Julian Assange Discussion

10 May, 2018 - Ecuador’s new rules ban Assange from taking visitors and phone calls – WikiLeaks
Ecuador’s new rules ban Assange from taking visitors and phone calls – WikiLeaks

Julian Assange has been hit with new rules limiting his communications by officials at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London. The new measures include bans on using the phone and having visitors, according to WikiLeaks.

The founder of the whistleblowing website has reportedly found himself isolated within the embassy recently. In March, he had his internet access curtailed after taking to Twitter to criticize Britain’s response to the poisoning of Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury, as well as repeated comments about Spain’s dispute with Catalonia. At the time, the Ecuadorian government said Assange had breached a written commitment “not to issue messages that might interfere with other states.”

Speaking with the foreign press Wednesday, Foreign Minister Maria Fernanda Espinosa confirmed that Assange was still being denied internet access while talks between the UK and Ecuador to decide on his fate are still ongoing.

"He still has no access to the Internet and communications. There is a dialogue, there is a will and an interest to move forward in the solution of that matter," he said, according to El Tiempo.

WikiLeaks claims Assange has been silenced because of pressure from the US. The website also says the description of the measures as a “social media ban” undersells the extent to which he’s being held “incommunicado.”
 
13.05.2018 - Ecuador Prepares to Hand Julian Assange Over to UK, US - Reports
Ecuador Prepares to Hand Julian Assange Over to UK, US - Reports

More than six years after Julian Assange moved himself into the confines of the Ecuadorian embassy building in London, the WikiLeaks founder finds himself in danger again.

Remarks made earlier this week by Ecuador’s Foreign Minister Maria Fernanda Espinosa suggest that her government may be depriving Assange of the political asylum it granted him in in 2012 and hand him over to British and then US authorities, the World Socialist Website wrote on Saturday.

In an interview on Wednesday, Espinosa said that the Ecuadorian government and Britain “have the intention and the interest that this be resolved.”

She added that the two sides were working to reach a “definite agreement” on Assange.

In March, the Ecuadorian government cut Assange’s phone and Internet contact with the outside world and barred his friends and supporters from visiting him.

The Ecuadorian authorities explained their action by stating that “Assange’s behavior, through his messages on social media, put at risk good relations this country has with the UK, the rest of the EU and other nations.”

If Assange is handed over to the British authorities, they could eventually extradite him to the United States to face prosecution over Wikileaks’ publication of leaked US military and diplomatic documents.

Last year, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions stated that putting Assange on trial for espionage was a “priority” and then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo, now secretary of state, asserted that WikiLeaks was a “non-state hostile intelligence service.”

In 2010, WikiLeaks published information leaked by US soldier Bradley Manning that exposed war crimes committed by US forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as thousands of secret US diplomatic cables.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ca.
16.05.2018 - Ecuador Spends some $5 Min to Protect WikiLeaks' Assange - Reports
Ecuador Spends Some $5Mln to Protect WikiLeaks' Assange - Reports

Ecuador spent at least $5 million on a spy operation to support and protect WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in its embassy in London, media reported.

Documents seen by The Guardian newspaper revealed that millions were put into a secret intelligence operation, dubbed "Operation Guest," and employing undercover agents to monitor Assange's visitors, embassy employees and the UK police.

Moreover, a joint investigation by The Guardian and the Focus Ecuador media outlet showed citing sources that the operation had been approved by former Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa and former Foreign Minister Ricardo Patino.

According to the newspaper, the security team also recorded the WikiLeaks founder's daily activities in minute detail, as well as his interactions with Ecuador's embassy staff and other visitors.


16.05.2018 - US Officials Name Vault 7 Suspect, Still Lack Sufficient Evidence to Charge Him
US Officials Name Vault 7 Suspect, Still Lack Sufficient Evidence to Charge Him

The identity of the suspected Vault 7 leaker, which detailed the capabilities of US intelligence agencies to manipulate everyday technologies, was revealed to be 29-year-old Joshua Schulte, a former CIA software engineer who designed malware that could break into the computers of suspected terrorists, the Washington Post reported on Tuesday.

There's one problem, though: investigators haven't been able to collect enough evidence to file charges against Schulte despite having searched his apartment and confiscated his personal computer and notes.

According to the New York Times, FBI agents obtained a warrant to search Schulte's apartment in March 2017, a week after WikiLeaks released the first batch of Vault 7 documents, which highlighted how the CIA tapped into iPhones and smart TVs and turned them into surveillance devices.

Instead of charging Schulte for the leak, prosecutors ended up charging him in August 2017 with possessing, receiving and transporting child pornography after investigators stated they'd found porn content on a server he'd created in 2009. Though he was released a month later in September, Schulte wound up back behind bars by December after violating the rules of his release.

"Those search warrants haven't yielded anything that is consistent with [Schulte's] involvement in that disclosure," Matthew Laroche, an assistant US attorney in the Southern District of New York, said in a January hearing regarding the Vault 7 case.

The Post reported Laroche saying at the time that the investigation was still "ongoing" and that the CIA employee was still a "target."

Schulte has pleaded not guilty to the child porn charges and stated that anywhere from 50 to 100 people had access to the server he'd created in 2009 as a way to share movies and other digital files, according to the publication.

The imprisoned software engineer told the outlet in a statement that he'd been blamed for the leaks because he'd reported "incompetent management and bureaucracy" at the CIA to the inspector general. This, he alleges, made him appear as a disgruntled employee when he left the spy agency in 2016.

"Due to these unfortunate coincidences the FBI ultimately made the snap judgement that I was guilty of the leaks and targeted me," Schulte told the Post for the story published Tuesday.

With Schulte's lawyers demanding prosecutors come to a decision on Vault 7 charges, officials indicated last week that they'd be filing a new indictment in the next 45 days, the Times stated.

"This case has been dragging since August 2017," Sabrina Shroff, Schulte's lawyer, told the outlet. "The government should be required to indict so Mr. Schulte has the opportunity to defend himself. Otherwise he is just languishing."

Schulte is currently being held at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan.


May 16, 2018 - Vault 7 Why the CIA sought to get IP-addresses of Russia's Interior Ministry
'Vault 7': Why the CIA Sought to Get IP-Addresses of Russia's Interior Ministry

ikiLeaks, a whistleblowing website, recently published a massive trove of documents from the CIA, code-named Vault 7. The leaks contain an archive of hacking tools used by the US intelligence agency.
tild3665-6232-4533-a261-306266343462__001.jpg

A program created by the CIA, called "Weeping Angel", can wiretap private homes by gaining access to smart TVs
Walls Have Ears
The diversity of hacking instruments at the CIA's disposal is outstanding. Among them are malware and remote control over Microsoft Windows-powered computers. Devices powered by iOS are also vulnerable, including the iPhone and the iPad. Calls, messages, emails and photographs on Android devices are also exposed to tracing and control.
Moreover, the CIA's Embedded Devices Branch (EDB) and the British MI5/BTSS agencies have developed a program called "Weeping Angel" which can penetrate smart TVs and turn them into covert microphones that listen in on conversations held at home.

In October 2014, the CIA studied embedding viruses into vehicle control systems. The document does not give a clear answer on the purpose of such procedures, but there is two assumptions that can hardly be ignored – turning a vehicle into a spying device or causing a crash.

Apple was quick to react to the leak, assuring that the majority of the vulnerabilities were outdated, or have already been fixed.

Similar statements were later made by Samsung and Microsoft. Even if some of the vulnerabilities were not fixed before the leak, they will be patched soon. Thus, the new dump by WikiLeaks has partially disarmed the CIA's cyber-intelligence branch.

Weird Consulate
The documents also reveal that the US consulate in the German city of Frankfurt is used as a "covert CIA hacker base," with intelligence operatives receiving diplomatic passports and cover from the government. The majority of the CIA hacking tools were developed there.
The consulate itself looks strange. Only a few US embassies are larger than the building in Frankfurt. According to the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, there are some 1,000 personnel in the consulate. It occupies an area of nine hectares and enclosed with a four-meter high barbwire fence.

According to Süddeutsche Zeitung, another German newspaper, in Frankfurt and its surroundings, the US runs a network of front companies as a disguise for intelligence activities.

A special legal status places no limits on US hacking activities at the site. Unlike an embassy, the consulate is not American territory, and thus it does not fall under US jurisdiction, including in terms of protecting privacy.

On the other hand, diplomatic immunity means that activities inside the consulate cannot be checked for compliance with German law.

(A page from the 'Vault 7' archive published by WikiLeaks)

Not Leaving a Trace
The archive of project UMBRAGE has a special place among the leaked documents. Within this project, the CIA collected information about hacking techniques from all over the world.

CIA cyber specialists used various techniques in order not to leave any data that could be used for attribution of the hacker attack. As a result, it is impossible to identify the true source of an attack, even after thorough criminal examinations. A special list of dos and don'ts was created for this.

"The CIA's Remote Devices Branch's UMBRAGE group collects and maintains a substantial library of attack techniques 'stolen' from malware produced in other states including the Russian Federation. With UMBRAGE and related projects the CIA cannot only increase its total number of attack types but also misdirect attribution by leaving behind the 'fingerprints' of the groups that the attack techniques were stolen from," WikiLeaks said in a press release.

Among other instruments, the CIA used a utility called Rebound, borrowed from the Shamoon malware. In 2012, Shamoon was used in hacker attacks on Saudi Aramco's systems and the infrastructure of Qatari gas company RasGas. At the time, Washington said that the malware was of Iranian origin. In turn, Tehran denied the allegations, calling for an international investigation.

The real history of Shamoon is unknown. Perhaps, it was really developed in Iran because its code contained an image of a burning American flag. Moreover, according to experts of Russian multinational cybersecurity provider Kaspersky Lab, the malware was not created by highly qualified programmers.

An updated version of Shamoon was once again used for attacks on Saudi facilities in November 2016 and January 2017.

(A page from the 'Vault 7' archive published by WikiLeaks)

"Russian Hackers"
Another interesting detail revealed from the leaked archive is a vast list of IP-addresses in different countries, which may have been used by CIA hacking experts. To make a long story short, it may have looked like the cyber attacks were carried out not from the US, but from other countries.

The list also contains several IPs located in Russia. They are assigned to different institutions of the Russian Academy of Sciences, including the Interdepartmental Supercomputer Center and Institute for Space Studies, as well as companies MTS, Sibirtelecom and Sinterra, and even the Russian Interior Ministry.

For example, journalists from Sofia counted 150 Bulgarian IP-addresses. They belong to telecommunications companies, Internet providers, banks and universities.

In late 2016, there were numerous reports about alleged Russian hackers involved in frauds with online ads. Those hackers used IP-addresses belonging to Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works, one of the largest steel companies in Russia.

The investigation was carried out by private American company White Ops. The Russian steel company denied the allegations, saying that the addresses have long been obsolete. Moreover, certain IP-addresses reserved by the company were used by unidentified individuals in the US.

Despite the fact that the allegations were rebuffed the incident has been firmly associated with Russia.

For example, if a private or state-run investigation revealed that a US state institution used ID-addresses assigned to the Russian government this would spark a grandiose scandal. Such an attempt has been made, though. In December 2016, the US issued a report containing a list of suspicious ID-addresses, including those related to "Russian hackers."

Commentators pointed out that at least half of those addresses belong to the Tor anonymous network, which means they could have been used by hundreds of thousands of people around the world.

Priority of Targets
Among the documents dumped by WikiLeaks, there is a list of questions which must be answered before any hacking operation begins.

Among the questions are types of targeted networks, types of information and files to be obtained, etc. It is also necessary to identify the target of the operation.

"Case Officers are allowed to configure a subset of the full capabilities of the provided tools. To configure a tool for an operation the case officer must answer a set of questions about the operation. The provided tool will then be configured based upon the answers to the questions," the document read.

However, among the possible variants of targets, there are no extremists and criminals. The list contains "foreign intelligence agency," "foreign government entity," as well as "system administrator or comparable technical target."

Perhaps terrorists and potentially dangerous targets can be referred to "other."
Nevertheless, this list clearly indicates the priority targets of CIA cyber operations.
 
Day 221.1 Did DNC Plant PR Guy Into Wikileaks NYC Office? Did DNC CrowdStrike Leakers In Vegas?
George Webb Published on May 26, 2018
Original George Webb Video - May 21st, 2017

Hmm. Seth Rich......:whistle:
 
Last edited:
08.06.2018 - Assange meets Australian Officials for First Time Since Taking Refuge
Assange Meets Australian Officials for First Time Since Taking Refuge

The Australian whistleblower, who is in London's Ecuadorian embassy evading US authorities after publishing classified information on Iraq , balked after Ecuador cut off his Internet and social media access and warned about terminating his asylum for breaking the rules.

The delegates from the Australian High Commission in London have reportedly paid a visit to WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy.

The whistleblower has been claiming asylum there for several years, fearing extradition to the US and persecution there for leaking Iraq War log, but this is believed to be the first time he has received officials from his homeland over last 6 years.

One of Assange’s lawyers, Jennifer Robinson, cited by the Australian site news.com.au, has confirmed that his meeting with Canberra’s government representatives took place. He declined to comment further, stating that her client “is in a very serious situation, detained without charge for seven-and-a-half years” as there’s a risk of extradition.

"That risk is undeniable after numerous statements by Trump administration officials, including the director of the CIA and the US attorney-general,” she told the media.

Moreno, who referred to Assange as “more than a nuisance” and an “inherited problem,” also ordered the shutting down of special security reports that the country had spent at least $5 million on a spy operation to support and protect Assange in its embassy in London. In January 2018, Ecuador also granted citizenship to the WikiLeaks co-founder, so he could get diplomatic immunity and leave the building. At the same time, Moreno denied there’s any pressure on Ecuador concerning Assange.
 
Following Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's exposure of former FBI Director James Comey's mishandling of the Hillary Clinton email case, investigative journalist John Solomon has shed light on Comey's meddling in the DOJ's negotiations with Julian Assange ahead of a massive disclosure of CIA cyber malpractice.

26.06.2018 - Vault 7, DNC Hacking: How Comey's Intervention Upset DOJ Deal With Assange
Vault 7, DNC Hacking: How Comey's Intervention Upset DOJ Deal With Assange

In a single shot, former FBI Director James Comey had put the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) under fire and killed an opportunity to find out who had hacked the Democratic National Committee's (DNC) email server during the 2016 presidential race, writes award-winning investigative journalist John Solomon.

In his op-ed for The Hill, Solomon described how US Justice Department (DOJ) officials negotiated an "immunity deal" with WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange ahead of the famous "Vault 7" release. The leak exposed the CIA's global hacking techniques, which "damaged [the agency's] cyber warfare capabilities for a long time to come," as the investigative journalist remarked, citing US officials.

On February 4, 2017, WikiLeaks started leaking cryptic questions about it's forthcoming dump code-named Vault-7, attracting a lot of attention from social media users across the world.

However, the story actually began in January 2017 when Assange's lawyers approached American attorney Adam Waldman, a former Clinton Justice Department official, offering a deal.

The parties negotiated "limited immunity" for Julian Assange who has been virtually locked in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since June 2012. The deal was "subject to adequate and binding protections, including but not limited to an acceptable immunity and safe passage agreement," as Waldman wrote in his email to David Laufman, then head of the DOJ's counterintelligence and export controls section on March 28, 2017, following WikiLeaks' March 7 publication of the first part of the CIA-related classified documents.

In exchange, Assange agreed to consider certain redactions in the classified documents he was about to release. However, he declined to compromise his sources, or stop publishing information, according to Solomon.

Furthermore, the WikiLeaks founder dropped a hint that he could provide technical evidence shedding light on "who did not engage" in the DNC data breach in 2016. "The US government believes those emails were hacked by Russia; Assange insists they did not come from Moscow," the investigative journalist highlighted.


Nate @BeansTown106

"We Have a Crisis of Democracy" and it isn't Trump

NSA cyber chief was ordered to stand down against "Russian hacking".

DOJ was in talks with Assange for an immunity deal for DNC/Podesta hacking info and Comey shut it down.

Why did the Obama administration fear the Truth?
3:22 AM - Jun 26, 2018

However, James Comey's sudden intervention spelled the end of the potential deal: The FBI chief had signaled to Waldman that he had to "stand down" and "end the discussions with Assange" without further explanation. According to Solomon, although Comey's controversial instructions had not immediately killed the deal, they sowed deep distrust in Assange's legal team.

The second release of CIA documents unmasking the agency's specific cyber tools by WikiLeaks on April 7, 2017, triggered a storm of criticism from the US government that backed out of the negotiations, the investigative journalist stressed.

On June 25, 2018, WikiLeaks tweeted that the organization "can confirm the accuracy of the Hill report on Comey, however, it should be noted that 'immunity/safe passage' was limited to covering the talks."

On April 25, 2017, Julian Assange published an op-ed in The Washington Post in response to then CIA Director Mike Pompeo, who slammed WikiLeaks, dubbing it a "hostile intelligence service."

The WikiLeaks founder referred to Pompeo and Donald Trump's double standard approach, recalling that earlier the two hailed the DNC email server leak, which apparently played into the hands of the Republican Party.

"Vault 7 has begun publishing evidence of remarkable CIA incompetence and other shortcomings," Assange wrote. "This includes the agency's creation, at a cost of billions of taxpayer dollars, of an entire arsenal of cyber viruses and hacking programs — over which it promptly lost control and then tried to cover up the loss."


Terry Williams @DeplorableWill1

Why did @Comey kill an immunity deal between @USAgov and @wikileaks? Assange is the only person who can say with proof, it wasn't Russia who hacked the DNC. #sethrich @seanhannity @SaraCarterDC @POTUS @DonaldJTrumpJr
11:26 AM - Jun 26, 2018

The damage was done and the rest is history; however, the question as to why James Comey intervened and what his genuine motivation was still remains unanswered.


27.06.2018 - Plot Thickens: Analyst Explains Why Comey Meddled in Assange-DOJ Talks
Plot Thickens: Analyst Explains Why Comey Meddled in Assange-DOJ Talks

Ex-FBI Director James Comey and some former Obama administration officials would have had much to lose if Julian Assange had shared his vision on what happened during the 2016 US presidential race, Wall Street analyst Charles Ortel opined speaking to Sputnik, explaining why the ex-FBI chief was so "incurious" about the DNC server hacking.

The story of a might-have been deal between the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange told by John Solomon left one question unanswered: Why did former FBI Director James Comey step in and upset the agreement?

Sputnik got in touch with Wall Street analyst and investigative journalist Charles Ortel, asking him to share his opinion on the matter.

"Comey was/is intimately familiar with the Steele dossier, and likely knows much concerning which foreign intelligence services may have proven useful in developing allegations against Americans and others connected to the Trump presidential campaign and to the incoming Trump administration," the investigative journalist noted, referring to the dodgy "Trump dossier" prepared by former British intelligence officer with the secret intelligence service MI6, Christopher David Steele.

Ortel explained that "prior to the presidential election on November 8, 2016, Comey and others may have felt their various activities would stand them in good stead with Hillary Clinton, who most assumed would easily defeat Donald Trump."

However, when their hopes did not come true, it is likely that many Obama administration officials, including the former president, were seriously concerned that they could soon "find themselves in legal jeopardy," the investigative journalist pointed out.

"Perhaps in league with other Obama era holdovers, Comey and Senator [Mark] Warner (let's not forget that he and the recently indicted leaking Senate staffer [James Wolfe, 58] have much to lose from determined investigations into history) likely decided to flush the Assange negotiations, perhaps encouraged by contacts in the UK intelligence community, who may also stand exposed for their cooperation in Trump-related investigations," the Wall Street analyst suggested.

Why Comey Remains so Incurious About the DNC Hack

In some twist of fate, Comey's intervention in the Assange-DOJ investigation also killed a chance to find out what forces had been involved in the Democratic National Committee's server hacking during the 2016 presidential race. WikiLeaks' founder was ready to provide ample evidence that Russia had not been behind the data breach.

On the other hand, it still raises questions as to why the Comey-led FBI had not examined the DNS server following the alleged cyber intrusion.

"Among many inexplicable decisions, the failure of the FBI to demand and obtain the DNC servers, and then the failures of Obama administration Justice Department officials to determine quickly and before the 2016 election happened whether Russia or other foreign powers may have been interfering is tough to fathom," Ortel highlighted.

He recalled that under the Obama administration numerous accusations were made about supposed cyber espionage by states including China, North Korea, Iran and others.

"The logical move for the FBI after DNC hacking claims were made would have been to use the sophisticated tools that our Federal government does have to learn the truth," the Wall Street journalist emphasized. "Yet, Comey displayed and still displays a remarkable lack of interest in figuring out what happened with DNC server breaches, and with claims that Pakistani government-linked spies may have obtained Congressional and state secrets through use by so many Democrats of the Awan family."

It was previously reported that Imran Awan, an IT employee of ex-DNC chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and his family had access to the e-mails and electronic files of members of the House's Intelligence and Foreign Affairs Committees for years.

A bad reason Comey and others remain so incurious may well be that they know exactly who started the Russian collusion narrative, that this narrative started much earlier than we presently know, and that US political interests and nations that had most to lose from a Trump presidency laid illegal traps various ways," the investigative journalist presumed.

Comey's Intrusion Appears to be a Plot

The question then arises as to whether it was Comey's own initiative to meddle in the DOJ's negotiations with Julian Assange or a "collective" decision.

"I see this much more as a plot," Ortel responded. "At first, to curry favor with Hillary Clinton, that quickly morphed into madcap efforts to protect Barack Obama, John Kerry, Loretta Lynch, James Comey and others in the pro-globalist, anti-Trump cabal."

The Wall Street analyst also presumed that in general, a Trump presidency was likely seen during 2016 as a threat to the "special relationship" between left-leaning British elites and their counterparts in the United States. Similarly, pro-globalist elites viewed the potential US-Russia rapprochement under Trump as a threat, he added.

"Knowing how much so many in the Obama administration may have colluded to promote Hillary Clinton's candidacy and then to obstruct president-elect, numerous persons likely pulled strings over James Comey until President Trump correctly, yet belatedly, fired him," Ortel suggested.

According to Ortel, "the forthcoming Inspector General Horowitz report concerning how Obama era officials and others may have ordered and attempted to cover up illegal spying on Americans by US and allied government security services should further shake the Washington, D.C. establishment to its core."

On June 25, award-winning investigative journalist John Solomon came up with a story about how Julian Assange tried to make a deal with the Trump administration in January 2017, ahead of WikiLeaks' massive exposure of CIA global hacking techniques in March-April 2017. According to Solomon, Comey's unexpected instructions to stop negotiations undermined the deal placing the CIA under fire and preventing Assange from disclosing the secret of the DNC server.

It wasn't a mere chance that Assange's lawyers approached DOJ officials to strike a deal. As Ortel remarked, the WikiLeaks founder and his team "hoped that the incoming Trump administration might be more receptive than previous administrations to negotiating a change in Assange's legal predicament, in exchange for useful information."

The views and opinions expressed by Charles Ortel and Ekaterina Blinova are those of the contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.

https://t.co/zWACFjmPJu
 
Unfortunately it isn't looking good for Julian Assange. There are rumours that the embassy of Ecuador will hand him over to the Brits:

Ecuador is ready to hand over the WikiLeaks founder to the UK in “coming weeks or even days,” RT editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan said citing her own sources, as prospects of his eviction from the embassy are back in the media.

“My sources tell [Julian] Assange will be handed over to Britain in the coming weeks or even days,” Simonyan wrote in a recent tweet which was reposted by WikiLeaks. “Like never before, I wish my sources were wrong,” she continued.

Simonyan's message comes, as speculations Ecuador is in talks with the UK over the future of Assange are back again in British press. Earlier this week, the Times reported Britain is locked in top-tier discussions with the Ecuadorians in a bid to remove Assange from their London embassy.

Sir Alan Duncan, the Foreign Office minister, is said to be spearheading the diplomatic effort. Sources close to Assange said he himself was not aware of the talks but believed that America was putting “significant pressure” on Ecuador, including threatening to block a loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) if he continues to stay at the embassy.

The Times report comes just weeks before a visit to the UK by the newly-elected Ecuadorian president Lenin Moreno, who has labeled Assange a “hacker”, an “inherited problem” and a “stone in the shoe.”

There have been other worrying signs indicating Assange is steadily becoming a troublemaker for Ecuador. In late March this year, the Ecuadorian government has suspended Assange’s communication privileges with the outside world, cutting off his Internet connection at the embassy.

The move was sparked by Assange’s alleged breach of an agreement to refrain from interfering in other states’ affairs. Previously, he blasted the Spanish government for cracking down on the Catalan independence movement.

Assange has been holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy since 2012 when he asked the Latin American state for asylum. The 47-year-old was wanted by Sweden on sexual assault allegations, but feared the extradition would lead to him being transferred to the US and prosecuted without a fair trial.

The US has been saying that Assange was “engaged in terrorism,” with Attorney General, Jeff Sessions, last year calling his arrest a “priority.” Over the years, WikiLeaks has published hundreds of thousands of classified US files, including the cables on the Iraq War, leaked by whistleblower Chelsea Manning in 2010.

Despite the Swedish investigation against him being closed in May last year, the Australian journalist was still unable to leave the embassy because of an outstanding British warrant for allegedly breaching bail conditions and no guarantees of him not being sent to the US.

Over the years, the whistleblower has been supported by activists and human rights groups, who demanded he be freed. A UN panel also found that Assange’s stay in the embassy amounted to “arbitrary detention,” but it wasn’t enough to change his fate.

Ecuador to hand over Assange to UK ‘in coming weeks or days,’ own sources tell RT's editor-in chief
 
Gawan said:
Unfortunately it isn't looking good for Julian Assange.

It does look bad. Even if Assange were to spill the beans and go against his Wikileaks rule of not revealing a source, the PTB and their MSM puppets will denigrate or ignore what he has to say.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Assange 'suicided' or locked up in solitary like Tommy Robinson - the latter of whom I suspect may be an unwitting or actual agent made up to infuriate certain segments of the public, thus making the end game of getting rid of all Islamic peoples occur. Of course, it's safe to assume Assange may be an agent too.

The only good news is that more and more people are waking up to the fact that the PTB are in panic mode right now and can't keep a lid on information like they used to.

So many games. So many lies. So much hysteria. We really do live in interesting times!
 
Unfortunately it isn't looking good for Julian Assange. There are rumours that the embassy of Ecuador will hand him over to the Brits

That's really a shame, but I'm not surprised. The current president of Ecuador -Lenin Moreno- is a traitor, and a real one. You might know about him already, but he won the elections only because he was under the Rafael Correa's wings -the forme president- and was supposed to follow his policies, yet, as soon as he got to power he revealed his true colours. According to what I've read, many people in Ecuador feel betrayed by him, as he started to change the policies in favour of external intervention by corporations, and now he's further attacking Correa by trying to send him to prison over a kidnapping that happened in Colombia! From the very beginning Moreno said that Assange was something like burden he inherited from the former government and seemed willing to get rid of this "burden".

Too sad...
 
Ecuador's National Communications Ministry (SECOM) denied in a statement on Friday that founder of the whistleblowing organization WikiLeaks Julian Assange had been ordered to leave the country's embassy in the UK capital.

28.07.2018 - Ecuador's Communications Ministry Denies Assange Told to Leave Embassy in London
Ecuador's Communications Ministry Denies Assange Told to Leave Embassy in London

Earlier in the day, Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno said Assange would ultimately have to leave the embassy where he has lived since June 2012. The UK Prime Minister's Office spokesperson told Sputnik that the United Kingdom and Ecuador continued discussing the situation around Assange but said the issue had not been raised during Moreno's latest visit to London.

The National Communications Ministry says that President of the Republic [of Ecuador] Lenin Moreno did not order that Julian Assange leave the Embassy of Ecuador in London at any point," the ministry's statement read.

According to the ministry, Moreno said the issue should be resolved through the negotiations between Ecuador and the United Kingdom.

Meanwhile, Carlos Poveda, one of Assange's lawyers, told Sputnik on Friday that the legal defense team of Julian Assange was concerned over the position of the Ecuadorian government on the situation around the founder of whistleblowing organization WikiLeaks, as the government's representatives refused to meet with his lawyers.

"We closely followed the statements of President Lenin Moreno both in the United Kingdom and in Spain and we should note that the team of lawyers… asked for a meeting in London or Madrid, but they were told that the agenda did not allow such a meeting," Poveda said.

The lawyer noted that Moreno's statements caused concern because previously it had been officially stated that the Assange case would not be discussed during Moreno's trip to Europe.

"We know that Assange's issue is somehow being considered… which leads us into confusion. We are surprised by his personal position, which shows that he has never agreed with the granting asylum," the lawyer said.


28.07.2018 - Assange's Defenders Alarmed at Ecuador's Wish to End His Stay in Embassy
Assange's Defenders Alarmed at Ecuador's Wish to End His Stay in Embassy

During his European trip, the country’s President Moreno confirmed that his government has been in contact with the British authorities and stated that the whistleblower should eventually leave the embassy, where he took refuge in 2012 fearing extradition to the US for leaking documents on the Iraq War.

The legal team of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has remained in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London for six years fearing extradition to the US, has told Sputnik that the representatives of the country’s government have refused to meet the whistleblower’s defenders.

According to one of his lawyers, Carlos Poveda, they requested talks in London or Madrid, but were rebuffed as “the agenda did not allow such a meeting."

He voiced concern after the recent statements by Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno, who recently confirmed during his European tour that his country is having talks with the UK authorities on Assange. The defender points out that it had been officially stated that Assange’s case wouldn’t be discussed during Moreno’s trip to Europe.

"We know that Assange's issue is somehow being considered… which leads us to confusion. We are surprised by his personal position, which shows that he has never agreed with the granting of asylum," the lawyer told Sputnik.

The recent development also outraged the whistleblower’s supporters, who shared their revolt on Twitter and in protests.

In Madrid, where Moreno headed after a visit to the UK, he said that "The only person I’ve never talked to is Mr. Assange," confirming that Ecuadorian authorities “are constantly talking with the British Government, with the ambassador, who is their representative in Ecuador."

Moreno also said that Assange should eventually leave the country's embassy and disapproved of Assange's activity, never agreeing with “the interventions in people's private emails in order to obtain information.”

He stressed, however, that all Ecuador wants is the guarantee that Assange’s life wouldn’t be in danger.

Later, Ecuador's National Communications Ministry issued a statement saying that “President of the Republic [of Ecuador] Lenin Moreno did not order that Julian Assange leave the Embassy of Ecuador in London at any point."

Assange took refuge at Ecuador’s Embassy in London in 2012 after he was accused of sexual offenses in Sweden during the presidency of Rafael Correa. While the charges have since been dropped, he still fears extradition to the United States, where he is wanted for leaking Iraq War logs.

Following Lenín Moreno taking the office in 2017, the leaker’s conditions have taken a turn for the worse. In March, the embassy cut off Assange's internet access, stating the 46-year-old had violated an agreement that stated he would not interfere with Ecuador's relationship with other countries.

Moreno, who referred to Assange as “more than a nuisance” and an “inherited problem,” also ordered the shutting down of special security reports that the country had spent at least $5 million on a spy operation to support and protect Assange in its embassy in London.
 
I worry, if Assange were to leave the Ecuadorian embassy in London (now) without the proper safe guards, he'll eventually end up on the Skripal-cide list?

August 8, 2018 - Assange Free to Leave Ecuadorian Embassy If London Guarantees Safety: President
Assange Free to Leave Ecuadorian Embassy If London Guarantees Safety: President

Ecuador’s President Lenin Moreno has said that WikiLeaks’ founder, Julian Assange, is free to leave the Ecuadorian Embassy in London any time, but only if Britain guarantees his safety.

According to Moreno, Ecuadorian authorities are currently in talks with Assange’s lawyers to work out an agreement that would ensure the security of the WikiLeaks’ founder “‘in line with the norms of international law.”

“If we come to an agreement, we’ll be happy to ask Mr. Assange to leave the embassy and surrender himself to legal investigation,” Lenin Moreno said in an interview with the national TV channel NTN24.

Late last month Moreno said that Julian Assange should leave the premises of the Ecuadorian embassy in London.

Shortly afterwards, media reports said that the Australian journalist planned to walk out of the Ecuadorian mission due to health problems related to his long-time isolation.
 
09.08.2018 - US Gov't Needs to Ensure Assange's Protection Amid Testimony Request - Lawyer
US Gov't Needs to Ensure Assange's Protection Amid Testimony Request - Lawyer

The WikiLeaks founder's lawyer Jennifer Robinson has said the request by The US Senate Select Committee shows US interest in Assange's testimonies and confirmed that the activist is looking into the possibility of giving them in case his safety is assured.

"We are seriously considering the offer but must ensure Mr Assange's protection is guaranteed," Robinson said.

DETAILS TO FOLLOW
 
The Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Saturday Moscow has not held any talks either with the associates of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange or the staff of the Ecuadoran Embassy in London, where he has been residing for years, regarding Assange's reportedly prepared escape from the United Kingdom.


Matthew Chattle | Barcroft Images | Getty Images
Julian Assange speaks to the media from the balcony of the Embassy Of Ecuador on May 19, 2017 in London, England.

Sat Sep 22, 2018 - Russia Denies Contacting Assange's Associates over Alleged Escape Plan
Farsnews

"The article contains a whole series of similar anti-Russia innuendos. On our part, we stress that Russian diplomats have not contacted either the staff of the Ecuadoran Embassy in London or Mr. Assange's associates in order to assist in his leaving the territory of the United Kingdom,"

The foreign ministry added that regular meetings between Russian and Ecuadoran diplomats in London were nothing more than a regular practice of diplomatic relations.

On Friday, The Guardian newspaper reported, citing unnamed sources, that Russia had allegedly secretly contacted Assange's associates in London in order to help him escape from the embassy. According to the newspaper, Russia was considered as one of the options for his final destination.

Assange has been residing in the Ecuadorian Embassy since June 2012 after the United Kingdom granted his extradition to Sweden, where he was accused of sexual offenses. While the Swedish police dropped the charges in 2017, Assange is still wary of being extradited to the United States, where he is wanted for leaking classified documents of the US State Department.


Sept, 21, 2018 - Revealed: Russia’s secret plan to help Julian Assange escape from UK
Revealed: Russia’s secret plan to help Julian Assange escape from UK

Russian diplomats held secret talks in London last year with people close to Julian Assange to assess whether they could help him flee the UK, the Guardian has learned.

A tentative plan was devised that would have seen the WikiLeaks founder smuggled out of Ecuador’s London embassy in a diplomatic vehicle and transported to another country.

One ultimate destination, multiple sources have said, was Russia, where Assange would not be at risk of extradition to the US. The plan was abandoned after it was deemed too risky. (Article continues.)


Sept, 21, 2018 - Ecuador attempted to give Wikileaks' Julian Assange diplomat post in Russia: Document
Ecuador attempted to give Wikileaks' Julian Assange diplomat post in Russia: Document
  • Ecuador in 2017 gave Wikileaks founder Julian Assange a diplomatic post in Russia.

  • But the offer was rescinded after Britain refused to give him diplomatic immunity, according to an Ecuadorean government document seen by Reuters.

  • The aborted effort suggests Ecuadorean President Lenin Moreno had engaged Moscow to resolve the situation of Assange's presence in Ecuador's embassy in London.
Ecuador in 2017 gave Wikileaks founder Julian Assange a diplomatic post in Russia but rescinded it after Britain refused to give him diplomatic immunity, according to an Ecuadorean government document seen by Reuters.

The aborted effort suggests Ecuadorean President Lenin Moreno had engaged Moscow to resolve the situation of Assange, who has been holed up in the Ecuadorean embassy for six years to avoid arrest by British authorities on charges of skipping bail.
The incident was revealed in a letter by Ecuador's foreign ministry to a legislator who had asked for information about Ecuador's decision last year to grant Assange citizenship.

Ecuador last Dec. 19 approved a "special designation in favor of Mr. Julian Assange so that he can carry out functions at the Ecuadorean Embassy in Russia," according to the letter written to opposition legislator Paola Vintimilla.

"Special designation" refers to the Ecuadorean president's right to name political allies to a fixed number of diplomatic posts even if they are not career diplomats.

But Britain's Foreign Office in a Dec. 21 note said it did not accept Assange as a diplomat and that it did not "consider that Mr. Assange enjoys any type of privileges and immunities under the Vienna Convention," reads the letter, citing a British diplomatic note.

Ecuador abandoned its decision shortly after, according to the letter.

British authorities have said they will arrest Assange if he leaves the embassy, meaning he would have needed to be recognized as a diplomat in order to travel to Moscow.

Lawyers for Assange in the United States and Britain did not respond to requests for comment. WikiLeaks website did not respond to an email seeking comment. The Ecuadorean foreign ministry could not be reached for comment.

The plan to make Assange an Ecuadorean diplomat was made public last year, but the effort to send him to Moscow has not been previously reported.

U.S. intelligence agencies in 2017 said they believed WikiLeaks was an intermediary used by Russia to publish emails hacked from top Democrats to embarrass 2016 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

U.S. President Donald Trump faces an investigation into whether his campaign colluded with Russia to win that election. Assange denies receiving the emails from Russia, but has not ruled out having obtained them from a third party. Trump and Russia deny collusion.

The Guardian newspaper on Friday reported that Russian diplomats held secret talks in London to help Assange flee Britain through an operation tentatively scheduled for Christmas Eve, 2017.

The story, which cited unidentified sources, said "details of the plan were sketchy" and that it was aborted because it was deemed too risky.

"The Embassy has never engaged either with Ecuadorian colleagues, or with anyone else, in discussions on any kind of Russia's participation in ending Mr Assange's stay within the diplomatic mission of Ecuador," Russia's embassy in London wrote on its web site in a response to The Guardian story.

It was not immediately evident if Ecuadorean officials had any contact with Russia as part of the Assange appointment.

Reuters was unable to obtain comment from Russia's foreign ministry on Ecuador's plan to make him a diplomat there.

The letter from Ecuador's foreign ministry was a summary of 28 documents that were sent to Vintimilla in response to her request.

Among those documents is a Dec. 4 letter from Assange in which he renounced his request for political asylum from Ecuador in preparation to become an Ecuadorean diplomat. The letter, which was seen by Reuters, said he ultimately planned to travel to Ecuador.

Vintimilla, who discussed some of the documents during a Thursday press conference, said Assange should lose his citizenship as a result of that letter.

Assange sought asylum in 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden to face questions about allegations of sex crimes, accusations that were later dropped.

Ecuador's president Moreno has said Assange's asylum cannot be eternal, but has also been reluctant to abruptly halt it on concerns that Assange's human rights could be at risk.
 
Julian Assange, who remains in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London fearing extradition to the US, hasn’t been allowed to communicate with anybody but his lawyers since this March. Although the whistleblower remains the official head of WikiLeaks, an Icelandic investigative journalist has taken over his job as editor-in-chief.

27.09.2018 - WikiLeaks gets New Boss while Assange remains cut off from Outside World
WikiLeaks Gets New Boss While Assange Remains Cut Off From Outside World

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has appointed its former spokesman, Icelandic journalist Kristinn Hrafnsson, to replace him as editor-in-chief.

Kristinn Hrafnsson, who has been named Iceland's journalist of the year several times, has worked extensively with WikiLeaks. He took part in the Collateral Murder publishing collaboration, served as the spokesperson of the NGO from 2010 until 2016, and has overseen several legal projects for the organization since then.

In his statement, quoted by WikiLeaks, Hrafnsson condemned the silencing of Julian Assange that had facilitated his career move.

“But I welcome the responsibility to secure the continuation of the important work based on WikiLeaks ideas,” his statement reads.


27.09.2018 - New Face of WikiLeaks: Facts to know about Kristinn Hrafnsson
New Face of WikiLeaks: Facts to Know About Kristinn Hrafnsson

Icelandic journalist Kristinn Hrafnsson has taken over as editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks, as Julian Assange has barely had any connection with the outside world since his internet connection at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London was turned off in March. Who is Hrafnsson and what does his appointment mean? Sputnik has collected all the important facts.

WikiLeaks Veteran

Hrafnsson, 56, has been involved with WikiLeaks for close to a decade, serving as the public face of the organization between 2010 and 2016, and becoming one of Assange's closest friends.

The journalist's association with Assange and WikiLeaks began after the organization's exposure of a major Icelandic banking scandal 2009, which eventually led to the collapse of the island nation's government. Hrafnsson faced sacking and censorship from his employers on Icelandic television for his work.

After Sweden issued an international arrest warrant for Assange over charges of sexual assault, Hrafnsson became one of the WikiLeaks founder's most tireless defenders, speaking to media outlets about the obvious "politicized" nature of the case, and Assange's "almost Kafkaesque" confinement to the Ecuadorean Embassy in London.

After resigning from the position of WikiLeaks spokesman, Hrafnsson continued to work with the organization, overseeing legal projects and speaking to Assange regularly.

Serious Journalist

Hrafnsson gained international recognition for his collaboration with WikiLeaks on its investigation into the July 12, 2007, Baghdad strikes. Footage of the attacks, received by WikiLeaks from US military intelligence whistleblower Chelsea Manning, showed US Army Apache helicopters firing indiscriminately at a group of Iraqi journalists and civilians.

Hrafnsson's investigative film "Collateral Murder, Hellfire," created together with fellow journalist Ingi Ingason, won the International Journalism and Human Rights award in May 2011. The film featured new insights into war crimes in Iraq, gleaned in part from Hrafnsson's travels to the war-torn country.

Hrafnsson is recognized as one of Iceland's top journalists and has received the country's "journalist of the year" award in 2004, 2007 and 2010 from the National Union of Journalists for his work.

'Power to the Powerless'

Hrafnsson offered Sputnik important insights on his aspirations and worldview in an in-depth interview with the news agency in 2014. Speaking about the dangers of cooperation between media corporations and states in spying on citizens, the Icelandic journalist warned that there is an imbalance when it comes to the privacy of those in power and ordinary people.

It is very strange that we live in times where the privacy of individuals is becoming practically nonexistent, but the secrecy of those in power is increasing day by day. That is something that is totally against every principle and value of society, and of course it should be reversed. We need more transparency for those in power. We need more privacy for the powerless – the individual," Hrafnsson insisted.

Back in his home country, Hrafnsson served as an advisor to the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative, a legal movement which culminated in a parliamentary resolution in 2010 aimed at turning Iceland into a safe haven for free speech and freedom of information.

WikiLeaks 'Not a One Man Organization'

The implications of Hrafnsson's appointment aren't immediately clear. Hrafnsson said of his appointment: "I condemn the treatment of Julian Assange that leads to my new role, but I welcome the responsibility to secure the continuation of the important work based on WikiLeaks ideals."

In a 2010 interview with Forbes published shortly after he was appointed as WikiLeaks' spokesman, the Icelandic journalist hinted about his vision for WikiLeaks. The transparency organization, he said, should "gradually put more emphasis on the leaks than on WikiLeaks, and more emphasis on the organization than the founder." WikiLeaks, he said, was "not a one man organization," and would not be detracted from its work, whatever happens to its key figures.

Published on Jul 6, 2018 (2:32 min.)

Classified military footage released by WikiLeaks showing an attack by US military in the Iraqi suburb of New Baghdad. This callous attack left 12 dead including two Reuters staff. Two Iraqi children were also seriously injured.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom