Philip Gardiner, Homosexuality and Alchemy Disinformation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hitch
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It is? Even in 'religion'?

...as this one is clearly an inadequate receptacle for such divine insight.
Please do elaborate on this statement. I'm curious.:)
 
Jonathan Rice says:

What's more, all the mysteries of alchemy seem solved. From the ludus puerorum to the decapitation, and from the role of the stone to the alchemist having to visit the center of the earth. Everything fits, and fits neatly. Even the Phoenix is explained, being a metaphor for the human body consumed and recomposed in kundalini-fire.''
Something one would know if one spent years on alchemy.

If.
 
Hitch, you just follow particular behavioral pattern which is seen here every once in a while, and some of us are growing weary dealing with the types of your kind. This in not a place where you do as you see fit, this is not a place to spread every BS one can find on the internet and definately, contrary to your belief - IT IS "Laura.org". She closed the topic and did it for a reson. And, no, we are NOT obliged to clear your misunderstandings or to satisfy your curiosity.
 
I shall file a complaint.
LOL! Please do! While you're at it, can you ask your higher-ups to go easy on my ears? They've been pestering me non-stop with crank calls - damn noise! Thanx
 
j0da said:
Hitch, you just follow particular behavioral pattern which is seen here every once in a while, and some of us are growing weary dealing with the types of your kind. This in not a place where you do as you see fit, this is not a place to spread every BS one can find on the internet and definately, contrary to your belief - IT IS "Laura.org". She closed the topic and did it for a reson. And, no, we are NOT obliged to clear your misunderstandings or to satisfy your curiosity.
What a fine forum this is indeed. I 'follow certain behavioral patterns'. 'Certain types of your kind'. I 'do as I see fit'. I 'spread every BS I can find on Internet'.
 
Craig said:
Hitch said:
And here is Jay Weidner, who apparently doesn't agree with you either...
Like attracts like.
You too, do elaborate on this statement. Or are you only capable of accusing and framing? Because that seems to be the normal 'behavioral pattern' on this Forum.
 
"I wonder why progress looks so much like destruction." -- John Steinbeck

Indeed!;)
 
starsailor said:
I shall file a complaint.
LOL! Please do! While you're at it, can you ask your higher-ups to go easy on my ears? They've been pestering me non-stop with crank calls - damn noise! Thanx
Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici
Vigeat veritas, sit pereat mundus!:)
 
Laura closed this thread because of this text below (by me), because it showed that she is painfully unaware of the history of the New Testament and that she didn't read the Letters very well either:

The Paris 4 don't say their 'translator' is a Frenchman.

And nothing depends on secret Mark. Secret Mark is attacked over and over, because most people in the world are homophobic.

Nothing is said either by the fact that the oldest copy (if it is one) is only a few centuries old. Nearly all books from the New Testament are copies dating from the 11th century (or the 4th).

I'm quite sure that people did there best to destroy secret Mark if it has existed in the second, fifth or ninth century.

But again, nothing depends on secret Mark. What I get from the Letters is that the Paris 4 say: isn't it special that our 'alchemist' is gay and that a Secret Mark exists also?
 
j0da said:
Hmm..."should we cut him like a regular chicken"? :D
[Forumrules]"Don't maliciously harass people, or flame them, or really make them want to flame you. If the moderators detect malice or manipulativeness (and they ARE experienced), and invitations to overcome such issues does not result in resolution, you will be deleted."
[Forumrules]"Okay people! Let's be clear on some things before you join up, now I know you are aching to get in there and comment on...stuff... but before you do you need to agree to some basic rules about politeness, kindness, and not being a total psycho."
 
Hitch said:
j0da said:
Hmm..."should we cut him like a regular chicken"? :D
[Forumrules]"Don't maliciously harass people, or flame them, or really make them want to flame you. If the moderators detect malice or manipulativeness (and they ARE experienced), and invitations to overcome such issues does not result in resolution, you will be deleted."
[Forumrules]"Okay people! Let's be clear on some things before you join up, now I know you are aching to get in there and comment on...stuff... but before you do you need to agree to some basic rules about politeness, kindness, and not being a total psycho."
As far as i can read Joda, he has just told you that you did not do your homework as suggested by Laura in the other thread. Moreover, you show definitively signs of non respect towards the owners of the forum.
 
Moreover, you show definitively signs of non respect towards the owners of the forum.
But not to me (Hitch)?

And what is it Laura does, closing a thread just because she doesn't like the topic.
 
As far as i can read Joda, he has just told you that you did not do your homework as suggested by Laura in the other thread. Moreover, you show definitively signs of non respect towards the owners of the forum.
LOL!! maybe you should move this thread to the ''Tickle Me'' section :')
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom