Induced Lucid Dreaming

fundamentally the aim of all ancient schools is the aim to develop these bodies the way I understand it starting with the astral.

but when you are using certain artificial methods maybe you are getting a faulty connection... I believe I have had this faulty connection. Gurdjieff says you are not born with a soul - that you have to develop the additional bodies starting with the 2nd. and this is by the foods (material, air, impressions) helping to crystalize it..

when I had the OoBE I was having a lot of work and struggle 4 years ago.. so that could have been a sort of catalyst which induced my experiences for three mornings in 1 week. but before that I was practicing methods and having frequent lucid dreams.. and I may not have had the experiences beforehand without practicing methods..

I do think better than practicing methods we should strive to develop self observation.. attention span, meditation etc..

it's true we can maybe be very productive with OoBE. but we can also be production in waking life which is 2/3 of life. sometimes both may go hand in hand that is my opinion. OoBE is a human experience a "higher experience" it could serve as inspiration for work.

But there is wrong crystallization which gurdjieff talked about. If you practice "methods" and negate real life - it is probably this wrong crystallization. But if you have a firm grip on waking life then maybe you can do this and it is natural thing. surely a lot of people have an interest in OoBE and I don't think it is an inherently destructive interest.
 
timmyman
why is chasing experiences bad? thanks :)
Others can probably give more detail as I am pressed for time this morning, but my understanding is that "experiences" that are reality altering, like
drugs, self induced chemical changes through excessive exercise/meditation, OBEs, etc., interfere with our ability to be "present" physically, mentally, and spiritually.
It is being present aka self-aware that is required to make progress in The Work, and to stay on the narrow path toward, "enlightenment" if you will, and a better
understanding of objective reality--truth.
shellycheval
 
timmyman said:
One question:

why is chasing experiences bad? thanks :)

When you chase experiences you are making a prejudgment that the present experiences are "unworthy" of you. This is untrue and is self-importance in action. The Work is about working with what we are given. Learn to walk before you can run. When you are ready the experiences will come to you.
 
timmyman said:
One question:

why is chasing experiences bad? thanks :)

On this and lucid dreaming the following may help

RedFox said:
Simon said:
"Seeing images through meditation is natural" - that's exactly my point - not for me. That's why I came up with this "visualization barrier" - and if it's not that - than I truly have no idea what to do.. so to continue answering 2 U, I have nothing to be distracted with - I am worried about it.

Can I asked why you are worried by this? Are you equating your inability to visualise in unguided meditation with some form of life/spiritual failing?
Have you perhaps considered the reason you 'cannot see anything' is infact perhaps like a firewall/virus killer on a computer? What you are trying to 'see' would infect your computer with a virus.....so 'not seeing' is healthy at this point?
For the record I could never 'see' anything in (unguided) meditations.....nor could I have OBE's (I had some spontaneously as a child) when I tried to force it, nor lucid dream. Fortunately I learnt that forcing such things can be harmful, so desisted before I permanently damaged myself.
I'm pretty sure that 'forcing' such issues may be abridging your own free will.
Also
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,5372.0.html
All right, MM took a
particular type of Reiki inititation or attumement today, and
I’d like to know, what was the... she had an event occur
during the attunements. I would like to know what this event
was. What this condition was that she experienced.
A: She should be careful not to “spread her self too thin.�
Q: (L) And what does that mean?
A: One does not need to cram learning, “steady as she goes.�
Q: (V) They’re punctually correct, aren’t they? (L) Yes, they
are! So, is that in a sense a caution?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Can you describe what it was that was taking place
with her? Or define it?
A: Soul bilocation.
Q: (L) So, it was not exactly a state, as the Sufis describe?
A: No.
Q: (L) And where did she bilocate to?
A: Not easily explainable.
Q: (L) Was it to another density or dimension? Or parallel
univers or spiritual domain? (T) Norfolk Naval Station?
[Laughter] Destination of bilocation! (L) Was this a beneficial
event for her?
A: No. She has been ripping open the fabric too much.
Q: (V) Do you know what that means? (TM) The fabric of
this dimension? (L) Is T correct? The fabric of this dimension?
A: Close. Each soul has its own patterning, which is held in
place by the three bodies of existence [planchette swirls a few
times] ... “thought center, spirit center and physical center,�
there are specific methodologies for adjusting these, and
travelling into or out of other planes of existence. When one
does not properly utilize these, one tears the fabric of their
trilateral continuum when they seek to travel. This can be very
problematic, and may lead to the soul being unable to
reconnect with the body, thus causing the physical center to
perish!!!

Simon said:
You wrote before that maybe the visualization barrier is there for a reason - I think this reason is the way I lived my life to this point. Strong, fact-oriented atheist, proud (!) of his power of deduction, "knowledge-lover" and total ignoramus in Spirit matter.

I'm the same (from the point of view of 'knowledge lover')...but you'll come to learn (if you stick around) that this forum is based on knowledge and reasoning and understanding. We approach the spiritual with a scientific/deductive attitude. In general the best attitude to take towards any 'experience' that is considered 'spiritual' (that is something you cannot define with knowledge/deduction) is that of at the very least scepticism. Lest you be caught in a trap.....4D STS just love to snare people through 'ecstatic religious/spiritual experiences' they 'cannot rationally explain'.

Simon said:
I mean I made myself empty inside because of my faith and admiration of Mind and it's power of Understanding. I gave up all things that I was unable to measure or to comprehend with my logical mind. I neglect that part of myself and I've builded my whole life on foundation without any depth. It is just "an optimal option in given circumstances".

Ok, so you are now swinging totally the other way....abandoning all rational reasoning for 'pure experience' right? Perhaps ask how that is any better?
Balance and caution is the key. I understand this because being someone who spent most of his life 'in thought' I swung the other way quite drastically too.

Simon said:
What I am looking for currently IS complex and it IS beyond my direct grasp, yes. After all those years I've spent on simplifying reality I live in, it is about time to focus on what's underneath/beyond my "direct grasp".
For me it was the though (feeling) that 'my soul was missing'...something fundamental was 'lost'. Which boils down to believing 'I was broken' at 'some level'.

Simon said:
Even if it may be dangerous, I am prepared to take this risk. I mean in what other way can I gain "understanding and knowledge" of it all if I won't try to work with it? Theory is good for imagination or partial understanding needs, but it will never be proper equivalent of experience.
So have you tried the EE program? So far all I see you doing is intellectually rationalising away it as an option - fixating instead on 'pure irrationality' of '(direct) experience'.....the problem is its a jungle out there. If you want a direct experience of a jungle, what are your odds of getting eaten/killed/ill if you don't know the terrain??
If you've lived all your life in a tiny village, and want a 'direct experience of a city' (ignoring the warnings of thieves and con men you've never seen, only heard of in tales) what to stop you from being prey to thieves, con men, manipulators, users and pushers?
It is hubris to presume the 'spiritual world' is no less dangerous because (from your perspective) it is intangible.

Now, you are probably reacting defensively right now....and feeling that what I have writtern is harsh. Would that person from the tiny hamlet feel any less hurt if they where warned them of the dangers of the 'city'? Would it stop them going? Would they go blindly regardless (and get 'eaten')?

Or would they do something smart.....Would they stop and ask what the dangers where, if anyone had gone before, what tools/maps existed? If anyone could help point out paths that may/may not have worked?

As to 'prepared to take the risk'....do you know what you are risking exactly?

You may or may not want to find out....
Here's a snippet from Stalking or Precis on The Good and The Evil on 'bidding'. If you cannot see how this is linked to your '(forced) experience chasing' you may want to consider it more deeply.
http://cassiopaea.org/2010/09/14/michael-topper-on-stalking/
Should there remain any reluctance to grasp this point, or some desire to conserve the liberal-humanistic proposal to which Strieber often turns (i.e. to call such things truly Negative or Evil is “simplistic,” you know) we find a passage in the Ra Material, that anticipates Strieber’s account by years and furnishes a framework before the fact, which not only fits the Strieber-entities’ behaviors like a key in a lock, but gives us a needed perspective of evaluation.

On page 21 of Volume III, The Law of One, the Ra entity characterizes a prototypical tactic of the [4th Density STS], that of “bidding.” “Bidding” is described in such a way to make it clear that Strieber’s experience represents a concrete instance of the phenomenon.

“Bidding” is a contest of will, rendering the consciousness that obeys into enslavement through its own free will. It is a command of obedience, precisely such as that issued without explanation against Strieber’s lust for sweets. It’s sole purpose is to bend the subject into accepting the command, the actual content of the order being largely beside the point. […] To possess a legion of servants in this way is an actual nourishment to the centers and systems of 4th density; a kind of “food-chain pyramid.” […]

Thus we find the Strieber entity virtually paraphrasing the earlier Ra recitation of the modus operandi that identifies the Negative beings – the failure to exact obedience bears punishable consequence. It is a continuing illustration of the way in which the Negative polarity extorts the desired obedience – and thus soul capture – through manipulation of Love.

In the end, you will do what you will do.

*edit* clarity/spelling
 
timmyman said:
One question:

why is chasing experiences bad? thanks :)

I wouldn't classify "chasing experiences" as good or bad. Anyone who's not involved in the Work can do what they want, but those who are needs to be aware that trying to alter one's reality (lucid dreaming, etc.) as a way to "gain" experiences drives one further into dream of the "past" (subjective) and away from the reality (objective).

Here's a thread on why phenomenon chasing is detrimental to the Work (with links of examples provided):

https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=23283.0

In regards to lucid dreaming, the C's said that it can be "useful for entertainment mainly" (Session 03 Sept 2008).

Just saw RedFox's post. :)
 
wetroof said:
fundamentally the aim of all ancient schools is the aim to develop these bodies the way I understand it starting with the astral.

but when you are using certain artificial methods maybe you are getting a faulty connection... I believe I have had this faulty connection. Gurdjieff says you are not born with a soul - that you have to develop the additional bodies starting with the 2nd. and this is by the foods (material, air, impressions) helping to crystalize it..

when I had the OoBE I was having a lot of work and struggle 4 years ago.. so that could have been a sort of catalyst which induced my experiences for three mornings in 1 week. but before that I was practicing methods and having frequent lucid dreams.. and I may not have had the experiences beforehand without practicing methods..

I do think better than practicing methods we should strive to develop self observation.. attention span, meditation etc..

it's true we can maybe be very productive with OoBE. but we can also be production in waking life which is 2/3 of life. sometimes both may go hand in hand that is my opinion. OoBE is a human experience a "higher experience" it could serve as inspiration for work.

But there is wrong crystallization which gurdjieff talked about. If you practice "methods" and negate real life - it is probably this wrong crystallization. But if you have a firm grip on waking life then maybe you can do this and it is natural thing. surely a lot of people have an interest in OoBE and I don't think it is an inherently destructive interest.
That depends, and, as always, the devil is in the details. If they have an interest to have the experience itself and nothing more, that is really pure STS - it's 'desire' and trying to bend things to ones will - trying to 'make it happen'. The reality is that OOBEs and lucid dreams are a normal part of human experience and they happen as they happen. Most of my dreams are "lucid" according to how these people who push the "lucid dreaming experience" define it. Big deal! It's just dreaming to me and just what happens naturally. I've also had what is defined as 'out of body experiences'. Big deal! That's just part of human experience and it's my suspicion that a lot of people experience that and just can't bring it back to conscious recall, so they don't 'remember' it, which is why some people think it's such a "big deal". It's not.

What is a big deal is learning how to master ones mental and emotional states - learning how to BE and, in that, becoming what we can only define as immortal - the real Work - that's a big deal because it could be the reason we are here (the alternative reason being just to be "food for the Moon") and accomplishing it is such a vanishingly rare thing. I'd get a LOT more excited about being the master of my own mental/emotional states (I'm not currently) than I ever would about the fact that most of my dreams are "lucid" or that I've occasionally recalled out of body experiences - like I said - big deal. Compared to actually accomplishing the kind of self-mastery necessary to escape this time loop and help others do the same, the whole lucid dream and OOBE subject is all nonsense. This is, of course, just my personal understanding, fwiw.
 
Thank you so much for clearing all that up :)

as for experience chasing in my account. It is what got me started down on this path in the first place. It was the quest to find god. I now of course know better but i still can not deny that it was experience chasing with all that is bad about it (drugs, extreme lifestyle, living recklessly, you name it) that got me where i am today. So in a sense you need the bad to see the good?
 
I remember that the Cs once said that curiosity in it's pure form is a spiritual function. I think genuine curiosity toward any subject can be fruitful.
 
Curiosity is not supposed to circumvent good judgement.

It may be argued that the Cassiopaean experiment is comparably dangerous to astral projection, and that curiosity played a part in it. But Laura has the knowledge and knows what she's doing. You don't plunge into the jungle without adequate supplies and an understanding of it, unless you expect to be eaten. Is that the curiosity you're wishing to satisfy?

Laura has a long list of books anyone who wants to attempt channeling should read. Maybe you should consider them?
 
timmyman said:
Thank you so much for clearing all that up :)

as for experience chasing in my account. It is what got me started down on this path in the first place. It was the quest to find god. I now of course know better but i still can not deny that it was experience chasing with all that is bad about it (drugs, extreme lifestyle, living recklessly, you name it) that got me where i am today. So in a sense you need the bad to see the good?

...or it kills you first (figuratively and/or literally).
 
That depends, and, as always, the devil is in the details. If they have an interest to have the experience itself and nothing more, that is really pure STS - it's 'desire' and trying to bend things to ones will - trying to 'make it happen'. The reality is that OOBEs and lucid dreams are a normal part of human experience and they happen as they happen. Most of my dreams are "lucid" according to how these people who push the "lucid dreaming experience" define it. Big deal! It's just dreaming to me and just what happens naturally. I've also had what is defined as 'out of body experiences'. Big deal! That's just part of human experience and it's my suspicion that a lot of people experience that and just can't bring it back to conscious recall, so they don't 'remember' it, which is why some people think it's such a "big deal". It's not.

What is a big deal is learning how to master ones mental and emotional states - learning how to BE and, in that, becoming what we can only define as immortal - the real Work - that's a big deal because it could be the reason we are here (the alternative reason being just to be "food for the Moon") and accomplishing it is such a vanishingly rare thing. I'd get a LOT more excited about being the master of my own mental/emotional states (I'm not currently) than I ever would about the fact that most of my dreams are "lucid" or that I've occasionally recalled out of body experiences - like I said - big deal. Compared to actually accomplishing the kind of self-mastery necessary to escape this time loop and help others do the same, the whole lucid dream and OOBE subject is all nonsense. This is, of course, just my personal understanding, fwiw.

okay, I believe this is a well reasoned approach. I also think people have a similar experience perhaps at other levels of awareness. but when it filters down to ordinary consciousness it is a particular event which must have some mechanism. I'm still too attached to dreaming and OoBE to call it nonsense though. For Laura - communication with the C's was part of her personal work? so not experience chasing. and I believe that at least one guy (Robert Monroe) has had communication with 6th density entities through astral projection which he calls Inspecs (intelligent species).
 
wr said:
I'm still too attached to dreaming and OoBE to call it nonsense though.

It shows, but it's good that you recognize that. Really, though, being attached to dreaming and oobes is no different than being attached to yawning or eating, since both are also normal human functions. Identification is identification and its base is always - always - illusion.

wetroof said:
For Laura - communication with the C's was part of her personal work? so not experience chasing.

It's not at all comparable, and I think you know that. Laura engaged in a critical channeling experiment over many years, with the vast majority of her effort focused on nuts and bolts research - you really can't get farther away from OOBEs and lucid dreaming than that - in fact, I'd say that the two are diametrically opposed.


wr said:
and I believe that at least one guy (Robert Monroe) has had communication with 6th density entities through astral projection which he calls Inspecs (intelligent species).

Anyone can say anything...
 
The very first experience I had with lucid type dreaming ( that I remember) was when I was four years old. What I've learned is

1. It may be used as a forum for disinformation

2. It may also be used as a forum for learning about ones assumptions. There appears to be a feedback loop between assumption and the dream's "physical laws". Thus, it may serve as a prep school for learning how to let go of limiting assumptions and opening one's self to unlimited possibilities.

3. Not every dream has meaning and attempting to derive meaning from all of them is counterproductive and a drain of mental energy.

4. Some dreams do have meaning and, for me, these type of dreams have a different "flavor" so to speak. Knowing the "flavor" is a learning process. For me, the "flavor" was recognized in retrospect. If you don't know what you don't know then system 2 has no data in memory storage for comparison. Once the "dream symbol" has played out its dynamic in reality then system 2 has "flavor" data in storage connected to dream data which is also connected to system 1. If you know the "flavor" then it becomes easier to discern significant dream symbols from insignificant ones. Thus, it seems to me that "dream data" if discerned correctly can help system 2 develop coherency
with system 1 in reality.

5. Anything that effects or activates the seeking system (drugs, alcohol or substance which increase activity if the dopaminergic system will cause major confusion in system 2's ability to recognize "flavor" coming from system 1.

6. If you are attempting to do The Work then it may be utilized as prep school for observing emotions and its connection to the feedback loop of the "dream field". If something in your dream is attacking you then the usual response is fear or anger. If you working on trying to observe your emotions then you can observe it in "dream time" and you can see how watching it changes the surrounding "dreamscape"
This may lead to bringing your emotional horse under conscious control in reality.

This is my current thinking about the possible benefits of this type of dreaming as it relates to Doing the Work. Of course, I am basing this on my experience thus it is more of a "theory" in progress. FWIW

"flavor" correctly.)
 
Back
Top Bottom