Kate & Will - Wedding coverage

I don't think "androgynous" is the right word to describe what the PTB is pushing men and women to behave like, i would say "juvenile". Today, i find very few adults who have more than a 14 years old mental age.
 
agni said:
truth seeker said:
agni said:
So, going to original question of "androgynous". I think it does not matter what gender one is or how proportionate presence of these energies in the body as long as they are not suppressed. I am a man, but I think I have dominating feminine part, so basically I can say I am a women within a male body, yet I am attracted to women only. What does it make me ? Am I men ? Am I women ? Am I androgynous ? Not that I care though, being a human being is good enough for me.
Perhaps the idea of androgyny becomes an issue when it is seen or more specifically programmed into someone as being the only choice in order to be accepted by society as opposed to being a personal choice one has made because it is an expression of oneself? In that case, I would think it would be a denial of an individual's choice to express as more "male" or "female". Not so different from what we (in general) do now in terms of denying feminine or masculine aspects. For what it's worth.

In other words it is an issue if present/residing/inner aspects of feminine/masculine energies that are natural to self are not allowed to manifest & function (suppressed), but rather dictated/shaped by outside influences. Did I understand you correctly ? Partially ? Or am I totally off ?

Thank you.
Yes. Basically what I was getting at is that I didn't see much difference between people becoming programmed to be androgynous versus how we are programmed now to accept "masculine" and "feminine" roles. Those are just my thoughts, however. :)
 
Thank you for clarification truth seeker ! For some strange reason had hard time comprehending what you wrote after several re-reads. Now that I look it's all clear and makes sense. :-[ I am in a process of recovery from effects of flu, so it's clearly me.

(edit) Note to self: Hah, looks like Cassandras' post touched some string in me, so I start bragging about "androgynous" thing without seeing what she meant. Defensive much ? Thanks Cassandra ! :thup:
 
Well actually, I was talking about the male pop stars. Yes, peadophelia-pushing for the gals (with blonde hair, enormous eyes and fake (pneumatic) breasts) sounds plausible. Maybe they also want pretty, effeminate boys. So sorry for not being clear!
I myself look petite, young for my age and have an innocent look. People often think I am an easy target or patronize me. However, I can be very direct and have an acid tongue (which I have learned to tame somewhat) I don't fit well in a box- it used to bother me, not now though.
 
annoying! the royal wedding was an unwanted intrusion even though we have no television and don't read newspapers! I view the so called royal family and its hideous add ons as nothing but parasites, and I am saddened by those folk who view these parasites as better than themselves.

Namaste,

Swooshy
 
:lol: The woman from the photo looks like coming from star wars or something hahaha.

mkrnhr said:
Many little girls could want to look like the new princess and switch to unhealthy diets
I don't know why some girls do this if they look pretty in their natural way or form. At the same time it's a big distraction to focus on your physical looks, people that focus on this are boring people.

mkrnhr said:
I don't think "androgynous" is the right word to describe what the PTB is pushing men and women to behave like, i would say "juvenile". Today, i find very few adults who have more than a 14 years old mental age.
True, and those who really are like an adult, they need to be in some religion because if not, as some I know, they behave so arrogant and intolerant toward others.
 
The_Seeker said:
3 Funny.. or maybe not. Things


1. If you would like to buy the hat... here you go lol.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Princess-Beatrice-Royal-Wedding-Hat-Philip-Treacy-/230620500557?pt=Women_s_Accessories_UK&hash=item35b20d924d

2. OMG, look closely at the face behind the hat!!!! :shock:

3. OMG, look closely at the other pictures that accompany it, her face. lol!!! :O



So, now that I have everyone's attention. What did you see? :scared:

The_Seeker


I saw the price...GBP 5,600.00
Approximately US $9,109.52
:O
 
The_Seeker said:
3 Funny.. or maybe not. Things


1. If you would like to buy the hat... here you go lol.
http://cgi.ebay.com/Princess-Beatrice-Royal-Wedding-Hat-Philip-Treacy-/230620500557?pt=Women_s_Accessories_UK&hash=item35b20d924d

2. OMG, look closely at the face behind the hat!!!! :shock:

3. OMG, look closely at the other pictures that accompany it, her face. lol!!! :O



So, now that I have everyone's attention. What did you see? :scared:

The_Seeker

It is scary. For some reason it looks predatory/symbolic to me, so it makes her face seem lifeless. Hmmm...
 
That was what I saw... A lifeless face. It seemed... different. But yea, the price for that hat was ridiculas. But my comment was more geared towards her eyes. It seemed the hat... had taken over the wearer, or possible diverted attention. lol
 
I heard princess Beatrice's hat sold on e-bay for $130,000 :jawdrop:

_http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2011/05/princess-beatrice-hat-goes-130k-ebay

The odd Philip Treacy-designed hat Princess Beatrice wore at last month's royal wedding sold for about $130,000 (GBP 81,000) in an eBay auction this weekend.

The proceeds for the famous headpiece will be forwarded to UNICEF UK and Children in Crisis. An anonymous buyer edged four other bidders for the privilege of calling the royal memento his own.

At least the money goes to charity. :halo:
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom