Mass Migration - a plan, or just a consequence of some other plan

Sooner or later the world will have a clear image of what this whole refugee crisis meant and the role of Turkey :

_http://townhall.com/news/world/2015/12/16/amnesty-reports-mistreatment-of-refugees-in-turkey-n2094230

Refugees are the manifold victims of these days: they suffer from the wars in they countries, they suffer from their status on foreign lands after being lured into believing that going abroad would solve their problem. They are used to promote enmity between masses of people and countries wherever they go. They served for some entities to gather large profits.They serve for the propaganda machines of various fractions.

Awful situation to be in - it really illustrates the dire consequences for living under stress and losing protection and clear reasoning capacity.

I wonder what it takes to being prepared when chaos increases and there will be no more props? Maybe our inspiration, will and courage would become the new means to forge our ways into the unknown?

Just my thoughts
Joy
 
Excellent RT documentary about the situation in Calais: _https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-pDWsD0PeU

Makes me really angry that these people had to give up their lives because of Western state terrorism, while everyone is whining here if there is an attack :evil:
 
Refugee crisis: EU summit exposes impotence and unfulfilled pledges

_http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/17/refugee-crisis-eu-summit-exposes-impotence-and-unfulfilled-pledges

European solidarity weakens further as divisions grow between countries over border control and refugee quotas

European leaders are struggling to agree on action to manage the refugee crisis amid ever deepening divisions, impotence, and failure to follow through on earlier pledges.

While David Cameron’s campaign to refashion the terms of Britain’s EU membership was set to occupy much of a critical summit, for many of the other leaders the migration crisis loomed larger given that an estimated 1.2 million people have entered the European Union this year, mainly from the Middle East.

Leaders were to discuss incendiary proposals tabled by the European commission this week to create an EU border and coast guard empowered to overrule national governments when the EU’s external frontiers are deemed to be inadequately secured.

The proposal won strong support on Thursday from the German and French leaders, but in many parts of the EU it was viewed as an assault on national sovereignty.

The summit, the fifth such meeting in a row to focus on the migration emergency, revisited many of the measures that heads of government and interior ministers had decided on since last spring, but had not put into effect.

“The measures have been taken, but not applied,” said the French president, François Hollande, for whom tough security policies are particularly important after the terrorist attacks in Paris last month.

Britain is only marginally involved in the policy debate because it is not part of the 26-country, free-travel Schengen zone, takes no part in EU common asylum policies, and need not take part in EU interior policy coordination.

The worsening divisions over what to do about refugees, the future of the Schengen area, and the re-establishment of national border controls were laid bare by a mini-summit of eight countries that preceded the full meeting.

The German chancellor, Angela Merkel, led a session of seven other government leaders from Scandinavia, Benelux, Austria, and Greece aimed at trying to agree on how to share quotas of refugees taken directly from Turkey as part of a flagging €3bn (£2.2bn) deal Brussels recently reached with Ankara.

Merkel is the driving force behind the initiative. But the “coalition of the willing” could only attract 8 of 28 EU countries, highlighting that there is no longer a majority in the EU prepared to support a new system of permanent quotas to share refugees across the union.

Hollande made clear that France would observe a system of quotas agreed in September, spreading 160,000 people across the EU from Greece and Italy, but that Paris would not take part in further similar schemes.

Merkel has said the future of the Schengen system could be in jeopardy unless there is more generous burden-sharing of refugees. Around 1 million newcomers have entered Germany this year.

The mini-summit linked governments who were willing to share refugees “voluntarily” rather than on the mandatory basis being proposed by the European commission. This strongly suggested that, at least for now, Merkel has abandoned hopes of securing a “European solution” to the crisis.

The figures being discussed have rapidly collapsed from the ambitious to the arguably meaningless, given the scale of the problem. A month ago, Berlin and others were talking of taking 400,000-500,000 people directly from Turkey. By Thursday the figure had sunk to 50,000-80,000.

The eastern European states most strongly opposed to taking in refugees were threatened with cuts to the large cash handouts they receive from the EU budget. Apart from Greece, all the countries attending the mini-summit are net contributors to the EU budget and are also the biggest recipients of refugees, an expensive undertaking.

The Austrian chancellor, Werner Faymann, told the eastern European countries they could not expect to shun “solidarity” on refugees while receiving hundreds of billions in transfers from western Europe.

A confidential paper on migration presented to the summit by Luxembourg, which is currently in the EU’s six-month rotating chair, revealed a long list of unredeemed pledges by national governments and false promises.

Of the September agreement to shift 160,000 refugees from Greece and Italy, 168 people had actually been moved to other host countries. Of an earlier agreement to take 22,000 refugees from camps in Turkey, Lebanon and Jordan, a mere 300 were beneficiaries to date. Of 11 reception centres promised for Greece and Italy months ago, only two were up and running.

And Merkel’s hopes that the deal struck with Turkey in October would stem the flow of people across the Aegean into Greece also appeared to be fading. This month, around 4,000 were making the crossing every day, the report said. This was a bit lower than in November, but the report ascribed the reduction to the weather rather than to Turkish action.

“We agreed a certain number of rules with Turkey,” Hollande said. “If we can’t get control of our external borders, then we can’t go further on the promises we made to Turkey.”


Sovereignty fears cloud EU debate over new border guard plan

_http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20151217/eu--europe-summit-migrants/?utm_hp_ref=world&ir=world

BRUSSELS (AP) — European Union heavyweights France and Germany on Thursday backed a potentially divisive plan for a border guard agency with powers to unilaterally deploy to member states unable or unwilling to manage their borders.

The border and coast guard project is chiefly aimed at protecting Europe's external borders in countries like Greece and Italy as they struggle to manage the arrival of hundreds of thousands of people fleeing conflict or poverty for better lives in Europe.

But the idea that the agency could send ships, planes or other assets to a country even if it opposes the deployment is reviving old fears about a loss of national sovereignty to unelected officials at the EU's executive Commission in Brussels.

Countries further north in Europe like Germany and Sweden — the preferred destinations of many migrants — are keen to have tighter controls to ease the flow of people, as is France.

"The external borders must be protected. I'm entirely in agreement with the proposal from the European Commission on a border guard," French President Francois Hollande told reporters at the EU summit in Brussels.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel also underlined that she "very strongly supports" the plan.

Before chairing the summit, European Council President Donald Tusk acknowledged that the border agency is a "most controversial idea" but said that passport-free travel in the 26-nation Schengen area would be compromised if Europe's outside borders are porous.

"Europe cannot remain vulnerable when Schengen states are not able to effectively protect their borders," Tusk said.

The new agency would have a standing reserve force of at least 1,500 border guards that could be sent to EU border crossings within three days, rather than relying on time-consuming calls to nations for volunteers during emergencies.

But for some, the plan touches at the very heart of national identity — a country's right to decide who or what can be deployed on its territory — and Greece, Italy, Croatia and Hungary were expected to oppose it.

A senior EU diplomat, briefing on condition of anonymity because the negotiations have not taken place yet, said it was unlikely that the European Commission would ever order the border guard to a country that objected, as that would mean imposing an occupying army.

The proposal is just the start of a potentially long and divisive legislative process. Still, the EU has planned a 2016 budget for the agency of 238 million euros ($260 million).

According to the International Organization for Migration, more than 920,000 people have entered the EU so far this year. The influx has overwhelmed national border guards and reception capacities, notably in Greece, where some 770,000 migrants have arrived, most of them from Turkey.
 
Denmark's proposed Immigration Legislation - to limit Refugees - is beyond common moral comprehension!

Denmark's government wants to seize valuables from Syrian refugees
http://www.vox.com/2015/12/17/10326178/denmark-refugee-jewelry-valuables

Denmark has one of the harshest records on Syrian refugees of any European Union nation, and last week it got even worse. On Thursday, December 10, the center-right Danish government proposed legislation that would enable immigration authorities to seize jewelry and other personal valuables from refugees.

"The Danish Government has on 10 December presented a bill before the Danish Parliament which includes a number of different initiatives on asylum policy, including the initiative on seizing valuable assets,"


Mia Tang, a spokesperson for the Danish Ministry of Immigration, Integration, and Housing explained in an email. "The bill will go through Parliamentary debate in January and will enter into force after adoption by the Parliament. The bill is expected to be effective from February 2016."

How the proposal works

Under the law, any possessions worth more than 3,000 kroner — about $440 — would be fair game for immigration authorities to seize. "Foreigners will always be able to keep assets which are necessary to maintain a modest standard of living, e.g. watches and mobile phones," Tang insists.

There's a general exemption for items of sentimental value such as wedding rings — as long as their value is under a certain limit.

"Assets which have a certain personal, sentimental value to a foreigner will not, as a main rule, be seized unless they have considerable value," Tang notes.

The idea is that the items might pay for the expense of supporting and accommodating refugees. "The Danish Immigration Service shall ensure that asylum seekers receive the necessary support while their asylum applications are being considered. The support includes basic maintenance, health care and accommodation," Tang writes. She continues:


It follows from current rules that an asylum seeker, who brings sufficient means to take care of him- or herself, should not also receive support from the Immigration Service. The asylum seeker is obliged to inform on any means the asylum seeker brings with him or her. The bill presented on 10 December 2015 provides the Danish authorities with the power to search clothes and luggage of asylum seekers — and other migrants without a permit to stay in Denmark — with a view to finding assets which may cover the expenses mentioned above.

The law would apply both to refugees entering Denmark in the future and to ones there now.

The ugly history of confiscation in Europe

The idea's sparked debate in Denmark since Justice Minister Søren Pind floated it in early December, arguing, "I’m talking about a situation in which a man comes along with a case full of diamonds and asks for protection in Denmark. That’s only fair." Martin Henriksen from the far-right populist Danish People's Party responded by suggesting that even wedding rings should be up for grabs. (He latter backtracked, saying that wedding ring confiscation is "not something that we should strive for" but "could be fair enough in some situations, even though they would be exceptional.")

Martin Geertsen, a member of parliament from the center-right Venstre party currently leading Denmark's coalition government, condemned Henriksen, noting that the idea of seizing wedding rings "awakens terrifying historical images."

Indeed it does. Denmark was occupied by Nazi Germany for five years, from 1940 to 1945, during which time Germany confiscated assets from Jewish Danes, just as it did to Jews across Europe. Danish Jews saw less seized than most nations under Nazi occupation; the Danish government successfully prevented most confiscations until 1943, and Danes who survived the concentration camps generally returned to find their homes as they had left them, as their neighbors prevented Nazis from looting them too thoroughly. But Nazi confiscations still loom large in European historical memory more generally.

Obviously there is no equivalence to be drawn between Denmark's proposed policy and the Nazi seizures. But it's nonetheless a strikingly cruel measure to inflict upon a population of poor men, women, and children fleeing death and chaos in their home country.

"A too high number of refugees put pressure on the Danish society and make it more difficult to ensure a successful integration of those who come to Denmark," Tang insists. Maybe so. But I've never heard of a "successful integration" that began with this kind of humiliating looting.
 
[quote author=angelburst29]There's a general exemption for items of sentimental value such as wedding rings — as long as their value is under a certain limit.
"Assets which have a certain personal, sentimental value to a foreigner will not, as a main rule, be seized unless they have considerable value," Tang notes.[/quote]

Way of pretending, yes we feel with you but we take it anyhow. Can't believe it all has come to this and we haven't seen nothing yet. Not so long ago racist and hateful comments were mostly only seen anonymous. Now even on social media under their own names people share their wish for a second holocaust if they realize it or not. These are times you truly get to know each other. Can't say alienation is a bad thing. The hysterical crowd is growing like wildfire.
 
While Merkel has abandoned hopes of securing a “European solution” to the crisis, in the U.S., a massive appropriations bill is expected to be approved by Congress, that would provide more than $1.6 billion to resettle illegal immigrants arriving at the U.S. border through 2018.

Congress Provides $1.6B to Resettle Illegal Immigrants Arriving at Border Through 2018
http://freebeacon.com/politics/congress-provides-1-6b-to-resettle-illegal-immigrants-arriving-at-border-through-2018/

Awards $1,645,201,000 for ‘refugee and entrant assistance activities’

Congress would award the massive check to the government just as the U.S. is experiencing a surge in arrivals of immigrant children at the southern border. Last week, federal agencies said they were opening two temporary shelters with 1,000 beds in South Texas to cope with the surge. A 400-bed shelter is also to be opened in Southern California.

“Out of an abundance of caution, the Office of Refugee Resettlement at the Department of Health and Human Services has begun a process to expand its temporary capacity to house unaccompanied children,” the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement last Monday.

The so-called omnibus spending bill would give $1,645,201,000 through fiscal year 2018 “for necessary expenses for refugee and entrant assistance activities authorized by section 414 of the Immigration and Nationality Act and section 501 of the Refugee Education Assistance Act of 1980, and for carrying out section 462 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002, section 235 of the William Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008, the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (‘‘TVPA’’), section 203 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005, and the Torture Victims Relief Act of 1998,” according to its text released Tuesday.

In October and November, U.S. government data showed that over 10,500 unaccompanied immigrant children crossed the southern border with Mexico, according to the Washington Post. That number is more than double the count of unaccompanied minors that arrived at the border during the same time period last year.

In the event that the new temporary shelters in Texas and California are not enough to account for the surge in migrants, HHS asked the Department of Defense last week to make plans for 5,000 more shelter beds to be made available. Those additional beds are not yet needed, an agency spokesperson said.



(Note: Their so-called omnibus spending bill - “for necessary expenses for refugee and entrant assistance activities" including temporary shelters sounds more like a "pompous Political solution" to make the U,S. Government "look good" in light of what Europe is experiencing - verses - the lack of any or no provisions or help given to it's own homeless population - who have resorted to setting up "Tent Cities" as a way of survival. )

Inside the tent cities springing up across America where hundreds of the country’s homeless will enjoy a ‘community’ Christmas
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3364320/Inside-tent-cities-springing-America-hundreds-country-s-homeless-enjoy-community-Christmas.html

* Homeless people across the United States have been developing special tent communities for their mutual support
* One resident of a New Mexico community said most Americans were only one pay check away from homelessness
* Some of the tent cities have developed and even have their own vegetable gardens and community buildings
* There are more than 100 tent cities across the US, although only around a dozen of them are officially sanctioned
 
Really terrible

Eighteen migrants drown after boat sinks off Turkey's southwestern coast

_http://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-turkey-idUSKBN0U207620151219

Eighteen people died and 14 were rescued late on Friday after a boat carrying migrants trying to sail to Greece sank off the southern Turkish town of Bodrum, Dogan News Agency reported.

Fishermen hearing the migrants' screams of migrants alerted the Turkish coast guard, who picked up the bodies from the sea after the wooden boat carrying migrants from Iraq, Pakistan and Syria capsized about 3.5 km off the coast.

Those rescued were taken to the hospital in Bodrum, many in serious condition, the agency said. The coast guard was not immediately available for comment.

A record 500,000 refugees from the four-year-old civil war in Syria have traveled through Turkey then risked their lives at sea to reach Greek islands this year, their first stop in the European Union before continuing to wealthier countries.

Despite the winter conditions and rougher seas, the exodus has continued, albeit at a slower pace.

Nearly 600 people have died this year on the so-called eastern Mediterranean sea route for migrants, according to the International Organization for Migration.

Turkey struck a deal with the EU on Nov. 29 pledging to help stem the flow of migrants into Europe in return for 3 billion euros of cash for the 2.2 million Syrians Ankara has been hosting, visas and renewed talks on joining the 28-nation bloc.
 
bjorn said:
[quote author=angelburst29]There's a general exemption for items of sentimental value such as wedding rings — as long as their value is under a certain limit.
"Assets which have a certain personal, sentimental value to a foreigner will not, as a main rule, be seized unless they have considerable value," Tang notes.

Way of pretending, yes we feel with you but we take it anyhow. Can't believe it all has come to this and we haven't seen nothing yet. Not so long ago racist and hateful comments were mostly only seen anonymous. Now even on social media under their own names people share their wish for a second holocaust if they realize it or not. These are times you truly get to know each other. Can't say alienation is a bad thing. The hysterical crowd is growing like wildfire.
[/quote]

It really is. And as the article states: "noting that the idea of seizing wedding rings "awakens terrifying historical images." Indeed it does. Denmark was occupied by Nazi Germany for five years, from 1940 to 1945, during which time Germany confiscated assets from Jewish Danes, just as it did to Jews across Europe." Can't they see they're doing the exact same thing?
 
[quote author=Oxajil]Can't they see they're doing the exact same thing?[/quote]

Indeed, all it took was basically just 14 years of programming. Its going to escalate dramatically when the global economy hits reality. It should be no surprise who will carry the blame. That in such a short amount of time a global holocaust can ensue says a lot about the human condition.
 
How Turkish Mafia Make Illegal Cash at the Cost of Refugees’ Lives

_http://sputniknews.com/europe/20151221/1032111168/turkey-mafia-refugees-boats-crimes-investigation.html

According to the German newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, a significant number of migrants come to Europe via Turkey.

While Turkey has signed a preliminary agreement with the EU to help manage the flow of irregular migrants, reports have started to emerge suggesting the Turkish mafia is becoming the largest source of boats used for smuggling refugees.

The migrant smuggling trade in Turkey is quickly being corralled by organized crime and which was brought to light in an investigative piece by the Financial Times.

The investigation provided detailed information on the various boats being used by Turkish smugglers to transport refugees to Europe and the careful planning that went into the organization of illegal migrant flows.

According to the investigation those who pay the Mafia can buy boats at small factories near Ankara for 400 dollars, while those who are reluctant to deal with criminals are forced to pay 6,000 dollars for even smaller vessels.

In the Turkish port of Cesme, control over the transportation of illegal migrants has been taken over by organized mafia groups, who force migrants to pay 1,000 dollars to even get on a boat.

As noted by the publication the New Eastern Outlook, this smuggling business run by the Turkish mafia has drawn the attention of the Finnish Border Guard. It has opened an investigation into this matter and according to their inquiry organized criminal groups have trafficked at least 100 people from Iraq via Turkey to Finland, while receiving a profit of well over 10,000 euros.

In an effort to stem this illegal human trafficking, European-law enforcement agencies and international human rights organizations have raised concerns to Turkey.

Amnesty International stressed that Turkey has not respected basic human rights of refugees who have been held in detention centers since the start of dialogue with the European Union.

“The refugees are being detained without the right to any contact with the outside world, and Turkish officials shrewdly present them with a choice: either they stay in prison indefinitely or get sent back to their homeland, Syria or Iraq, where they risk persecution, torture and death. Thus, Turkey’s actions contradict international humanitarian law,” the New Eastern Outlook wrote.

Similarly, the EU has provided Turkey with money to set up centers for refugees and EU representative in Ankara confirmed that such refugee centers are in fact nothing more than detention centers.

As the publication noted, different Western political forces have expressed negative attitude towards Ankara’s actions and policies. For instance, US presidential candidate Mike Huckabee expressed his distrust of Turkish politicians in an interview with Breitbart.
 
Immigration From Syria Causes 'Brain Drain' - UN Commissioner for Refugees

_http://sputniknews.com/middleeast/20151222/1032122044/immigration-syria-brain-drain.html

Syria is suffering from a "brain drain," as 86 percent of those leaving the war-torn country for Europe have a secondary education, UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres said in a statement.

UNITED NATIONS (Sputnik) — Since 2011, Syria has been in a state of civil war, with the government forces fighting several opposition factions and a number of extremist groups.

According to UN estimates, the conflict has forced some 4 million Syrians to flee their home country.

"Syria is experiencing a massive brain drain. 86% of those [refugees] we interviewed have a secondary education. Almost half have gone to university. One can only imagine the disastrous consequences of such an exodus on the future post-conflict reconstruction of Syria," Guterres told the Security Council on Monday.

Guterres also said it was necessary to achieve the ceasefire foreseen in the Vienna talks and in the Security Council Resolution adopted unanimously on December 18 in New York.

The resolution supports a ceasefire, sets a target of six months for a government transition, while elections in the country are planned to be held within 18 months.
 
Czech Prime Minister chastises Merkel over refugee crisis

_http://www.dw.com/en/czech-prime-minister-chastises-merkel-over-refugee-crisis/a-18935902

Bohuslav Sobotka has said Merkel's policies are partly to blame for the refugee crisis. He also reiterated the Czech Republic's commitment to helping the EU mitigate the crisis.

Sobotka criticized German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday for saying that Germany would take in an unlimited number of refugees, insisting it has led to deep divisions across Europe.

"Germany sent a signal that was seen and heard in many parts of the Middle East and North Africa. That has spurred illegal migration toward Europe," the Czech prime minister said in an interview with German daily Süddeutsche Zeitung.

Sobotoka emphasized regardless that his country was working in solidarity with the EU on the refugee issue. "We are in solidarity," he said. "We have sent police to Slovenia, Hungary and Macedonia. We have granted humanitarian aid to Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia."

"No one from Brussels had to force us to do these things," he added.

Upholding states' autonomy

However, Sobotka also emphasized the importance of individual EU member states maintaining autonomy.

"We reject the pressure to accept a centrally managed migration policy, which only strengthens the radicals and can damage the idea of Europe," he said.

The leader also rejected Austrian Prime Minister Werner Faymann's threat to cut EU funding for member states that don't comply with his refugee policy. "So an argument only continues to split Europe," he said.
 
Survey: Europeans Fear Immigration More Than Terrorism

_http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941002001538

Immigration has consolidated its top position as the main concern for Europeans in November, an EU poll revealed on Wednesday, Sputnik reported.

"Immigration has consolidated its place as the most important issue facing the EU for Europeans, and has become the first concern at the national level," the Standard Eurobarometer survey (EB84) stated.

Over 100,000 monthly arrivals were registered as the EB84 gathered its data on November 7-17. The European Commission requests and coordinates the survey.

"The fear of terrorism is also still rising, and terrorism is now seen as the second most important issue facing the EU," Eurobarometer indicated.

Slovakia, Latvia, Hungary, the Czech Republic and Estonia expressed the most opposition to migration from outside the bloc at over 80 percent, with EU-wide negative views at 59 percent. Around 90 percent across the EU support additional measures to combat illegal immigration.

Both indicators represented an increase on previous polling data gathered in spring.

Irregular migration has tested the EU’s unity this year as several frontier member states imposed national border controls to curb an estimated 1.2 million irregular crossings to date.
 
sToRmR1dR said:
Survey: Europeans Fear Immigration More Than Terrorism

_http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941002001538

It is now on SOTT:

http://www.sott.net/article/309089-Social-hysterization-Europeans-fear-immigration-more-than-terrorism
 
Gaby said:
sToRmR1dR said:
Survey: Europeans Fear Immigration More Than Terrorism

_http://en.farsnews.com/newstext.aspx?nn=13941002001538

It is now on SOTT:

http://www.sott.net/article/309089-Social-hysterization-Europeans-fear-immigration-more-than-terrorism

I'm losing count, on how many times, I've noticed "immigration" and "terrorism" in the same sentence by News Media, like the words are interchangeable and mean the same thing - when their meanings (separately) have no relation?

Truth known, all of our Families, have immigrated from one place to another, in the last hundred years or so. Are "we" all terrorist?


U.S. plans raids to deport families who surged across border
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/us-plans-raids-to-deport-families-who-surged-across-border/2015/12/23/034fc954-a9bd-11e5-8058-480b572b4aae_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_immigration-920pm%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

The Department of Homeland Security has begun preparing for a series of raids that would target for deportation hundreds of families who have flocked to the United States since the start of last year, according to people familiar with the operation.

The nationwide campaign, to be carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents as soon as early January, would be the first large-scale effort to deport families who have fled violence in Central America, those familiar with the plan said.
More than 100,000 families with both adults and children have made the journey across the southwest border since last year, though this migration has largely been overshadowed by a related surge of unaccompanied minors.

The ICE operation would target only adults and children who have already been ordered removed from the United States by an immigration judge, according to officials familiar with the undertaking, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because planning is ongoing and the operation has not been given final approval by DHS. The adults and children would be detained wherever they can be found and immediately deported. The number targeted is expected to be in the hundreds and possibly greater.

The proposed deportations have been controversial inside the Obama administration, which has been discussing them for several months. DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson has been pushing for the moves, according to those with knowledge of the debate, in part because of a new spike in the number of illegal immigrants in recent months. Experts say that the violence that was a key factor in driving people to flee Central America last year has surged again, with the homicide rate in El Salvador reaching its highest level in a generation. A drought in the region has also prompted departures.

The pressure for deportations has also mounted because of a recent court decision that ordered DHS to begin releasing families housed in detention centers.

Although Johnson has signaled publicly for months that Central American families not granted asylum would face deportation, the plan is likely to trigger renewed backlash from Latino groups and immigrant advocates, who have long accused the administration of overly harsh detention policies even as Republicans deride President Obama as soft on border security.

Advocates have not been briefed on the plans and on Wednesday expressed concern. They cited what they called flaws and abuses in the government’s treatment and legal processing of the families, many of whom are fleeing danger or persecution in El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras.

“It would be an outrage if the administration subjected Central American families to even more aggressive enforcement tactics,” said Gregory Chen, director of advocacy for the American Immigration Lawyers Association. “This administration has never acknowledged the truth: that these families are refugees seeking asylum who should be given humanitarian protection rather than being detained or rounded up. When other countries are welcoming far more refugees, the U.S. should be ashamed for using jails and even contemplating large-scale deportation tactics.”

Groups that have called for stricter immigration limits said the raids are long overdue and remained skeptical about whether the scale would be large enough to deter future illegal immigration from Central America.
 
Back
Top Bottom