A 'great Soul' is no guarantor of anything - you'll still get kicked out of the house if you don't pay rent.
I'm wondering if his soul hasn't detached during his benzo-collapse... Or maybe some entities got attached. When I was thinking about his coma, I got a weird feeling that his daughter really is his Harvey Pasternak, but maybe in a more metaphorical sense...
JP and his ARC kind of fit what I've heard about how security services operate in Poland (and I guess everywhere):
(...) On this occasion, I would like to show you several ways in which anyone who comes up with something that could disturb the order of certain interest groups can be played by the system's guardians and their helpers.
The first way to deprive the real author of an idea or initiative that is dangerous for the smooth operation of these behind-the-scenes arrangements is to create a double who will say, postulate and propagate seemingly the same thing. Of course, this will be done in such a way that it will not disturb the status quo of this system, if it ever had to be introduced. Such action is only about using an idea or initiative to deprive someone who came up with it of the so-called freshness that could interest people and find their support. This is typical of nipping the matter in the bud so that no uncontrolled person can appear in public space. Then the real author of solutions that could actually change something, without the support of the media, politicians or public figures, will easily be covered by such a double prepared and promoted by the services, before the real author himself manages to reach people's awareness with his solutions. Of course, I do not lump all dishonest opportunists into the same category as the security services, because certainly many people who act in this way are simply ambitious morons and mediocrities who try to gain their own benefits at someone else's expense.
However, if the first method is not sufficient to effectively take over an idea or initiative, the second way to play a person who threatens the system is to create several doubles who will overlap with similar solutions. Then the real author gets lost in the crowd of people who say very similar things and the one who stands out the most in the public space wins. This creates a situation that is very easy to control, because the system's guards have a whole range of tools to promote the one that is convenient for them. However, if someone proposes and promotes an extensive package of solutions, they use the third method.
While it is relatively easy for the system guards to take over one idea or initiative, because someone else could also come up with a similar idea, creating a duplicate that copies many solutions of one author carries the risk that ordinary people will support the robbed one person because they will not believe in such a large number of cases, because it will become clear to them that this double is a carved muppet of the security services. Therefore, in this variant, they have to cut such a package of solutions into smaller fragments and assign them to individual muppets. Preferably those who have dealt with similar topics in the past. So that you can easily argue that it's only natural that these people would announce it now. It's even better when they manage to involve people with scientific degrees to additionally support it with their authority. Then all you need to do is combine these people into one entity, for example organizations or parties, and you can pretend that this unrest is the joint work of many people and the situation is under control again. Then if a real author loudly points out that this one is a thief, that one is a cheater, and the next one is a plagiarist, that they are all trying to take over and control his idea or initiative, this author puts himself in a situation where it is easy to label him with some mental disorder. Either some paranoia or a persecution mania. And if this person talks about the security services, you can make him look like a schizophrenic, because "everyone is following him and everyone is trying to rob him". In this way, the system's guardians will achieve their goal anyway, because they either successfully take over and control a given idea or initiative, or they discredit the real author.
(...) Here I would also like to emphasize that I do not believe that all such people who participate in such activities should immediately be security service officers. Because I don't think that's the case. A good agent does not reveal himself and does not play the first violin. Rather, he tries to control the situation from the back seat. It is much wiser for them to use other people to achieve their goals. This is not too difficult for them either, because they are highly trained in psychology and manipulating other people is their craft. So they know exactly which side to play to get the right people to do what they want them to do.
Source (in Polish):
