Possible war between Kosovo and Serbia?

Just trying to get some money for himself. No one sees him as any serious.
That's not exactly true. It's all over the the Russian media and he is presented as a real NATO official (yeah, part of usual Russian propaganda war, nevertheless that's how it is sold to the Russian population).

TASS
Gunter Felinger, Chairman of the NATO European Development Committee, called on the North Atlantic Alliance to strike at Serbia.

Lenta:
NATO called for the bombing of Belgrade again

Chairman of the NATO European Development Committee Gunter Felinger reacted to the increase in violence in northern Kosovo and called for “bombing Belgrade right now” as part of the new alliance intervention.

RGRU (here, at least they have 'NGO' in the opening paragraph, but not in the headline):
The head of the European NATO Enlargement Committee, Felinger, called for bombing Serbia

KC (kapital-rus)
NATO called for bombing Serbia
 
Really nice from Russia for taking care, but in reallity he is irrelevant with irrelevant NGO taking some grant money from USAID here and there. Also, known in Serbia for a couple of years and very ridiculed. He tweets pro NATO and "european values" slogans every time he is on a vacation in the Balkans. And thats about his all activity. Nothing but lazy oportunist.
 
Because of the lack of any meaningful official explanation of what happened in that event in Kosovo, I searched for the "wisdom of the people", and found this. Of course, take it with a grain of salt.

In essence, the following happened: Kurti had been preparing the arrest of Milan for some time, and Milan then went all or nothing because his entire criminal business in Kosovo would fail and someone else would take it over. This mega stupid plan was supported by Vucic and he is most likely the one who betrayed Milan to the Albanians to get him off the hump once and for all because he is in the way of the implementation of the agreement plan for Kosovo.

So, from an ordinary gangbangin' calculation by the mafia, which is supported by both the state of Serbia and the state of Kosovo, it has become an international security issue. Milan Wurst Wagner lost, received a day of regret as a wooden medal of respect, and now his power in the party and on the street has been decimated. Someone else will succeed him, and then someone else after that.

Milan Radoičić, the vice-president of the Serbian List, says that he takes full responsibility for the events in Banjska in the north of Kosovo.
 
Serbia will not send military forces into Kosovo, Vučić insists

Serbia’s president says he has no intention of ordering his country’s military forces to cross the border into Kosovo, despite US officials’ warnings of an “unprecedented” build-up by Belgrade.

In a statement issued to the Financial Times on Saturday, Aleksandar Vučić said that he would draw down Serbia’s forces in the area because an escalation of the conflict would be counter-productive for Belgrade’s EU aspirations.

“Why this would be beneficial for Belgrade?” Vučić said. “What would be the idea? To destroy our position we have been building for a year? To destroy this in a day? Serbia does not want war.”

On Friday White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said the US had observed an “unprecedented staging of advanced Serbian artillery, tanks and mechanised infantry units” on the Kosovo border and called it a “very destabilising development”.

“We are calling on Serbia to withdraw those forces from the border and to contribute to lowering the temperature and the tension,” Kirby said, adding that Vučić and Antony Blinken, US secretary of state, had spoken about ways to defuse the situation.

International efforts to cool the tensions have mounted in recent days after a violent stand-off near a monastery in the Serb-majority north of Kosovo left at least four people dead, including a Kosovo police officer.

Kirby said the attack had been “well-co-ordinated and planned”, adding that the size of a weapons cache found afterwards threatened the safety of Kosovo officials and international personnel, including Nato troops.

Vučić told the FT that Washington’s warnings were disproportionate as the number of Serb forces on the ground was declining.

Last year we had 14,000 men near the administrative line, today we have 7,500 and we will reduce that to 4,000,” he said.

“Serbia sending troops to the administrative line is a pure lie . . . Serbia would not benefit from it as that would jeopardise its position in EU-sponsored talks with Pristina.”

The EU has said it would not admit Serbia or Kosovo to the bloc until they normalised relations.

Jake Sullivan, the US national security adviser, held talks with Kosovo prime minister Albin Kurti on Friday, where they discussed the EU-sponsored dialogue as the only way out of the crisis.

Kosovo unilaterally declared independence from Serbia in 2008 after a brief but bloody war in the late 1990s, but Serbia and most ethnic Serbs living in Kosovo never acknowledged its statehood. Serb nationalists reject Pristina’s authority.

The EU, the US and other western powers have tried to broker talks but despite coming close to an agreement in March, the proposals disintegrated as a result of disputed municipal elections in northern Kosovo, which has a majority-Serbian population.

“[Serbs] want to turn back time” to an era when Kosovo still belonged to them, Kurti told the Associated Press. “They are in search of a time machine. They want to turn the clock back by 30 years. But that is not going to happen.”

Milan Radoičić, a hardline Serb political leader in north Kosovo, has taken responsibility for the attacks this month, saying he wanted to stoke resistance to Kurti’s government. Belgrade authorities had not known about his plan, nor did they assist him, he added.

Vučić and Kurti have both called in recent days for Nato-led KFOR peacekeepers to step up their presence in the north of Kosovo. On Friday Nato said it would do that, including by deploying hundreds of additional British troops.


“We will always continue to make sure that our commander has the resources and flexibility necessary for KFOR to fulfil its mandate,” Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg said on Friday. “We stand ready to make further adjustments to KFOR’s posture as required.”

KFOR is made up of about 4,500 troops.

In the face of Serbian discontent about the violence, Vučić has recently been forced to reform his political group and declare general and local elections. The presidency will not be up for election, however.

“We want to have a clean mandate in the future and to be a sovereign country,” Vučić said in a televised address on Friday. “The opposition demanded elections, they [succeeded], let them prepare.”

 
Happy Victory Day!

This is of topic here, but I was reluctant to ruin other topics. Where I live, and that is Serbia, 11th of November is Victory day. Why I am writing this? Because, in the first world war, Serbian army WON the war, and defeat the aggressors to their teeth. Got them run to Vienna. Didn't "sign the armistice" but WON. And with the price of ONE THIRD od the whole population dead in the war. So, it is really annoying when current pro-Western quisling government of Serbia calls it sissy "armistice day". Annoys folk a lot.

So, happy Victory day with the Serbian army march from the first world war.


 
Happy Victory Day!

This is of topic here, but I was reluctant to ruin other topics. Where I live, and that is Serbia, 11th of November is Victory day. Why I am writing this? Because, in the first world war, Serbian army WON the war, and defeat the aggressors to their teeth. Got them run to Vienna. Didn't "sign the armistice" but WON. And with the price of ONE THIRD od the whole population dead in the war. So, it is really annoying when current pro-Western quisling government of Serbia calls it sissy "armistice day". Annoys folk a lot.

So, happy Victory day with the Serbian army march from the first world war.


'It will march again, and no, I am not off the topic.'
 
Reaction from Russia, i.e. Zakharova.


Attempts by protestors to storm the Belgrade city administration building on Sunday were part of a plot by Western countries to overthrow the Serbian government, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said.

Thousands of pro-Western demonstrators attempted to break into government buildings in the capital on Sunday evening following the victory of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) over the pro-EU Serbia Against Violence (SPN) coalition in parliamentary elections.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has labeled the protests an attempted color revolution – a term used to describe movements funded and organized by Western countries, usually the US, aimed at toppling world leaders opposed to Washington’s interests.

In a statement to TASS on Monday, Zakharova agreed with the Serbian leader’s suspicions and said that “attempts of the collective West to shake up the situation in [Serbia] using the techniques of Maidan coups are obvious.”

The spokeswoman stated that “the only possible reaction” to the weekend’s election results was strict adherence to the letter and spirit of Serbia’s constitution and respect for the choice of its people. ...
 
'CIA is organizing the color revolution in Serbia which aims to oust the President Vucic from power and to install puppets who will sign Kosovo's independence.'

West behind ‘color revolution’ attempt in Serbia – Moscow

25 Dec, 2023
The use of techniques applied during the Maidan coup in Ukraine was “obvious,” according to the Foreign Ministry’s spokeswoman

Attempts by protestors to storm the Belgrade city administration building on Sunday were part of a plot by Western countries to overthrow the Serbian government, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said.

Thousands of pro-Western demonstrators attempted to break into government buildings in the capital on Sunday evening following the victory of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) over the pro-EU Serbia Against Violence (SPN) coalition in parliamentary elections.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has labeled the protests an attempted color revolution – a term used to describe movements funded and organized by Western countries, usually the US, aimed at toppling world leaders opposed to Washington’s interests.

In a statement to TASS on Monday, Zakharova agreed with the Serbian leader’s suspicions and said that “attempts of the collective West to shake up the situation in [Serbia] using the techniques of Maidan coups are obvious.”

The spokeswoman stated that “the only possible reaction” to the weekend’s election results was strict adherence to the letter and spirit of Serbia’s constitution and respect for the choice of its people.

One of the accusations that sparked Sunday’s demonstrations was that the SNS had committed “vote theft” during the election. President Vucic has vehemently dismissed that claim as “lies” and insisted that the protests were being sponsored by the West, which he claims wants to remove him from power over his friendly relations with Russia and refusal to recognize Kosovo’s independence from Serbia.

After Sunday’s protests were dispersed by police, Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabic expressed her gratitude to Russian security services, which she said had given advance warning of demonstrators’ plans to start a riot. In his initial address, Vucic also thanked unnamed “foreign services” for alerting his government of the upcoming unrest.

Kremlin speaks out on attempted Serbian ‘Maidan’

25 Dec, 2023
The unrest was “evidently” stirred by third parties, spokesman Dmitry Peskov says

The recent riots in the Serbian capital of Belgrade were provoked by “third parties,” including from abroad, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov claimed on Monday.

Serbia has been hit by a string of mass protests following the parliamentary election of December 17, in which the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) won a decisive victory. The opposition Serbia Against Violence (SPN) coalition, which is pro-EU, has made allegations of “vote theft.”

The unrest escalated on Sunday evening when protesters attempted to besiege government buildings in Belgrade. Police ultimately removed the demonstrators from the center of the city amid violent clashes.

Speaking to the Russian media, Kremlin spokesman Peskov said there was nothing to suggest irregularities in the Serbian elections, explaining that observers “did not record any violations that could cast doubt” on their legitimacy.

“Evidently, there are processes and attempts by third forces, including from abroad, to provoke such unrest in Belgrade. This is what we are seeing. We have no doubt that the leadership of the republic will maintain the rule of law in the country,” Peskov stated.

Moscow maintains a policy of non-interference in the affairs of other countries, the Kremlin official stressed, adding that this particularly applies to Russia’s “ally and partner” Serbia.

“Everything that happens in the country is Serbia’s own business. We have never interfered in the internal affairs of other countries and do not intend to,” Peskov said.

His remarks echoed comments by Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova earlier in the day. “The attempts of the collective West to shake up the situation in [Serbia] using the techniques of Maidan coups are obvious,” Zakharova said, referencing the 2014 armed uprising in Kiev that saw the overthrow of the elected Ukrainian government.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic denounced the riot in Belgrade as an attempted “color revolution” – a term commonly used to describe movements funded and organized by Western countries, usually the US, aimed at overthrowing leaders opposed to Washington’s interests.

Vucic initially thanked unnamed “foreign services” for warning Belgrade about “exactly what the thugs were preparing.” Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabiс revealed that Belgrade had received vital intelligence from Moscow on the protesters’ plans. “I feel that it is important, especially tonight, to stand up for Serbia and to thank the Russian security services who had that information and who shared it with us,” Brnabic told TV Pink.
 
'CIA is organizing the color revolution in Serbia which aims to oust the President Vucic from power and to install puppets who will sign Kosovo's independence.'
History repeats itself—Capitol Hill: Serbia Edition.
Unfortunately, the color revolution happened a long time ago. The puppets are well placed and people are suffering. The recent "uprising" is used to cement another stolen election. Grass hardly regrows when it has been "Americanized." Russia knows this and is playing 4D chess with the U.S. through Serbia.
 
'Which means there will be no signings for Kosovo's independence.'

31.12.2023

'"Peacekeeping mission": The deployment of US National Guard to Kosovo as preparations for provoking war with Serbia.'

Published on Dec 31, 2023 (041)

28.12.2023
 
History repeats itself—Capitol Hill: Serbia Edition.
Unfortunately, the color revolution happened a long time ago. The puppets are well placed and people are suffering. The recent "uprising" is used to cement another stolen election. Grass hardly regrows when it has been "Americanized." Russia knows this and is playing 4D chess with the U.S. through Serbia.
Was there some hopeful pre-color revolution period in Serbia? When exactly in the last 200 years was a period of something hopeful and positive happening in Serbia? In the 1950s-60s when Tito was still alive? Already in the late 60s and 70s Tito and the others of Yugoslavian elite lost any hope of confederalising Yugoslavia. Maybe in the early 2000s when Zoran Đinđić was the Prime Minister before his assassination? All other Serbian elite before and after these short time periods were only thinking about anti-Ottoman/Muslim and pro-Greater Serbian ("Srpski svet", Serbian World) ideas causing only suffering after suffering and especially for the Serbs themselves.
 
Was there some hopeful pre-color revolution period in Serbia? When exactly in the last 200 years was a period of something hopeful and positive happening in Serbia?
Serbia has had a rather tumultuous, war-ridden history. Its strategic location (close to Russia; a bridge to Asia) has attracted many evil intentions. Serbia's liberation from the Ottoman Empire after 500 years of occupation could be considered 'hopeful' and 'positive,' but the enthusiasm was short-lived because power corrupts even the most valiant warriors. On top of fighting wars, juggling between rulers—whether they are Kings, Nazis, or Communists—doesn't ensure much stability, and in fact, leaves the door open to more nefarious plans (i.e. becoming America's personal playground).
 
Was there some hopeful pre-color revolution period in Serbia? When exactly in the last 200 years was a period of something hopeful and positive happening in Serbia? In the 1950s-60s when Tito was still alive? Already in the late 60s and 70s Tito and the others of Yugoslavian elite lost any hope of confederalising Yugoslavia. Maybe in the early 2000s when Zoran Đinđić was the Prime Minister before his assassination? All other Serbian elite before and after these short time periods were only thinking about anti-Ottoman/Muslim and pro-Greater Serbian ("Srpski svet", Serbian World) ideas causing only suffering after suffering and especially for the Serbs themselves.
Very materialistic and pessimistic point of view. The one you would have if comparing Serbia and Swiss, or Sweden. Or if you are overly nationalistic Croat, or serbian fifth column (so called "drugosrbijanac" - "second-serbians", always schooled on the West, and always thinking of their own people the worse. Much used by Soros' NGOs since 2000s). Russians have lot of such ilk too.

Serbs fight when there is a need. Be it because of external aggression or inner fight (like today). Serbia didn't attacked Austro-Hungary, but Austro-Hungary attacked Serbia. Serbia didn't attacked Turkey or Germany, but other way around, and so on . . .

You even misunderstood the term "serbian world".

First: that is the term for serbian cultural and traditional influence on the Balkans, not political or territorial. And that is pretty much new term, couple of years old.

Second: that term is irrelevant in Serbia, very few pays attention to it.

But, there is much more attention for the term in neighbouring countries, such as Croatia. It resembles the situation from the 1990s, when Serbian academy of science and art, and especially the writer Dobrica Cosic were used (from the West, of course) to pump up croatian nationalism to fight against ethnic Serbs in Croatia, and in that way to destroy Yugoslavia. Croats were bombarded with the false premises that Serbian academy hates them, and that Serbian academy had great influence on politics in Serbia, and Dobrica Cosic is serbian "father of the nation". BUT, that was just for internal use in Croatia, to incite hatred. In reality, in Serbia, Serbian academy had none influence (just as today), and its "memorandums" were unknown and irrelevant (nobody paid attention). Dobrica Cosic was distinguished writer (and much hated, because he was communist) appointed president in short term, and not much more than that. Let alone "father of the nation", as was imprinted in Croats (that's a strange term for Serbs BTW, there is no such thing as "father of the nation" in Serb's collective thought, but even if there was, he should be some thousand years older than he was, Serbs count themselves as a nation with the same name and the same spirit for some 1000-1100 years, not just 30).

And so on . . .
 
Back
Top Bottom