shijing
The Living Force
Hi everyone,
I have been going through the Cassiopaean transcripts in preparation for something I want to put together regarding prehistory, but in re-reading I ran across the following from the early transmissions (ca. 1994) and decided to take a detour:
As far as I can tell, this was never followed up on publicly, either in later published transcripts or on the forum. I realize that in a more recent session a deadline of 2014 was given (although whether or not this meant the coming of the Wave or not is unclear to me at this point), but I thought if nothing else, it would be fun to follow up on this puzzle and maybe something useful would grow out of it.
In trying to dig into this, the first problem I have is exactly what constitutes the Orion and Arcturian material. For the first, the closest I can figure out is The Orion Material: Perspectives on Awareness by Elisabeth Y. Fitzhugh. For the second, the only thing I can find is We the Arcturians by Norma J. Milanovich et al. This latter source was brought up in the early sessions regarding this line of questioning:
So it looks like this may be the one; however, this source was also duly deconstructed in the following thread: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=2901.0, so it doesn't seem like it is really in the same ballpark with either the Cass material or Bringers of the Dawn. I don't know enough about The Orion Material to judge it either way.
That being said, here are the distances from each reference point (taking into account the additional clues given about where to measure from) compared with the best I can find for the dates of the beginning of each channeling source (organized by distance from Earth):
Orion: Epsilon Orionis (1359.01 ly) : The Orion Material begins 1984 (published 1987)
Pleiades (440 ly) : Barbara Marciniak begins channeling Pleiadians 1988 (published 1992)
Cassiopaea (Alpha Cassiopaea: 229 ly) : Transmissions begin July 1994
Arcturus (36.7 ly) : We the Arcturians published 1990
Leo: Wolf 359 (7.78 ly)
In terms of absolute distance compared to date that transmissions begin for each source, the only one that is out of place is Arcturus, which seems problematic all around. The path of the Wave, as noted above, is supposed to be a 'circuitous or cyclical route', and I am not sure if that may help explain this. In any case, I am interested in anyone else's thoughts or contributions to this topic.
I have been going through the Cassiopaean transcripts in preparation for something I want to put together regarding prehistory, but in re-reading I ran across the following from the early transmissions (ca. 1994) and decided to take a detour:
Message follows: See pattern. Orion, Pleiades, Arcturas, Cassiopaea; check distances from earth; progress locator for wave combined with earth references of space time. For you to figure out. Cross reference channeled messages, printing dates and location. We are where we are...Cross reference Time and distance...Any star chart and Marciniak, Arcturas Channel, Orion literature and Us. We speak from “crest” of wave, now, where are we?..Each represents locator in space time. You can judge speed and ETA by cross referencing distance with publishing dates and these messages from us...Circuitous or cyclical route...Next stop is Leo...Check third most distant star in Cassiopaea and middle “belt” star in Orion, closest star in Leo.
As far as I can tell, this was never followed up on publicly, either in later published transcripts or on the forum. I realize that in a more recent session a deadline of 2014 was given (although whether or not this meant the coming of the Wave or not is unclear to me at this point), but I thought if nothing else, it would be fun to follow up on this puzzle and maybe something useful would grow out of it.
In trying to dig into this, the first problem I have is exactly what constitutes the Orion and Arcturian material. For the first, the closest I can figure out is The Orion Material: Perspectives on Awareness by Elisabeth Y. Fitzhugh. For the second, the only thing I can find is We the Arcturians by Norma J. Milanovich et al. This latter source was brought up in the early sessions regarding this line of questioning:
Q: (L) The book, “We Are the Arcturians”, talks about the Arcturians, and it says that they live on the star Arcturus, that it is a planet for them, and that they have families, reproduce, and do all kinds of normal things. This struck me as strange and reminded me of the Jiles Hamilton stuff.
A: No.
Q: (L) Okay, what was the source of this information?
A: This information was told in a format that would be understood best by those
who read it.
Q: (T) Is this the book we are supposed to get the dates out of for the Arcturus position of the wave?
(L) Yes.
So it looks like this may be the one; however, this source was also duly deconstructed in the following thread: http://www.cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=2901.0, so it doesn't seem like it is really in the same ballpark with either the Cass material or Bringers of the Dawn. I don't know enough about The Orion Material to judge it either way.
That being said, here are the distances from each reference point (taking into account the additional clues given about where to measure from) compared with the best I can find for the dates of the beginning of each channeling source (organized by distance from Earth):
Orion: Epsilon Orionis (1359.01 ly) : The Orion Material begins 1984 (published 1987)
Pleiades (440 ly) : Barbara Marciniak begins channeling Pleiadians 1988 (published 1992)
Cassiopaea (Alpha Cassiopaea: 229 ly) : Transmissions begin July 1994
Arcturus (36.7 ly) : We the Arcturians published 1990
Leo: Wolf 359 (7.78 ly)
In terms of absolute distance compared to date that transmissions begin for each source, the only one that is out of place is Arcturus, which seems problematic all around. The path of the Wave, as noted above, is supposed to be a 'circuitous or cyclical route', and I am not sure if that may help explain this. In any case, I am interested in anyone else's thoughts or contributions to this topic.