May I post my session transcripts here?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Some of the schizophrenic voice some of you are reading into is me/they still finding our solidified voice. I drift back and forth between who is “talking” so sometimes I’m in good flow, and other times “Me” steps in to comment.
That sounds like a possible sign of schizophrenia. It could also be signs of struggle between various identities.
But, for any of you who've taken Auhuasca or DMT, I seem to be able to step through that portal without those heavy-hitter drugs.
The way you are framing it, sounds as if you have used these and perhaps still does use these drugs. Drugs can be a cause for psychosis, schizophrenia and other mental disorders. DMT is also called "the 45 minutes psychosis".

What I want is a little bit of feedback that I am possibly not completely bonkers.
I think that is very reasonable and perhaps a sign that there is a doubt in you as to the veracity of this whole thing. Yet you follow this sentence up with:
I've long since decided I can be bonkers and it doesn't matter, if the message is sound and worthwhile, I'm okay with being crazy.
That actually negates the first sentence of wishing for sincere feedback and more like "I want you to say that I am not bonkers, but if you do say so, then I don't care as I am okay with being crazy". You have already made it up to yourself to be the judge of whether the message is sound and worthwhile and you have long ago decided that to be the case. But who is this 'i' deciding and are there not many little 'i's competing for attention as there is in all of us? And how reliable are any of these little 'i's? The work involves weeding out these little subjective 'i's and become a solidified I, but that does not happen by listening to voices in the head.

Are any of you familiar with Frank DeMarco's work? I'm new to his books, but started first with the book "Awakening from the 3D world: How We enter the next life -- a Rita Book".
Frank worked with a group of researchers to transcribe and write several books, mainly talking to what they call TGU, The Guys Upstairs - his higher self, more or less.
I don't know of him but have been around similar types of the New Age movement for 20 years. Enough time to know not to waste more time. What he calls the guys upstairs according to the promo on coast to coast, are disembodied entities such as dead dudes like "Rita".

You might want to look into the subforum about New Age Cointelpro and the whole Love and Light movement. You mentioned that "it" is like the cosmic internet, which just happens to be a title of one of Frank's books.

Rita was a friend and peer who passed away after several books they wrote together. In this book he is channeling Rita, or what was Rita but is now more than Rita, to help folks understand and wrap their mind around the AKL stuff, after life and higher dimensions.

If you know this work, the sessions in this book have a very good level of resonance with my work, FWIW. Its books like this that have been my anchor to sanity, to be honest.
I am afraid to say it, but such books are more likely to make you more unhinged rather than more sane. As Laura has said many times about channelling dead dudes, "A dead Presbyterian is still just a Presbyterian." In other words, why think that just because a person dies that they then all of a sudden have great superior knowledge? Most are just as ignorant as before but hungry for energy from someone still alive.

Nienna already posted about this in post 17 but worth repeating as you might have overlooked it.
From The Sufi Path of Knowledgeby Chittick, Ibn al ‘Arabi says:

Nowadays most people interested in the spirituality of the East desire the "experience," though they may call what they are after "intimate communion with God." Those familiar with the standards and norms of spiritual experience set down by disciplined paths are usually appalled at the way Westerners seize upon any apparition from the domain outside of normal consciousness as a manifestation of the "spiritual." In fact there are innumerable realms in the unseen world, some of them far more dangerous than the worst jungles of the visible world. No person familiar with the teachings of Sufism would dare lay himself open to such forces...

Like Oxajil, I also hope that you will enjoy reading and learning from this forum.
 
I do thank you all for the lessons - this IS why I jumped in, after all. Here to learn and share, not to preach.

Ok. Then, you have your work cut out for you. Others have mentioned how we are speaking in a "different language" to yours. When you go to a foreign country and don't speak the language, IF you want to become part of a society it's always a good idea to learn the local language. Here it's a bit like that. Many people have tried to help giving you feedback, but for it to really help if that's what you want and if it's in your path, it would be good for you to take some time to read some more and "learn the language". Then you'll not only see what other people mean, but you'll also be able to determine whether this is the place for you or not. :-)
 
Also, what is 'Work
That's the first thing that occurred to me to ask. Is there a history of schizophrenia in your family?

From CME's website:

If it helps you get on board with PSH by throwing out all the woo-woo level psychic and spiritual mumbo-jumbo, please do. I very well am a bipolar schizophrenic with delusions of grandeur. That explanation also works, but the ideas are stand-alone. We discerning adults of the world need to be free to separate the ideas from the person. An idea can stand alone, regardless of who said it or gets behind it. In this realm of work, ideas matter, people not so much in that way. So chill if you find me strange or not believable; listen to the message, don’t worry about me.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom