"Pizzagate" Explodes

UNICEF & 800,000 CHILDREN: MORE THAN A “MERE COINCIDENCE”​


UNICEF & 800,000 children: More than a “Mere Coincidence”


Google “UNICEF & 800,000 missing children”. Global organizations have a peculiar pattern with the number 800,000 and missing or afflicted children. There are no more coincidences… #SaveOurChildren.


Image


What doesn’t make sense is that in January 2018 the @UN reported that 800,000 children went missing in the Congo.
Image

The following year in January 2019 @WHO announced that they were giving the measles vaccine to 800,000 children in the Congo. ???
Here are some more “coincidences between global organizations and the number 800,000 with children.
@UNICEF decided [to] educate 800,000 children in Yemen by 2020 ….

redpill-a-800x199.jpg

In another instance @UNICEF reported their support to help Nigeria due to 800,000 children being forced to flee their region. unicef.org/media/media_81…
Who’s doing these consensus??
red-pill-b-800x412.jpg

#SaveOurChildren
800,000 children forced to flee violence in Nigeria and region – UNICEFDAKAR/GENEVA/NEW YORK, 13 April 2015 – Around 800,000 children have been forced to flee their homes as a result of the conflict in northeast Nigeria between Boko Haram, military forces and civilian se… — Article LINK
Again … this time right before the Covid hysteria, @UNICEF reports that 800,000 children have died from pneumonia …weird. unicef.org/press-releases…
red-pill-c-800x197.jpg
One child dies of pneumonia every 39 seconds, agencies warn — Article LINK
In the Ukraine @UNICEF will respond to the urgent needs of …800,000 children. K
unicef.org/appeals/ukraine
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-d-800x314.jpg

Ukraine Appeal Humanitarian Action for Children 2020 — Website LINK


The @UNICEF in the UK says that breastfeeding could prevent over 800,000 child deaths a year. That would mean UNICEF has data suggesting that many are dying a year from breastfeeding related situations alone. That’s an astronomically high number …
red-pill-e-800x379.jpg

Another report about how @UNICEF have reportedly counseled 800,000 children in Yemen and Syria …
help.unicef.org/brighter-futur…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-f-800x317.jpg
Ramadan 2019 — Website LINK
Oh this one’s great .. @UNICEF is literally asking people to buy vaccines for underprivileged children & they have a goal of vaccinated children in Pakistan. Guess how many? …. 800,000.
unicef.org.au/give-a-gift/ch…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-g-800x263.jpg
The Gift of Protection – 350 Polio Vaccines Your gift will help protect children against polio, which is highly contagious and dangerous, but preventable. — Website LINK
800,000 children were reported to have suffered from child abuse in Uganda. Of course @UNICEF got involved but instead of offering any real support -or even reporting on the matter, they donated 16 motorcycles. So are they racing the pedophiles? I’m confused.
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-h-800x233.jpg

Then @CBSNews shared a report by @UNICEF that 800,000 children die from accident every year. Globally, I’m sure that there are a lot more deaths than that, so why focus on that number? cbsnews.com/news/accidents…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-j.jpg
Accidents Kill 800,000 Kids Every Year
UN: Drownings, Car Crashes, Poisonings Among Killers Of Children Around World
— Article LINK
#SaveOurChildren
A survey was conducted by @UNICEF in Kano, reporting that 800,000 children suffer stunted growth and poor diet. saharareporters.com/2019/12/20/800…
red-pill-k-800x197.jpg
Referring to a recent baseline survey conducted by United Nations Children’s Fund at a one-day town hall meeting organized by KECCoHD in collaboration with UNICEF in Bichi, Muhammad revealed that plan… — Article LINK
In 2011 @UNICEF reported that 800,000 children were kept home from school due to yellow fever in Ivory Coast. voanews.com/africa/unicef-…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-l-800x129.jpg

UNICEF Targets Yellow Fever in Ivory Coast
The United Nations Children’s Fund is kicking off a yellow fever vaccination campaign in Ivory Coast despite growing instability and hostility to U.N. staff following a disputed presidential election… — Article LINK
In 2016 in Europe, @UNICEF reported that they supported once again 800,000 children living in emergency situations with “childhood kits”. mashable.com/2016/01/05/ref…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-m-800x57.jpg
Young refugees struggle to hold on to their childhood
Nearly one in four of the more than 1 million refugees and migrants who have arrived in Europe by sea this year is a child. — Article LINK
In 2003, @UNICEF reported that 800,000 Iraqi children have been orphaned, and that more would be abducted. english.alaraby.co.uk/english/indept…
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-n-800x321.jpg

The Iraq Report: Almost 800,000 Iraqi children orphaned
This week’s round-up of under-reported news from Iraq focuses on… — Article LINK
At this point the @UNICEF reports of exactly 800,000 is way too coincidental. Many of the reports aren’t even consistent with the area’s population. Nothing is adding up.
There’s also various pictures throughout their galleries that have pedophile code swirls.
#SaveOurChildren
red-pill-o-800x700.jpg
red-pill-p-800x513.jpg
So, why this 800,000 figure, I wonder? So very odd.

It certainly indicates there's no "reality" to the stats these various organizations are using. But why would they do something that, when put together like this, is so obviously, uh, "made up?"

Remember the Tom Hanks photograph where he photographed a glove on the ground with the Russian (it think it was) search engine code that linked to child sex trafficking? The "hidden in plain sight" idea seems to suggest that the perpetrators of these abominable goings on unconsciously seek exposure. It may come as a shock to them when such exposure actually happens, but nevertheless it forces them to have to consider the very real possibility that a part of themselves -- maybe the last human schred of decency left in them -- has sought to emerge into public/private consciousness.
 
So, why this 800,000 figure, I wonder? So very odd.

It certainly indicates there's no "reality" to the stats these various organizations are using. But why would they do something that, when put together like this, is so obviously, uh, "made up?"

Remember the Tom Hanks photograph where he photographed a glove on the ground with the Russian (it think it was) search engine code that linked to child sex trafficking? The "hidden in plain sight" idea seems to suggest that the perpetrators of these abominable goings on unconsciously seek exposure. It may come as a shock to them when such exposure actually happens, but nevertheless it forces them to have to consider the very real possibility that a part of themselves -- maybe the last human schred of decency left in them -- has sought to emerge into public/private consciousness.

I believe it is 'Code Words' for the people in 'the know'
As in "we're heading to Nigeria now, place your orders in advance"

Yes I remember the Tom Hanks clues on the ground, which led to Wayfair 'furniture & paedophile site' hosted by Yandex. That all went quiet didn't it. If you Google Wayfair now, you get a whole bunch of Conspiracy Theory results.
No hope!
 
powerful video indeed. funny I m mot saying this in the qanon thread, I m writing a long one, should be good. GO POTUS! crazy how in this thread its so obvious the connections laid out for Trump/admin is actually doing the deed and saving kids trafficked. All this completely laid out for the qanons to see. This tale is about to start unravelling at top speed -HIS-story. For everyone else that had an inkling on what has really been going on in this realm, me not included - I really don't know much, but this: We will All Be Shocked! No exclusions, and only up to a point that any one person can take it. But this will not stop, too much karma and biblical/historical storylines all intermingling on a Nexus. The most dark will finally have light shed on it, already starting with ICE, Marshals, DOJ, etc. On utube and interwebs, its the Hurtcore, darkweb, and beyond. This might be the darkest stuff I have ever stumbled upon, nothing graphic, just reality as it is. Shawn Atwood with Ron Swanson.

I will say it again and keep saying it. Great Awakening is here, and not even close to what Q and Trump or any single source can predict to playout. This does have the smell of divine planning and of course everyone is going to be part of it. Time to keep learning some more lessons! We got this Patriots! WWG1WGA! 🤠

Yes the reality of a 'paedophile epidemic' is seeping through to the fabric of our society, there can be no shoving it under the rug now. It is Out there. Just recently a close relative remarked how practically everybody is talking about it and asking questions on how it can be stopped. There is outrage on Facebook and people are in a lynching mood. The anger is palpable.
There are home grown vigilantes in the UK finding and tracking known paedophiles and taking the law into their own hands. They get s*it done. The police are actually grateful that they are helping catch the scum.

There was a recent TV show called Crime UK about a female paedophile vigilante, so you can see it is going mainstream now.
It is not secret any more.
 
Katy Groves a DUMB survivor of extreme abuse and MK Ultra programming as a child. Somewhere near Austin, Texas. Possibly Fort Hood.
She seems such a strong, empathic person. It's a miracle really that she survived.

One of the comments :
WoW just WoW. I just found your Survivor Story an hour or so ago and through my tears as I listened to your story it opened up the side I didn't want to think about.
But this is exactly why the light is on you and many others because Our Father has had enough and without Warriors like you to be Brave and speak THEY could turn this into "O just another Crazy person"

I felt everything you said, every little piece that was taken from you.
I'm honored to have watched your Testimony,
I can't watch many at a time because it becomes too emotional for me.
I've been Hyper-Empathic since I can remember, things like taking the sheets off my bed because if other people slept out in the cold I needed to know how that felt to feel the same all at 4yrs old and up.

I experienced SRA except it didn't get too far by the grace of God.

My abuser was a Woman and I was about 4 or 5.
She was in the church and I must have been Hunted.
I'm inspired by you. You make me want to be Brave as well and tell my story,
I want to watch EVERY Vid u made :)

Thank you Katy for finding your Light, it is a Bright, Bright Light and I think you are going to help heal a lot of Souls and in Life to be something Wonderful, something you never would Imagine.
Peace and my Hearts Love to you.


 
Not the usual human trafficking here. Cuba "sells" doctors into slavery, under the auspices of the W.H.O., to work in socialist countries and makes $11 billion from it annually?
 
perpetrators of these abominable goings on unconsciously seek exposure. It may come as a shock to them when such exposure actually happens, but nevertheless it forces them to have to consider the very real possibility that a part of themselves -- maybe the last human shred of decency left in them -- has sought to emerge into public/private consciousness.
I wonder about that Heather. There is a very interesting element to High Strangeness/STS control on this planet that suggests the 'price' of their freedom to lie, corrupt, destroy, own, farm, etc here is that they also have to accept the possibility of being openly exposed, and indeed every so often must put their heads around the curtain and in a very direct way cry 'peekaboo'! If only every so often. There has to be an occasional big hidden-in-plain-sight moment. It's one of the three rules of 'Maya' - that whilst having use of - or taking advantage of - the veil, they simultaneously have to accept being exposed for the frauds and monsters of delusion and deception they have chosen to be. Thus, there's no such thing as a free lunch in the universe. Like a glitch in the Matrix.

Take for example the Boomerang UFO that flew so low over Laura's swimming pool that she felt she could touch it. This happened within striking distance of her first making contact with the C's. This issue appears again and again in fairy stories and myth - that the serpent of perpetual disguise and deception is also forced to be the road way to illumination and revelation. I think the same kind of aspect plays out with their agents down here on earth - the psychopath and their close cohorts - that they cannot stop themselves from wanting to parade their evil in plain sight, to be caught, to be seen for what they are - dark and malevolent genius who have played us all - they hunger for this, its a deep drive inside that they can't control, and many have eventually only been outed because in the end they cannot stop this program playing out - 'come find me! look here I am - look how darned smart I've been and you never even noticed!!!?

I believe it is 'Code Words' for the people in 'the know'
As in "we're heading to Nigeria now, place your orders in advance"
That's an interpretation I would hold to as being very possible Ocean. There's been one code for us humans and another for those in the know for an age or more - and it used to be wrapped up in visual symbolism and complex language/code - but now they don't need to bother. They know how dumb they've bred the latest batch of sheep and they can be as overt as they like, even if its still 'code' - just it takes about 5 seconds to crack if you're in the know.
 
I wonder about that Heather. There is a very interesting element to High Strangeness/STS control on this planet that suggests the 'price' of their freedom to lie, corrupt, destroy, own, farm, etc here is that they also have to accept the possibility of being openly exposed, and indeed every so often must put their heads around the curtain and in a very direct way cry 'peekaboo'! If only every so often. There has to be an occasional big hidden-in-plain-sight moment. It's one of the three rules of 'Maya' - that whilst having use of - or taking advantage of - the veil, they simultaneously have to accept being exposed for the frauds and monsters of delusion and deception they have chosen to be. Thus, there's no such thing as a free lunch in the universe. Like a glitch in the Matrix.
My interpretation would maybe pertain to the Subject who hasn't altogether submitted as yet to this rather "altered" state you're describing. What you say has me thinking about what it means to cross the threshold of no return. Whereas, for my interpretation to hold true, there still might be that part of the self seeking a kind of redemption. I see no such self present in what you're talking about... so, again, maybe it's that you're suggesting that a kind of threshold has been crossed. It's all a bit tricky and slippery though when you factor in the unconscious. It's almost as if the unconscious has become all conscious in this altered state you are describing. Even "exposure" (which most people fear) is just part of the job -- not a very pleasant part, maybe, but part of the necessary dues to be paid in exchange for "so much more," or so this person would have to think in order to make it all worthwhile. In any event, given it was Tom Hanks himself who exposed himself with that photograph (something perhaps you're also including in your version, although I'm not positively sure of that), but it's that aspect that I decided to analyze.

Let me back up a bit.

So, when I wrote what I did, I was considering a person like Tom Hanks being all caught up in this dark entanglement as an example of what might happen to a young wanna-be actor who comes to Hollywood, and who is maybe being considered for stardom. That person is going to be invited to the very best parties, with the very best drugs, and is going to be mingling with the most exciting "beautiful people" Hollywood has to offer. As a young person trying to succeed in a very competitive business, young Tom isn't going to want to step on any toes. Of course, partying with a bunch of Hollywood "beautiful people" isn't exactly a chore for most up and coming actors -- even if it is a bit intimidating at first -- and those in power know this. It's one of the many "carrots" they are employing. What gets tricky is when our young Tom is drawn into activities that maybe the old Tom would never have thought himself capable of, or in any way wanting to be a part of. These are thresholds too. The real problem here is that the fresh new talent of Hollywood are really just so young, and largely malleable. They are only just getting a sense of who they are in the world. They are naive, and unaware that their every move is being monitored; that they are, in very calculated fashion, being initiated into an underworld, or a "secret" world of no return.

But what does Tom GET in return? He gets one of the most envied movie careers in recent Hollywood history. And he identifies with that. He identifies with this "constructed" persona he's got going: the disarming, charming "every man" with whom the average movie goer can identify, and admire, and adore. In fact, he is the all American every man. And, I mean, how seductive a thing is that? For Tom it's also to be seduced by -- and even addicted to -- this "constructed" self. And in that there's such a radical split: this all American every man persona versus this "processed" soul who's been clandestinely initiated, even though it's true that so much of this secret world is operating in plain sight, or at least for those who know what to look for.

But, for our protagonist, Tom, which is the "real" world? And just where is he in all this? Where is the young man who first came to Hollywood to do the thing that he loved best: acting?

Actually, I really don't know much about Tom Hanks at all. I'm just imagining him as a typical young actor coming to Hollywood. But like many Hollywood successes, his family may have already been Hollywood elite, which would change the story I'm telling perhaps quite dramatically. But for the sake of our little story here, let's just say he was a young man who left an average American home to seek his fame and fortune in Hollywood. You see, it's that young man that I wonder about. I wonder if there might still be something salvageable there that can still be retrieved. But the "constructed" self would forbid it, since it would necessitate its own decomposition. That's why, if there still is something there to be retrieved, it would have to unconsciously (sneakily) participate in the constructed persona's own undoing. So, Tom -- always a creative sort who at some point decided to put that creativity into taking photographs -- seemingly unwittingly betrayed the Hollywood persona (which his more authentic self is so entrapped by) through leaving in one of his photographs a very dangerous clue of that secret life (a secret life which is also an entrapment) for ALL THE WORLD to see. And yet the Tom who identifies with the constructed persona is still terrified that he will be "found out." Even if, in the deepest, truest sense, it is his only way out.

So, that's how I was thinking of Tom Hanks and his shockingly self-sabotaging photograph. If, on the other hand, Hanks was born into the Hollywood elite, it might suggest that his "initiation" is inseparable from his upbringing. It would have most probably been going on in both subtle and possibly overt ways. Still, just like the rest of us (with the possible exception of true psychopaths or sociopaths), beneath the constructed selves we were forced to create in order to "fit in" either within our families, or in the larger world, or both, there is still the more authentic self that the process of healing works to slowly uncover. It still resides there as this redeemable part of ourselves.

But, @Michael B-C, your version -- suggestive as it is of Tom Hanks having crossed a threshold of no return -- might also be right. It seems it's to consider a completely dissociated being whose constructed persona is the foil for an utterly corrupted, soulless existence that is beyond redemption.

It could be it's just my writer's preference, but that seems too without dimension, too inhuman almost. That's not to say I'm right, however. Still, the world that you are describing almost seems a comic book world without psychological dimension. I suppose it's to be entirely broken and controlled. Or, it's to be a complete sociopath who has long ago lost any conscience -- or perhaps was born that way. Again, I don't know anything about Tom Hanks the private person, but it is difficult to see him that way.

Oh, one last thing I wanted to mention (I'll have to have another look at the second part of your comment some other time, @Michael B-C) but I wanted to say something about an early Tom Hanks movie, "Big." In the context of this thread, there's just so much that could be said about this Hanks movie, in particular. On its surface, it's rather funny and sweet in a lot of ways. Quite entertaining. But in a deeper sense, it's creepily disconcerting. And we've been seeing this theme come up again and again in the culture for years now: the one that contends that children really are adult, after all. Maybe even more adult than adults. In "Big," Tom Hanks, who is actually playing a child who has "wished" himself into adult form, is embarking on a "relationship" with an adult woman, who doesn't realize she is actually dating a prepubescent boy. Again, this really is kind of funny and seemingly harmless -- at first, at any rate -- only is it really? Isn't it in some way "confessing" the fantasy lives of just so many of the Hollywood elite that we're now hearing about? They would like to "normalize" adults having a sexual relationship with children, and how better to get that ball rolling than to, you know, play around with these themes a bit, as happens in the movie "Big":

 
Last edited:
Well, well, well. Scottland is teaching kids that "wolves" belong with children


It’s a book currently being given to P1 children in Scotland, via the Scottish Book Trust. (We’re sure that by Christmas it’ll be getting read to them in class by drag queens.) And it’s something that people should probably be concerned about.

(If you’re not watching the video, click all the pics to enlarge and read the text.)








You can already see where this is going, can’t you?


According to the back cover blurb, the book is “a very funny story of mistaken identity and acceptance”. It’s also described as a “hilarious story of a wolf in sheep’s clothing with a surprise twist”. For most of its length it runs like a variant on the traditional tale of Little Red Riding Hood, with a big bad wolf disguising itself in order to eat its prey.
 
My interpretation would maybe pertain to the Subject who hasn't altogether submitted as yet to this rather "altered" state you're describing. What you say has me thinking about what it means to cross the threshold of no return. Whereas, for my interpretation to hold true, there still might be that part of the self seeking a kind of redemption. I see no such self present in what you're talking about... so, again, maybe it's that you're suggesting that a kind of threshold has been crossed. It's all a bit tricky and slippery though when you factor in the unconscious. It's almost as if the unconscious has become all conscious in this altered state you are describing. Even "exposure" (which most people fear) is just part of the job -- not a very pleasant part, maybe, but part of the necessary dues to be paid in exchange for "so much more," or so this person would have to think in order to make it all worthwhile. In any event, given it was Tom Hanks himself who exposed himself with that photograph (something perhaps you're also including in your version, although I'm not positively sure of that), but it's that aspect that I decided to analyze.

Let me back up a bit.

So, when I wrote what I did, I was considering a person like Tom Hanks being all caught up in this dark entanglement as an example of what might happen to a young wanna-be actor who comes to Hollywood, and who is maybe being considered for stardom. That person is going to be invited to the very best parties, with the very best drugs, and is going to be mingling with the most exciting "beautiful people" Hollywood has to offer. As a young person trying to succeed in a very competitive business, young Tom isn't going to want to step on any toes. Of course, partying with a bunch of Hollywood "beautiful people" isn't exactly a chore for most up and coming actors -- even if it is a bit intimidating at first -- and those in power know this. It's one of the many "carrots" they are employing. What gets tricky is when our young Tom is drawn into activities that maybe the old Tom would never have thought himself capable of, or in any way wanting to be a part of. These are thresholds too. The real problem here is that the fresh new talent of Hollywood are really just so young, and largely malleable. They are only just getting a sense of who they are in the world. They are naive, and unaware that their every move is being monitored; that they are, in very calculated fashion, being initiated into an underworld, or a "secret" world of no return.

But what does Tom GET in return? He gets one of the most envied movie careers in recent Hollywood history. And he identifies with that. He identifies with this "constructed" persona he's got going: the disarming, charming "every man" with whom the average movie goer can identify, and admire, and adore. In fact, he is the all American every man. And, I mean, how seductive a thing is that? For Tom it's also to be seduced by -- and even addicted to -- this "constructed" self. And in that there's such a radical split: this all American every man persona versus this "processed" soul who's been clandestinely initiated, even though it's true that so much of this secret world is operating in plain sight, or at least for those who know what to look for.

But, for our protagonist, Tom, which is the "real" world? And just where is he in all this? Where is the young man who first came to Hollywood to do the thing that he loved best: acting?

Actually, I really don't know much about Tom Hanks at all. I'm just imagining him as a typical young actor coming to Hollywood. But like many Hollywood successes, his family may have already been Hollywood elite, which would change the story I'm telling perhaps quite dramatically. But for the sake of our little story here, let's just say he was a young man who left an average American home to seek his fame and fortune in Hollywood. You see, it's that young man that I wonder about. I wonder if there might still be something salvageable there that can still be retrieved. But the "constructed" self would forbid it, since it would necessitate its own decomposition. That's why, if there still is something there to be retrieved, it would have to unconsciously (sneakily) participate in the constructed persona's own undoing. So, Tom -- always a creative sort who at some point decided to put that creativity into taking photographs -- seemingly unwittingly betrayed the Hollywood persona (which his more authentic self is so entrapped by) through leaving in one of his photographs a very dangerous clue of that secret life (a secret life which is also an entrapment) for ALL THE WORLD to see. And yet the Tom who identifies with the constructed persona is still terrified that he will be "found out." Even if, in the deepest, truest sense, it is his only way out.

So, that's how I was thinking of Tom Hanks and his shockingly self-sabotaging photograph. If, on the other hand, Hanks was born into the Hollywood elite, it might suggest that his "initiation" is inseparable from his upbringing. It would have most probably been going on in both subtle and possibly overt ways. Still, just like the rest of us (with the possible exception of true psychopaths or sociopaths), beneath the constructed selves we were forced to create in order to "fit in" either within our families, or in the larger world, or both, there is still the more authentic self that the process of healing works to slowly uncover. It still resides there as this redeemable part of ourselves.

But, @Michael B-C, your version -- suggestive as it is of Tom Hanks having crossed a threshold of no return -- might also be right. It seems it's to consider a completely dissociated being whose constructed persona is the foil for an utterly corrupted, soulless existence that is beyond redemption.

It could be it's just my writer's preference, but that seems too without dimension, too inhuman almost. That's not to say I'm right, however. Still, the world that you are describing almost seems a comic book world without psychological dimension. I suppose it's to be entirely broken and controlled. Or, it's to be a complete sociopath who has long ago lost any conscience -- or perhaps was born that way. Again, I don't know anything about Tom Hanks the private person, but it is difficult to see him that way.

Oh, one last thing I wanted to mention (I'll have to have another look at the second part of your comment some other time, @Michael B-C) but I wanted to say something about an early Tom Hanks movie, "Big." In the context of this thread, there's just so much that could be said about this Hanks movie, in particular. On its surface, it's rather funny and sweet in a lot of ways. Quite entertaining. But in a deeper sense, it's creepily disconcerting. And we've been seeing this theme come up again and again in the culture for years now: the one that contends that children really are adult, after all. Maybe even more adult than adults. In "Big," Tom Hanks, who is actually playing a child who has "wished" himself into adult form, is embarking on a "relationship" with an adult woman, who doesn't realize she is actually dating a prepubescent boy. Again, this really is kind of funny and seemingly harmless -- at first, at any rate -- only is it really? Isn't it in some way "confessing" the fantasy lives of just so many of the Hollywood elite that we're now hearing about? They would like to "normalize" adults having a sexual relationship with children, and how better to get that ball rolling than to, you know, play around with these themes a bit, as happens in the movie "Big":


Hi Heather, just to clarify I was not speaking in any specific way about the likes of Tom Hanks but rather in general terms concerning the set of hidden rules that appear to pertain to the specific frequency we inhabit down here on 3rd Density earth that allows on the one hand for a veil of illusion and deceit to be laid across the whole density, entrapping the consciousness beings within its bounds and through our 5 senses, (and other programs), to fall in to a state of perpetual sleep, whilst on the other hand, for the very same set of rules to have to reveal this fact every so often as a counterbalance or 'glitch'. Hence figures like the serpent and the owl being both symbols of dread and symbols of initiation/wisdom.

Maya literally "illusion" or "magic", has multiple meanings in Indian philosophies depending on the context. In later Vedic texts and modern literature dedicated to Indian traditions, Māyā connotes a "magic show, an illusion where things appear to be present but are not what they seem". Māyā is also a spiritual concept connoting "that which exists, but is constantly changing and thus is spiritually unreal", and the "power or the principle that conceals the true character of spiritual reality"
Hope that clears any confusion up for you.

In terms of Tom Hanks, from memory his contemporaries in college said that whilst at the outset he appeared to have a very limited talent, it always came with with a huge 'wanna-be' mentality. He also had a love for very low grade comedy and banal soaps as well as a belief that his childhood in the 1960s had been stolen from him not just by his parents (a very troubled home life - big clue) but by all the assassinations, riots, wars etc that were its perpetual backdrop. He wanted that period to feel like apple pie and picket fences but it was more like raw meat and stacked up bones! Hence much of his mission in life has been to remake history in the image of his own fantasy. His path to becoming the epitome of the establishment line / Hollywood gatekeeper is thus maybe worth looking into as an example of how the system looks for damaged delusionals who can be used to help keep people in this state of sleep and illusion.

Quite a while back I did read James DiEugenio's book 'The JFK Assassination' in which he goes into great detail as to how Hanks rose to such a position of power - and in particular his desire to whitewash the past and make it wholesome again. In particular he worked for a long time to try and get a massive documentary series made of Vincent Bugliosis's fraudulent Reclaiming History and in particular to prove beyond any shred of doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy all by himself - and that all was therefore still good in his world. Thankfully this never happened but maybe that gives you an insight into why Hanks has been so useful to Hollywood and why he rose so far.

As an aside about how Hollywood and the control system intertwines, this video covers an example whereby Angelina Jolie muzzles up close to MI6. Segment starts at 7:05 in to video.


And if you haven't seen this talk by Dutch entrepreneur Ronald Bernard before, I recommend watching both the following as they cover in very personal terms the kind of pathway you describe - from 'normal guy' to practicing occult psychopath (though the subject here managed to escape such horrors to tell the tale)


 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom