WhiteMountain
Jedi
Jordan to me is like Trey Goudy, who talked a good game, but ultimately let people off the hook on hearings (specifically Trey with Hillary Clinton's emails most notably; the stuff Comey reported on in 2016 should have been revealed in the hearings if proper investigations were done). I mean really obvious stuff. Like when those Twitter execs he had in who kept answering "they did not know, but their boss did" or something to that effect, why the hell was the boss who was making all the decisions not called? I mean when I hear stuff like that it is clear the hearings are for show and they do not ACTUALLY want to get to the bottom of things. I think Jordan is probably compromised through either bribery or blackmail in the normal Washington two step.True. Jim Jordan has, in the last decade or so, come across to me as one of the very few voices of reason in US politics. He's usually very well prepared in various hearings and his arguing usually sounds like common sense. However, despite all of those hearings and questionings, nothing substantial has ever come out of those, no justice has to my knowledge ever been served (think e.g. Clinton, Hunter, Russia hoax). So, has Jordan's 'attacks' been just for show or has he really tried to make a difference?
As you say, maybe peeps like Jordan actually believe the 'Holy Land' stuff, that being their huge blind spot. Or, is someone like Jordan blackmailed by the Epstein folks? If the latter, couldn't they've had put him in place and shut him up years ago?