Israel-Palestine War: Hamas Breaks Out of Gaza, Israel Responds With Genocide

'"Four-hour pauses" for accelerating ethnic cleansing: The US and Israel do not even think to start ceasefire in Gaza.'

9 Nov, 2023

10 Nov, 2023

09.11.2023
 
The French language is incredible. It's so rich and full of nuances, absolutely delicious.
Yes loreta, it's like Aeneas said, and he speaks a French language here that may have disappeared and is restoring the truth without almost any possible dispute even.
His clear and strategic thinking is like reasoning that no one dared (or is no longer able?) formulate, so powerful is the consensus.
It is a balm for the mind to know that he can intervene on television and elsewhere and push such strong arguments (because filled with common sense)!
On the other hand, Maq-Ron speaking for Peace just reminds us of his tendency to say everything and his opposite in the same theatrical tone, changing his ideas as he does his shirt, so much so that he no longer even knows where he lives..., disgusting !

Stay strong Loreta, your spirit has saved me many times :hug2: :flowers:

Oui loreta, c'est comme le disait Aeneas, et il parle ici une langue française qui a peut-être disparu et rétablit la vérité sans presque aucune contestation possible même.
Sa pensée claire et stratégique est comme un raisonnement que personne n'a osé (ou n'est plus capable?) formuler, tant le consensus est puissant.
C'est un baume pour l'esprit de savoir qu'il peut intervenir à la télévision et ailleurs et pousser des arguments aussi forts (car emplis de bon sens) !
A l'inverse, Maq-Ron parlant pour la paix nous rappelle juste sa tendance à dire tout et son contraire sur le même ton théatral, changeant d'idées comme de chemise, si bien qu'il ne sait même plus où il habite..., dégoûtant !

Restez forte Loreta, votre esprit m'a sauvé plusieurs fois 🙏🪷
 
"Hamas just wants to kill all Jews, can't be any other reason" - riiight? Watch Hamas' founder Ahmed Yassin:



His wikipedia entry is also quite interesting:

Sheikh Ahmed Ismail Hassan Yassin (Arabic: الشيخ أحمد إسماعيل حسن ياسين; June 1936 – 22 March 2004)[2] was a Palestinian politician and imam who founded Hamas, a militant Islamist and Palestinian nationalist organization in the Gaza Strip, in 1987.[3][4][5][6][7] He served as the organization's spiritual leader after its founding.

Yassin, a quadriplegic who was nearly blind, had been reliant on a wheelchair due to a sporting accident at the age of 12.[8] In 2004, he was killed when an Israeli helicopter gunship fired a missile at him as he was being wheeled from Fajr prayer in Gaza City.[9] The attack, which also killed both of his bodyguards and nine bystanders, was internationally condemned.[9] 200,000 Palestinians attended his funeral procession in Gaza.[10]


Early life​


Ahmed Yassin was born in al-Jura, a small village near the city of Ashkelon, in the British Mandate of Palestine.[1] His date of birth is not known for certain: according to his Palestinian passport, he was born on 1 January 1929, but he claimed to have actually been born in the summer of 1936. His father, Abdullah Yassin, died when he was three years old. Afterward, he became known in his neighborhood as Ahmad Sa'ada after his mother Sa'ada al-Habeel. This was to differentiate him from the children of his father's other three wives. Together, Yassin had four brothers and two sisters. He and his entire family fled to Gaza, settling in al-Shati Camp after his village was ethnically cleansed[11] by the Israel Defense Forces during the 1948 Arab–Israeli War.[9][12]

Yassin came to Gaza as a refugee. When he was 12, he sustained a severe spinal injury while wrestling his friend Abdullah al-Khatib. His neck was kept in plaster for 45 days. The damage to his spinal cord rendered him a quadraplegic for the rest of his life. Fearing a rift between his family and al-Khatib's, Yassin initially told his family that he sustained his injuries while playing leapfrog during a sports lesson with his school friends on the beach.[13]

Although Yassin applied to and attended Al-Azhar University in Cairo, he was unable to pursue his studies there due to his deteriorating health. He was forced to be educated at home where he read widely, particularly on philosophy and on religion, politics, sociology, and economics. His followers believe that his worldly knowledge made him "one of the best speakers in the Gaza Strip." During this time, he began delivering weekly sermons after Friday prayers, drawing large crowds of people.[13]

After years of unemployment, he got a post as an Arabic language teacher at an elementary school in Rimal, Gaza. Headmaster Mohammad al-Shawa initially had reservations about Yassin, concerning the reception he would receive from the pupils due to his disability. However, according to al-Shawa, Yassin handled them well and his popularity grew, especially among the more scholarly children. His teaching methods reportedly provoked mixed reactions among parents because he encouraged his students to attend the mosque an additional two times a week.[13] Having a regular job gave Yassin financial stability, and he married one of his relatives Halima Yassin in 1960 at the age of 22.[14] The couple had eleven children.[citation needed]


Involvement in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict​


Yassin was actively involved in setting up a Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.[15] In 1973, the Islamic charity Mujama al-Islamiya was established in Gaza by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin and the organization was recognized by Israel in 1979.[16] In 1984 he and others were jailed for secretly stockpiling weapons, but in 1985 he was released as part of the Jibril Agreement.[17] In 1987, during the First Intifada, Yassin co-founded Hamas with Abdel Aziz al-Rantisi, originally calling it the "paramilitary wing" of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood, and becoming its spiritual leader.[18]

In 1989, Yassin was arrested by Israel and sentenced to life imprisonment for ordering killings of alleged Palestinian collaborators.[19] In 1997, Yassin was released from Israeli prison as part of an arrangement with Jordan following a failed assassination attempt of Hamas leader Khaled Mashal by the Israeli Mossad in Jordan. Yassin was released in exchange for two Mossad agents who had been arrested by Jordanian authorities, on the condition that he refrained from continuing to call for suicide bombings against Israel.[18][20] The New York Times reported about his poor health at the time: "Sheik Ahmad Yassin, spiritual leader of Hamas, back home in Gaza after his release by Israel, is so frail he drinks only with help."[21]

Following his release, Yassin resumed his leadership of Hamas. He immediately repeated his calls for attacks on Israel, using tactics including suicide bombings, thus violating the condition of his release.[20] He also sought to maintain relations with the Palestinian Authority, believing that a clash between the two groups would be harmful to the interests of the Palestinian people.[18] Yassin was intermittently placed under house arrest by the Authority. Each time he was eventually released, often after extended demonstrations by his supporters. Yassin criticized the outcome of the 2003 Aqaba summit. His group initially declared a temporary truce with Israel. However, in July 2003, the truce unravelled after a Hamas suicide bombing of a Jerusalem bus killed 21 people the previous month. Israeli forces killed two Hamas members in retaliation.[18]

On 6 September 2003, an Israeli Air Force (IAF) F-16 fired several missiles on a building in Gaza City in the Gaza Strip. Yassin was in the building at the time but survived.[9] Israeli officials later confirmed that Yassin was the target of the attack. His injuries were treated at Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. Yassin responded to the media that "Days will prove that the assassination policy will not finish the Hamas. Hamas leaders wish to be martyrs and are not scared of death. Jihad will continue and the resistance will continue until we have victory, or we will be martyrs."[22]

Yassin further promised that Hamas would teach Israel an "unforgettable lesson" as a result of the assassination attempt.[23] Yassin made no attempt to guard himself from further attempts on his life or hide his location. Journalists sometimes visited his Gaza address and Yassin maintained a routine daily pattern of activity, including being wheeled every morning to a nearby mosque.

Reem Riyashi's suicide bombing at the Erez crossing on 14 January 2004, which killed four civilians, was believed by the Israeli military to have been directly ordered by Yassin.[24] Yassin suggested that the suicide bomber was fulfilling her "obligation" to make jihad,[25] and Israel's Deputy Defence Minister responded by publicly declaring that Yassin was "marked for death". Yassin denied any involvement in the attack.[24]


Involvement in attacks on Israel​


See also: List of Hamas suicide attacks

Yassin was a founder and leader of Hamas, which is regarded as a terrorist organization by a number of national governments.[26] Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon characterized Yassin as the "mastermind of Palestinian terror" and a "mass murderer."[10] The Israeli government repeatedly asserted that Yassin was responsible for a number of terrorist attacks, which targeted and killed civilians.[27]

In his statement Yassin declared that Hamas did target Israeli civilians, but only in direct retaliation for the death of Palestinian civilians. In his thinking this was a necessary tactic to "show the Israelis they could not get away without a price for killing our people."[28] In June 2003, after visiting al-Rantisi in hospital after a failed Israeli missile attack against him, Yassin told reporters: "Israel is targeting Palestinian civilians, so Israeli civilians should be targeted. From now on, all Israeli people are targets." "We got Israel's message. They should now expect the answer."[29]


Views on the peace process​


Yassin's views on the peace process between the Palestinians and the Israelis were ambiguous. He supported armed resistance against Israel and asserted that Palestine is an Islamic land "consecrated for future Muslim generations until Judgment Day" and that no Arab leader had the right to give up any part of this territory.[30] Concerning that territorial conflict, Yassin's rhetoric did not distinguish between Israelis and Jews, at one point stating that "reconciliation with the Jews is a crime."[31] However, film of him exists stating he loved all people, including Jews, whom he regarded as his religious cousins, and explaining his conflict with them is purely over land he regarded as stolen territory.[32] Yassin's rhetoric was often scrutinized in the news media.[33] On one occasion, he opined that Israel "must disappear from the map."[33] Yassin's declaration that "We chose this road, and will end with martyrdom or victory" later became a repeated mantra among Palestinians.[34]

Yassin on several occasions proposed long-term ceasefire agreements, or truces, so called Hudnas, in exchange for Israeli concessions. All such offers were rejected by Israel. Following his release from Israeli prison in 1997, he proposed a ten-year truce in exchange for total Israeli withdrawal from the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza and a stop to Israeli attacks on civilians. In 1999, in an interview with an Egyptian newspaper, he again offered a truce:[35]


We have to be realistic. We are talking about a homeland that was stolen a long time ago in 1948 and again in 1967. My generation today is telling the Israelis, 'Let's solve this problem now, on the basis of the 1967 borders. Let's end this conflict by declaring a temporary ceasefire. Let's leave the bigger issue for future generations to decide.' The Palestinians will decide in the future about the nature of relations with Israel, but it must be a democratic decision.[35]

Assassination​


Main article: Killing of Ahmed Yassin

Yassin was killed in an Israeli attack on 22 March 2004. While he was being wheeled out of an early morning prayer session in Gaza City,[36] an Israeli AH-64 Apache helicopter gunship fired Hellfire missiles at Yassin and both of his bodyguards. Before the attack, Israeli F-16 jets flew overhead to obscure the noise of the approaching helicopters.[36] Yassin always used the same direction every morning to go to the same mosque in the Sabra district that is 100 m (330 ft) from his home.[36]

Yassin and his bodyguards were killed instantly, along with nine bystanders.[9][37] Another 12 people were injured in the operation, including two of Yassin's sons. Abdel Aziz al-Rantissi, Yassin's Deputy, became the Hamas leader after his assassination.[36]


Reaction to assassination​


Kofi Annan, UN Secretary General, condemned the killing.[38] The UN Commission on Human Rights passed a resolution condemning the killing[39] supported by votes from 31 countries including the People's Republic of China, India, Indonesia, Russia, and South Africa, with 2 votes against and 18 abstentions. The Arab League council also expressed condemnation,[40] as did the African Union.

A draft resolution condemning the extrajudicial execution of Yassin and six other Palestinians, as well as all terrorist attacks against civilians[41] was brought before the United Nations Security Council and vetoed by the United States, with United Kingdom, Germany, and Romania abstaining.[42] The United States explained that the draft resolution should have condemned Hamas explicitly following its sponsored suicide bombings in Ashdod the week before.[43]


Palestinian​


The Palestinian Authority declared three days of mourning and closed Palestinian schools. Hamas official Ismail Haniyeh suggested, "This is the moment Sheikh Yassin dreamed about". The Hamas leadership said Ariel Sharon had "opened the gates of hell." Hamas called for retaliation against Israel. About 200,000 people took to the streets of the Gaza Strip for Yassin's funeral as Israeli forces declared a national alert.[10]

The assassination of Yassin also led to the fact that Hamas, for the first time, was named as the most popular movement in Palestine by the residents of the West Bank and Gaza Strip two weeks after the assassination.[44]

Abdel Aziz Rantisi was announced as the new head of Hamas. At a memorial service for Sheik Yassin, he declared that "The Israelis will not know security... We will fight them until the liberation of Palestine, the whole of Palestine."[45] Publicly addressing the "military wing" of Hamas, Rantisi suggested, "The door is open for you to strike all places, all the time and using all means."[45] Rantisi was himself killed by Israel on 17 April 2004 in an assassination almost identical to that of Yassin.[46] He was killed by three rockets fired from a Gunship by the Israeli Military.[47][48]

On 31 August 2004, at least 15 Israeli people were killed and 80 injured in a suicide attack against two Israeli buses in Beersheba. Hamas stated the attack was a revenge for the assassination of Rantisi and Yassin.[49] Following the bombing, an estimated 20,000 Hamas supporters in Gaza took to Gaza's streets, celebrating the successful attack.[50]


Israeli​


The Israeli government said the targeted killing was in response to dozens of suicide attacks by Hamas against Israeli civilians.[51] The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs defended the assassination of Yassin:


Yassin was the dominant authority of the Hamas leadership, which was directly involved in planning, orchestrating and launching terror attacks carried out by the organization. In this capacity, Yassin personally gave his approval for the launching of Qassam rockets against Israeli cities, as well as for the numerous Hamas terrorist bombings and suicide operations. In his public appearances and interviews, Yassin called repeatedly for a continuation of the 'armed struggle' against Israel, and for an intensification of the terrorist campaign against its citizens. The successful operation against Yassin constitutes a significant blow to a central pillar of the Hamas terrorist organization, and a major setback to its terrorist infrastructure.[52]

Shaul Mofaz, the Israeli Defense Minister, branded Yassin "the Palestinian Bin Laden" and said, "If we have to balance how many more terrorists Yassin would have sent, how many terror attacks he would have approved, if we weigh this on the scales, we acted rightly".[10]

Avraham Poraz, Israel's Interior Minister and member of the centrist Shinui Party, said he believed the assassination of Yassin "was a bad idea because I am afraid of a revenge coming from the Palestinian side, from the Hamas side."[53] Shimon Peres, then leader of the Labour opposition, was critical of the assassination, suggesting that it "could lead to an escalation of terror".[53]


Arab world​


King Abdullah II of Jordan described the assassination as a "crime";[9] Lebanon's president Emile Lahud vehemently denounced the Israeli act as "...a crime [which] will not succeed in liquidating the Palestinian cause";[9] Emir of Kuwait Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah said: "Violence will increase now because violence always breeds violence";[9] the head of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Mohammed Akef, described Yassin as a "martyr" and his assassination a "cowardly operation."[9]


Western world​


Jack Straw, then British Foreign Secretary, said: "All of us understand Israel's need to protect itself – and it is fully entitled to do that – against the terrorism which affects it, within international law. But it is not entitled to go in for this kind of unlawful killing and we condemn it. It is unacceptable, it is unjustified and it is very unlikely to achieve its objectives."[54] The European Union's foreign policy head Javier Solana expressed concern that it might impede the peace process.[9]

In response to a question about the killing, U.S. President George W. Bush responded:

As far as the Middle East, it's a troubled region, and the attacks were troubling. There needs to be a focused, concerted effort by all parties to fight terror. Any country has a right to defend itself from terror. Israel has the right to defend herself from terror. And as she does so, I hope she keeps consequences in mind as to how to make sure we stay on the path to peace.[55]

United States Representative to the United Nations John Negroponte stated that the United States was "deeply troubled by this action by the Government of Israel", while asserting that the U.S. would not support any U.N. Security Council statement condemning Israel's assassination of Yassin that did not include a condemnation of "Hamas terrorist attacks".[56] According to his statement to the UN Security Council,


The killing of Sheikh Yassin has escalated tensions in Gaza and the greater Middle East, and sets back our effort to resume progress towards peace. However, events must be considered in their context and as we consider the killing of Sheikh Yassin, we must keep in mind the facts. Sheikh Ahmed Yassin was the leader of a terrorist organization, one which has proudly taken credit for indiscriminate attacks against civilians, including most recently an attack last week in the Port of Ashdod, which left 10 Israelis dead. He preached hatred, and glorified suicide bombings of buses, restaurants, and cafes. Yassin was opposed to the existence of the State of Israel, and actively sought to undermine a two-state solution in the Middle East.
 
That psycho graham swings harder than a pendulum in a hurricane. I wonder what deal he made now

He was only recently telling Zelensky that the money given to Ukraine to kill Russians was the best money the US ever spent.

Now the shift is to immigration.

So, Ukraine is finished, complete disaster. And pictures of Israel committing genocide are all over the internet.

Time to shift public focus away from what’s going on ‘out there’ towards what’s going on ‘here’?

But with all those US carrier groups still in the med and Middle East?

Reminds me of that famous saying, “The war will be televised”. Maybe it just won’t.
 
Right. The 26th marine expeditionary unit (MEU) onboard the navy USS Bataan was in the Persian gulf, was ordered to make its way down gulf of Aden and I’m sure has made its way up the Red Sea… surely they’re not leaving anytime soon. Seems to the US has Israeli area more surrounded then it already was. Not to mention the ships in the Mediterranean USS Ford and Eisenhower IMG_5669.jpeg
 
"Hamas just wants to kill all Jews, can't be any other reason" - riiight? Watch Hamas' founder Ahmed Yassin:
Not only that, the tired "they want to kill all Jews" is a projection propaganda that's nonsense in my experience. What about Jews in Iran? In Iraq? In Morocco? In Yemen (I had a Jewish teacher in middle-school who after traveling to the middle-east and the US, told us that it's in Yemen where he heard "real Hebrew" (i.e. Semitic), he described Israel's Hebrew as "Hebrew with a German accent")?
When I was a kid, there was a Rabbi who came to hometown every summer to visit his childhood friend, an Imam. The two old guys spent their time joking and laughing. According to the Imam's grandson, they just never talked religion, simple rule for friendship.
Of course there are weirdos who've been brainwashed by Wahabism and other Western-sponsored movements (The "Muslim Brotherhood" is a British creation in Egypt for instance). But overall, many of what's considered a truism in mainstream media is either an oversimplification, or in most cases, completely false.
 

Russia's public pivot to Palestine

"As the west's support for Israel's Gaza war becomes indefensible, Moscow aligns itself with the global majority in defense of Palestine."

Pepe Escobar
NOV 7, 2023

"Exhibit A is Russian President Vladimir Putin addressing - in person, on 30 October - his country's Security Council, top government officials, and heads of security agencies."

"There is no justification for the terrible events taking place in Gaza now, where hundreds of thousands of innocent people are being killed indiscriminately, without having anywhere to flee or hide from the bombing. When you see blood-stained children, dead children, the suffering of women and old people, when you see medics killed, of course, it makes you clench your fists as tears well in your eyes.”

"In no uncertain terms, Putin described “the current ruling elites in the United States and its satellites” as “the main beneficiaries of the global instability that they use to extract their bloody rent. Their strategy is also clear. The United States as a global superpower is becoming weaker and is losing its position, and everyone sees and understands this, even judging by the trends in the world economy.”

"The Russian president made a direct connection between the American drive to extend “its global dictatorship” and the policy obsession with promoting non-stop chaos: “This chaos will help it contain and destabilize its rivals or, as they put it, their geopolitical opponents, among which they also rank our country, which in reality are new global growth centers and sovereign independent countries who are unwilling to kowtow and play the role of servants.”

"Crucially, Putin made a point to “repeat again” to both his internal and Global South audiences that, “the ruling elites of the United States and its satellites are behind the tragedy of the Palestinians, the massacre in the Middle East in general, the conflict in Ukraine, and many other conflicts in the world – in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and so on.”

"It is a vitally important point. By conflating the perpetrators of the Ukraine conflict and the war on Gaza - “the United States and its satellites” - the Russian president has effectively lumped Israel in with the western Hegemon and its agenda of “chaos.”

Full article below:

 
Can’t get the below link to embed:


Lindsay Graham saying that he isn’t going to vote for any more money to be sent to any more countries, including Israel, until the US border is secured against illegal immigrants and that if Trump was in charge there would be no illegal immigration crisis and this ‘thing with Iran’ wouldn’t be happening.
Damage control for his constituents
“America first from now on guys! I promise!”
 
Maybe the beginnings of an answer - according to this report, unmarked journalists who freelance for Western MSM news outlets just happened to be 'in the right place at the right time' to capture key images of the conflict on Oct 7.

Broken Borders: AP & Reuters Pictures of Hamas Atrocities Raise Ethical Questions | Honest Reporting

1699529841667.png

Beautiful handling! So Hamas, created and financed by Israel, decides to attack Israel and invites journalists.Israel decides that day not to put soldiers on its usually well-guarded border.The media is doing its job, and the world is on the verge of chaos.And there are even “journalists” who say they are angry because their Muslim and Jewish friends are afraid! They create chaos, they divide us, and in the meantime, they establish a society of control....

I've also heard rumblings of Israel pushing to eliminate journalists who participated in the Oct 7 coverage of the Al Aqsa Flood.


1699633722597.png

From the Guardian (for what it's worth):
Four of the world’s biggest news organisations have vigorously denied any prior knowledge of Hamas’s deadly assault on Israel on 7 October, saying such a suggestion was untrue, outrageous and reckless.

The suggestion appeared in an article by HonestReporting, which describes itself as an organisation devoted to fighting media disinformation about Israel and Zionism. It was taken up by two senior Israeli politicians, who said any journalists with prior knowledge of the assault should be treated as terrorists.

The Associated Press, Reuters, the New York Times and CNN issued robust statements in response to questions about Palestinian photographers in Gaza who documented Hamas’s cross-border raid in which at least 1,400 people were killed.

Gil Hoffman, HonestReporting’s executive director, has since admitted there was no evidence to back up the article’s suggestions, but said “they were legitimate questions to be asked”.

Benny Gantz, a former defence minister who sits in Israel’s war cabinet, said on X, formerly Twitter: “Journalists found to have known about the massacre, and [who] still chose to stand as idle bystanders while children were slaughtered, are no different than terrorists and should be treated as such.”

Danny Danon, a former Israeli ambassador to the UN, said Israel had a list of people it would “eliminate” for participating in the raid, and that journalists who recorded the assault would be “added to that list”. He added: “We will hunt them down together with the terrorists.”

The Israeli prime minister’s office said: “These journalists were accomplices in crimes against humanity; their actions were contrary to professional ethics.”

Some of the photographs sent out by the news agencies were published by the Guardian and other media outlets.

In a statement, the New York Times said the accusation that anyone at the news organisation had advance knowledge of the terrorist attack was “untrue and outrageous”.


It added: “It is reckless to make such allegations, putting our journalists on the ground in Israel and Gaza at risk. The Times has extensively covered the October 7 attacks and the war with fairness, impartiality, and an abiding understanding of the complexities of the conflict.”

Referring to Yousef Masoud, a photojournalist named by HonestReporting and who has worked with the New York Times over the past five weeks, the news organisation said: “There is no evidence for HonestReporting’s insinuations. Our review of [Masoud’s] work shows that he was doing what photojournalists always do during major news events, documenting the tragedy as it unfolded.”

It said freelance photojournalists in conflict areas often “rush into danger to provide first-hand witness accounts and to document important news. This is the essential role of a free press in wartime.”

The Associated Press said it had no knowledge of the 7 October attacks before they happened, and had received photographs from freelancers about an hour after the assault began.

“No AP staff were at the border at the time of the attacks, nor did any AP staffer cross the border at any time. When we accept freelance photos, we take great steps to verify the authenticity of the images and that they show what is purported,” it said.

Reuters said it “categorically denies that it had prior knowledge of the attack or that we embedded journalists with Hamas on October 7. Reuters acquired photographs from two Gaza-based freelance photographers who were at the border on the morning of October 7, with whom it did not have a prior relationship.

“The photographs published by Reuters were taken two hours after Hamas fired rockets across southern Israel and more than 45 minutes after Israel said gunmen had crossed the border. Reuters staff journalists were not on the ground at the locations referred to in the HonestReporting article.”

CNN said: “We had no prior knowledge of the October 7 attacks.”

The AP and CNN said on Thursday they had severed ties with Hassan Eslaiah, a freelance photographer who took images of Hamas gunmen crossing the border. HonestReporting posted a photo of Eslaiah being kissed by the Hamas leader, Yahya Sinwar.

In its article, HonestReporting said: “Hamas terrorists were not the only ones who documented the war crimes they had committed during their deadly rampage across southern Israel. Some of their atrocities were captured by Gaza-based photojournalists working for the Associated Press and Reuters news agencies, whose early morning presence at the breached border area raises serious ethical questions.”

It added: “Is it conceivable to assume that ‘journalists’ just happened to appear early in the morning at the border without prior coordination with the terrorists? Or were they part of the plan?”

At least 39 journalists and media workers have been killed in the Israel-Gaza war so far, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, making it the deadliest month-long period since records began in 1992. A further eight have been wounded and 13 are missing.

Sherif Mansour, of the CPJ, said: “Journalists are civilians doing important work during times of crisis and must not be targeted by warring parties. Those in Gaza, in particular, have paid, and continue to pay, an unprecedented toll and face exponential threats.”

It's interesting this accusation of complicity in the attacks from journalists is coming from a pro-Zionist NGO. In spite of having allegedly "no evidence" the Shin Bet (Israel's internal security agency) is going ahead and adding the journalists to lists for elimination. Knowing what we know about the LIHOP, it seems peculiar for this NGO to try and give advanced warning to these major media organizations to publicly divest themselves from any foreknowledge, perhaps as a courtesy chilling effect to keep people quiet, and to provide grounds to eliminate those who speak out about it. "Dead men tell no tales."
 
I've also heard rumblings of Israel pushing to eliminate journalists who participated in the Oct 7 coverage of the Al Aqsa Flood.
It's interesting that the pro-Israel people are blaming those journalists of complicity with Hamas because they were there. Yet they skip the obvious and most important question - how come the journalists were at the scene at the right time while Israeli forces were not?
 
Scholz says he is "ashamed" of new wave of anti-Semitism in Germany after being himself the one to suppress pro-Palestinian protests

The German chancellor commemorated the 'Night of Broken Glass', when Nazi Germany carried out one of the largest massacres against the Jewish population, and said he was "ashamed" of the new wave of anti-Semitism as attacks against German Jews have increased following the resumption of hostilities between Israel and Hamas, adding: "The police and the judiciary must consistently enforce the law. Those who support terrorism or incite anti-Semitism will be prosecuted."

Translated with DeepL


 
Back
Top Bottom