Japan - 8.9 Earthquake - Fukushima Meltdown

Yes, this was posted on SOTT: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226892-Japan-Earthquake-Magnitude-7-4-Honshu

As well, Mexico had a 6.5 this morning: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226889-Mexico-Earthquake-Magnitude-6-5-Veracruz
 
Aya said:
http://tenki.jp/earthquake/
http://www.world-earthquakes.com/

It looks like it happened almost at the same spot as Mar. 11th's earthquake.

7.4 Quake Hits Japan; Tsunami Alert Issued
Warning Issued For Coastal Area Already Ravaged By March Tsunami
POSTED: 10:49 am EDT April 7, 2011
UPDATED: 10:55 am EDT April 7, 2011

Japan's northeastern coast has been rattled by a strong aftershock.
The Japan meteorological agency has issued a tsunami warning for a wave of up to one meter. The warning was issued for a coastal area already ravaged by last month's tsunami.
Officials say the quake was a 7.4-magnitude and hit 25 miles (40 kilometers) under the water and off the coast of Miyagi prefecture. The quake that preceded last month's tsunami was a 9.0-magnitude.
Buildings as far away as Tokyo shook for about a minute.

Seems that it did not last as long, but anything over 10 seconds is long enough :shock:, Pray no one seriously injured.

http://wcatwc.arh.noaa.gov/2011/04/07/ljadqj/01/messageljadqj-01.htm

To: U.S. West Coast, Alaska, and British Columbia coastal regions
From: NOAA/NWS/West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center
Subject: Tsunami Information Statement #1 issued 04/7/2011 at 7:40AM PDT
A strong earthquake has occurred, but a tsunami IS NOT expected along the California, Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, or Alaska coast. NO tsunami warning, watch or advisory is in effect for these areas.

Based on the earthquake magnitude, location and historic tsunami records, a damaging tsunami IS NOT expected along the California, Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska coasts. At coastal locations which have experienced strong ground shaking, local tsunamis are possible due to underwater landslides.

At 7:32 AM Pacific Daylight Time on April 7, an earthquake with preliminary magnitude 7.4 occurred near the east coast of Honshu, Japan . (Refer to the United States Geological Survey for official earthquake parameters.)

Pacific coastal regions outside California, Oregon, Washington, British Columbia, and Alaska should refer to the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center messages for information on the event.

This will be the only statement issued for this event by the West Coast/Alaska Tsunami Warning Center unless conditions warrant. See the WCATWC web site for basic tsunami information, safety rules, and a tsunami travel time map and table. (NOTE: Travel time maps and tables indicate forecasted times only, not that a wave was generated.)
 
Aya said:
1984 said:
Yes, this was posted on SOTT: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226892-Japan-Earthquake-Magnitude-7-4-Honshu

http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2130218775972794601

Flash lights in the distance. (in Sendai)

Was it a comet???

OMG exactly the same thing happened here in Peru in the 2007 earthquake!!! people freaked out, thinking we where on an Alien invasion! It got almost no press, one friend saw this same type lights from the beach, she says she saw them coming from the sea horizon and also coming down from the sky. I saw them from the city, and I saw something shockingly similar to the video of lights in Sendai.

EDU

EDIT: Links

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHmHsP1gd8I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe2noR6Lts0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxfkvrbt9kc
 
EGVG said:
Aya said:
1984 said:
Yes, this was posted on SOTT: http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226892-Japan-Earthquake-Magnitude-7-4-Honshu

http://matome.naver.jp/odai/2130218775972794601

Flash lights in the distance. (in Sendai)

Was it a comet???

OMG exactly the same thing happened here in Peru in the 2007 earthquake!!! people freaked out, thinking we where on an Alien invasion! It got almost no press, one friend saw this same type lights from the beach, she says she saw them coming from the sea horizon and also coming down from the sky. I saw them from the city, and I saw something shockingly similar to the video of lights in Sendai.

EDU

EDIT: Links

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHmHsP1gd8I

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe2noR6Lts0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxfkvrbt9kc

could be some sort of electrical outburst from something damaged while the quake ?
Hmm... I don't know pretty intense lights....!? :huh:
 
just now in this moment I watch the news (germany)
they playing this video too, but do not say anything about this lights

Edit: spelling
 
It looks like some electric phenomenon. It happenend in Santiago de Chile too in February 2010 and it has been attributed to disturbances in high voltage electric lines (as a hypothesis). The only examples seen on youtube are indeed from big cities. I wonder if the same has been observed outside cities were no power lines are present.
Some luminous phenomena has also been reported to be the result of the stresses on certain rocks but i don't know if these flashes are part of them.
 
mkrnhr said:
It looks like some electric phenomenon. It happenend in Santiago de Chile too in February 2010 and it has been attributed to disturbances in high voltage electric lines (as a hypothesis). The only examples seen on youtube are indeed from big cities. I wonder if the same has been observed outside cities were no power lines are present.
Some luminous phenomena has also been reported to be the result of the stresses on certain rocks but i don't know if these flashes are part of them.

Do you have some links to share? I would be interested in learning more about these lights.
 
mkrnhr said:
It looks like some electric phenomenon. It happenend in Santiago de Chile too in February 2010 and it has been attributed to disturbances in high voltage electric lines (as a hypothesis). The only examples seen on youtube are indeed from big cities. I wonder if the same has been observed outside cities were no power lines are present.
Some luminous phenomena has also been reported to be the result of the stresses on certain rocks but i don't know if these flashes are part of them.

My friend was with her school mates and they all where on a trip to the south of lima, outside the city and they all saw this phenomena coming from the sky and from the sea into the air where it flashed very strongly! Same when I saw the lights they came from the sea area.
 
EGVG said:
My friend was with her school mates and they all where on a trip to the south of lima, outside the city and they all saw this phenomena coming from the sky and from the sea into the air where it flashed very strongly! Same when I saw the lights they came from the sea area.

Interresting. It may suggest some sort of electrical discharges then.

XRz said:
Do you have some links to share? I would be interested in learning more about these lights.

wikipedia
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_light
gives particularly a link to
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?id=22089
 
mkrnhr said:
EGVG said:
My friend was with her school mates and they all where on a trip to the south of lima, outside the city and they all saw this phenomena coming from the sky and from the sea into the air where it flashed very strongly! Same when I saw the lights they came from the sea area.

Interresting. It may suggest some sort of electrical discharges then.

XRz said:
Do you have some links to share? I would be interested in learning more about these lights.

wikipedia
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake_light
gives particularly a link to
http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Newsroom/view.php?id=22089



Earthquake Lights = Plasma http://www.thunderbolts.info/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1028&sid=88d889e46685a4e3f9900c11b909a1b3
by Ben D » Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:06 am

Just wondering if anyone is aware if any serious investigation has been carried out on the possibility that earthquake lights are a discharge plasma generated through piezoelectric effect by earth stress events.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/weather/article3556127.ece
The earthquake on February 27, did more than shake people up in the middle of the night. Reports have come in that mysterious lights also appeared around the quake’s epicentre near Market Rasen, Lincolnshire
.

One witness described how a grapefruit-sized glowing sphere appeared in her bedroom and then went out like a light. “This thing seemed to be coming across the room straight at me. I was very frightened,” she told the Louth Leader. Another person described flashes like car headlights at her window, and others spoke of lightning flashes after the quake. However, there was no lightning activity at the time of the quake.

In fact, there have been many reports of “earthquake lights” throughout history. Residents of Tangshan in China, for example, were awakened one night in July 1976 by bright flashes in the sky. Two days later an earthquake registering 7.8 on the Richter scale killed 240,000 people and destroyed the city. And a Japanese scientist took photographs of balls of light and red streaks in the sky during a swarm of earthquakes in Matsushiro between 1965 and 1967.

One explanation for his phenomenon is that the electrical properties of rocks may change under severe stress before or during a quake. This may generate changes in the electrical behaviour of the atmosphere, ionising the air and producing glowing lights.
Check out this story Ben, written by my oldest brother. It's a very real story about an earthquake which happened near the town where I lived when I was only 7 years old. Whilst the whole piece is quite entertaining, the most interesting part, and very relevant to your ponderings, is this bit:

Phil Smith's 'The Earthquake' wrote:
... I still couldn't figure out how a road that had been perfectly okay yesterday could have been so badly damaged by this morning. As I stood there wondering about this, there was a very deep and dreadful roaring sound which came from beneath my feet and the ground started to rock and shiver just as it had during Saturday night's earthquake. This was accompanied by flashes like lightning from the broken ground where the road had collapsed. To this day I am still not sure about this ... was my mind playing some sort of tricks on me to get me out of there, or did these flashes really happen? As rocks and stones started to tumble down the mountainside and land all around me, I leapt back on the Triumph, spun it around, and headed off flat-out down the hill to get clear of the mountain. Later that day, when scientists arrived to invesigate the earthquakes, I learned that there had indeed been two periods of aftershock activity recorded that morning and the first of these must have caused my "moving humps" which I saw near Boolara and the landslide which had taken the foundations out from underneath the road where I had had my roller coaster ride, and the second had caused the dreadful noise and rockfall which occurred while I was standing looking at the damage caused by the first one. ...

In the sessions, it describes this being a reason that interdimensional craft, hang around fault lines, as means of siphoning of the this kind elector magnetic energy, that is discharged from tectonic plate movements. I don't have search engine for that session, but will give it a random search, to see if i can find that particular one...........But it very well could be a transformer malfunctioning, due to a surge or power lines colliding. :huh:
 
Could it be related to this?:

[quote author=http://www.sott.net/articles/show/223336-Cyclones-Earthquakes-Volcanoes-And-Other-Electrical-Phenomena]

Recent events provide us with a great case study of the cosmic forces that may lie behind large storms such as cyclones, hurricanes, blizzards and much more. The recent events I speak of include the major blizzard that swept across the Midwestern and Eastern US as well as the punishment Cyclone Yasi inflicted on eastern Australia earlier last week. Both of these storms grew to enormous sizes during a time period that coincided with the Earth being lashed by a solar storm just following a New Moon. As strange as this may sound, this isn't the first time that celestial alignments along side of solar activity have spurred such events. If a correlation between these factors exists, as we suspect, then this overturns much of what is commonly believed about Earth weather and, as we'll see, even geology.

[...]

As James McCanney explains in an interview he did for Spectrum Magazine in 2003:
The [New] Moon moves in front of Earth, breaks that electrical flow [between the sun and Earth], and then moves out of the way. It gives us tremendous bombardment after that Moon moves out of the way, the first and second day after the New Moon. That's the condition that has been identified as being one of the leading causes of kicking-off major hurricanes and storms. What it does is: The Moon is interacting with the solar electric field. It's that CHANGE which causes the storms, and causes the environment around Earth to change, and thus affects Earth weather.

[...]

ow, I'm sure those of skeptical mind are probably saying, "So what? Don't earthquakes happen every day?" That is true, but one must take into consideration all the other factors we've noted above which also discharge the planet: events such as lightning storms, cyclones, tornadoes, hurricanes, etc. Once we factor in all of these discharging events, maybe then we will begin to see the overall patterns. Any of these events taken in isolation show us nothing, but when brought together there seems to be a correlation - as recent events show. Every massively energetic event that happens on the surface of this planet is likely the result of activity in our solar system along with the Earth's attempt to correct any electrical imbalances from such. As Dmitriev writes:

The facts of various luminescences in the atmosphere were known long ago: preceding and accompanying earthquakes; preceding and accompanying volcanic eruptions; before and during the passage of tropical hurricanes; during a thunderstorm's development; and above the tectonic fault areas. Actually, there's no large-scale high-energy event in the depths of the Earth or on its surface which would not be accompanied by luminous objects. Without any reason or proof, these emitting atmospheric objects are considered as effects of the "main" events, i.e. earthquakes, hurricanes, eruptions, tornadoes, fault-developing processes, thunderstorms, etc. This version of secondary genesis of luminous objects and of their dependence of the main process keeps out of notice thousands of luminous [phenomena], existing in quiet atmospheric and lithospheric conditions.
[/quote]

A couple of days back there was a New Moon on April's 3rd and a Coronal Mass Ejection at the same day...

[quote author=Spectacular Coronal Mass Ejection From Sunspot 1176 April 3, 2011
http://www.sott.net/articles/show/226772-Spectacular-Coronal-Mass-Ejection-From-Sunspot-1176-April-3-2011]
NASA twin STEREO spacecraft observed a spectacular coronal mass ejection launched from the vicinity of decaying sunspot 1176 on April 3rd around 0500 UT. The blast was not Earth directed. Nevertheless, there is a chance that the expanding cloud will deliver a glancing blow to Earth's magnetic field on or about April 6th. CME movies: STEREO-A, STEREO-B. [/quote]
 
FWIW...

http://www.naturalnews.com/031992_radioactive_cesium.html

Virtually all the numbers you're seeing about the radioactivity coming out of Fukushima are based on iodine-131 which only has a half-life of 8 days, not the far more dangerous cesium-137 which has a half-life of 30 years. So while the mainstream media reports that "radiation levels are falling rapidly" from the 7.5 million times reading taken a few days ago, what they're not telling you is that the cesium-137 radioactivity will take 30 years just to fall by 50 percent.

It's the great global cover-up in all this: What happens to all the radioactive cesium being dumped into the ocean right now? It doesn't just burn itself out in a few months like iodine-131. This stuff sticks around for centuries.


And so on with the cover up. Remember: three reactors have a "meltdown", in plain words: uranium and Plutonium are outside without any control... ok this is a bit old, but maybe anyone can find some interesting:
-----------------------

http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=126888

A Russian nuclear expert has stated that the crisis situation in Fukushima is much worse than that in Chernobyl and might lead to a change in the scale for measuring nuclear emergencies.
"The crisis in Japan will cost a lot more than Chernobyl in terms of economic and human losses," according to nuclear engineer Nataliya Mironova, who is a leading figure in Russia in the field.
Mironova is visiting the USA together with other people engaged in anti-nuclear activism on the eve of the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl tragedy of April 26, 1986.
Meanwhile, it was revealed that radioactive water is leaking from a breach in the Fukushima NPP.
-----------------------

-------
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/mar/31/japan-battle-save-nuclear-reactors-failed

Japanese officials have conceded that the battle to salvage four crippled reactors at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant has been lost.
The plant's operator, Tokyo Electric Power (Tepco), said the reactors would be scrapped, and warned the operation to contain the nuclear crisis, well into its third week, could last months.
Tepco's announcement came as readings showed a dramatic increase in radioactive contamination in the sea near the atomic complex.
The firm's chairman, Tsunehisa Katsumata, said it had "no choice" but to scrap the Nos 1-4 reactors,
.../... On Tuesday, a US engineer who helped install reactors at the plant said he believed the radioactive core in unit No 2 may have melted through the bottom of its containment vessel and on to a concrete floor.
-----

http://www.stripes.com/news/http-www-stripes-com-news-pentagon-preparing-for-a-nuclear-worst-case-scenario-at-fukushima-1-1379-1.137969
Pentagon preparing for a nuclear worst-case scenario at Fukushima

If the deteriorating situation at a Japanese nuclear plant veers toward a worst-case meltdown scenario, people across the country — including 86,000 American servicemembers, civilian employees and their dependents — could face an unprecedented atomic disaster.
The Pentagon on Wednesday began laying out precautions to keep troops safe, announcing a 50-mile no-go zone around the unstable Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex that is wider than the official Japanese evacuation zone. The U.S. Embassy in Japan told American citizens within 50 miles of the plant to evacuate if possible or stay indoors.
-----------


http://abcnews.go.com/International/radioactive-leak-found-japans-fukushima-dai-ichi-nuclear/story?id=13281691

Radioactive water has been spilling into the Pacific Ocean from a crack in a maintenance pit discovered Saturday at Japan's distressed nuclear plant.
The crack was discovered on the edge of the plant, according to Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency spokesman Hidehiko Nishiyama. It was most likely caused by the March 11th earthquake and tsunami that ravaged the coast of Japan and the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear complex, according to the Associated Press.
--------

The air above the radioactive water in the pit is measuring 1,000 millisieverts of radiation per hour, according to Nishiyama. Risk of cancer is greatly increased by exposure to 500 millisieverts over a short period of time.
El aire encima del agua radiactiva de la fuga, es 1000 m. por hora. El riesgo de cáncer es altamanete aumentado con exposiciones de 500ms. en un corto espacio de tiempo-
--
Meanwhile, international nuclear experts believe that melted fuel in reactor No. 1 has caused a "localized criticality," which is a small, uncontrolled chain reaction that occasionally emits a burst of heat, radiation and a blue flash of light.
 
Executive Vice President of AREVA at Stanford University on 3.21.2011 said:
Clearly we are witnessing one of the greatest disasters of modern times.

Arnie Gunderson comments on the nuclear industry closing ranks to cover up the facts at the Fukashima Dai-ichi nuclear reactor meltdown. The temperatures in the reactors exceeded 5000 degrees Fahrenheit. These temperatures are high enough to melt uranium, zirconium and stainless steel.

The latest news from the New York Times Asia Bureau is a typical report from the increasingly chaotic situation at the Fukashima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. The intense radiation hampers efforts to contain the Godzilla of the atomic age loose again in Japan.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/08/world/asia/08japan.html?_r=1&hp said:
...................

But some of the radiation readings at Reactors Nos. 1 and 3 over the last week were nearly as high as or higher than the 3,300 rems per hour that the commission said it was trying to explain, so it would appear that the speculation would apply to them as well. At No. 2, extremely radioactive material continues to ooze out of the reactor pressure vessel, and the leak is likely to widen with time, a western nuclear executive asserted.

“It’s a little like pulling a thread out of your tie,” said the executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to protect business connections in Japan. “Any breach gets bigger.”

Flashes of extremely intense radioactivity have become a serious problem, he said. Tokyo Electric’s difficulties in providing accurate information on radiation are not a result of software problems, as some Japanese officials have suggested, but stem from damage to measurement instruments caused by radiation, the executive said.
 
Current commentary, from FairwindsAssociates: Closing Ranks: The NRC,the Nuclear Industry, and Tepco are limiting the Flow of Information 4-6-11

http://www.fairewinds.com/
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom