Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

The list seems big enough? Wow, is just that, seeing it that way is way different than hearing/reading about in a somewhat isolated way, one here and there, or in a very general way, “UAPs have been observed in military and nuclear bases”.
Here's the current list of sites where Drones/UAPs have been reported:
RAF Lakenheath (UK)
RAF Mildenhall (UK)
RAF Feltwell (UK)
RAF Fairford (UK)
Ramstein AFB (Germany)
Dover AFP (Delaware) Picatinny Arsenal (NJ)
Naval Weapons Station Earle (NJ)
Lakehurst Naval Air Station (NJ)
Lockheed-Martin Aegis R&D (NJ)
Ft. Dix (NJ)
Langley AFB (Virginia)
Naval Station Norfolk (Virginia)
Barksdale AFB (Louisiana)
Wright-Patterson AFB (Ohio)
Nevada National Security Site (Nevada)
Hill AFB (Utah)
Lawrence Livermore Lab (California)
Edwards AFB (California)
Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton

Reservoirs
Reservoir in Connecticut
Drones were spotted flying along Raritan River (a waterway that feeds the Round Valley Reservoir)
Round Valley Reservoir (NJ)
Woodcliff Lake (NJ)
Lake Tappan (NJ)
Spruce Run Reservoir (NJ)
Clinton Reservoir (NJ)
Boonton reservoir (NJ)
Hillview Reservoir (NY)
The Horseshoe Curve in Altoona (Pennsylvania has three reservoirs)
Liberty Reservoir (Carroll County)

Power Stations/Electrical:
PSEG Salem Nuclear Station
Hope Creek Generating Station
Groton CT (electrical transmission substations)
Charles County MD (30 drones flying over an electrical substation in a rural area)
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1869344446329811295

In this replay, Richard Geldreich provides a UAP wave 2024 with more information: place, date, source.
 
Soluna said:
The following is a video by a very interesting fellow. He is part of a group who does behavioral analysis, and makes videos on that subject. He is also in his own right an author, teacher in these sorts of things including interrogation, psy-ops, neuroscience and so on.

Pretty recently he discovered he has a degenerative brain disease and decided to start revealing some of his more uh, covert knowledge I guess. I think there are so many frauds in this genre, and people who tease truth, that there may genuinely be some honest people in the bunch and my feeling is that this guy is on the level as much as is safe for him to be.

In any case, he uses a lot of the safe language of hypothesis, theory, if this is the case - and so on - but I think he very cleverly applies some critical thinking explained in a way that regular people could get behind if they don't throw the baby out with the bath water.

Click to expand...

Agree with others that this is a very useful video. He not only hints at what may be occurring, but underscores some useful things to look for when deconstructing big news stories, and sniffing out propaganda in general.

In any case, I'm now leaning towards the idea that this is, or has become, one big psy-op - 'The Great Drone Psy-op 'Flap' of 2024!'. While what we're seeing may have began as a secret gov/military attempt at observing and creating confusion around the sightings of orbs and other UAPs over military installations (though we can't be certain even of that) - it just seems to me that one of the main objectives here has much to do with controlling airspace and the aerial perspectives that anyone with an $75 drone can have access to - which is a lot of people at this point.

Consider the following from what Niall posted:

"Intelligence officials insist there is nothing nefarious about the drone invasion that has plagued New Jersey residents in a three-hour classified briefing."
Click to expand...

But, at least in the article, the intelligence officials do not say just who is responsible for deploying the drones and yet we're supposed to believe they don't present a problem in the midst of millions of people following this story and wondering just what the heck the drones are doing, and why they're doing it.

So a concern and mystery around this phenomena was created leaving many anxious to know just what is going on and, at the same time, we're being told not to worry about it - which is downright cognitive dissonance-inducing!

In the meantime, we have New York state Governor Kathy Hochul

pushing Congress to pass the Counter-UAS Authority Security, Safety, and Reauthorization Act, which would renew the Department of Homeland Security’s soon-to-expire ability to track and investigate drones, and require it to give state law enforcement the power to operate their own drone mitigation programs, which could include the ability to “disrupt control of, disable, damage, or destroy” drones.
Click to expand...

Governor Hochul was also the person trying her very best to create quarantine camps in New York State not too long ago by the way. So it seems clear that she is a political agent of some rather nefarious forces, and looking to help implement yet another policy that would enforce totalitarian controls over the US population.

Maybe we can think of public drone operation in the same way as an uncensored internet - because a lot of visual information can be gleaned from independently operated drones if and when some form of martial law should get enforced. And just like weapons and 'gun control' perhaps, the use of independent drones may be seen as something of a threat to those who are seeking something like an all-encompassing lock down.

But its not ony Hochul who's calling for more drone-related legislation:

States lack the ability to respond to drone threats, as these powers lie with federal agencies—mainly the Department of Homeland Security.
Click to expand...

So the "drone problem" is being presented as a lack of the ability of States to respond to threats, and yet further in the article, we learn that Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas (another agent of the Deep State) wants to empower states - when really what he means is that he wants to empower the Federal government to control states.

The act—which would also require federal agencies to share threat information collected from drone mitigation with state and local governments—was introduced in the House in June by Rep. Mark Green, R-Tenn., but has not yet faced a vote.

Gov. Phil Murphy, D-N.J., has recently pushed for Congress to pass the Safeguarding the Homeland from the Threats Posed by Unmanned Aircraft Systems Act, a bill introduced in the Senate last year that would renew the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice’s power to intervene if drones appear to pose a threat, including by seizing, confiscating or destroying drones.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said Sunday he would co-sponsor and “help pass” the act, which would also give state and local law enforcement the ability to use DHS-approved technology to track, disable and destroy drones.

Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas echoed calls for Congress to delegate authority to state and local governments to address drone threats, stating in an ABC News interview Sunday federal resources are “limited” and hampered because state and local authorities do not have the ability to respond to drone threats themselves.

Other politicians have vowed to work on legislation that has not yet been introduced, including Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., who said Saturday he is drafting legislation that would give state and local governments authority to bring down drones, asking: “Why can’t we bag at least one of these drones and get to the bottom of it?”
Click to expand...

Rep. Smith is just applying too much common sense to this; we're not meant to know what these drones are really doing and who's responsible for them. What we're meant to do, I think, is react and see the drone flap as a problem that can only be solved by the Federal Gov getting more involved with States' control of (but really suppression of) independent drone activity. Or so I think!
 
Beau said:
Wasn't that a lot full of Teslas? I saw the tweets about the hazards flashing but just checked and its been community noted on X because the lights flashing are part of a Tesla light show:


github.com

GitHub - teslamotors/light-show: Tesla Light Show

Tesla Light Show. Contribute to teslamotors/light-show development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com github.com
Click to expand...

It’s very often at a Tesla car lot where I see flashing lights going off on the vehicles, off and on. No drones or UFOs in sight when that happens. Just malfunctioning software OSIT.
 
Ennio said:
Agree with others that this is a very useful video. He not only hints at what may be occurring, but underscores some useful things to look for when deconstructing big news stories, and sniffing out propaganda in general.

In any case, I'm now leaning towards the idea that this is, or has become, one big psy-op - 'The Great Drone Psy-op 'Flap' of 2024!'. While what we're seeing may have began as a secret gov/military attempt at observing and creating confusion around the sightings of orbs and other UAPs over military installations (though we can't be certain even of that) - it just seems to me that one of the main objectives here has much to do with controlling airspace and the aerial perspectives that anyone with an $75 drone can have access to - which is a lot of people at this point.

Consider the following from what Niall posted:



But, at least in the article, the intelligence officials do not say just who is responsible for deploying the drones and yet we're supposed to believe they don't present a problem in the midst of millions of people following this story and wondering just what the heck the drones are doing, and why they're doing it.

So a concern and mystery around this phenomena was created leaving many anxious to know just what is going on and, at the same time, we're being told not to worry about it - which is downright cognitive dissonance-inducing!

In the meantime, we have New York state Governor Kathy Hochul



Governor Hochul was also the person trying her very best to create quarantine camps in New York State not too long ago by the way. So it seems clear that she is a political agent of some rather nefarious forces, and looking to help implement yet another policy that would enforce totalitarian controls over the US population.

Maybe we can think of public drone operation in the same way as an uncensored internet - because a lot of visual information can be gleaned from independently operated drones if and when some form of martial law should get enforced. And just like weapons and 'gun control' perhaps, the use of independent drones may be seen as something of a threat to those who are seeking something like an all-encompassing lock down.

But its not ony Hochul who's calling for more drone-related legislation:



So the "drone problem" is being presented as a lack of the ability of States to respond to threats, and yet further in the article, we learn that Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas (another agent of the Deep State) wants to empower states - when really what he means is that he wants to empower the Federal government to control states.



Rep. Smith is just applying too much common sense to this; we're not meant to know what these drones are really doing and who's responsible for them. What we're meant to do, I think, is react and see the drone flap as a problem that can only be solved by the Federal Gov getting more involved with States' control of (but really suppression of) independent drone activity. Or so I think!
Click to expand...
This makes a lot of sense !

It also explains the aloofness a la "we don't know anything, but you could give us power to help"
 
Ennio said:
Rep. Smith is just applying too much common sense to this; we're not meant to know what these drones are really doing and who's responsible for them.
Click to expand...
I had to register my small drone with the FCC, they gave me an official reg. # that is on the drone. I had to register it because it was over the 250-gram limit - whatever. I am auto-locked-out from flying over certain areas. So they already have a good bit of control over civilian drones, they really have nothing to worry about but it's no surprise since the PTBs myopic scrutinizing gaze misses nothing. Blaming the victim is standard MO.

But yeah, they know nothing about these whoppers flying high, fast, and with impunity all over the place. Joe Biden recently said that he sees 'nothing nefarious' in the NJ drones. Not reassured, after all, how much would it take to ding Biden's 'nefarious meter'?
 
This is a side thought.

The fire here in Redwood Valley in 2017 burned two child family members.

About a year after the fire, the father came to me one day, he knows I think, to say, out of the box. He was up on the burned property, many trees were burned to death, some right down into the ground burning the roots and all. Many trees still stood, some actually lived through the fire.

It was nighttime, little moon, he saw hovering lights, two of them skirting in and through the standing trees, many standing eighty or a hundred feet tall … at night?

He suggested that they were drones, well my son was there at the time, he knows how to run anything that runs on a remote … boats, cars, planes and drones. He laughed at the thought, he knew of the land that got burned and said he would never even think of running these things at night, definitely not in those trees like that. The boy continued and said, street lights, power lines, antennas and things that can interfere with the transmissions and loss of signal to the device … the big item was to never fly at night. Now I know how capable these drones have become, automated, it is really getting insane.

The conversation ended with the man saying that what was odd was the orbs were the same colors as the kid's favorite colors.

Now I didn’t immediately catch onto what he said right there until I thought it over, later I told him that I thought it wasn’t drones, it was a physical impossibility and that it might have been the spirits of the kids. It touched him and he didn’t know what to say after that.

Now I think these drone items are mostly a psy-op, but we are in a time of merging with 4th density. I’m just saying that some of these dot-lights might not even be a drone, it could be a past soul saying, ‘Hey someone needs to look over here’, as it was needed, a last closure for a soul.

Sorry, this is rather deep, Haiku …
 
Ennio said:
Agree with others that this is a very useful video. He not only hints at what may be occurring, but underscores some useful things to look for when deconstructing big news stories, and sniffing out propaganda in general.

In any case, I'm now leaning towards the idea that this is, or has become, one big psy-op - 'The Great Drone Psy-op 'Flap' of 2024!'. While what we're seeing may have began as a secret gov/military attempt at observing and creating confusion around the sightings of orbs and other UAPs over military installations (though we can't be certain even of that) - it just seems to me that one of the main objectives here has much to do with controlling airspace and the aerial perspectives that anyone with an $75 drone can have access to - which is a lot of people at this point.

Consider the following from what Niall posted:



But, at least in the article, the intelligence officials do not say just who is responsible for deploying the drones and yet we're supposed to believe they don't present a problem in the midst of millions of people following this story and wondering just what the heck the drones are doing, and why they're doing it.

So a concern and mystery around this phenomena was created leaving many anxious to know just what is going on and, at the same time, we're being told not to worry about it - which is downright cognitive dissonance-inducing!

In the meantime, we have New York state Governor Kathy Hochul



Governor Hochul was also the person trying her very best to create quarantine camps in New York State not too long ago by the way. So it seems clear that she is a political agent of some rather nefarious forces, and looking to help implement yet another policy that would enforce totalitarian controls over the US population.

Maybe we can think of public drone operation in the same way as an uncensored internet - because a lot of visual information can be gleaned from independently operated drones if and when some form of martial law should get enforced. And just like weapons and 'gun control' perhaps, the use of independent drones may be seen as something of a threat to those who are seeking something like an all-encompassing lock down.

But its not ony Hochul who's calling for more drone-related legislation:



So the "drone problem" is being presented as a lack of the ability of States to respond to threats, and yet further in the article, we learn that Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas (another agent of the Deep State) wants to empower states - when really what he means is that he wants to empower the Federal government to control states.



Rep. Smith is just applying too much common sense to this; we're not meant to know what these drones are really doing and who's responsible for them. What we're meant to do, I think, is react and see the drone flap as a problem that can only be solved by the Federal Gov getting more involved with States' control of (but really suppression of) independent drone activity. Or so I think!
Click to expand...
Even if they were to pass such a bill, they would still be powerless to destroy the drones, because by their own admission they do not pose a threat!
 
tschai said:
Even if they were to pass such a bill, they would still be powerless to destroy the drones, because by their own admission they do not pose a threat!
Click to expand...
True !

Perhaps this is a preemptive way of banning civilian drones altogether.
At least in certain areas.

Classic: Create a problem, wait for the people to beg for the solution.

If I were a govermnt type obssessed with order and control would I want the common folk to be able to just put up eyes in the sky whenever they wanted ?

All that's needed is a breakthrough in commercially available battery tech, and it would become a "problem".
 
Another update from Dolan:


He laments the lack of regular media coverage about sightings of all kinds, and specifically the lack of details for almost all of the supposed 5,000+ sightings/reports of 'New Jersey Drones'. He then goes through the various theories, without favoring any one in particular, but is especially astonished that not a single 'drone' has been taken down yet.

Next is US Navy pilot Ryan Graves, who had his own 'mystery drone encounters' - along with many other pilots - in 2019. Rogan had him on his podcast, and here's the part where they discussed the NJ 'swarm':


Note Graves mentions that there were previously TWO 'swarms' at Langley AFB in the run-up to Christmas, prompting him and his colleagues to anticipate another one this year. Well, it happened, but on a much bigger scale and over a much bigger area!

Finally, here's UFO 'veteran reporter' George Knapp, who's still plugging away for local Las Vegas TV, with a good summary report on the situation to date:

 
seek10 said:
I listened to my commute radio station yesterday and callers made few good arguments that discredits this 'drones as search party' narrative.
  • If it is a search party, drones in the morning makes sense rather than in night.
    • If drones don't want to people know what they are, why to have lights at the night and all that flashy display?
  • People are seeing the drones for a month, weeks before these mentioned date of Dec 2nd for missing medical radio active material.
Click to expand...
On the issue of 'drones as search party', this CEO of a drone company has some interesting take. He says:
  • The attachment sensors to the drones for radioactive material is useful in the day time rather than in the dark.
  • He mentions scenario where drone usage in the night may be useful. That is to identify methane gas leaks using thermal sensors attached to them.
  • He also mentions of one of the 80 missing Ukraine war head sent to US.
https://twitter.com/x/status/1868960828063682579
 
gottathink said:
It makes sense that maybe for a large scale holographic seen hundreds of drone “projectors” would need to be established in the atmosphere first.
Click to expand...

Theoretically, I think that such role could be played by satellites. That would perhaps explain why are they appearing only during the night. Just like standard projectors which work best at night, perhaps these drone projections could also not be properly seen in the daylight. And SpaceX started launching Starlink satellites in 2019, the same year that these mystery drones started appearing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom