Possibility of Being,
I read your post couple of times and realized that I did not pay enough attention to my family during mye experience. I had a one day depression, couldn't sleep and finally cried for 2 hours. The next day I felt an urge to have one-day starvation. I apologized Luke again for my all unaware deeds which could hurt him. I apologised my son too. I paid attention to him while we were playing, as much as I could. He is only 2 years old but suddenly he looked me deeply in the eyes and stroked gently my hair. That was one of the most beautiful moments in my life (he understood that his mum is coming back ;) Luke, however, was a bit surprised and joked that now I would have to give him a foot massage every day. He is a person who does not bear a grudge against somebody for a long time. Afterwards, he seriously admitted that we hadn't been very close to each other recently and it was also his fault. We decided to forgive each other our mistakes; none of us is an angel. For him, my experience which was deprived of clear visible effects, was not of a great importance even it was a telepathic contact. I emphasize that I told him about "physical sensations", he accepted my way (however - unusual) of getting rid of my problem. Since Luke doesn't make a mountain out of a molehill, I figured out that the best thing I can do now - is trying to pay much more attention to my family life and do not "fly away".
There was also the other thing. I realized that I was manipulative and coercive, then my perception suddenly changed. It was like loooking at the vase instead of faces (at the famous picture with faces and vase: http://blog.powersof10.com/?attachment_id=7336). During the day I was constantly vigilant all the time, especially during interactions with other people. I was able to detect every manipulative behaviour in me - a thought, stop it before reaction, and then act with attention to the needs of others. It came to me naturally. The process is in progress. At the same time I am a mother, and cannot be too good, otherwise my child would climb over my head.
I'd like to answer your questions now.
You want to know why I knew I would win and I would not blame anybody but me.
I believed my inner insight and was very strongly oriented to heal myself (and F. at the same time). I believed in my own power. There was/is no time to loose. I know I would blame myself because I was aware of the choices I was making and their possible negative consequences. Me, not my husband or my parents.
About insights:
Couple of years ago there was a kind of lottery in my office. There were several voucher to win. About 10 minutes before reading the scores(results?) I had had a strong insight that I would have win a hotel voucher to...there was a 3 seconds pause.... I guessed: to Frankfurt?. Later, I heard my name among the winners. I won a voucher to Frankfurt. I did not expect that I would win.
I felt similar this time.
Fresh insight:
I have problems to obtain the books mentioned in this thread. There are no Polish translations. No results in all online library catalogues in my town. When I tried to download ebooks - I received viruses. The last chance is to buy them on amazon. The are expensive so I was considering whether to buy them or not. I sent emails to my friends (not very close friends) in the USA and UK if they can get them for me. No response. I thought "If my intention is clear - I will get that money, I don't know how but I will". I did not expect anything. And couple of days ago I received an email from an online gallery where I have my paintings for sale. I sold one painting. I will have the money to buy the books.
What were these insights according to your knowledge?
However....I will be more cautious and next time try to do external and internal consideration as much as I can.
Regarding F. - you wrote that I had credited him with quite strong psychic/telepathic power nevertheless he desribed himself as "a weak telepathist".
You probably did not take into consideration the possibility that he could have lied. And that was my feminine intuition which told me that. Since I do not have contact with him - I'll stick to the facts:
J. (who knows him personally and much longer than me) once mentioned that had interactions with F. "at a distance" and F. is a kind of "feeling seer". F. also mentioned in our correspondence that he destroyed/shattered engrams with J. at a distance. They didn't explain it in details. At the beginning of my contact on FB I received twice written direct answers from F. for questions which I asked only in my mind. Once I was lying in bed and feeling F.'s presence, my husband got up and told me that I had strong electric discharges in my head, he couldn't stand the tension and went sleep to another room. The other time I was arguing with Luke and suddenly felt F.'s love I didn''t want to quarrel more. Luke told me that he had noticed sudden change in my appearance. He asked "What happened?" I answered: "F. is helping me right now".
These are only evidences I have. Very poor, I know.
I think F. lied because he hadn't wanted me to know about his abilities because I am a nosy girl and would find his weakness. After blocking me - I was sure that he wouldn't contact me anymore. I was crying a lot and somehow felt somebody watching me while I was crying. I think that he took pity on me and decided to help me this extrasensory/nonverbal way. If this was not him - what was that?
In my opinion there are 4 options:
1.F. contacted me telepathically but made efforts to hide it from me, pretended that it was not him. I was able to see a little unloved boy inside him and he did not want me to reveal it.
2. All is my hallucinations. I divided me into 2 parts, one was asleep and activated when I badly needed help. Since I was convinced that F. could help me - it behaved as my projection of F. - carrying, loving man, sending my energy, forgiving everything, not punishing, ...
3. Both above answers are correct. It was F. one time, the other - my projection.
4. It was something else.
Here is a quotation from C's session which I found worth noticing here:
Q: (L) Next question. (Psyche) {name redacted} says:
"I sometimes have the feeling when I look at {name redacted} that I knew him from a past life, and he might have been a woman. Did {name redacted} and I have a past life together?"
A: More than one.
Q: (L) I don't think we're going to follow that. (Bubbles) Can I ask my quirky question real quick? (L) Well, wait a minute. Is there any more on {name redacted}? (Psyche) Well, she basically has more questions about advice on the relationship but it looks like the one answer covered it. So we're basically done with that. (Bubbles)
Is it possible to enhance one's telepathy or psychic connection through Eiriu Eolas practice?
A: Absolutely as we have already said. Read the transcripts!
Q: (Bubbles) So would that mean that one could become more receptive to the frequency of feelings and thoughts of others?
A: SPA {See Previous Answer}
https://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,24722.msg285390.html#msg285390
"But from what you wrote in the latest one and the other post, it had gone beyond your thoughts. You claimed you'd got into a telepathic contact with F., you exchanged energies with each other, there were physical effects of that alleged contact. So, which one is true? "
Gradually, I was telling my husband what was going on. He answered once: "If this is the way F. can help you - that's fine." There were times I was sure it is F. Because I haven't had a telepathic contact in my life - I was also considering the possibility that it is my projection. The whole experience was very strange.
I have a question:
Do phenomenons, which are not confirmed by science, exist? Perhaps for some questions science has not found the answers yet?
"Have you read the whole thread? Janov and his Primal Therapy received a lot of criticism and rightly so. It does not have a solid base in science and can be harmful. Janov himself is a person of doubtful reputation as well. You can do your own research by looking for "Janov criticism". Not everything that comes out is equally valid, but there is a lot of good and reasonable critics to learn from."
I read the whole thread and knew about the critisism. What I'm trying to do - is to name the process I went through.
Do you think that a method which is criticized but it worked in some cases, is of no value? Is it possible to work out a method which brings positive results for every patient? What is the role of a patient, is it important how much a person is determined to recover (if there is no brain damage) ?
I have a question to you:
You know that somebody is very ill but is telling you all the time that he is healthy. What would you believe? The feeling in your heart or the words? Would you help him?
It would depend on a few factors the main one being if she/he was asking for help. It's hard to phatom that a person who perceives themselves healthy would ask for help. But if she/he does, then I would consider what is the source of my knowledge and how reliable it is, and what is the source of her/his knowledge. Do we have the same set of data yet come to two different conclusions? If that's the case than why is it so? What kind of help is asked for? Am I able to give exactly that and not what I 'think' would be best for him/her?
Thanks for that. What if a case would need a sudden reaction? And there was no time to answer all these questions?
"In general, there is a lot of what seems completely ungrounded claims in your posts taken for the truth. What is worrisome. you don't seem to question your 'feelings', 'intuition', your telepathic contact at all, despite serious indications that you should. You don't question your motivations and your behaviors. You just know it is what you think it is. This kind of self-assuredness and certainty usually indicates a significant lack of knowledge. "
I realized that I have a strong imagination and my level of knowledge is not very high, but I still have a will to compensate shortcomings. However, understanding of the knowledge and ability to apply it in life is of equal importance.
What I think is more important is to keep balance betweeen knowledge and understanding/being.
My translation from Polish publication In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching by P. D. Ouspensky , p. 98:
"Generally speaking: balance between knowledge and being is even more important than separate development of each of them. (...) Knowledge all alone does not give understanding. And understanding does not develop only through the growth of knowledge. Understanding depends on the relation between knowledge and being. Understanding is a resultant of knowledge and being. Knowledge and being cannot diverge too much because it may appear that understanding is distant from any of them."
"When you finish reading Strangers to Ourselves, you may have a bit better idea why it is so that we can't trust our thinking. But are you ready to acknowledge that? Or are you attached to your imagination and your own image of yourself and the world around so strong that you can't and don't want to see what's behind it?
I may seem stubborn but I'm also flexible.
You asked if I care.
In general - yes, I do. If I have problems - I focus on mine again.
My translation from Polish publication In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching by P. D. Ouspensky , p. 147 :
"In order to get to know how to help others - a man needs to learn how to be an egoist. Only a conscious egoist can help people".
This is the meaning I had in my mind while I was writing about "cleaning my own yard" first.
In general I suspect, that I'm in the middle of so called shamanic initiation. This excerpt desribes it, more or less:
(There are no comments under this article here : http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,25680.msg305554.html#msg305554 )
"The shamanic personality is very sensitive to the unconscious, both in themselves and in others. The shaman has
very permeable boundaries between their conscious mind and the unconscious, as if they’ve created a bridge which allows contents between the two to easily pass through and intermingle with and reciprocally co-inform each other. The shaman’s collaborative, creative interplay between the conscious and unconscious creates
a synthesis, which is a “third thing,” a new birth, a further evolution in the incarnation of a more all-embracing, integrated and expansive consciousness.
The figure of the shaman is related to both the figures of the artist (see my article “The Artist as Healer of the World”) and
the wounded healer – (see my article “The Wounded Healer,” Part 1 and Part 2). The archetypal figure of the shaman is the primordial medicine person and carrier of healing. The figure of the shaman (arche)typically takes on the illness that is in the community into themselves and literally becomes sick, as if they have “caught” the disease of who they are trying to heal. This process can become animated through the choice of a seasoned shaman, or it can happen spontaneously and unintentionally in a budding shaman who is unusually sensitive to the underlying contradictions and spiritual illness that pervade the social and cultural fabric which connects us and in which we are embedded. A fully cooked shaman, in internalizing the illness in the field,
allows the sickness to fluidly move through them without getting stuck in them, which is the mark that distinguishes an accomplished shaman from a novice.(...)
To again quote Laing,
“Anyone in this transitional state is likely to be confused. To indicate that this confusion is a sign of illness, is a quick way to create psychosis. ..A psychiatrist who professes to be a healer of souls, but who keeps people asleep, treats them for waking up and drugs them asleep again…helps to drive them crazy.” To the extent they are projecting their own madness outside of themselves, the psychiatrists are unknowingly complicit in evoking the very madness they are hoping to cure, which is nothing other than an expression of the psychiatrists’ madness. "
I bolded parts which I consider important.
"As a side note, you've mentioned Castaneda several times. You might want to read the book The Life & Teachings of Carlos Castaneda by William Patrick Patterson. Here is a good video that can give you an idea of what it is about:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtMf_1J2tU8
[/quote]"
Thanks for that. I'm going to watch the video.
Curious detail: While I was reading Castaneda's serie - I wanted to see his face. I found it in the net and observed for a while. I thought "Hmmmm, he is not fully trustworthy, he is a kind of petty liar".
I have also found similarities in my experience to Gurdjieff's forming of the second body.
Here is a quotation, my translation from Polish publication In Search of the Miraculous: Fragments of an Unknown Teaching by P. D. Ouspensky , p. 62 :
" Fire, which is needed to achieve fusion, is obtained by "friction", which is received in man through fight between "yes" and "no". If man surrenders to all his desires, even indirectly cares about satisfying his needs, there will be no inner fight, no "friction" and no fire. But, when for achieving a definite aim, he will take up the fight with his desires, he will create fire which gradually transform his inner world into one unity".
That's my aim now ;)
Laura,
Here is an excerpt from EE site:
Disclaimer
"Bio energetic Breathing (round breathing) is contra -indicated in pregnancy, epilepsy, bi polar disorders or other chemical imbalances.
All other portions of the Eíriú Eolas Breathing and Meditation system may be utilized with these conditions."
At least I can practise Three Stage Breathing, Warrior's Breath and Meditation. Or...I missed something? Regarding Beatha - I have already stopped practising this portion.
I had already set an appointment with my psychologist before I read your post, just in case. I have to wait one month for that visit. However, I do not think that she will put some light on that telepathic contact. Such things are really hard to verify and psychology does not answer all questions. Since I have already cleared the situtation with Luke, I wonder if the visit is really necessary, there are people with more severe problems than mine. However, I'll go for that visit and see.
Thank you for your remarks