rb said:
As far as "cointelpro" or whatever you call it i have no clue what you are talking about and i thought i had heard every theory ever.
You have not heard about many things, yet you foolishly assume you've heard it all. Do research on COINTELPRO. Read Laura's blog and hopefully you'll understand why ATS is cointelpro.
rb said:
unless they are retarded enough to think anything other than a plane hit the pentagon
rb said:
rb said:
Also i never called anyone anything.
Do you have memory problems? Or simply reality problems?
rb said:
I dont know what "eyewitness" accounts you are talking about. Everyone who i knew in the area saw the same reality i did.
rb said:
There are 0 eyewitness reports of eyes on a missile or anything other than a silver airplane.
Again, you did not do your research. See this flash here for other eyewitness accounts. Lots of people saw a missile.
http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/
Don't know how you missed it. Your severe ignorance of the easily available evidence is why you are convinced of your imaginary reality about what transpired. I cannot imagine how you managed to miss that flash animation, about half of all people on the entire internet, if not more, have seen it.
rb said:
It seems to me that no matter the evidence none of you is going to believe anything.
What evidence? Your testimony is not evidence. You've shown 0 evidence.
rb said:
You want photos of airplane? IF you look they are everywhere.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/Pentdebris.jpg
No, that's most likely a section of the winged missile that was painted to look like the American Airlines.
rb said:
The use of the scientific method if applied to this "argument" would require you to show proof of anything other than a plane hitting the pentagon.
There is - the size of the hole in the Pentagon proves that something other than a plane hit it, among many other things.
rb said:
“Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence.”
Ok, let's contrast that with what you just said above:
rb said:
It seems to me that no matter the evidence none of you is going to believe anything.
You are upset because we don't BELIEVE anything?
rb said:
Promise?
rb said:
If you really researched we found 77 bodies of passengers in the pentagon.
The government said that the DNA was identified. Where did you read that bodies were found? Please provide the link. If the plane was "disintegrated", how'd bodies survive? What about DNA?
rb said:
And they faced the grim task of sifting through the rubble to recover the remains of victims.
Facing the task of recovering the remains of victims, and actually recovering remains of victims are 2 different things. Recovering the remains may have very well been a task they faced, but did they actually recover any?
This article provides no evidence, no data, just unsupported statements. Yes, the article says Flight 77 hit the Pentagon - so do a billion other mainstream news articles. So what? I can say the moon is made of cheese. Their statement is just that - a statement, and it also happens to be a lie. How do we know? Because evidence, something you have not provided one shred of to support your statements, says otherwise.
We're not going to believe you on your word. You can ridicule anything you want, and call people names, and tell everyone how "obvious" or "retarded" this or that is. But until you provide evidence, all of that is nothing but noise. The question is, why are you so determined to make us believe you? The attack on the Pentagon has the most damning evidence of any other part of 911 - it is the Achille's heel of the entire event. But your inability to see that is not so surprising given that you're unaware of so many commonplace pieces of data about the event like the eyewitness testimony. Also, having no idea about COINTELPRO and how it works puts you at a rather big disadvantage in terms of navigating the sea of disinformation about this event. Finally, having the attention span of a sugar-high fruit fly does not help matters either. You cannot recall your own statements in this very thread, or knowingly contradict them, trying to create your own reality. If you cannot stay consistent and aware of what you just said, how can you be expected to have any coherent understanding of anything as complex and involved as what happened on 911? Knowledge protects.