Laura Knight-Jadczyk & Arkadiusz Jadczyk - Q & A Session - Barcelona Conference

[anart]

I certainly don't have all the answers, but I'll add in below what my current understanding is on this (always open to revision!):

1. the universe is evolving.

It's my understanding that the Universe simply 'is' - and it is in balance, which would probably mean that parts of it are evolving and parts of it are devolving in a timeless process of the Universe 'knowing' itself.

2. our purpose as humans is to help in that evolution.

The Universe is more than capable of 'doing what it does', so to speak, from what I understand. In fact, if humanity fails to continue on being a part of the process (at least in this sector of space/time), I'm quite sure another life form would develop (or be developed) to step in and take part. I think, from humanity's point of view, the main factor here is the opportunity humanity has to learn and grow through this experience. The Universe will fill in with another life system if humanity fails - humanity is just a part of the life system, and thus, if it fails, another part takes over (at least to my current understanding).

3. the information that we need to do our work is encoded within our cells but inaccessible to most
of us.

There is information encoded in all living cells - most of which we cannot decipher yet. It's the life-system ensuring that it and its information survives through time. What we need to do our work is, again, a complicated issue that might take a book to really suss out, though it seems to be a coordinated dance of genetics, soul potential and action/environment that affects the expression of those genetics, through which the soul energy can act in this reality - complex...

4. the entities that have coopted our thoughts and bodies are on a macro level analogous to the
psychopaths that have taken over this planet.

Close. Those who 'own us' use psychopaths on the 3D level to do their bidding, since it's inconvenient for them to do so here. I'm not sure I really got your point, though, so my input on that might not be relevant.

5. If they succeed on earth - if it is the growing branch of the universe - then the entire universe will be
adversely affected - in what way? Would all of creation fall into entropy? Or would the earth's work
be replaced by another entity such as the moon?

The Universe as a whole will not be affected adversely to my understanding, since whatever happens here is all part of an ongoing process and it's all happened before and will happen again, so to speak - (though not at all related to time as we know it). The Earth might become a 'dark planet' upon which further soul evolution becomes too difficult to be useful at all, but the Universe itself will continue in balance, from what I understand. Of course, I don't know - not from where I currently sit - so all of the above could be wrong!

 

[dannybananny]

And whoever has the (…?) and that is almost the end to their career. I don’t think there is technology that is 100% sure. Even with alchemical transmutation.

I think one right word could be technology but I m not sure.

Q: Next question. Is Obama dealing with the Extra-terrestrials?

L: What?

(Audience Laughter)

L: I think Obama is too stupid. Let me just say something about this. There is a whole lot of material that has been put out since Bob Lazar. And we talked about Bob Lazar earlier. About some kind of agreement between, say, the United States Government, or some government of the world and extra-terrestrials. I don’t think that is necessarily true. If anybody here has read Richard Dolan’s books, UFO’s and the National Security State (two volumes), what you discover in that book is case after of military interaction’s with UFO’s, where the UFO is behaving hostile to the military planes or the military planes are chasing and trying to fire on a UFO. I don’t think there is agreement. I think that’s been put out as propaganda to keep people calm. They want people to believe they are in control of the situation and they are not in control of the situation. There’s way too much evidence that these governments of the world are not in cahoots with the extra-terrestrials, or ultra-terrestrials, as the case may be. So, Obama being in contact or talking to extra-terrestrials would be like … if he is sending his military to chase them down and fire on them, which has been witnessed many, many times, I don’t think he is talking to them.

I can't agree on that. Laura statement could be also backed up by military involvement with abducted people when they visit them after the abduction and ask them about 4D STS. It seems they aren't very communicative whit each other and don't trust each other which is normal for STS world. But that could be also the reason why elite tries to find some info or technology which could get them the upper hand, which brings that statement by C's about Arc of Convent that are 3 and 4D STS looking for.

But until some upper hand is achieved it would be logical to conclude that psychopaths and negative people would choose survival and by that alliance with 4D STS which is not so trustworthy like every STS alliance, C's said that there's one world government that is made of humans and aliens, and there is much information about underground bases where humans and aliens work together, which is backed up by C's and other sources.

And from where did all this advanced technology came from in this last 50 years? But question of military jets attacking UFO's and vice versa depends on many factors which should be taken in the consideration like military hierarchy, 4D STO and STS and which country is it about. If it happens in some small and unimportant countries then their government isn t probably aware what is happening and is just being controlled by outside countries or organizations, or doesn't have a clue. If it, let's say happen in USA, then it depends if we are dealing with 4D STS or STO beings, it would be logical to attack STO if in alliance with 4D STS. And if military jets attack STS crafts there is a question of hierarchy because those lower on it don t know nothing about higher hierarchy. Military has protocols like if you see some craft in air you must intercept it because it's a violation of your space, so commanders from base issue a order to attack or stay with it. I don't now if there are firm protocols regarding UFO's and like I said it depends on many factors, but it seems like commanders have free hands to decide what they do and do what is under regular protocol. Maybe people would get suspicious if military don't gets involved because it would look like military is not a match for them. But I don't now how it's effective to calm people down if there is many "info" about government and aliens working against humanity.

If they are not with them why not make it public? It would be a great plan for their complete NWO. Create enemy and unite world for better coordination against aliens. I know I would do that. There are many holes that don t fit in with what was quoted above in my opinion.

 

[SeekinTruth]

dannybananny, I think what Laura meant was that there were/are many promises made (like technology and saving the elite from cataclysms, etc.) by 4th D STS but they go back on their word when they get what they want from the 3rd D elite. A lot of double crossing, etc. and nobody trusts anybody else. They HAVE given technology to 3rd D but probably not everything that was promised. In other words they don't really have an agreement in the true sense because none of the players are trust worthy and will never keep an agreement just because they made one. Game theory on steroids.

The governments don't want people to know that they are not at the top of the food chain, so to speak, that they are NOT in control. That would really cause huge problems for them to keep control. All the major organized religions would collapse, for one example.

 

[Joe]

I certainly don't have all the answers, but I'll add in below what my current understanding is on this (always open to revision!):

1. the universe is evolving.

It's my understanding that the Universe simply 'is' - and it is in balance, which would probably mean that parts of it are evolving and parts of it are devolving in a timeless process of the Universe 'knowing' itself.

2. our purpose as humans is to help in that evolution.

The Universe is more than capable of 'doing what it does', so to speak, from what I understand. In fact, if humanity fails to continue on being a part of the process (at least in this sector of space/time), I'm quite sure another life form would develop (or be developed) to step in and take part. I think, from humanity's point of view, the main factor here is the opportunity humanity has to learn and grow through this experience. The Universe will fill in with another life system if humanity fails - humanity is just a part of the life system, and thus, if it fails, another part takes over (at least to my current understanding).

If human reincarnation is a reality, which seems probable based on the evidence, and if it is a reality across the material universe, then the whole material universe is a churning pile of matter, that dies and get recycled, and that includes our bodies. It's like a big pile of play-dough, that gets formed into shapes of specific lifeforms (maybe based on some kind of "morphogenetic field") and it all get periodically 'mushed' and reformed, because that's what play dough is for. Within those play dough bodies there is a spark of consciousness, which is more or less conscious or aware depending on the life form. The only thing that can evolve is that spark of consciousness, but it usually gets recycled with the play dough. There may be a chance though that that spark of consciousness can evolve, become more aware, perhaps to the point where it can avoid being recycled with the play dough.

:D

 

[dannybananny]

dannybananny, I think what Laura meant was that there were/are many promises made (like technology and saving the elite from cataclysms, etc.) by 4th D STS but they go back on their word when they get what they want from the 3rd D elite. A lot of double crossing, etc. and nobody trusts anybody else. They HAVE given technology to 3rd D but probably not everything that was promised. In other words they don't really have an agreement in the true sense because none of the players are trust worthy and will never keep an agreement just because they made one. Game theory on steroids.

Aha, thanks for clarification, it helped a lot to get better picture. It makes perfect sense when we get better understanding of "agreement".

 

[David Topi]

J: Could you share with us the news the Cassiopaeans gave you on the arrival of the wave.

L: The very latest news was that 2014 was supposed to be year 1 of the new reality. They don't usually give dates, but appearantly when we start getting closer and closer to something... They didn't give us a specific date they just said that 2014 would be year 1 of the new reality. What that means... we'll see.

For me, this was one of the best moments of the Q&A when the people around me (I was up in the middle of the room) started saying.... uuuuuhhhh just 2 years away!

 

[webglider]

Quotes by anart Today at 11:21:48 AM »

It's my understanding that the Universe simply 'is' - and it is in balance, which would probably mean that parts of it are evolving and parts of it are devolving in a timeless process of the Universe 'knowing' itself.

Thank you for this anart. I tend to create analogies for myself when I try to grasp concepts such as this one. However, the explanation that you provide is satisfying in that it, as what it is describing, just "is" The magnitude of what is being described here is infinitely beautiful and terrifying. I think I had overestimated the role human beings play in this dance - a variation of self-importance I had entertained about our species. How humbling to think that all this could go on without us.

The Universe is more than capable of 'doing what it does', so to speak, from what I understand. In fact, if humanity fails to continue on being a part of the process (at least in this sector of space/time), I'm quite sure another life form would develop (or be developed) to step in and take part. I think, from humanity's point of view, the main factor here is the opportunity humanity has to learn and grow through this experience. The Universe will fill in with another life system if humanity fails - humanity is just a part of the life system, and thus, if it fails, another part takes over (at least to my current understanding).

The difficulty with being given such an opportunity is that the goal is so mysterious for most people including me. The concept of dormant dna in our cells waiting for the right conditions, actions, and understanding to become activated and fulfill this mysterious purpose is, if true, so beautiful and elegant that the idea itself takes one to another level of undertanding I am reminded of the story of the princess and the frog, of the kiss that transforms the frog into a prince. I need to revisit that fairytale. I used to read fairytales all through my childhood. They used to comfort me - I never understood why until now.

quote from anart:

There is information encoded in all living cells - most of which we cannot decipher yet. It's the life-system ensuring that it and its information survives through time. What we need to do our work is, again, a complicated issue that might take a book to really suss out, though it seems to be a coordinated dance of genetics, soul potential and action/environment that affects the expression of those genetics, through which the soul energy can act in this reality - complex...

Complex and very beautiful. Awe-inspiring to think of the consciousness that created all this.


quote from webglider answr from anart:

Quote from: wg
4. the entities that have coopted our thoughts and bodies are on a macro level analogous to the
psychopaths that have taken over this planet.
Close. Those who 'own us' use psychopaths on the 3D level to do their bidding, since it's inconvenient for them to do so here. I'm not sure I really got your point, though, so my input on that might not be relevant.

I was using as my point of reference the adage "As above so below" - analogous thinking trying to make sense of a mystery by bringing it down to common language thus, in a sense, losing the mystery.

quote from anart:

The Universe as a whole will not be affected adversely to my understanding, since whatever happens here is all part of an ongoing process and it's all happened before and will happen again, so to speak - (though not at all related to time as we know it). The Earth might become a 'dark planet' upon which further soul evolution becomes too difficult to be useful at all, but the Universe itself will continue in balance, from what I understand. Of course, I don't know - not from where I currently sit - so all of the above could be wrong!

I despair for the earth as there are so many transgressions upon it, so little respect. I was motivated by several recent Sott focus pieces to pluck my copy of Hannah Arendt's The Human Condition from my bookshelf and actually start reading it. In the introduction written by Margaret Canovan, Canavan offers this explanation:

Quote from Canavan pages 10-11:

In other words, if we have a nature or essence, only a god could know and define it, and the first prerequiite would be that he could speak about a "who" as though it were a "what". The perplexity is that the modes of human cognition applicable to things with "natural" qualities, including ourselves to the limited extent that we are specimems of the most highly developed species of organic life, fail us when we ask the question "Who are we?" This is why attempts to define human nature almost invariably end with some construction of a deity...

As I understand this when we try to define ourselves, the deity which we create to do this for us takes us away from ourselves to the extent that we can never know ourselves. To bring in another example - it's like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz and her magic shoes which could have brought her home at any time if only she knew what power they had to do so.

I don't know if any of this makes sense...

 

[carcoom]

Thanks to all of those who created these transcriptions. It is greatly appreciated.

I took the liberty of combining the various transcription segments and put them in one file which I will attach to this post in a file named

Laura Knight-Jadczyk & Arkadiusz Jadczyk - Q & A Session - Barcelona Conference.doc

 

[sebbe]

Thank you very much Carcoom.

 

[cassandra]

Thank you , carcoom. Really appreciate all your hard work!

 

[Redrock12]

Thank you , carcoom. Really appreciate all your hard work!

Ditto to that carcoom. Reading is more my medium than audio.
You have done me a great service.