Were those alpaca's actually letting people touch them?
Indeed! Seeing as there are so many tourists who visit Machu Picchu they are well adapted to being around people. They all had tags on them as well.
I thought I would just add a little bit more commentary to the trip and take it all with a grain of salt because I haven't actually read the history so am basing all of this off of word of mouth. I had several different tour guides throughout, and most of them, although giving a decent explanation of the history of Peru, the Inca and the Spanish Conquistadors seemed to often say the same thing and reading off of a script - except for my last tour guide who took me to Machu Picchu. He seemed to be well-read and versed in the history of the Inca and the archaeological discoveries and when questioning him about it could hold his own and provide detailed answers and opinions.
For one, he refuted a lot of what the earlier tour guides said about how the Inca's fell and some of the mythology and what he described as propaganda surrounding the stories of the Inca and Spanish, and there's no real evidence to support:
1. The reason all of the ancient stone cities were never finished was because of the arrival of the Spanish - he stated that the Inca were going through a period of civil war and two sons of an Inca king who passed away, one from his wife the other from his concubine, were fighting for control of the Empire so all the resources that originally went towards building went to war. That they were already in disarray and in collapse by the time the Spanish arrived so they took advantage of the situation to seize control.
2. My first tour guide told said one of these sons was captured by the Spanish and ransomed for all the gold and silver in the Empire which amounted to roughly 20,000 kilos+. And that they had gardens filled with giant ornaments and statues made of gold and silver, that in some of the pictures you see rectangular shapes in the stones that look like windows without glass were arrayed with the like, along with gemstones and other precious metals, and that they put ornaments and sometimes even used them as graves for important figures, etc. All of graves were destroyed by the Spanish and precious metals melted down. Even after receiving the ransom they ended up killing the son anyways.
The last tour guide shrugged his shoulders at this and said there was a more practical purpose for those rectangular 'windows' - mainly storage. The equivalent of pantries and cupboards. And that there's no evidence to state the Inca valued gold or silver to such a degree and mainly what they found were small ornaments given as gifts made of precious metals and that's about it. He believes that what most likely happened was the Spanish used the Inca as slave labour to mine for gold and silver after they had arrived.
3. Evidence of human sacrifice, at least in regards to the Inca, are negligible. He didn't comment on any of the other cities, but stated that the only type of sacrifices discovered at Machu Picchu were animal sacrifices and that's it. No human sacrificial remains. Which is interesting because there was a sacrificial altar in the temple dedicated to Viracocha.
I found it refreshing and a much different take to what the previous tour guides said and I wish I asked him about the megalithic stones and giant skulls - it would've been interesting to hear his take on it - but there was so much to see in Machu Picchu that it seemed out of place and not urgent at the time. And in thinking about the set up and structure of the city, that the Inca were very practical people in a lot of ways.
The way they designed the city was impressive in that they had a huge agricultural section and utilized the slopes of the mountain to grow a LOT of food, were very close to the river to catch fish, had built it next to underground streams and built channels and aqueducts so they had a constant supply of running water. The city was broken up into multiple sections and had an entrance way that separated agricultural from the residential section which was broken up into two main sections, one was the ritzy section for nobles and priests and - separated by a large city center or market area - was the larger area with smaller houses for the average Inca. They had communal areas, almost like community centers for what were probably weddings, events and the like. Estimates say the city housed roughly 700+ people.
Their temples were close to the priests and built with much larger stones and more care, so given a lot of precedence. There were two, one dedicated to 'God/Viracocha' and the other to Nature, represented by the past, present and future, also represented by the Sky/Condor, Earth/Puma, Underground/Snake, and the elements of thunder, lightning and rainbows. I didn't really understand that last one.
In regards to human sacrifice, I was talking to
@manitoban about it today who visited Chichen Itza, which was a pyramid city built by the Mayans in the Yucatan and she said she got a bad vibe or feeling being there. And it's more well
documented that the Mayans were a lot more 'liberal' about human sacrifice. She also brought up an interesting idea that maybe the stones 'remember' and resonate that out which might be one of the reasons she felt that way. So maybe that's more evidence, in a difficult to prove way, that there was no such thing going in with the Inca because the prevailing 'feeling' being there was that of reverence and in trying to imagine what it was like for the people who built these cities (on Rock and Roll!
) was that of a labour of love.
P.S. The last tour guides name was Paul. Which was more an interesting coincidence that I just thought of now.