Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

The Crimean bridge. According to preliminary reports, a fuel tanker is on fire. The cause of the fire and whether the bridge is damaged is not yet known
Today was also sabotage that disrupted the train network in northern Germany.
Just a small note about a recent fire in Iran. The timing of the Cabal's activities seems like a sign of desperation in both events IMHO.





Three people have died as a result of explosion on #CrimeanBridge, preliminary data suggests - Investigative Committee of Russian Federation (RIA)
"Officials said that the blast, which occurred shortly after 6am local time, caused a partial collapse of the road on the vehicle section. It also triggered a blaze on a freight train on the parallel rail section, with seven fuel tanks catching fire.

“The arch above the shipping section of the bridge has not been damaged,” the committee added.

Meanwhile, Ukraine has claimed responsibility for the attack, with Mikhail Podoliak, a top aide to President Vladimir Zelensky, warning it was just the beginning.

An unverified video appears to show the moment of the blast".

 
Last edited:
Brain delves into the latest situations on the ground.

Talking points are:




It's a terrorist attack and imo it could only mean, that they are getting more and more desperate and use terror tactics for fear and causing further hardships on the civilian side and even more losses. Also the statement from Zelensky with his preemptive strike points in that direction. Well, it is dangerous to have these freaks in these positions.
 
According to Telegram channels, trains are starting to move again over the bridge and cars are moving across as well, though only in one lane.

[Forwarded from Slavyangrad (ZIПDΣЯПΣЦF)]
Zin Note: So that's half of the vehicle traffic restored as well!

❗The condition of the undamaged part of the roadway allows the launch of car traffic on the Crimean bridge after 16:00 today in one lane in reverse mode.
/authorities/
#Crimea

@new_militarycolumnist

[Forwarded from Slavyangrad (ZIПDΣЯПΣЦF)]
Crimea 24:

❗Five trains are planned to be sent from Crimea today according to the schedule, the carrier company said

🚂 No. 28 Simferopol - Moscow leaves at 17:10
🚂 No. 8 Sevastopol - St. Petersburg departs at 17:15
🚂 No. 166 Simferopol - Moscow leaves at 20:00
🚂 No. 426 Simferopol - Kislovodsk leaves at 20:30
🚂 No. 174 Evpatoria - Moscow departs at 22:20

[Forwarded from Slavyangrad (ZIПDΣЯПΣЦF)]
📸 The first cars from Crimea are already driving along the Crimean bridge

▶️ Subscribe to WATCH

The Crimea Bridge is a marvel of engineering.

The Russian Ministry of Transport says the first trains on the bridge will be back in business THIS EVENING - after 8 pm.

The railway part of the bridge is extremely resistant. And structurally, the bridge is beyond rock solid. When I crossed it nearly four years ago, back to back, I had some excellent discussions in Kerch and looked at some structural maps.

As for the roadway, they just need to replace the sections damaged by the blast.

The logistics of moving military equipment and supply of Crimea will NOT be affected.
Edit: Bolded certain parts.
 
Here's how destruction on the bridge looks like up close.

Needless to say that the Russians are up in arms on Telegram. It looks like some sort of response would have to be made, but then there are also rational voices that urge to stop and think. That strong response is exactly what the West or Ukraine want from us. So we will wait and see.

It seems to me that particularly a section of Russians in Russia, and/or pro Russians in general, are prone to be "up in arms" about many "blips on the radar" quite often in terms of the Ukraine situation in particular and what Putin is or is not doing in general. Further, those same people often seem to lack quite some faith, trust and understanding of Putin and co and the fact that they might know better what is the best course of action, also in terms of the bigger picture involved. Many of those people also seem to have the tendency to be armchair generals, presuming that what they would do, would be better. I can't really understand that, unless those people, generally speaking, are not that well-informed about all the context, nuances and bigger picture aspects Putin has to take into consideration. Sadly, by being so "up in arms" every time something happens, no matter how "small or insignificant" it is, they are playing into the hands of the dark forces I think, who, in large parts, want exactly those kinds of sentiments to spread inside Russia (and within the world of normal thinking people around the globe in general). Hoping to start a revolt against Putin and/or unsatisfaction with him and/or sabotaging his plans.

Yesterday I spoke to a Russian colleague again (formally living in Kazakhstan) and she expressed once again how she didn't quite understand why Putin doesn't do the "Iraq" or "Afghanistan" routine of bombing everything hard and fast (thus avoiding suffering, she explained, because of a quick death). She also expressed the idea that is going around Russian circles that Putin might be undermined and/or manipulated by people in his entourage or "in the shadow" which could explain "why he is doing what he is doing". When I suggested to her that Putin and co might have already started to plan for what is going on now +- 20 years ago, and, once again, that he is doing it the way he is doing probably partly to avoid unnecessary deaths and suffering of civilians and soldiers, she didn't quite understand that either. When I told her that Putin might have bigger plans/considerations, that he has to work with and take into consideration, she didn't quite understand that either, and said to me, that that is all fine and good, but try to explain that to a woman who has lost her son, that "this is because of a plan". I also tried to suggest to her, when she made the comment, that went something like "why doesn't Putin do it like the west would do it, when the west obviously doesn't care at all about upholding the principles he tries to stand by", that Putin tries to uphold and be guided by some fundamental and higher principles that at least one leader/country in the world should stand by and reinforce, while nobody else does it. Therefore, I essentially tried to tell her that Putin is doing what he is doing and in the way he is doing it "because it is the right thing to do" and somebody "has to do the right thing on the global stage when everybody else doesn't do it". She didn't quite understand that either.

What I'm trying to get at here is that I get frustrated that even people who more or less know what is going, and/or are pro Russia/Putin, make Putin's work needlessly hard and put up road blocks unnecessary with sentiments like this. I'm kind of fed up with that attitude of disrespect and lack of gratitude and faith toward Putin which seems to be largely grounded in ignorance. Ignorance of context, history and what it would mean if Putin did it like everyone else would do it. To this day I can't see any way how Putin could have handled things in a better way than what he has done up to this point in time. And that includes so many aspects. Frankly, the way Putin handled things so far is simply masterful, and I can't think of better ways one could handle what he is trying to handle in such a position. It is simply remarkable to me. So when I hear such "up in arms" sentiments and "armchair general suggestions" I'm thinking, something like:

"Give the guy a break and be grateful for what he managed to navigate so masterfully up until now! If he had done any of those crude and very ill-considered suggestion you and all those armchair generals suggest, I'm sure things will have fallen to hell a long time ago. So be grateful, you fool, for what he has done for countless millions, and you personally as well, in that way, and have some faith that he knows what he is doing (or at least, knowing it better than you!) based on that remarkable track record! Be ashamed of yourself for being so ungrateful, presumptuous and ignorant."

End of rant.
 
Last edited:
Some thoughts regarding the Crimean bridge.

Interestingly, the two separate sections of the bridge seem to be destroyed, see the video here. This may possibly indicate that there may have been more than just a vehicle with explosives that caused the destruction.

The following posts offer some interesting ideas as to who may have done it and why.

Thus, Russian politician Marat Bashirov suggests that London is trying to sabotage the ongoing negotiations between the US and Russia:

The bombing of the Crimean bridge is an attempt to disrupt some systemic negotiations. It is not for nothing that the Americans are already writing that they had nothing to do with this terrorist attack.
...
So the negotiations are with them, and the Kievites with their younger Anglo-Saxon brothers from London realize that they will be traded in this deal.
...

The Telegram channel Militarist draws parallels between this attack and the recent one against the Nordstream pipelines:

The level of execution of the sabotage on the Crimean bridge and the object itself (critical transport infrastructure in the maritime area) indicate that it could have been carried out by the same people as in the case of Nord Stream.

Some Russian experts, including Michail Khazin, suspect that the Nordstream pipelines were destroyed by the order of a certain cirlce of British elite, namely the 'deep state'.

The Russian military correspondent Eugeny Poddubny also recalls interesting details in this regard:

In June, the Main Directorate of Intelligence of Ukraine announced the receipt of technical documentation for the Crimean bridge. They even showed a video presentation with detailed information about the ramps, pavement, supports, and the entire infrastructure of the complex.

Then, in June, at the NATO summit, Kiev held talks with British Defense Secretary Ben Wallace "about a plan to destroy the Crimean bridge. This was the "joke" in political circles in Ukraine.

Two months earlier, in April, two groups of specialists in sabotage and guerrilla warfare from the British Special Air Service (SAS) had arrived in Ukraine.

I posted earlier the information about British underwater drones operating in the Black Sea allegedly for 'mine searching'. Whether Britain and/or their drones were involved in this case is hard to tell at this point, but I thought it's worth to mention here, fwiw.
 
Just reported via Battlefield Insights:



I can’t find any other official sources on this either, but from what I’ve gathered if this is true it looks like we’re looking at the next phase of force generation in the SMO.

Looking at his Wikipedia page, it looks like this guy is really about it.

Sergey Surovikin - WikipediaView attachment 65110

Confirmed


For the first time, a single commander of the SMO has been appointed
I dare to suggest that Sergei Surovikin's credentials is at the level of the Chief of General Staff, if not higher.

Here we can clearly see an attempt to accumulate all the military resources of the country to achieve the main goal - to turn the situation on the front line and deprive the enemy of the initiative, which it is developing after its success in the Balakleya, Izyum and Krasno-Liman directions.

And it is the right decision, because the General Staff, detached from reality, from the theatre of military operations, in this situation looks more like a rudiment. And the figure of the Minister of Defence, essentially a civilian with representational functions, is also receding into the background. This is reality.

 
In a live channel about the explosion there was a 'subtitle'/text message that it might have been a tanker explosion.
If you look at the main footage with this in mind (or an underwater explosion), it makes much more sense than a truck explosion. While the blast is huge, it goes very little in the direction of the camera and the other cars, like when it would come from the Truck. It looks more like it came from the right side from beneath the bridge, possibly from underwater, so the nearer cars actually get shielded by the bridge segment they are on. The segments near the explosion might have been moved upwards before they collapsed, which would also explain why 2 segments collapsed. Also the 'silver rain': I don't see how that could move in the direction it does and where it would come from with a truck explosion. It just looks a lot more like sea water coming from the right, see with 1/2 speed at second 12 and second 19.
 
Last edited:

‘Sabotage’ blamed for massive railway disruption in Germany" (6:40am local time)​


(Crimean bridge occurred shortly after 6am local time)

"According to Der Spiegel, the company’s communications network failed completely at around 6:40am local time. The newspaper said that “unknown persons” severed a data line in a cable duct near Berlin, while another one near Dortmund was also sabotaged. According to the paper’s sources, saboteurs would have needed “information about the railway network and how you can paralyze it.”

Article below:

 
Last edited:
Confirmed


For the first time, a single commander of the SMO has been appointed
lots of armchair generals blabing on the link, but if it is true for Surovikin its actually scary. He shot at the demonstrators in 90s, colegue killed himself in front of him and so on. That would mean real war.

The man's name is also telling. It could be translated as: cruel, or of the cruel ones.

(btw, names of serbian generals in the war of 1990s were also telling. Ratko Mladic means: young warrior, Gvero is war, Koljevic is: slaughter, and so on)
 
Any thoughts on this? Is it as simple as this video being staged to 1) increase the overall BS about Ukrainian gains and 2) try to sow seeds of doubt in any scared Russian soldiers to encourage them to call the 'surrender hotline'? I don't know whether the fact that the tank crew's faces are covered makes it more likely they're Ukrainian soldiers, or Russians who don't want their identities known. There have been articles about the Ukrainians capturing Russian tanks of this kind.
It looks staged to me. For starters, the camera starts rolling before the tank appears on the screen. Were they expecting the dramatic scene that followed?
Why is the liberation of Donbass going so slow?
I keep seeing on Twitter pro-ukronazi/NATO accounts (trolls and obvious sock-puppet accounts, a lot of them) cheering that Russia is being defeated and that they are winning, etc. I think the answer is very simple. When they called for the mobilization, it was said that the whole involvement of the new forces would take two months. Russia doesn't care what people think in the West. They have a plan and they are going to stick to it. So they will wait until they have optimal conditions and then proceed with whatever they have in mind that required such mobilization, and I don't think it's groing to be pretty.

Meanwhile, someone is trying to force Russia's hand with the North Stream and the Crimea Bridge terror attacks. Or so it seems to me.

Added: Remember how Napoleon was lured deep into Russian territory unchallenged, even finding abandoned cities? Then winter came and Napoleon lost his army. I don't know if Russia is waiting for winter or its full forces this time, but I'm sure they have a plan and we'll see it unfold within 2 months at most.
 
Last edited:
Added: Remember how Napoleon was lured deep into Russian territory unchallenged, even finding abandoned cities? Then winter came and Napoleon lost his army. I don't know if Russia is waiting for winter or its full forces this time, but I'm sure they have a plan and we'll see it unfold within 2 months at most.

Good article here more or less about that: Politics By Other Means
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom