There's this story from January 2010, about a similar looking being found in Wise County, Texas, that turned out to be a hairless raccoon. In this instance, since the animal was not immersed in water or anything to have made it hairless, the vet said it was probably an anomaly:
http://cryptozoologynews.blogspot.ca/2010/01/chupacabra-debunked-its-hairless.html
You can see the photo in the article.
I don't know why anyone will say it's a pig, that's truly bizzare, if they said that. A pig, roasted or not, certainly does not look like that!
http://cryptozoologynews.blogspot.ca/2010/01/chupacabra-debunked-its-hairless.html
You can see the photo in the article.
Bo said:From the NyMag.com(_http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/07/new-east-river-monster-is-not-a-pig.html) we can read:
If this was from a cookout, why was it not eaten at all, but left to rot on the beach? Just what is the Parks Department hiding? Is Wilbur a mutant? We pointed out the toe discrepancy to the Parks Department this afternoon, only to be dismissed. "It was a roasted pig — we threw it out," a spokesperson insisted."We didn't count its toes, we just threw it out."
I don't know why anyone will say it's a pig, that's truly bizzare, if they said that. A pig, roasted or not, certainly does not look like that!