IVERMECTIN good or bad?

Laura said:
Makes you wonder. I just saw this on X:

View attachment 100440
Click to expand...

The origin of homosexuality as discussed in the transcripts suggests that past lives, genetics, and an early childhood imprint window are the causes. The C's also mentioned that homosexuality can't usually be changed. No mention of parasitic mind control in the cause of homosexuality:

Q: (L) We received a question from a reader who wants to ask: “Is homosexuality determined at the early imprinting stage?”

A: In some instances. There are many reasons.

Q: (L) The second part of the question reads: “If not, what determines sexual orientation at an early age?” Well, they just said there are many reasons. Can you list any of those other reasons?

A: Past life influences and more rarely, genetics.

Q: (L) So which of these three reasons is the most frequent?

A: Early imprinting could be said to be marginally most frequent cause.

Q: $1 So you were very close, Laura.

(Perceval) Does the early imprinting case have to do with abuse?

A: Not necessarily abuse as lack of proper input at moments of high susceptibility. Also, in some individuals the sequence of imprint slots is different or not synchronous with the pattern of the majority. In a sense, then, this is genetic though all such individuals do not necessarily develop as homosexuals.

Q: (L) I think that the writer wanted to know is this a condition that can be changed, assuming the individual wanted to change?

A: Not usually.

Q: $1 When you talk about a lack of proper input, I assume then that in some way development is not normal. Does that mean that homosexuals have any impediment to spiritual growth?

A: No, that is not implied.

Q: (L) Well, you know the story of Konrad Lorenz and his ducks. The story is that there is this window of time when the substratum of the duck’s psychology is open to receiving the imprint of the mother image. So, these ducks were not exposed to a mother duck, but rather to his boots during that window. They came to see his boots as mother. Forever. These ducks believed that boots were “mother”.

So what it means is that there are these like… circuit boards… in us where there is a window that opens when they can be written on. Whatever is written on them in that moment is what sets that circuit. It’s like a really basic circuit in our makeup. And I think what this means is that these individuals may have either hyper-sensitive circuits, or windows when circuits can be written that were different that other people. Maybe their windows don’t open at the same
time as the majority of people.

Say for example the majority of people in the first week, they get their mother imprint - probably. Babies that don’t get a mother imprint because they are given up for adoption, or there is some kind of extenuating circumstance, they always have this lack because nothing was written in. If they are put in a crib and never nurtured, they never got this imprint. Then the window closes, and whatever was written on that circuit board during that period when the window was open is what is there forever.

Okay, so maybe some people’s windows open too early, or maybe it opens while they’re still really tiny in the hospital and they don’t get the imprint of the mother. Or maybe it opens and closes very fast because of their sensitivity. Maybe they get imprinted by the look of the doctor with a mask on his face, or a nurse passing by or a Coke machine.

(Perceval) Maybe whatever the stage is for the imprint of sexuality, maybe it’s later and for most people it’s at a certain age, but there are some people that for genetic reasons it’s earlier or later and so the adults around that person act differently than they would have when the child was younger.

(L) Yes. And when we’re talking about something like imprints, you have to take a very specific individual, and then you have to say, “Okay, does this person have…” and then you’d have to ask all these yes/no questions to boil it down. It could be as varied as the number of individuals that exist!

And the same for homosexuals. Every one is different. It could be a partial past life cause, there could be a partial imprint vulnerability cause, or even as they said in rare cases a genetic cause.

(Perceval) I wonder what the imprint actually is. What is the actual imprint data? Is it interaction, or words, or treatment by another human being?

(L) Well, let’s ask. In a general sense, what is the imprint that determines sexuality for an individual?

A: The pleasant interaction with an adult model at a moment or during the time the imprint window is open in conjunction with the release of specific hormones and brain chemicals.

Q: (Perceval) So you’ve got a kid, a boy, and if the window is open, then they get more female attention from their mother. But if the window opens later, when the father takes more interest in the boy and starts to treat him “like a man”… like fathers will sometimes chide their sons about things like, “You cry like a little girl” or “Don’t be such a little girl”, “You gonna wear a dress?”, etc. If you had the window open then during that period, and you received that kind of treatment…

(L) In other words, a delayed imprint window.

(Perceval) Yeah, and producing chemicals and being treated that way or laughed at or made fun of, and being made to think that you’re a little girl…

(Burma Jones) Though they did say a “pleasant” interaction with adult models.

(Perceval) That’s the ideal.

(Belibaste) Usually at what age does this window open?

A: 18 months to 2.5 years.

Q: (Burma Jones) That’s a big window.

(L) Yeah, well that’s not the whole window, but the range.

(Ark) What I don’t understand is why sexuality is not hard wired, and for what reason? It could have been wired like number of legs and then there would be no problem. Everybody this way with two legs and everybody is born heterosexual except with radiation, mutations, blah blah blah. There must be a reason for that, but what is this reason? Why is there this possibility of people being changed in this way that leads to suffering? Or maybe I don’t know anything about internal structure.

(Burma Jones) Well, I was wondering if that imprint comes in with an adult model, does that also set the sort of person that you’re going to look for to mate with?

A: Yes

Q: (Burma Jones) So maybe it’s also to make it so that you will look for a mate within your own “group”? Like setting up the parents early on in life.

A: Control system modification.

Q: (Perceval) It’s probably like you were saying, a pleasant interaction with an adult model. So, if it’s later than 18 months to 2.5 years…

(L) So if you have an unpleasant interaction, it can really mess you up.

(PoB) Does it mean that somebody can make another person homosexual by specific kind of treatment?

A: Yes.

Q: (Burma Jones) Well, it sounds like if you knew when someone’s imprint vulnerability was, and you abducted them and put them with someone that you wanted to pair them with, you could set up the whole imprint for them.

(L) Yeah, you could.

(Perceval) The problem is that the normal window is 18 months to 2.5 years, and then there are people who have delayed windows.

(L) And maybe people who have early windows. So, it’s like Sidney Baker talks about our individual physiology in terms of health and how completely individual we are. There are certain patterns for the majority, but still there are ranges. So everybody is really completely individual and different.

(Andromeda) Are they talking here about having a role model of the same sex, or the opposite sex?

A: Opposite generally.

Q: (L) So if you have a pleasant experience with a member of the opposite sex during this moment of imprint, that will set you up to be attracted to members of the opposite sex.

(Perceval) It kind of suggests that a normal person in a normal family with both a mother and father, that baby or small child is going to have interaction with both…

A: It should be noted that the infant is sensitive to pheromone type substances that can trigger the imprint window. That part of the process is “hard wired”.

Q: (Perceval) So for girls and boys they’re hardwired to be attracted to male or female.

(L) So say a female infant is hardwired to be triggered by the presence of the pheromone of a male, and the interaction is pleasant, then what is supposed to get written to the circuit gets written, and everything is fine.

If the pheromone opens the window and what happens in the interaction is extremely unpleasant, then everything gets screwed up. And possibly it could be that if there is some genetic difference in the infant, then maybe they are set up so that the pheromones of a female will open the window. So, there are a number of possibilities here. It’s obviously an interactive thing that triggers it, writes the circuit, and whatever.

Q: So the way that some homosexuals are overidentified with being gay, like gay bars and that stuff, that has to be just cultural then…?

A: The gay “movement” is a CIA program incepted by 4D STS designed to set up antipathy, differences, and to identify individuals for purposes of inflicting further suffering.

Q: (L) Huh.

A: It is the soul that counts.
Click to expand...

I suppose parasites could be another possible explanation, maybe parasites as an epigenetic factor that changes one's relationship with the information field.

But the narrative of 'homosexuality caused by parasites, can be cured by ivermectin' sounds way over the top to my ear.
 
But there's also the issue of proteins as transmitters , and , possible dna changes as a result of contextual interactions.
 
Laura said:
Makes you wonder. I just saw this on X:

View attachment 100440
Click to expand...

imamthis said:
I suppose parasites could be another possible explanation, maybe parasites as an epigenetic factor that changes one's relationship with the information field
Click to expand...

Around 20 years ago, I came across the work of Prof. Dr. Max Daunderer, (1942- 2013), a leading toxicologist.and researcher in Germany.

Among many other books, he wrote a "Clinical Toxicology Encyclopedia" 14 books, that have been taught at German medical universities. He also was controversially discussed by main stream medicine for his unconventional findings.
2007 he applied for the worldwide ban of Amalgam (dental mercury) at EU, WHO, UNO
His homepage: toxcenter.org has 4300 chapters. (German)
.
In one of his papers, unfortunately I don't know the source anymore, he proposed (paraphrasing out of memory): In mercury and lead intoxicated patients a tendency to extreme and weird sexual behavior is to be observed. These patients are difficult to work with and often therapy resistant until successfully detoxed.

Then, it was the first time I became aware that chemical influences can be a cause for a shift towards extreme sexual behavior. The connection to parasites - who also store vast amounts toxins - was not specifically mentioned in this paper. This only slowly seems to come into focus of research today.

As so many people worldwide, researchers included, have infections and an overload of toxins, and are often not aware of it, I think this might be another reason for the lack of awareness (chemical buffers? ) on the strong influence of parasites on self-distructive - against life itself - human behavior.

As proposed by the C's, parasites act as a link through their receivership capacity to hyperdimensional STS - carried within the body. It seems to me (might be wrong) they induce chemically directed dissociative states. And if the "right" genetics are met this can cause a physiological shift towards pathological behavior including extreme sexuality.
 
" As proposed by the C's, parasites act as a link through their receivership capacity to hyperdimensional STS (..)" , there's also a possible further vector for this, the constant bombardment by EM frequencies, which may well make things more amenable for certain parasites and else.
 
According to a research paper ivermectin induces several types of cancer cells to die. The video also has an anecdotal testimony of a cancer doctor who suggested ivermectin to a patient with prostate cancer and he went into remission when they had already diagnosed him with a death sentence:

 
Windmill knight said:
According to a research paper ivermectin induces several types of cancer cells to die. The video also has an anecdotal testimony of a cancer doctor who suggested ivermectin to a patient with prostate cancer and he went into remission when they had already diagnosed him with a death sentence:
Click to expand...

Very interesting! And today, the translated version of the following article was posted on the Russian SOTT:

www.theepochtimes.com

Ivermectin Could Be a ‘Powerful Drug’ for Fighting Cancer–Here’s Why

Different from many conventional cancer therapies, ivermectin kills cancer cells by enhancing immune response.
www.theepochtimes.com www.theepochtimes.com

Rick Alderson was a retired sawmill worker who was diagnosed with terminal colon cancer in November 2020.

He experienced excruciating pain in his bowels for months; then, a gastroenterologist found a large tumor in his rectum and told him and his wife that he only had six months to live...

By the time he started treatment, his colon cancer had metastasized and spread to his liver, where he had 25 tumors.

“I was off their charts,” Mr. Alderson said in an interview with The Cancer Box, a cancer diagnosis blog.

Due to concerns about COVID-19 and the ongoing pandemic, he started looking into preventive medication and found ivermectin.

Further research showed that the drug could likely enhance the effectiveness of his chemotherapy and radiation therapy and was relatively safe. In February 2021, he began taking ivermectin.

Ten days later, his CEA levels had dropped to 184 ng/mL.

Come March, the number was 47.9 ng/mL. By April 7, it was 20.7; by April 21, it had dropped to 13.9 ng/mL. By midsummer, it had fallen into the normal range. Of the 25 tumors in his liver, only three remained...
Click to expand...
 
iamthatis said:
The origin of homosexuality as discussed in the transcripts suggests that past lives, genetics, and an early childhood imprint window are the causes. The C's also mentioned that homosexuality can't usually be changed. No mention of parasitic mind control in the cause of homosexuality:



I suppose parasites could be another possible explanation, maybe parasites as an epigenetic factor that changes one's relationship with the information field.

But the narrative of 'homosexuality caused by parasites, can be cured by ivermectin' sounds way over the top to my ear.
Click to expand...
There's a whole document called Parasite pill 2.0, I think it can easily be find on google, it started on 4chan I guess, I thought about posting it here, but was reluctant, as it contains some examples of posts that contain explicit sexual language, disturbing stuff, about some people that get sexual satisfaction from eating poop and some gay stuff. But it shows some studies and experiences of some 4chan users that give examples how they were gay or bi and they're not anymore, how they don't want to watch porn anymore. I don't know how legit those posts are, after all all those users are anonymus I think. Then it's said something how AIDS isn't a virus, that it's a parasite, what works against them and what not. I guess it's good put together document, but some of the stuff was truly disturbing to read. I feel weird now just by thinking about it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom