RedFox said:
I don't think music is essential to increasing awareness.....but like everything else in this existence it can help or hinder depending on your level of knowledge and understanding.
I would tend to agree with this. The more knowledge you have, it is possible (but not guaranteed) to increase your awareness. When you are more aware, how you react to music is different. Imagine how different you might perceive the same music of your teenage years many years later after you had experienced much more of life. Even if your taste had not really changed, you might react to the music very differently. As (I think) Gurdjieff suggests, your "being" has changed.
For myself, having become aware of esoteric studies, and hyperdimensional realities, I am more likely to search for and pick up on lyrics in songs that might be influenced by these things. I also find that I desire to be more aware of the responses it awakens in me and question them: is this helping or HINDERING my spiritual growth. Here I define spiritual growth as being more aware of objective reality. Also, by being more aware of how music makes me react, I can learn more about my machine, and observe it.
Not long after the infamous day in september 2001 I started to wake from my sleeping subjective reality and started to really look at the world I was living in and tried to understand it. My studies showed that society, "civilization", was uglier, more corrupt, and depressing than I could have guessed. I found myself searching for music that had lyrics that expressed these same things that I was seeing and feeling. In fact, it was the search for this music that led me in 2008 to the MP3 files posted on a certain page I had never seen before: Signs of the Times! Since then, thanks to the assistance of the SOTT team the learning has advanced amazingly. Now some of those ballads and folk songs that protested war and societal injustice that I found are a bit out of date and somewhat naive even, and I have lost the need to listen to them much anymore.
On another note: Music and its effects on people is an intriguing topic.
This topic is not only interesting, but I think that understanding this is crucial if we want to look at music for the purposes of "positive dissociation" as Laura brought up in its own thread:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=14103.0
I have had the desire to learn more about this, but my research has been limited and paltry so far, and I was surprised that just doing Google searches for articles (not very extensively I admit) has not brought to me very much of what I would call very solid data yet. Lots of conjecture, speculation, urban myths, and articles that promote religious interpretation of good and bad music.
I would really like to investigate this idea I have sometimes come across, of sort of "higher" vs "lower" music. Perhaps certain frequencies are designed more to please or suit our lower centers and there may be others that seem more oriented to our higher centers. Or some frequencies appeal to the lower emotional, others to lower intellectual, or moving center. Or something like that. I wonder what Gurdjieff said about music - my studies have not gone that far.
Another term that has been used is "positive" or "negative" music. "What is negative music? It is music that stimulates the negative emotions: anger, frustration, depression, hatred and fear." [from _http://www.dovesong.com/Positive_music/negative_music.asp - (I don't know if this is a credible site or not)]
Then it gets all more complicated with tastes, moods, and then even add possible cultural upbringing that has labeled some music as "good" and other as "evil".
From personal experience what is in my mind and how I am feeling and then the reason I choose the music I listen to, determines a great deal of its effect on me. For example if I am angry, and I purposely choose some heavier stuff BECAUSE I am angry, I get angrier, and downright aggressive. However, if I choose meditative or relaxing and calm kind of music, mainly because I don't want to dwell in my anger, I find myself getting calmer pretty rapidly. However having a fairly neutral mood, for example I have no anger, when I choose either the heavy or meditative music, the effect is almost neutral - or at least I don't consciously notice the effect.
Or what do you think about this thought I came across in my (limited) searches:
_http://www.dovesong.com/Positive_music/effects_of_music.asp said:
We all have our built-in filters, our likes and dislikes, that can block the direct effect that music might have. A happy song might appear to make an angry person angrier, yet it is not the music itself that is creating the anger; rather it is the positive effect of the music. The angry person does not want to accept the song’s happy feeling: it points out his already existing anger, and makes that anger come to the surface.
In any case, I will stick my head out on a limb and say that music, whatever it is, is not neutral. It has effects on us, and thus I suppose also to our spiritual growth. But I do not know enough to say more.
Studies about the effect of music on plants and animals are interesting and I might like to read more. However, humans are still a different kind of creature and I immediately imagine that there is only a certain limited applicability of such studies to human beings that are more complex. Perhaps a place to start is "The Sound of Music and Plants" by Dorothy L. Retallack? I think this may be the often referred to study about plants thriving or dying when exposed to certain kinds of music?
If anyone has done any research along these lines mentioned in this post, I encourage them to share! Maybe start a new thread? It is possible, (and quite likely) I have not searched SOTT/Cass enough and there might be some deeper dicussions on this topic already.
In the meantime it is on my todo list to gather some more information on this. I suspect the more knowledge we have about music, the more we can use it for whatever spiritual growth effect that we consciously desire, (heh whether it is STO or STS oriented!) rather than simply being subject to our "likes" and "dislikes" of the mood of the moment.
_Breton_