Heather
Dagobah Resident
We're basically in agreement here. What's going on related to fourth density has its expression in everything I had talked about. I'd add that this thread seems mostly to be concerned with 3D evidence of child sex trafficking, etc., so it's to stay on the ground with that as well.Hi Heather, just to clarify I was not speaking in any specific way about the likes of Tom Hanks but rather in general terms concerning the set of hidden rules that appear to pertain to the specific frequency we inhabit down here on 3rd Density earth that allows on the one hand for a veil of illusion and deceit to be laid across the whole density, entrapping the consciousness beings within its bounds and through our 5 senses, (and other programs), to fall in to a state of perpetual sleep, whilst on the other hand, for the very same set of rules to have to reveal this fact every so often as a counterbalance or 'glitch'. Hence figures like the serpent and the owl being both symbols of dread and symbols of initiation/wisdom.
Hope that clears any confusion up for you.
In terms of Tom Hanks, from memory his contemporaries in college said that whilst at the outset he appeared to have a very limited talent, it always came with with a huge 'wanna-be' mentality. He also had a love for very low grade comedy and banal soaps as well as a belief that his childhood in the 1960s had been stolen from him not just by his parents (a very troubled home life - big clue) but by all the assassinations, riots, wars etc that were its perpetual backdrop. He wanted that period to feel like apple pie and picket fences but it was more like raw meat and stacked up bones! Hence much of his mission in life has been to remake history in the image of his own fantasy. His path to becoming the epitome of the establishment line / Hollywood gatekeeper is thus maybe worth looking into as an example of how the system looks for damaged delusionals who can be used to help keep people in this state of sleep and illusion.
Quite a while back I did read James DiEugenio's book 'The JFK Assassination' in which he goes into great detail as to how Hanks rose to such a position of power - and in particular his desire to whitewash the past and make it wholesome again. In particular he worked for a long time to try and get a massive documentary series made of Vincent Bugliosis's fraudulent Reclaiming History and in particular to prove beyond any shred of doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy all by himself - and that all was therefore still good in his world. Thankfully this never happened but maybe that gives you an insight into why Hanks has been so useful to Hollywood and why he rose so far.
As an aside about how Hollywood and the control system intertwines, this video covers an example whereby Angelina Jolie muzzles up close to MI6. Segment starts at 7:05 in to video.
And if you haven't seen this talk by Dutch entrepreneur Ronald Bernard before, I recommend watching both the following as they cover in very personal terms the kind of pathway you describe - from 'normal guy' to practicing occult psychopath (though the subject here managed to escape such horrors to tell the tale)
Actually, what you said regarding Tom Hanks' personality conforms perfectly with what I laid out. His extreme identification with his constructed "all American" persona tacitly implicates the extremely threatening role (concerning the public image he so desperately clings to) that his unconscious has played in his exposing his own wrongdoing. His self exposure is especially dangerous given the dark elements in his family's past, which, as you pointed out, his conscious self sought to thoroughly "dispense with" and/or "re-write." That there are also trans-dimensional forces at work in this would also be true, as with everything that's taking place in the here and now. I'd only add that such trans-dimensional considerations needn't displace the "work on the ground" taking place on this thread. Instead, we might work to acknowledge how they go hand in hand.
I believe that means we're largely in agreement, in other words. It's just a matter of which aspects one chooses to emphasize and/or focus on. Certainly, the role of the unconscious doesn't disappear in the face of the deeper themes/forces at work. All such aspects are "of a piece."
Video wise, I've seen Ronald Bernard before but not at such length. I will definitely take the time to watch these -- thank you!
Last edited: