Courageous Inmate Sort
Jedi Master
I've been searching the transcripts for references to Putin and Ukraine. Might as well share the snippets I've found. In session order but not exhaustive.
Session 16 July 2007 said:Q: (L) He can work on the Signs page. (Andromeda) Good idea! (A) I want to know what is the future of the present growing tension between the US and Putin?
A: Most of it is show, but there is also the fact that Putin is a smart man who is leading the tyrant into a trap.
Q: (L) I would say it's not so much because he's a good guy as it is because it's a power struggle.
A: Yes.
Q: (Ailén) Is Putin working with Chavez on that?
A: Sure.
Session 3 September 2008 said:(Ark) Is Putin a psychopath?
A: Now, now... That would be cheating!
Q: (L) I don't think he is. (S) I think he could still be evil, ya know, but of all the leaders I've ever heard or read about, he seems to say the most reasonable and truthful things. Which doesn't mean he isn't evil or hasn't done evil things, but in comparison to all the other ones... (L) When you're in that position, growing up in this world, how can you not be... But he's like the Diet Coke of Evil: Just one calorie. (Ark) When you want to show that you are not a psychopath, you have to say something completely different. (L) Well, Bush does it all the time, Bush is always saying those completely different things all the time too, but he doesn't have any action to back it up. I mean, he didn't do anything to break down the oligarchs in the US, and the US has plenty of them. (J) In the time that Putin has been in power, he hasn't really used his power... (L) In an evil way... (J) like Bush has, Putin hasn't invaded any other countries unilaterally, or...
Session 29 December 2009 said:(Ark) By the way, this is probably not so much relevant, but in the Russian news, there was the new Putin Doctrine. They are NOT going to develop anti-missile systems at all. In response to US anti-missile things, they will develop very fast and strong offensive weapons.
(L) No more defensive...
(Ark) No.
(L) Oh, they're just trying to keep us going. That's part of the play.
(Joe) What about the missile test earlier this month that was allegedly by the Russian navy that was seen over Norway. Was it a missile?
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) A normal, run of the mill, standard missile?
A: Yes. What was not normal was the atmosphere.
Q: (Anart) That's from dust from incoming rocks or debris.
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) What about the triangular UFO over Moscow, was it real?
(Allen) Fake!
A: No
Session 7 September 2013 said:Q: (Ailen) She can sense storms coming! (Belibaste)Why did you think she had psychic abilities? (L) Because she said that there was somebody in the group who was "evil", and it was {name redacted}. She was right about that, just wrong about who it was. (Ailen) Yeah, but it wasn't a psychopath like she said. And come on... What's the likelihood of somebody in the group going whacko in the next two months? (L) So in other words, about as good as Cherie. I just want ya’ll to know that my Cherie is a wonder dog! Okay, now, let’s get out there in the big world: Did the president of Syria and his forces use any kind of chemical weapons, sarin nerve gas or any of that sort of thing, in his battles against the rebels?
A: No!
Q: (L) He's not that stupid.
A: Exactly, nor that heartless!
Q: (L) Next question? (Andromeda) Is the whole show to cover up the oncoming comets?
A: Partly, though even the higher level players may not be totally aware.
Q: (Atriedes) Why is there this big show with the British House of Lords or Commons or whatever, and suddenly there are all these speeches in Congress about taking back the power to declare war, and suddenly Obama changed from just going to war to, "Oh, I'm gonna go talk to Congress!" Why is there this whole big show about that aspect?
A: Drama to keep the masses off their backs about what really matters.
Q: (Ark) What really matters I think is that once in awhile you have to get rid of the old missiles, because they're costly. It's much better to get new ones so you have to get rid of the old ones. For the French and for the US; you have to get rid of them.
A: What really matters to the people is the coming Earth events for which they are entirely unprepared.
Q: (L) I guess what matters to them in the short term is jobs and the economy, all of which is related to climate change?
A: Yes
Q: (L) So they're not doing anything about climate change - and I don't mean global warming, either. I mean what's going on here on the planet right now in a big way. They're not doing anything about that, they're not doing anything to straighten out the vast inequity between the rich and poor... (Perceval)Are we talking about this Syria business at some level having been decided upon...
A: Yes, of course! Who do you think sent in the people to stir up that mess??!?
Q: (Perceval)Well, there's all sorts of talk about strategic colonial agendas: pipelines and blah blah blah...
A: Have any of their plans worked thus far except to put billions in their pockets?
Q: (Perceval)So it is just a racket!
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval)For making money and distracting people. (L) And distracting the people from kicking them out of power by keeping the people afraid.
A: Yes yes yes yes yes yes.
Q: (Perceval)See, that's just unthinkable to me, that they'd have a war just to have a war for no other good reason than to make money.
A: That is psychopathy for you!
Q: (Atriedes) Right before Hillary Clinton went all evil with the Libya thing, I noticed that she suddenly swelled and became very inflamed looking. And then John Kerry right before this Syria thing, he got a lot more puffy and now he has this weird lazy eye, his eyes swelled, and his face, and he's starting to puff out, too. Is that kind of like the sign that they've turned evil when they become mega-inflamed?
A: Evil takes its toll on the body.
Q: (Atriedes) So, cutting out the evil is more important than cutting out the calories. (L) Pretty much! (Andromeda) So, there's no intent of pushing people to a revolution with some of this revolution hype and drama...?
A: Sure! It will make billions for some people and others plan to come in and set up shop on the ashes. But as we just asked: When have their plans for results actually worked as they present them?
Q: (Ark) I think there is another reason. You start the war, and then you let some kinds of these rebels to have access to nuclear weapons. Can you imagine how much more Homeland Security you will be able to have then if you let all these "Islamist rebels" get these weapons? Give your enemy advanced weapons, pretend you are helping them to get rid of Assad, and then later, "Oh, we didn't know they are terrorists, but now they have access to these weapons! We have to close our borders! We have to control everything!" (Andromeda) It's creepy, some of these reports of Homeland Security making these huge orders of hollow point bullets, and building these compounds with fences... It looks like they're kind of getting ready for some revolution or something. (Perceval)I wondered if those reports are just...
A: The real war, as you know, is on normal people via proxies.
Q: (Kniall) Are the Russians really trying to stop this?
A: At the moment.
Q: (Perceval)So...
A: Putin is also not so heartless.
Q: (Perceval)What are the chances that if the Americans and French bomb Syria, that Putin and the Russian military would respond?
A: Very good unless things change.
Q: (Mr. Scott) Except things change every five minutes, so that doesn't mean much. (L) Yeah. (Perceval)Yeah, it's ongoing.
Session 22 March 2014 said:Q: (L) Okay, I guess the question on a lot of people's minds is: How about that Vladimir Putin, huh?
A: He's not perfect but he's the best your planet has in such a position at this time.
Q: (L) So, he's not a psychopath?
A: No.
Q: (Perceval) Is there anyone essentially giving him orders? Is what he's doing being controlled directly in that sense?
A: Not in the sense you mean, but yes in the sense of conscience.
Q: (Ark) I think that what is of value is that he has the right team of advisors. When you have your advisors and they are smart and knowledgeable, they are experts in certain areas, and they will say, "If you do this, this will be the result, so I suggest that."
A: Indeed, there are many in Russia who learned in a school of hard reality difficult for Westerners to imagine. On top of this, they are better educated in general.
Q: (PoB) Is there a real threat of Putin being assassinated?
A: Always that, but he wasn't KGB for nothing.
Session 17 May 2014 said:(Horseofadifferentcolor) I was kind of curious about Ukraine: the Cs once said in the past that Nazi Germany was a test run for everything that is happening today. Since the Nazis are kind of back in action over there, I was wondering if this is a continuation of what that was, or if it's just the US and their greed and their normal games? Or if there was something different about this Ukraine issue?
A: A combination. There has long been survival of Nazi ideology in various places. It has been encouraged by similar forces in the USA and Israel.
Session 14 June 2014 said:(L) There is no time! Okay. Hello? Is anybody out there? Jesus Christ, what a world we live in...
A: Not Jesus Christ, only Korilla of Cassiopaea. However, we understand the sentiment! Things are rather chaotic in some places, yes? Just wait! Much more to come!
Q: (L) Well. That tunes in to my initial question. We've got Ukraine going to hell in a hand basket. Now all of a sudden, out of the blue seemingly, Iraq is being "re-invaded" and there have been suggestions that this is all being done by forces that have been armed by the US and/or NATO. Is that in fact the case? Is the West behind this re-invasion of Iraq?
A: Indeed. However, as has happened before, the "Allies" are strange bedfellows and the alliance will not last. This situation signals great danger because it reflects the cosmic situation. Many of those in "power" do not realize how controlled they actually are nor why.
Q: (L) Okay, so let's ask the obvious question: Why are they controlled and being driven to act in these warmongering ways?
A: Cosmic justice is coming.
Q: (L) Alright then. Um...
A: They feel it like the hound of hell.
[Pause for fixing mic problems on the remote end since they were talking, but we couldn't hear anything]
(L) Okay, where were we?
(Chu) The Hound of Hell...
A: As the changes approach, they feel the pressure but do not understand what it is. They only feel an insatiable hunger and fear that they will be left with nothing. Thus the drive to grab and destroy.
Session 19 July 2014 said:Q: (L) Okay. We're going to change topics here. As you know, we just had this plane fall out of the sky over the Ukraine. Immediately the US blamed Russia, and then it started blaming the Russian-aided freedom fighters in East Ukraine. Meanwhile, the Russians say it was clearly the Ukrainians in conjunction with US/NATO/UK/Whoever. So, I guess the first thing we ought to ask is: What brought the plane down?
A: [Spiraling] Bomb on the plane placed there prior to departure.
Q: (Pierre) Schiphol airport, again! The famous Underwear Bomber place! So, MOSSAD?
(L) Who was involved?
A: Note change in altitude for "signature".
Q: (Perceval) From 35 to 33...
(L) 33. Is 33 the clue?
A: Yes. Consortium. And who is at the top of this STS pyramid??
Q: (Perceval) Figures.
(L) Who is at the top of this pyramid? And who is at the top?
(Perceval) MOSSAD.
(L) MOSSAD? The Israelis?
A: Yes
Q: (Perceval) It seems the goal was to further demonize Putin and Russia. But was it also to distract from what's happening in Palestine?
A: Absolutely!
Q: (Pierre) Is it only coincidence... before MH 17, there was MH 370, this plane that disappeared from the same company. Is it just coincidence that the two incidents involve the same airline company?
A: Another "signature".
Q: (Data) Why did the plane deviate from its usual course?
A: Instructed by ATC.
Q: (Perceval) Air traffic control at Schiphol?
A: Kiev.
Q: (Perceval) So, some agent...
(L) There was some control by MOSSAD in Kiev, and that whole Nazi business going on there...
(Kniall) They've been there for DECADES!
A: Yes!
Q: (L) I think that was answering Kniall there.
(Data) Why was it necessary to change the course with a bomb on board?
(L) So it would fall where it did. They had to change the course to put it in the middle of the war zone.
(Ark) The Russians were saying that the timing was a little bit miscalculated because it was supposed to come down closer to the Russian territory so that it would be easier to blame Russia.
A: Yes.
Q: (Pierre) It exploded too early.
(L) Yeah, they're so lazy, they never get anything perfect.
(Chu) Or too impatient.
A: But most people are so gullible it doesn't matter.
Q: (Perceval) You can say that again.
(Kniall) Another signature. That suggests some planning at a level behind the first Malaysian plane...
(L) No it doesn't. It's just like answering back to what happened to that first one.
(Pierre) It's like, "They removed the 370, so we'll bring down the 17!"
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Which is really screwed up when you think about it. The signal is strong, ya know? Okay, we make MH 370 disappear. And the only answer they have instead of behaving better is, "Okay, we bring down MH 17, and we increase even more the lies and suffering!"
(Perceval) So these signatures are used for what? Just for fun? For whose benefit?
A: Pride, hubris, warnings to those who know.
Q: (Chu) On the session when we talked about the interpreters and stuff, the plane {that disappeared, Flight 370}, if I understood correctly, was a message...
(L) It was a warning...
(Chu) To not go too far.
(L) And they've basically answered by saying, "Up yours!"
A: Yes.
Q: (Chu) So would that mean that there really is a "law" that can prevent them from really going full-blown and starting a war?
(L) There's no law that can prevent them, no.
(Chu) They can go to war if they want to. It's just not in their interest to go too far.
(L) I don't think they think about what's in their interest. I think they're too far gone.
(Perceval) Well, hang on... The original idea was that it was some kind of bleedthrough. So, it was a natural thing. It wasn't necessarily a warning from anybody. They just interpreted it that way. They didn't see it as something was telling them, "Don't you dare!"
(L) Yeah, they don't see it that way. But it SHOULD have been a warning IF they had been paying attention.
(Perceval) As in a cause and effect kind of way. If you keep going like this, you're gonna...
(Chu) But the effect would have been that they would have seen it as, "You can't go too far here..."
(L) IF they had understood it. If they had understood that the conditions that were causing bleedthroughs and so on and so forth were a result of their actions and their behaviors globally speaking... If they had understood that, they would have said, "Hmm, weird things are happening. Let's rethink what's going on and what we're doing!" But instead, they interpreted it...
(Pierre) And they did the opposite, and they're raising the ante. They're worsening the situation.
(Perceval) What I was thinking earlier on was that, if the original idea was that they couldn't go too far, as in spark a major war with Russia by sending NATO into the Ukraine or whatever, they backed off from that because of their interpretation of the {disappearance of Flight 370}... As in, a plane went missing, it's a bit dodgy, we don't know what's going on, let's just cool it a bit...
(L) Somebody backed off...
(Perceval) Somebody backed off. So if that's true in that sense, shooting down a plane was like a Plan B or a second option that wasn't the full-scale kind of war {they may have been planning; it was on the level of mass emotional manipulation; an information war as opposed to an actual war. Because it's an all-out information war going on now because of this.
(L) Well, let me ask this: 20 years ago, on 3rd December 1994, you gave a series of short little prophecies. Being so long ago, they kind of hit to the side, but one of the first was, "Ukraine explosion; chemical or nuclear". The second one was: "Hawaii crash; aviation, possibly involving military." And those two were juxtaposed next to each other, and there was a semicolon and period, and then the next sequence began. The next sequence was a series of earthquakes in California, destruction of California, Mount Lassen, several other volcanoes along the west coast of the US erupting, the sea floor subsiding, and so forth.
Quote
{3 Dec 1004: Ukraine explosion; chemical or nuclear. Hawaii crash; aviation, possibly involving military. More California seismic activity after 1st of year: San Diego, San Bernardino, North Bakersfield, Barstow: all are fracture points. Hollister, Palo Alto, Imperial, Ukiah, Eureka, Point Mendocino, Monterrey, Offshore San Luis Obispo, Capistrano, Carmel: these are all stress points of fracture in sequence. “Time” is indefinite. Expect gradual destruction of California economy as people begin mass exodus. Also, Shasta erupts; Lassen activity. Ocean floor begins to subside.
Getting to my question: Was that “Hawaii crash” a reference to what has happened here recently, like for example with MH 370 and MH 17? Even though the original was Hawaii, I would say Malaysia is in the Pacific more or less, so it's kind of sideways... Was that a reference to these events, even that far in advance?
A: Yes.
Q: (Perceval) So that was seen that far in advance as a marker, as a major event. There's been a lot of stuff that has happened since then that they didn't mention. So, why did that one stand out 20 years ago? Why did this event stand out so strongly? Are we all screwed?
A: Interpretation is key. The elements here are metaphoric. That far in advance it can only be approximate. However, note the confluence of major elements in terms of similarity.
Q: (L) So, Ukraine obviously has been known in advance as a flashpoint, and there is some awareness of... Could it be said that these sorts of things were already in the minds of some planners that far in advance?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So, they change or shift their plans...
(Perceval) When you say planners...
(L) Do you mean human planners?
A: And 4D STS.
Q: (Perceval) The ones who jump around in time and stuff.
(L) So they change things to confuse things. Well, they once said something about how they can change things. They specifically said something about that: moving back and forth in time.
Quote
{7 Jan 1996: The forces at work here are far too clever to be accurately anticipated so easily. You never know what twists and turns will follow, and they are aware of prophetic and philosophical patternings and usually shift course to fool and discourage those who believe in fixed futures.}
(Perceval) Can I ask how long in advance this bombing of MH 17 was planned? Like in a practical sense?
(L) Practical sense like right now?
(Perceval) As in today? How long ago did they decide on it?
A: 3 weeks.
Q: (PoB) It was well organized with Kiev moving the ground to air missile launchers closer...
(L) Yeah, they made a plan, and they moved those launchers in place to confuse the issue. They turned them on so that the radar would be read by the Russian detectors, they planted the bomb... That was probably the easiest part: getting the bomb on the plane. The Israelis run that airport. It could have been a timed bomb, or it could have been a triggered bomb. It could have been triggered by the accompanying jets that were seen flying alongside it, assuming they were there.
(Perceval) I wouldn't think that would even be necessary.
(L) It could be just a timer. Hell, it could be set off by dialing a telephone or something.
(Pierre) You know, it's roughly three weeks before... It's roughly the beginning of the Gaza invasion. They're starting to bomb Gaza, and they already know, "Okay, we are going to bomb and kill all those civilians, and there'll be this international uproar. So in two or three weeks, we need to create a diversion. Let’s bring down a plane!"
(Perceval) Or they see how it goes. It's part of the plan...
(Pierre) Yeah, and if necessary, we bring it down.
(Perceval) Were the Israelis or someone working for the Israelis responsible for the murder of those three Israeli teenagers?
A: Yes. How else to get a conflict going?
Q: (Perceval) That's what they've always done.
(Timotheos) Is there any significance to the fact that there were a hundred or so AIDS researchers on board that plane?
(Perceval) Were there that many?
A: Not as many as that.
Q: (Perceval) Yeah, apparently there weren't that many.
A: And, no.
Q: (L) They just were there.
(Perceval) It was just a random plane in the sense that it fit the bill.
(L) And they made sure they didn't have anybody they didn't want to kill on there.
(Perceval) In terms of the propaganda war and the kind of lower-level conflict, I suppose you would say that it is between the US and Russia...
(Kniall) Is there some understanding between the US and Russia that Israel is the wildcard?
(Perceval) No, that's not what I'm thinking of. In terms of these people at the top of the pyramid, do they feel threatened in any way by what Putin and Russia is doing, or is that merely at the lower level of geopolitical chessboard nonsense?
A: They are incapable of seeing outcomes other than what they wish.
Q: (Perceval) I think way back just after 9/11, there was a reference made to the "Russians" having some evidence about 9/11? Is that true, or am I...?
(L) No, that wasn't in the sessions.
(Perceval) Do the Russians have any data on the truth of the 9/11 attacks?
A: Yes.
Q: (Perceval) Would it ever be in the realm of possibility, or within Putin's power to release that kind of information just to mix things up in the information war?
A: Strong possibility if the tide of public perception can be adjusted.
Session 16 August 2014 said:(Puck) Is Putin a descendant of Julius Caesar? [laughter]
A: No, but member of the same soul group.
Session 23 August 2014 said:(Nicolas) We were wondering if Putin was going to play the 9/11 card, if he was going to be forced to do it, or...
A: Eventually. All of the efforts to support Putin will help the revelations to come sooner.
Q: (Perceval) Yay, Putin!
(L) I mean, did ya'll notice the propaganda over the last week or so with this aid convoy to Ukraine? I mean, the incredible... The New York Times, the UN, this Fogh Rasmussen guy, the incredible bald-faced, outrageous LIES that they were publishing in the media! "Russia Invades! Armed Convoy! Ukraine wipes out Russian troops!" All of it was lies, lies, lies, and bullshit. How can Putin DO anything when he's up against that kind of absolutely un.... I can't even find words for it! You never would have expected the US of A, the Western world, supposedly the carrier of the torch of liberty, publishing CRAP like that! It's worse than the worst Soviet era propaganda! And they were publishing it and people were buying it!! What do you think they would do if Putin suddenly gave out the information of who was really behind 9/11?
(Pierre) They would dismiss it.
(L) It would be immediately dismissed, and he would be blamed for being a whacko. He would be a whacko 9/11 truther conspiracy theorist who lost his mind. Remember, there was more than one case of people who were actually taken under psychiatric care for daring to say that 9/11 was an inside job. They've got the situation set up where he can't say a freaking word unless and until THIS situation changes.
(Perceval) What about if he's got evidence?
(L) They would dismiss the evidence. What about the evidence of nanothermite, the videos of the collapsing WTC buildings, etc.
(Perceval) What about something that's more of a smoking gun?
(L) They had the evidence of this aid convoy driving in, delivering their stuff, and then driving away, and they STILL called it a freaking invasion!
(Chu) What kind of evidence couldn't they destroy?
(L) The level of propaganda and the level of stupidity of the majority of people is still way too high. Everybody has to see the man behind the curtain.
(Andromeda) They have to at least suspect him.
(Perceval) Okay, so, if Putin eventually will reveal something, what evidence does he have?
(Approaching Infinity) The last time we had a session with NC, I thought I asked if he had 9/11 information, and they said yes.
(Perceval) Yeah, but we didn't ask what. Does he have like high definition video of a Global Hawk flying into the Pentagon that nobody can refute?
A: Almost.
Q: (Pierre) But the Global Hawk would frame the US and not Israel.
(Perceval) Doesn't matter.
Session 30 August 2014 said:(Anam Cara) Is there a Chinese Putin who's waiting to make his move on the geopolitical stage?
(Perceval) Ah, Pu Ting! [laughter]
A: Not likely.
Q: (Mr. Scott) You don't need a Chinese Putin when you've got a Putin Putin.
(L) When you've got Putin in Russia, what do you need a Chinese Putin for?
(Perceval) You've got a rootin-tootin' Putin! [laughter]
(Alada) Well, China is so big, but it's so relatively quiet...
A: Still waters run deep and strong. The USA and allies are in for a rude and painful awakening.
Q: (Perceval) All that’s going on are hollow threats and blustering, and it has no effect. Which means the people they're directing it at are not threatened because they know that it's hollow. They know they can pull the rug out from under the US empire's feet whenever they want, really. The US has become so dependent on China.
(L) Next?
(Anam Cara) With the elevated US and European terror threat levels, and the NATO summit happening next week, is there a false flag terror attack imminent?
A: Good chance! After all, that is their raison d'être.
Q: (L) They were searching for the proper punctuation and the French "ê"! [laughter]
(Perceval) Seems to me that it's more likely that they'll do something like that because of the whole Putin thing. They wouldn't have done it if Putin hadn't arrived on the scene. With Putin coming in, it's to get people back in line because of Putin's actions.
(Andromeda) A reminder.
(Windmill Knight) There was talk about the need for a "Rapid Reaction Force", and the EU is saying they're putting together a force of 10,000 from the EU countries to protect NATO countries. So is there any chance of direct NATO intervention in Ukraine against Russia?
A: That action may be preempted by upcoming events.
Q: (Pierre) Cosmic events?
(Perceval) By upcoming events like what? What do you mean? That's such a...
(Andromeda) Do tell!
A: Wait and see! Admit that it is better than a cliffhanger adventure movie!
Q: (Perceval) Yeah, it is.
(Andromeda) Will it be soon?
A: Relatively.
Q: (L) Relative to what? [laughter]
(Chu) That makes it clear.
(L) We are SO enlightened by that answer! [laughter]
(Pierre) So, there will be a big event relatively soon. Okay...
(L) Coming soon to a theater near you!
A: Indeed! Reference questions about "space invasion" and just change the parameters and players.
Q: (Perceval) So, not aliens in ships, but microbes on rocks. Space invasion.
(L) Could be, yeah. And they would come as the US is trying to do some kind of fake invasion or false flag stuff. Is that what we're talking about here? That when the Western Consortium-type government tries to take over the world with their faked invasion, that's when everything is going to go kaflooey?
A: More or less. You will see!
Q: (Pierre) That will be exciting, eh?
Session 7 February 2015 said:(Andromeda) I know. We know the whole world has gone completely nuts. And we're waiting for a sign to tells us if we need to do something, like move or something like that. But I can't think of anything to actually ask.
(Perceval) Are we gonna have to move to Russia? [laughter]
(PoB) I was going to ask should we move to Russia?
A: Wait and see! [Everyone calls out the letters together]
Q: [laughter] (Perceval) Did Lavrov or Putin get to read Laura's letter?
A: Inquiries are in motion.
Q: (Niall) They're checking us out.
(Scottie) So it's a good thing we put up Russian SOTT then.
(Chu) Should we close down French SOTT?
A: Not yet, but be careful. [Noko speaks during answer]
Q: (Perceval) Inquiries are open... Inquiries about you.
(L) Oh boy...
(Andromeda) Did Putin read the letter?
A: Yes
Q: (Pierre) Oh yeah? Wow, that's cool! That's the good news of the day. So he read it...
(Ark) Maybe he was showing it to Hollande during their meeting... [laughter]
(Chu) That's why it lasted five hours. [laughter]
(L) They met for five hours?
(Perceval) Basically, the result of it seems to be that the US is all up in arms about the fact that Germany and France are not supporting arming the Ukrainians. McCain is criticizing and saying, "They don't care about people dying and suffering in Ukraine!" Because basically, if Germany and France don't agree to the US plan to give weapons to Kiev to kill everybody in Eastern Ukraine, they can't do anything since it has to be under the auspices of NATO; NATO bases in Europe that would be used for any kind of procedure like that are in Germany, Italy, and are sanctioned by European countries.
(Niall) They basically agreed to partition Ukraine.
(Pierre) They asked for more autonomy for Eastern Ukraine, and a no weapon zone between the zones.
(Perceval) A demilitarized zone. The Europeans talking to Putin have decided that it needs to be some kind of strong autonomous region to end the conflict, while the US is saying, "No! War! War! We hate Russia!" And Hollande and Merkel are meeting with Putin.
A: Letters that Putin receives give him hope.
Q: (Pierre) That's really good.
(Scottie) I wrote to him about the Holocaust Memorial thing. I was super-pissed off and feeling really bad for Russia. I mean, more Russians died in World War II than any other country or group... estimates are between 21 and 27 million Russians! I wrote him a letter when he wasn't invited to the Holocaust thing in Poland. It was... heartfelt.
(Perceval) We should all start writing letters of support.
(Pierre) Yeah, why not!
(L) Keep his spirits up. Yeah, just like we feel when we get letters...
[Write to Putin: http://eng.letters.kremlin.ru/]
(Pierre) Imagine this guy: there's so much pressure: political, economic, financial... He takes time to read letters!
(L) And he's being defamed by the biggest, loudest propaganda artists in the whole world. We were defamed for a long time by propaganda artists, but it was very, very small scale compared to what is being done to him. Yes, it damaged us, and it hurt me personally, and it hurt all of us personally, but it was still such a small scale, that all it can do is give you a tiny bit of insight on what Putin is experiencing. He's a human being. And here, what's supposed to be, "The Greatest Nation on Earth" is calling him everything but the devil incarnate - and they've probably even called him that!
(Perceval) Yeah, they call him Hitler basically.
(L) Yeah, that's got to feel horrible.
(Pierre) If you're not a psychopath, if you're a normal human being, sensitive and you are the brunt of all those criticisms and you see the lies... It can be very hurtful.
(Alana) I was thinking about him last night, and the position he's in and the danger he's in, he's not even probably allowing himself to have close relationships because those will become his weaknesses.
(Perceval) Yeah, he's aware of that.
(L) I think he is completely aware of that. Putin gives me hope.
(Perceval) It's a lonely life.
(L) But I'm so afraid for him.
(Pierre) But I'm worried about him. If he disappears, what is left?
(L) It would take all the hope away.
Session 14 March 2015 said:Q: (L) Well, I guess that means we should ask some questions. Everybody is concerned about Vladimir Putin's health. That's Vladimir Vladimirovitch Putin. So, I'm wondering is his health compromised?
A: No, not even close. He is working hard and steady.
Q: (L) What is he working on?
A: Solving major global imbalances.
Q: (L) So does that suggest that he has some surprises in store for the globalists?
A: Oh indeed! But they are too blinded by greed to anticipate his moves.
Q: (L) What was that article we read a week ago where somebody was writing that the reason everything is falling apart is because that's what they want it to do?
(Perceval) Dmitry Orlov. He was basically just saying that chaos and destruction was on purpose or intentional. ISIS and all that business is intentional, according to him. They didn't bring freedom and democracy to Afghanistan or Iraq; they brought worse than before. But that's all intentional. That was his point.
(L) But that doesn't make any sense.
A: It makes sense only from a 4D STS perspective.
Session 13 June 2015 said:Q: (L) Now, changing topics... Well, let's stay on the world affairs business. Okay, one person on the forum wrote:
Quote
Observing the political arena closely over the past months and years and especially the maneuvering of Putin's government in regards to the Western Elites, I have the strong impression that Putin is likely a person that Łobaczewski described as a person that can feel that something is terribly wrong with the system and can make the right decisions, even though he might not know the pathological roots [that is, he has a conscience].
The more I read, hear and research about Putin, I think it is quite likely that he is not only the mayor player in most of those smart moves over the years, put probably one of the masterminds, if not the mastermind itself, behind it. I mean, what he created and was able to accomplish (within this system!) is not only brilliant, long-sighted, but also genius in more than one way. The fact alone that he is now stronger than ever, even though the Elites must have tried every dirty trick to eliminate him in the last 15 years, speaks volumes in such a big and powerful country as Russia and in the system in which we live. I watched the last documentary about Putin's history as President since before he came to power until today. Taking it all together, it seems like there is strong "fire from within" burning in Putin, which pushed/pushes him to achieve almost superhuman things with himself, within Russia, and in the world as a whole. So is it fair to say that Putin is the Caesar of our days, or even, dare I say it, a caliber smarter?
(Pierre) Well, it's quite a true depiction.
(Perceval) Maybe.
(L) So, what do you have to say about Putin?
A: He has a team of good and smart helpers. But it can be said that that is a good analysis and close conclusion.
Session 8 August 2015 said:Q: (Heimdallr) We were wondering if Putin and his team of advisors are aware of the hyperdimensional reality, and if so, how they do they understand it?
A: He is somewhat aware, but in a different context.
Q: (Perceval) Would that context be kind of in a more military or technological context where they've been trying to use devices or...
A: More like a form of mental martial arts.
Q: (Ennio) So, he's battling through his mind basically?
A: Yes
...
Q: (Bear) Recently the US changed policy with reference to Syria in terms of supporting bombing. Russia said that there would be a line in the sand. So, the question is: Is this gonna be turned into something wider?
A: Putin has cards up his sleeve that may be well played.
Q: (L) Hmm. I hope it involves a video.
A: It may!
Session 10 October 2015 said:(Perceval) Well, the changes that we can see, are they indicative of the kind of changes that are happening behind the scenes?
A: If you connect the dots correctly.
Q: (L) So, I guess that's kind of what you've been doing. You noticed the changes in the American position. It changes one day to the next. They tried to launch this whole anti-Russia campaign, and then they backed away. "Get out of Syria!" and then they backed away from that. It's just crazy.
(Pierre) They're desperate.
(Perceval) There's been talk before of a kind of secret government that is not the overt government. Is it possible that they are in some way restraining the Americans like you just described?
A: The secret government did not anticipate Putin.
Q: (L) Well we had a funny talk the other day where we speculated that we moved into a different timeline. In previous years, we were in a timeline where there was not or could not be a Putin - or at least a Putin as he is in this one. Then, somehow some way, we moved ourselves into a different timeline. Well, I know it's a little egotistical to say that our efforts to send a signal could have shifted us into this other timeline and in effect helped with the manifesting of the changes of today... Is it a possibility that we helped even in a small way?
A: More than you have given yourselves credit for!
...
(Perceval) Yes. I wanted to ask about the extent to which the US and the powers in that camp have been checkmated by Russia and Putin? They seem to be extremely quiet. All they can do is talk a lot of nonsense and throw silly accusations around...
A: Not checkmate just yet, but the queen is certainly in danger of being taken.
Q: (L) That's not bad.
...
(Pierre) And you wonder: Is the most important war being waged on ISIS in Syria, or is it being waged all over the world in people's minds?
(Perceval) The PTB made it very clear that a propaganda war is the most important for them. They're willing to shoot down a passenger plane just to try to give Putin some bad press? That's pretty extreme. It's a lot to do just to smear someone.
(Pierre) And it connects to what we said previously about reality changes/splitting. If Putin wins the propaganda war, billions of people will see the world more objectively. That's not good for US supremacy.
Session 26 October 2015 said:(Ennio) It was previously said that the secret government did not see Putin's actions in Syria coming. If the secret government is connected to 4D STS, would it be fair to say that it reveals the wishful or achille's heel of 4D STS?
A: Indeed.
Q: (L) In other words, it's wishful thinking.
A: Yes
Session 12 November 2016 said:Q: (Pierre) Ya know, there's been a recurring pattern lately. These mistakes they made with allowing Putin to be elected in Russia, the mistakes with Brexit, and now the mistakes they made with Trump... This series of mistakes, what is it due to?
A: Wishful thinking.
Session 9 December 2017 said:(Joe) I have a question about the US Air Force's request for 12 samples of Russian RNA in July of this year. They specified in a FAQ that they couldn't be Ukrainian, they had to be Russian. And Putin commented on it not so long ago in a speech. So, I'm wondering if there's some devious plan...
(L) Are they up to no good?
A: You can say that!
Q: (L) So they're up to no good...
(Joe) The idea was that they're trying to create some kind of bioweapon that's genetically specific...
A: Yes
Q: (Joe) ...against Russians.
A: Yes
Q: (Mikey) Why not just get samples...
A: Unfortunately, since most Caucasians are related to Russian forebears, this is a dangerous and delusional undertaking.
Q: (Joe) No doubt! They're trying to specifically isolate something that specific to only Russians? And it's not going to affect anyone else?! Maybe some kind of airborne pathogen or something...
(Ark) It doesn't make sense! If they want DNA they can have Russian DNA as much as they want without anybody knowing it.
(Joe) That's what Putin said. When he commented on it, he said that there were people inside Russia collecting samples of DNA.
(Ark) Massively?
(Joe) He didn't say. And he referred to this Air Force thing. So, I don’t know. Would you need lots of samples? It's a stupid idea.
A: There are many activities at present being driven by 4D STS to further their aims of preparing a suitable population for their benefit in numerous ways.
Q: (L) So, they want a slave population, they want soldiers, they want maybe bodies that they can incarnate into themselves?
A: Yes. All that and more.
Q: (Pierre) For this purpose, they're trying to fine-tune and select the proper genetics of human beings - to design the best vehicles?
A: Yes
Session 4 July 2020 said:Q: (L) Well... One thing I was wondering about: It bothers me because I see Putin going along with the whole coronavirus thing, and it just really bugs me.
A: Imagine if he didn't!
Q: (Artemis) Yeah, I was thinking that it's a mask.
(Andromeda) It's strategic.
(L) So, if he claimed it was all a lie, there are people in his own country that would say he doesn't care about people. The way they've got this virus worked up as such a bugaboo, I mean... It would make him look bad. That's probably why Trump's going along with it. It would make him look bad, too. It would give their enemies leverage against them, and they'd look bad in the eyes of all the brainwashed people who are under the control of the media and terrified by a microbe.
A: Remember the secret correspondence between Kennedy and Kruschev.
Q: (L) So in other words, the leader of Russia and the leader of the USA still have a lot of forces arrayed against them within their own countries.
(Niall) They have to act a certain strategic way.
(Artemis) There are a lot of people that don't actually believe what's going on, but they're just putting on a show because they have to do what they have to do. They're trying to accomplish something.
A: Yes
Session 30 October 2021 said:(Altair, Cosmos, Gawan) Does Putin believe the official corona narrative?
A: No
Q: (Altair, Cosmos, Gawan) If not, has he caved in or is he attempting a long-term strategy behind the scenes in terms of corona?
A: Latter.
Q: (Keit) So far Russia, despite various restrictions, has lower levels of corona craziness in comparison to other countries. Should we expect Russia to catch up also because of low vaccination rates?
(L) Are you asking if Russia is going to have more coronavirus cases because they're not...
(Keit) More corona craziness.
(L) Oh, so are they gonna become more like Western countries because they've been slack so far...
A: No.
Q: (Keit) Will mandatory vaccination bill pass?
A: Yes
Q: (Keit) And will there be protests?
A: Yes
