Seamas said:
This seems to be what pathological types do best, and I think the essence of the problem is the nature of lies. Since it's extremely difficult (if not impossible on most occasions) to counter a lie before it is made, you're left holding the bag in the eyes of most people. Without general awareness of manipulation and knowledge of pathological types, it's a mighty effort to sort things out. Since we do have lots and lots of material on lies and pathology (mainly because of the attacks!), we're in a better position than most. Maybe a carefully worded section about manipulation would be helpful on the blog? I think it is a pretty fascinating story just in itself about how the research into pathology came from Bridges attacks, and after applying that info to the world scene resulted in contact from Lobaczewski about publishing Ponerology.
Ermm..why do you think we should impose our will on 'the enemy'. That's seems to be taking a play from the pathological playbook.
I think your general focus is good to consider, but we don't want to loose track of what we're doing.
I included the quote from the Art of War because I was thinking that it is a well respected book of strategy that is widely applicable to conflicts of all kind and that it would back up the point I was trying to make. I interpret that passage as saying that you should make your adversary play your game, rather than playing their game. I was echoing the language used in the passage to tie it into what I was saying. 
