Putin Recognizes Donbass Republics, Sends Russian Military to 'Denazify' Ukraine

This post turns out to be a follow-up to my previous post.
Those who imagined themselves to be at least to some extent an ally of the United States have not seen the real state of affairs. It's probably "painful," but it's definitely useful in the end.
"We were not even informed": Poland confirmed the suspension of military aid to Ukraine from the United States

Washington has indeed suspended the supply of military goods to Ukraine. This was stated by the Polish Foreign Ministry. As the diplomatic department explains, when making the appropriate decision, the United States did not even consider it necessary to inform its NATO partners.

The US decision was made without informing and consulting with NATO allies and within the framework of the Ramstein format, a group that supports the fighting Ukraine.

– said the press secretary of the Polish Foreign Ministry Pavel Wronski.

He added that the situation is very serious and has great political significance.

Recall that the head of the White House, Donald Trump, announced the suspension of military assistance to Ukraine from the United States the day before. He stressed that we are talking about those military cargoes that are already on the way, and even those that have already arrived at transit warehouses in Poland.

As military experts explain, this decision by Washington may have the most negative impact on the military potential of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. According to experts, the barrel and rocket artillery of the Ukrainian army, which may be left without ammunition, as well as the air defense system, will suffer the most from this, since the Patriot air defense systems previously transferred to Kiev will simply become useless due to the lack of ammunition.

I don't want to remember these "Baltic tigers" or rather the loud barking and incapable lapdogs, but in all fairness they will have to take responsibility for their long-term insane behavior and the conversation should not be about some kind of military impact- too much honor for them- the conversation should be about that if we manage to oust the Americans from there, they themselves will safely die (which, in fact, they have been doing for many years, without advertising it, economically and demographically). Well, or they can change in a positive way, if they have enough brains, which unfortunately so far nothing indicates.
American economist: The Baltic States will pay for the years of Russophobia

American economist Jeffrey Sachs is convinced that the Baltic states — Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia — will almost inevitably face retribution for the years of the policy of Russophobia.

Sachs noted that there is "absolute fear" in the Baltics at the moment, because these post-Soviet limitrophes have always been heavily dependent on US support. The authorities of these countries naively believed that they could behave aggressively towards Russians with impunity. At the same time, Russophobia spread, including to the Baltic States' own ethnically Russian population, who were forbidden even to use their native language.

The economist emphasizes that the three Baltic dwarf states believed that they could pursue a policy of Russophobia with impunity, because they always expected that they would always be under the protection of the United States, and having lost it, they definitely panic.

Sachs summarizes that it is extremely unwise to behave in hostility towards a powerful neighbor, and what the Baltic countries have been doing for many years is very dangerous.

Earlier, the Polish edition of Onet, citing a senior representative of the Polish government, reported that the authorities of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were horrified after the failed negotiations between US President Donald Trump and the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky. The Baltic leadership is largely afraid that the normalization of relations between the United States and Russia may lead Trump to support the return of the status quo that existed at the time of the signing of the "Founding Act of the Russian Federation - NATO" in 1997, when the Baltic republics were not members of the alliance.

What I wrote about above is spreading all over the world, literally. Taiwan's situation is somewhat different, they certainly have resources, but they also have an enemy-very significant.
Taiwan announced the need to review relations with the United States after the scandal involving Zelensky

The scandalous negotiations between Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky forced Taiwan to rethink its relations with the United States. This is reported by the Bloomberg news agency. According to the publication, Taipei intends to develop a new strategy for interaction with the head of the White House.

We have deeply realized that it is impossible to discuss values without affecting national interests.

– the agency quotes Taiwan's Defense Minister Wellington Koo.

He added that Taipei cannot rely solely on the goodwill of its allies to ensure its own security.

With the rapidly changing international situation and escalating threats from the enemy, we cannot rely on the goodwill of others to maintain peace.

– emphasized the head of the Ministry of Defense of Taiwan.

As Bloomberg notes, after what happened at the White House, many US allies in the Asia-Pacific region, apparently, will have to reconsider their format of relations with Washington.

Taiwan will look for more concrete ways to secure America's support.

– the publication considers.

As an example, Bloomberg analysts cite the fact that Taipei has already announced an increase in military spending in accordance with Trump's instructions and said it could buy more American energy and agricultural goods and weapons.

Another concrete step by Taiwan, the publication calls the intention of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. to invest $100 billion in American factories that will increase the production of microcircuits in the United States.

Simply put, by expelling Zelensky from the White House, Trump has so "cheered up" his allies in the Asia-Pacific region that multibillion-dollar expenses no longer seem like an emergency measure to them.

Этот пост получается как бы вдогонку к предыдущему моему посту.
Те, кто мнил себя хоть в какой то мере союзником США, теперь увидели реальное положение дел. Наверное это "больно", но в конечном итоге безусловно полезно.
Про этих "балтийских тигров" или правильнее сказать громко лающих и ни на что больше не способных болонок и вспоминать то неохота, но по справедливости они должны будут понести ответственность за свое многолетнее безумное поведение и разговор не должен идти о каком то военном воздействии- слишком много чести для них- разговор должен идти о том, что если удастся вытеснить оттуда американцев, то они сами благополучно загнутся (что собственно они и делают уже много лет, не афишируя это, в экономическом и демографическом плане). Ну или смогут измениться в положительную сторону, если мозгов хватит, на что к сожалению пока ничто не указывает.
То, о чем я написал выше распространяется по всему миру, буквально. У Тайваня ситуация несколько другая, у них безусловно есть ресурсы, но и противник у них-будь здоров.
 
Just wanted to throw in here that, way back when (not sure exactly when), there's an answer in a session in response to a question about the future where it was predicted that "the world increasingly turns against the USA". Wish I could find it, but I don't have the exact words. Anyway, seems like a hit for the Cs, and it's one of those rare accurate predictions that are accurate because they are part of broad dynamics that *can* we predicted, and in that sense are likely a marker for a definite 'stage' in the developing drama.
Hello,

I found potential candidates:

Session 10 October 2015
Q: (Perceval) So the engineered part is to destabilize or put pressure on European governments?

A: Yes and more than that: to insert agents that will act against the various governments in the future.

Session 4 July 2020
(L) So, if he claimed it was all a lie, there are people in his own country that would say he doesn't care about people. The way they've got this virus worked up as such a bugaboo, I mean... It would make him look bad. That's probably why Trump's going along with it. It would make him look bad, too. It would give their enemies leverage against them, and they'd look bad in the eyes of all the brainwashed people who are under the control of the media and terrified by a microbe.

Session 18 May 2019
(L) They have manipulated things around now to the point where Christianity can be basically demonized and destroyed after they'd already manipulated Christians to think that Muslims are terrorists. So now, they're the bad guys for thinking what they've been manipulated to think. They've essentially put themselves in the position of being subject to destruction.

Session 30 January 2021
Q: (L) Okay. We've already pointed out that they're shooting themselves in the foot again and again. The very chaos that they're trying to control is the chaos that they have created by their actions. Well, it's like in the book Political Ponerology: they don't believe that they can't do what they decide that they want to do, and they can't believe that they get the resistance that they get. They're like somebody in a house with 500 holes in the roof in a rainstorm, rushing one bucket all around trying to catch all the leaks. They're unable to read history or historical analyses and derive any benefit from it.

(...)

A: It is very bad juju for the forces of darkness to take over against the free will of the majority.

Q: (L) So in other words, the fact that the majority voted FOR Trump and he was not allowed to become the president and they took over means that they took over against the will of the people. I think that has some kind of energetic implication. There was some stuff about that in the Ra material.

(Pierre) You once asked what is the main universal rule. The C's said Free Will. At some level, energetic or informational, respect of free will of life forms is a rule. If you infringe on the rule, you expose yourself to some consequences even if you are high up 4D STS.

(L) In other words, cosmically speaking, they just painted targets on their own heads!

A: Yes

Q: (Joe) Or is it going to manifest as earthquakes and tornadoes and kill a bunch of people?

(L) People will be objecting to this takeover inside themselves, so it'll manifest in some way externally, we just don’t yet know how. Well, that's interesting.
 
The world will turn agains the US, and it seems to be going on, although I never expected Russia to be on the US side, more or less.. that's what is so nuts about it.

Not sure if this has been posted elsewhere but I found it quite apt an understanding of Zelensky from Lavrov as reported by RT.

The Russian foreign minister indicated that it is not possible to predict how the head of the Ukrainian regime will act after the pause of U.S. arms supplies.

It is impossible to predict how the suspension of U.S. military aid will affect the actions of the Kiev regime's leader Vladimir Zelensky, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said Tuesday.

“I cannot get into the head of this human being, and he is not a human being,” the head of Russian diplomacy told Pervy Kanal when asked whether Zelensky would come to peace settlement talks after the pause of U.S. arms supplies to Ukraine.

And I think that's just it when attempting to analyze Zelensky's obsession with the continuing sacrificing of the people of Ukraine in the interest of pleasing his overlords.
 
The world will turn agains the US, and it seems to be going on, although I never expected Russia to be on the US side, more or less.. that's what is so nuts about it.
A very strange statement. What is it based on? On the fact that Trump was offended by his (in the sense of American) suckling and decided to strangle him, just as Russia has been strangling him for several years?

Thus, we can say that Russia is an ally of Israel, because now Israel actively supports the preservation of Russian military bases in Syria? Do you know about this? Do you know why this is so?

Весьма странное заявление. На чем оно основано? На том, что Трамп обиделся на своего (в смысле американского) выкормыша и решил его задушить, как и Россия душит его уже не первый год?
Таким образом можно сказать, что Россия союзник Израиля ибо сейчас Израиль активно выступает за сохранение российских военных баз в Сирии? Знаете об этом? Знаете почему это так?
 
He had not learned much, though .Germany invaded France in WWII and now he is in kind of brotherly friendship with Scholz.

He's well emboldened, isn't he? Who else is helping him - besides some in the EU - to enter the fray against Russia and possibly the US?

Macron Calls for a "Tamed Russia" and Signals Readiness for War
French President Emmanuel Macron declared that peace in Europe is only possible with a weakened Russia, calling the country a direct threat to France and the continent.He rejected a ceasefire in Ukraine, insisting that peace cannot come under Russian terms or through Ukraine’s surrender.
He also did not rule out sending European troops to Ukraine.
Macron raised the issue of France’s nuclear deterrence, emphasizing its role in European security and responding to German calls for extended protection. He stated that any decision on nuclear use would remain with the French president and military command.
Other key points:
- Europe must prepare for reduced U.S. support.
- Europe’s future should not be dictated by Moscow or Washington.
- France has the most capable military in Europe.
Is Macron leading Europe toward direct conflict with Russia?

🇫🇷🚨 FLASH - According to a poll, 97% of French people are in favor of sending Emmanuel Macron to fight at the front if France were to become involved in Ukraine.

1741217885543.png
 
Just wanted to throw in here that, way back when (not sure exactly when), there's an answer in a session in response to a question about the future where it was predicted that "the world increasingly turns against the USA". Wish I could find it, but I don't have the exact words. Anyway, seems like a hit for the Cs, and it's one of those rare accurate predictions that are accurate because they are part of broad dynamics that *can* we predicted, and in that sense are likely a marker for a definite 'stage' in the developing drama.
bumping - found something seemingly more accurate than the ones I posted before - sorry last try:

Session 4 December 1999

Q: Well, I have read them, and have posted them, but some folks don't quite understand. They want to understand if people will experience this as a sort of "Rapture" event where people just disappear?

A: But the definitive answer they seek is predicated upon uniformity of experience based upon the typical 3rd density linear time model.

Q: Another question along this line: one reader noted that the last time the "Wave" arrived, there were 6 billion people on the planet. And now, it is supposed to be coming again, and we are again in that ballpark in terms of population. So, the question is: is this sort of like a marker for the Wave, sort of like a critical mass?

A: Numbers don't mark. Psychic aural fields of energy mark.

Q: I have two last questions: at one point you said to note the "struggle out of sequence with pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines." Now, of course, I made the remark about usurpation of a throne, but later I realized that we don't really know what the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines really are. They don't necessarily have to do with a secular position, they could be a function. What are the pre-ordained activities of royal bloodlines?

A: Control.

Q: Control of what? People?

A: Close.

Q: Control of the reality in some sense?

A: Not as close.

Q: Control as in STS domination?

A: Yes.

Q: Are there any other pre-ordained activities?

A: Need there be?

Q: Okay, "struggle out of sequence." Loss of control? The royal bloodlines lose control?

A: Only when energies build prior to completion of cycle.

Q: What sign am I looking for? Struggle out of sequence... a rebellion that breaks out... a particular cycle to these events... a period of time?

A: You need to review.

Session 23 August 2014

(Menrva) I wanted to ask about Ferguson, Missouri. We wanted to know if the events there were a marker?

A: Not a marker per se, it was an opportunity.

Q: (Perceval) It was an opportunity for people to wake up, see what's going on, and take action. But they didn't. It was a missed opportunity by the people.

(L) Yeah.

A: The killing will continue until even the "silent majority" find their voice. They were silent at the exposure of Ferguson and many previous incidents. But notice that the anger is still building and psychopaths always miscalculate.

Q: (Pierre) That's a message of hope. There will be a reaction eventually.

(Perceval) They'll miscalculate in that they'll allow the killing to continue, and they don't realize that there's a breaking point where there's a string of murders, just killing people gratuitously in the street, and that will trigger large percentage of people...

(Andromeda) Something will break...

(Perceval) And that's what they can't budget for because they're psychopaths. All of these shootings by cops are the result of the ponerization of America and the influx of psychopaths into society and into positions of power; more ordinary psychopaths, the only place they can get power is the police force; so, they flood the police forces because they're not smart enough to be politicians. Then they get guns and start shooting people. That's not part of their plan. I mean, I don't think they're trying to incite revolution by killing people. It's just a function of psychopaths in the police force doing what they do. It's going to be a war between them and ordinary people.

(Andromeda) It'll be like in V for Vendetta.

A: Psychopaths see these events as reasons to impose more controls, but that only results in more pressure and more anger which will reach a global tipping point.

Q: (Pierre) Doesn't it mean national or international revolt?

A: "Tipping points" can be other than human initiated actions.

Q: (Pierre) Cosmic reactions.

(L) Yeah.

(Perceval) Earth changes.

(Pierre) It would have been better that humans react. {Note: if humans don’t take care of their problems, the cosmos will.}

(Chu) But that makes sense like with dictatorships where people were oppressed and killed in front of other people, and still the people submitted. If it's not a cosmic type of reaction, people won't react now. They just don't have it in them.

(L) Yeah, I think the big key to what's going on here is the global nature of the repression, the killing, the suppression, you know?

(Perceval) It's linked because they say, okay, the effect of psychopaths can cause people to rise up and have a revolution. But other than that, it would be nature. It reminds me of that 2004 tsunami when they said...

(L) “If you can't create within, you create without”. When people's creativity is suppressed...

(Perceval) …it manifests externally. It was a wave of creativity that was being suppressed, and it was a wave that came in and destroyed everything, you know what I mean?

(L) Yeah.

(Pierre) There's a circle, or negative feedback loop described with the dynastic cycle {in “Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection}...

(L) That's a positive feedback loop of negative events.

(Pierre) Yeah, you're right. More earth events, more desperation, more control, more anger, and it keeps feeding itself.

:cool2:
 
The US regime waged a proxy war on Russia through Ukraine, without a formal declaration of war. It is devious but smart. If things go wrong you can always deescalate and change course. European "leaders" on the other hand, doubled down on Russophobia and propaganda to such an extent, they can't tell their populations "we lied about everything and collapsed the economy for nothing".
Now, Micron directly declared war on Russia on TV. Eurocrats imagine that by conquering Russia and taking control of its resources, they would save their collapsing economy. It ain't going to happen. If the world needed the reconstruction of Europe after WWII, it was because the rest of the world was still in the pre-industrial era. It's not the same world as in the 1945's.
For the neocons who wanted to separate the European peninsula from the rest of Eurasia, it's mission accomplished. As for America, it can re-industrialize and become auto-sufficient thanks to its large agricultural lands only if they are liberated from the likes of Bill Gates and BlackRock. It doesn't seem to be heading that way for now. Additionally, as long as the US is under the thumb of Israel, there is no golden age in view. OSIT
 
Now, Micron directly declared war on Russia on TV. Eurocrats imagine that by conquering Russia and taking control of its resources, they would save their collapsing economy. It ain't going to happen. If the world needed the reconstruction of Europe after WWII, it was because the rest of the world was still in the pre-industrial era. It's not the same world as in the 1945's.
It is hard to believe that the eurocrats would actually push for a direct war with Russia.

Though then again, legitimately insane leaders, psychopathic doubling down and possibly "beaming" or transmissions towards the antennas from covid injections - then who knows what insanity they may go for.
 
I asked Grok to help find the quote from the session. Initially it didn't bring much but it helped when I pointed to the sessionn transcript site. At least so I thought.
GROK came up with:
[GROK] After searching, a promising candidate emerges from the session dated July 27, 2002. In this session, the Cassiopaeans discuss future probabilities involving the U.S. Here’s a relevant excerpt I’d find using the tool:
Q: (L) What is going to happen with the war business with Iraq and the US?
A: The world will become increasingly fed up with the lies, manipulations, and arrogance of the United States. All it will take is one too many lies exposed at the wrong time, and you have a rather rapid shift in opinion globally.
The only problem is that there is no session transcript from July 27, 2002. When I searched through the archive using "manipulations" as key word, it also gave no match. It other words, GROK is now channeling the C's :lol:
So the lesson is that even if something look bonafide from GROK including date and right sounding text, it might still not be true. GROK apologized unlike Zelensky, so all is ok again ;-)

Regarding what Joe was referring to, then I also remember them saying something like that and that the US would become isolated.
 
George Webb - Investigative Journalist
@RealGeorgeWebb1

The Elephant In The Oval Office - Where Did 58% Of The $350 Billion Go? Answer - Kolomoisky.

I don't see why we'd quote anyone expending on Trump's fairy tale (plain lie) about the oh so huge US spending of $350 bln on Ukraine, a mantra repeated by Trump many times in his attempt to "make it true" and rob Ukraine and Europe from their resources.

The US Government audit record, however, shows, not only that Trump’s 350 number is twice larger than the actual number appropriated by Congress between 2022 and the present: that number is $182.78 billion. But Trump’s claim to have “given”, “spent”, or “sent” 350 to the Ukraine is more than four times the number which has been actually disbursed: this number is just $83.43 billion.
Source and in-depth analysis here.
 
I don't see why we'd quote anyone expending on Trump's fairy tale (plain lie) about the oh so huge US spending of $350 bln on Ukraine, a mantra repeated by Trump many times in his attempt to "make it true" and rob Ukraine and Europe from their resources.
I agree. Trump likes putting out big numbers and then in emperial manner use those numbers to rob the conquered countries blind. What is also clear is that Trump can stop the war even without Ukraine or an agreement with Russia. The US just has to cut off all military and financial aid and there is peace. Ukraine will by itself settle for peace without that aid. If the US pulls out of NATO and takes its military out of Europe, then Europe will instantly stop entertaining the idea of helping Ukraine and instead settle for peace. Trump could also settle the China issue and stop all aid to Taiwan. That would stop the money drain and the war rhetoric vis a vis China and Trump would as a reward make big deals with China.
It is refreshing to hear even the US officials making it clear that it was always a proxy war between the US and Russia, started by the US.
 
I don't see why we'd quote anyone expending on Trump's fairy tale (plain lie) about the oh so huge US spending of $350 bln on Ukraine, a mantra repeated by Trump many times in his attempt to "make it true" and rob Ukraine and Europe from their resources.

I wish Trump would not do things to confirm the Left's main attack point which is, Trump is a liar! Really, the pot calling the kettle black, but still. And I don't really give George Webb the time of day. He's not very credible, IMO.
 
Back
Top Bottom