 

[Explorer]

Something interesting is the way that some of them look like what we might typically think of as a spaceship, even shifting about to achieve this look. Am I the only one who got this vibe?

 

[mada85]

They seem to combine aspects of living organisms and machines. Some of the forms remind me of bones. They don't look solid, though. A 4D incursion into our reality that causes plasma to take on certain forms according to 3D natural laws?

 

[sitting]

Have a look at these things:

Hi Laura,

If I'm not mistaken, these were the objects John Lear had mentioned several years ago as evidence of a dozen or so weaponized space satellites the U.S. had in orbit. I think this video is the one he alluded to. But I could be wrong.

 

[seek10]

he doesn't talk about when the video was taken and in what direction etc. for some more people to view and clarify. music does seems dramatic. it does like some structure shape shifting.

 

[sitting]

I recall seeing this one...uploaded 5 years ago.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWP_-a1P5hA

Please note I'm NOT saying what it really is or is not. Only that it's been on the net for some years now. And yes, there definitely is something ephemeral about these objects.

 

[Loire]

Could this thing be one of the international space stations we sparingly hear about? It seem that there are some folks of this world who have secretely managed to acquire some weird technology which the rest of us cannot even conceptualize! Just thinking though

 

[Green_Manalishi]

This reminds me of a quote on Mouravieff book (i believe), where he said that when our cells look up, what they see a sky full of stars. By analogy what we see on the sky could be other life forms, or constituents of the whatever "body" we are immersed in. Just a thought that this could be some other life form.

 

[Nicholas]

John Lenard Walson has a you tube channel with all of his sightings on video.

_https://www.youtube.com/user/JohnLenardWalson

It is amazing some of the things he has captured.

 

[treesparrow]

Talking of some UFO's being perhaps a manifestation of some type of living organism (but in this instance much closer to Earth), I came across this article last year that may be of interest. Fascinating perspective and a really original take on Ufos for the most part, osit.

SKY BEASTS, NOT SPACE CRAFT - UNMASKING THE UFOS?

"Unknown, luminous things, or beings, have often been seen, sometimes close to this earth, and sometimes high in the sky. It may be that some of them were living things that occasionally come from somewhere else."

Charles Fort - Lo!

It has often been said that Nature abhors a vacuum – and evolution certainly does. Every conceivable niche upon planet Earth has been populated by life forms – on land, in freshwater and the seas, beneath layers of rock far below the earth’s surface, even buried within the formless ooze on the ocean beds and encircling their scorching water-spewing hydrothermal vents. Yet, inexplicably, there is one lone but vast ecological niche that has remained totally untouched by such animate activity – the rarefied atmospheric layers above and encompassing our world. True, insects, bacteria, birds, bats, and various other living entities spend varying extents of time in the sky, but there is no known life form that has evolved to live exclusively here, never venturing groundward except to die. There are no sky beasts, or cloud creatures – or are there?

One of the most intriguing UFO explanations on offer is that at least some of these elusive aerial entities are not alien spacecraft or anything else from beyond our planet. Instead, they are living creatures – huge, fast, and exceedingly fragile, but life forms nonetheless, highly-specialised for an absolute existence high above our earthbound domain. In my recent book Dr Shuker’s Casebook (2008), I devoted a lengthy chapter to this fascinating, but previously largely-forgotten scenario, which has helped to revive interest in the sky beast theory - one that, as will now be seen, is certainly greatly deserving of renewed attention.

CRITTERS AHOY!

Down through the decades, a sky beast identity for UFOs has been championed by a number of writers and researchers, of which the most famous must surely be Trevor James Constable, who spent over 20 years investigating this subject, and published two books. The first of these, They Live in the Sky, came out in 1958, but the second, The Cosmic Pulse of Light, published in 1976 and then again, in abridged form, in 1978 as Sky Creatures: Living UFOs, brought this fascinating notion to a much wider audience than it had ever before reached.

Constable considered the sky beasts – or ‘critters’, as he dubbed them – to resemble gigantic unicellular amoebae, but encased in a metallic or mica-like outer shell or capsule, and with the majority of their bodies composed of plasma, the fourth state of matter, comprising an ionised gas. Although some critters may be as small as a few centimetres, others could be several kilometres long, and remain hidden on most occasions from humans by virtue of their ability to reflect infra-red light, thus rendering them invisible to our eyes – except if they change colour, thereby temporarily reflecting light within the electromagnetic spectrum’s visible section.

Yet even if critters are usually beyond our range of vision, their presence can still be detected, for according to Constable they can actually be photographed – using infra-red film and appropriate filters. In his books, he published a number of photos depicting supposed critters snapped by him in the skies above California’s Mojave Desert, and one of his acolytes, Richard Toronto, duplicated Constable’s attempts in this same locality during 1977, obtaining similar pictures. Their photos have never been exposed as hoaxes (though Kodak representatives have suggested that Toronto’s critters may be nothing more exciting than dirty fingerprints and drying spots), and show several different morphological types. These include fusiform entities, giant amoeboid blobs, huge bladder-shaped objects, gigantic discs, and even some with curiously reptilian ‘beaks’. Moreover, cine-films taken by Constable show that these objects change shape as they move through the sky, and are luminous.

IN SEARCH OF IDEOPLASMS

Another dedicated supporter of the sky beast theory was John Philip Bessor, whose own interest in such a concept was in no small way inspired by Kenneth Arnold’s historic sighting on 24 June 1947 of a phalanx of nine UFOs while flying a Callair aeroplane near Mount Rainier in Washington State, USA. What fascinated Bessor in particular concerning this encounter (which heralded the modern-day wave of UFO interest and sightings worldwide) was Arnold’s belief that what he had seen were: “…living organisms, sort of like sky jellyfish” – far removed from today’s popular spacecraft image for UFOs.

Bessor later stated that, in his view, UFOs were a form of living creature (which he christened an ideoplasm) composed of a highly attenuated substance, enabling them to materialise or dematerialise at will, utilising telekinetic energy for propulsion. As would be echoed by Constable in relation to his critters, Bessor opined that these entities must be capable of becoming visible, invisible, and changing colour, all very rapidly. He even submitted his thoughts to the U.S. Air Force, and, remarkably, was informed by them that they considered his notion to be “one of the most intelligent theories we have received” regarding the possible nature and identity of UFOs.

Yet another theory of sky beasts, proposed during this same era of thought regarding UFOs, was that of Countess Zoe Wassilko-Serecki. Authoring a number of articles on this subject, she deemed it plausible that such entities were enormous, glowing, stratosphere-inhabiting creatures resembling gargantuan bladders of colloidal silicones, containing a central core of insubstantial matter but otherwise composed predominantly of pure energy. She claimed that they appeared spherical when stationary but became fusiform when moving, and so diffuse at higher levels as to appear virtually invisible.

In addition, hydrophone inventor John M. Cage, commenting upon how closely the pursuit of aircraft by UFOs resembled that of dolphins with ships, suggested that some UFOs may be sentient beings feeding upon negative electricity. And in his book The Circlemakers (1992), veteran psychical investigator Andrew Collins speculated that perhaps some cropfield circles may be created by energy released by biological UFOs when swooping downwards from the skies.

_http://www.karlshuker.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/sky-beasts-not-space-craft-unmasking.html

The rest of the article - which deals with foo fighters, rods and other odd stuff - goes off at a tangent I think and incorporates maybe too much disparate and unrelated material.

 

[neema]

Well I came up with two possibilities.

One, since they look organic, I can see how they could be the layer of reality that is slowly being exposed due to thinning of the veil.

Two, they can be the very comets clusters and the plasma electric discharges between them that you Laura are talking about in HoM. They are orbiting our solar system and in the videos it talks about how they are in sync with the constellations. Don’t know just thinking out loud.

Here is a link to a longer video of the objects.

Fwiw.